Reporting and impact of subsequent cycle toxicities in oncology phase I clinical trials.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: As oncology treatments evolve, classic assumptions of toxicity associated with cytotoxic agents may be less relevant, requiring new design strategies for trials intended to inform dosing strategies for agents that may be administered beyond a set number of defined cycles. We describe the overall incidence of dose-limiting toxicities during and after cycle 1, frequency of reporting subsequent cycle toxicities, and the impact of post-cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities on conclusions drawn from oncology phase 1 clinical trials. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of subsequent cycle toxicities in oncology phase I clinical trials published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology from 2000 to 2020. We used chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression to describe predictors of reporting subsequent cycle toxicity data. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2020, we identified 489 articles reporting on therapeutic phase 1 clinical trials. Of these, 421 (86%) reported data regarding cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities and 170 (35%) reported data on cycle 1 dose modifications. Of the trials that reported cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities, the median percentage of patients that experienced cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities was 8.89%. Only 47 (9.6%) publications reported on post-cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities and only 92 (19%) reported on dose modifications beyond cycle 1. Of the trials that reported post-cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities, the median percentage of patients that experienced post-cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities was 14.8%. Among the 371 studies with a recommended phase 2 dose, 89% did not report whether post-cycle 1 toxicities impacted the recommended phase 2 dose. More recent year of publication was independently associated with reduced odds of reporting subsequent cycle toxicity. CONCLUSION: Reporting of subsequent cycle toxicity is uncommon in oncology phase I clinical trial publications and becoming less common over time. Guidelines for reporting of phase I oncology clinical trials should expand to include toxicity data beyond the first cycle.

A scalable, GMP-compatible, autologous organotypic cell therapy for Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa.

Background: Gene editing in induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells has been hailed to enable new cell therapies for various monogenetic diseases including dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB). However, manufacturing, efficacy and safety roadblocks have limited the development of genetically corrected, autologous iPS cell-based therapies. Methods: We developed Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa Cell Therapy (DEBCT), a new generation GMP-compatible (cGMP), reproducible, and scalable platform to produce autologous clinical-grade iPS cell-derived organotypic induced skin composite (iSC) grafts to treat incurable wounds of patients lacking type VII collagen (C7). DEBCT uses a combined high-efficiency reprogramming and CRISPR-based genetic correction single step to generate genome scar-free, COL7A1 corrected clonal iPS cells from primary patient fibroblasts. Validated iPS cells are converted into epidermal, dermal and melanocyte progenitors with a novel 2D organoid differentiation protocol, followed by CD49f enrichment and expansion to minimize maturation heterogeneity. iSC product characterization by single cell transcriptomics was followed by mouse xenografting for disease correcting activity at 1 month and toxicology analysis at 1-6 months. Culture-acquired mutations, potential CRISPR-off targets, and cancer-driver variants were evaluated by targeted and whole genome sequencing. Findings: iPS cell-derived iSC grafts were reproducibly generated from four recessive DEB patients with different pathogenic mutations. Organotypic iSC grafts onto immune-compromised mice developed into stable stratified skin with functional C7 restoration. Single cell transcriptomic characterization of iSCs revealed prominent holoclone stem cell signatures in keratinocytes and the recently described Gibbin-dependent signature in dermal fibroblasts. The latter correlated with enhanced graftability. Multiple orthogonal sequencing and subsequent computational approaches identified random and non-oncogenic mutations introduced by the manufacturing process. Toxicology revealed no detectable tumors after 3-6 months in DEBCT-treated mice. Interpretation: DEBCT successfully overcomes previous roadblocks and represents a robust, scalable, and safe cGMP manufacturing platform for production of a CRISPR-corrected autologous organotypic skin graft to heal DEB patient wounds.

Engineering human skin model innervated with itch sensory neuron-like cells differentiated from induced pluripotent stem cells.

Atopic dermatitis (AD), driven by interleukins (IL-4/IL-13), is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by intensive pruritus. However, it is unclear how immune signaling and sensory response pathways cross talk with each other. We differentiated itch sensory neuron-like cells (ISNLCs) from iPSC lines. These ISNLCs displayed neural markers and action potentials and responded specifically to itch-specific stimuli. These ISNLCs expressed receptors specific for IL-4/IL-13 and were activated directly by the two cytokines. We successfully innervated these ISNLCs into full thickness human skin constructs. These innervated skin grafts can be used in clinical applications such as wound healing. Moreover, the availability of such innervated skin models will be valuable to develop drugs to treat skin diseases such as AD.

Reprogramming and Differentiation of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa.

The early onset and rapid progression of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) leads to high mortality rates in individuals with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB). Currently, the molecular mechanisms underlying cSCC development in RDEB are not well understood and there are limited therapeutic options. RDEB-cSCC arises through the accumulation of genetic mutations; however, previous work analyzing gene expression profiles have not been able to explain its aggressive nature. Therefore, we generated a model to study RDEB-cSCC development using cellular reprograming and re-differentiation technology. We compared RDEB-cSCC to cSCC that were first reprogrammed into induced pluripotent stem cells (RDEB-cSCC-iPSC) and then differentiated back to keratinocytes (RDEB-cSCC-iKC). The RDEB-cSCC-iKC cell population had reduced proliferative capacities in vitro and in vivo, suggesting that reprogramming and re-differentiation leads to functional changes. Finally, we performed RNA-seq analysis for RDEB-cSCC, RDEB-cSCC-iPSC, and RDEB-cSCC-iKC and identified different gene expression signatures between these cell populations. Taken together, this cell culture model offers a valuable tool to study cSCC and provides a novel way to identify potential therapeutic targets for RDEB-cSCC.