A case of restrictive dermopathy in a Hutterite newborn: Diagnosis and creative skin-directed management.

Restrictive dermopathy is a lethal autosomal recessive disease characterized by tightly adherent skin, distinctive facial dysmorphisms, arthrogryposis, and pulmonary hypoplasia. While clinical findings are unique, histopathology and genetic analysis are critical for early diagnostic confirmation and to initiate appropriate management for this lethal disease. We report on a preterm Hutterite male neonate with biallelic ZMPSTE24 mutations to highlight the clinical and histopathological features of restrictive dermopathy and share our skin-directed management strategies.

Epidemiology and Healthcare Expenditure for Skin Disease in Emergency Departments in Alberta, Canada.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the epidemiology and costs associated with managing dermatologic conditions in emergency departments (EDs). OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence and mean cost per case of skin diseases in EDs in Alberta. METHODS: Alberta Health Services' Interactive Health Data Application was used to determine the epidemiology and costs associated with nonneoplastic dermatologic diseases in EDs in the province of Alberta, Canada, from 2018 to 2022. Skin conditions were identified using the International Classification of Disease 10th edition diagnostic groupings. RESULTS: Skin disease represented 3.59% of all ED presentations in Alberta in 2022. The total costs associated with managing dermatologic conditions have remained stable over time at approximately 15 million Canadian Dollars (CAD) annually, but the mean cost per case has risen from 188.88 (SD 15.42) in 2018 to 246.25 CAD (SD 27.47) in 2022 (7.59%/year). Infections of skin and subcutaneous tissue were the most expensive diagnostic grouping. The most common dermatologic diagnostic groupings presenting to the ED were infections of skin and subcutaneous tissue [mean age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) of 143.67 per 100,000 standard population (SD 241.99)], urticaria and erythema [mean ASIR 33.57 per 100,000 standard population (SD 59.13)], and dermatitis and eczema [mean ASIR 18.59 per 100,000 standard population (SD 23.65)]. Cellulitis was both the most common and the costliest individual diagnosis. The majority of patients were triaged as less urgent or nonurgent. CONCLUSIONS: Skin disease represents a substantial public health burden in EDs. Further research into drivers of cost change and areas for cost savings is essential.

Stigmatization and Mental Health Impact of Chronic Pediatric Skin Disorders.

Importance: Chronic skin disorders in children frequently are visible and can cause stigmatization. However, the extent of stigmatization from chronic skin disease and association with mental health needs further study. Objective: To examine the extent of stigma, dependence on disease visibility and severity, and association with mental health and quality of life (QOL) in chronic pediatric skin disease. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional, single-visit study was conducted at 32 pediatric dermatology centers in the US and Canada from November 14, 2018, to November 17, 2021. Participants included patients aged 8 to 17 years with chronic skin disease and 1 parent. Main Outcomes and Measures: Using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Instrumentation System (PROMIS) Stigma-Skin, the extent of stigma with child-, caregiver-, and physician-assessed disease visibility (primary outcome) and severity was compared, as well as reduced QOL (assessed by Skindex-Teen), depression, anxiety, and poor peer relationships (PROMIS child and proxy tools) (secondary outcomes). Results: The study included 1671 children (57.9% female; mean [SD] age, 13.7 [2.7] years). A total of 56.4% participants had self-reported high disease visibility and 50.5% had moderate disease severity. Stigma scores significantly differed by level of physician-assessed and child/proxy-assessed disease visibility and severity. Among children with chronic skin disorders, predominantly acne, atopic dermatitis, alopecia areata, and vitiligo, only 27.0% had T scores less than 40 (minimal or no stigma) and 43.8% had at least moderate stigma (T score ≥45) compared with children with a range of chronic diseases. Stigma scores correlated strongly with reduced QOL (Spearman ρ = 0.73), depression (ρ = 0.61), anxiety (ρ = 0.54), and poor peer relationships (ρ = -0.49). Overall, 29.4% of parents were aware of bullying of their child, which was strongly associated with stigma (Cohen d = -0.79, with children who were not bullied experiencing lower levels of stigma). Girls reported more stigma than boys (Cohen d = 0.26). Children with hyperhidrosis and hidradenitis suppurativa were most likely to have increased depression and anxiety. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that physician assessment of disease severity and visibility is insufficient to evaluate the disease impact in the patient/caregiver. Identifying stigmatization, including bullying, and tracking improvement through medical and psychosocial interventions may be a key role for practitioners.

Infections in Children Aged 6 Months to 5 Years Treated with Dupilumab in a Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), particularly infants and young children, are at greater risk of developing skin infections. In this study, we assessed infection rates in AD patients aged 6 months to 5 years treated with dupilumab. METHODS: In LIBERTY AD PRESCHOOL, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III clinical trial, children aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe AD were randomized 1:1 to subcutaneous dupilumab or placebo, with concomitant low-potency topical corticosteroids, every 4 weeks for 16 weeks. Exposure-adjusted infection rates were used to compare treatment groups. RESULTS: The analysis included 162 patients, of whom 83 received dupilumab and 79 received placebo. Total infection rates were not significantly different between the dupilumab and placebo groups (rate ratio [RR] 0.75, 95% CI 0.48-1.19; p = 0.223). Non-herpetic adjudicated skin infections and bacterial infections were significantly less frequent with dupilumab versus placebo (non-herpetic skin infections: RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.21-0.99; p = 0.047; bacterial infections: RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.67; p = 0.019), and the number of patients using systemic anti-infective medication was significantly lower in the dupilumab group (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.30-0.89; p = 0.019). There were no significant differences in the number of herpetic infections between the dupilumab and placebo groups (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.31-4.35; p = 0.817). The number of patients with two or more infection events was significantly higher in the placebo group (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12-0.68; p = 0.004), and no severe or serious infections (including eczema herpeticum) were observed among patients receiving dupilumab. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that dupilumab treatment in infants and children younger than 6 years with AD does not increase overall risk of infections and is associated with a reduced risk of bacterial and non-herpetic skin infections compared with placebo, resulting in a reduced need for anti-infective medication. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov with ID number NCT03346434 on November 17, 2017. INFOGRAPHIC.

Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), a chronic disease of the skin, are at greater risk of developing skin infections, particularly infants and young children. Several medications for AD may weaken the patient's immune system, further increasing the risk of infections. Dupilumab is a recently developed drug for AD that should not interfere with the patient's immune defenses against bacterial, viral, or fungal infections. In this study, we evaluated the effect of dupilumab on infections in children aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe AD. Patients received 200 or 300 mg of dupilumab (depending on the child's weight) or placebo, together with ointments containing mild steroids, every 4 weeks for 16 weeks. At the end of treatment, total infections were not significantly different between patients receiving dupilumab and placebo. Furthermore, patients receiving dupilumab experienced significantly less bacterial and non-herpetic skin infections and used significantly less anti-infective medication compared with patients receiving placebo. Herpetic infections were also not significantly different between dupilumab- and placebo-treated patients. Finally, significantly more patients in the placebo group experienced two or more infections. This study demonstrates that dupilumab does not increase the risk of infections in infants and young children with AD and can decrease the use of anti-infective medication.

Multicenter Canadian case series of pediatric patients less than 12 years of age with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab.

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab is approved for moderate-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in patients aged ≥6 months by the US Food and Drug Administration and Health Canada; however, there are little real-world data because providers have limited practical experience with this recently approved therapy. OBJECTIVES: To describe the real-world effectiveness and safety in patients aged <12 years with moderate-severe AD currently receiving or previously having received dupilumab. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study was conducted at six Canadian sites. Cases were divided into Group 1 ≤2 years old, Group 2 >2 to <6 years old, and Group 3 ≥6 to <12 years old. Medical history and details of dupilumab treatment were collected. The primary outcome was to measure the improvement in eczema area and severity index. Secondary outcomes examined included the children's dermatology life quality index/infant's dermatitis quality of life, peak pruritus numerical rating scale, and delay to dupilumab access for patients who were considered off-label for dupilumab due to their age. RESULTS: Sixty three pediatric patients (37 males) with moderate-to-severe AD were included; the mean age was 6.4 years old (range: 2-11) when dupilumab treatment was started. Overall, 75% (36/48) achieved EASI-75% and 71% (34/48) achieved EASI-90. EASI-75 and EASI-90 were achieved in 90% (17/19) and 73% (12/19) in patients <6 years old, and 76% (22/29) and 59% (17/29) in patients >6 years old, respectively. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Dupilumab is safe and effective for patients under the age of 12. However, even for experienced providers, access to the medication was challenging.

Pediatric Dermatology in Canada: A Broad Review of Population Needs, Workforce and Training With Proposed Solutions.

INTRODUCTION: The need for pediatric dermatology services is increasing across Canada. In parallel, the complexity of treatment with novel targeted therapeutics has increased. Currently, there is no accredited and limited non-accredited fellowship training access to pediatric dermatology in Canada. HYPOTHESIS: Understanding the current state of pediatric dermatology training in Canada will provide insight into opportunities for strategic improvement. METHODS: A survey was distributed to 44 pediatric dermatology providers. In addition, a review of the burden of pediatric skin disease and education/training in Canada was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-four specialists responded to the survey (77% response rate). One third of current pediatric dermatology providers are over 50 years old and half of these (15%) plan to retire within the next 5 years. Half of respondents were dermatologists, 35% were pediatricians, and 11% were double boarded. Almost all respondents practiced in an academic setting (94%). Most had further fellowship training in pediatric dermatology (82.4%) but only 57% achieved this training in Canada, due to lack of accredited or non-accredited funded fellowship positions. CONCLUSION: There is a high and growing need for pediatric dermatology specialty care in a diverse range of settings. The current provider population and training programs are insufficient to meet current and future demands. We highlighted solutions to close this gap between supply and demand including increased double board certification in Pediatrics and Dermatology, a protected pediatric stream within existing Dermatology residency training programs and accredited fellowships in Pediatric Dermatology for both dermatologists and pediatricians.

COVID-19 associated severe mucocutaneous blistering eruptions: A case series.

Mucocutaneous eruptions are associated with numerous infectious processes and can present as erythema multiforme (EM), reactive infectious mucocutaneous eruption (RIME), Stevens Johnson syndrome (SJS), or toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). Limited reports have detailed the association of these eruptions with SARS-CoV-2 infection. We present a series of eight cases of severe mucocutaneous blistering eruptions associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. A retrospective case series was performed at six tertiary medical centers from March 1, 2020 to August 1, 2022. Inclusion criteria were met with a clinical diagnosis of EM, RIME, SJS, or TEN and a positive SARS-CoV-2 test (rapid antigen or polymerase chain reaction) less than 4 weeks prior to onset of dermatologic manifestation. Data was collected at time of each patient encounter. Eight patients met criteria with six pediatric patients (<18 years of age) having a median age of 15 years and two adult patients (>18 years of age) having a median age of 36 years. Patients were found to have a clinical diagnosis of RIME in 85.7% of cases. Oral mucosal involvement was the most common clinical finding (100%), followed by ocular (50.0%), urogenital (50.0%), and skin (37.5%) involvement. Evaluation did not reveal any additional infectious triggers in four patients. Evidence of possible concurrent or previous infectious triggers were identified in four patients. This case series highlights the development of severe mucocutaneous eruptions in association with COVID-19 infection, as well as the potential contributing role of concurrent or prior infections.

Proceedings of the 10th Pediatric Dermatology Research Alliance (PeDRA) Annual Conference.

The 10th Pediatric Dermatology Research Alliance (PeDRA) Annual Conference occurred November 3-5, 2022 in Bethesda, Maryland. This conference was the first in-person PeDRA conference after 2 years of a virtual format due to COVID-19. Fittingly, given the effects of the pandemic, the conference theme was "Reimagining Community." The conference included presentations and panel sessions on finding individual and collective purpose, leveraging community in pursuit of a shared goal, and creating a community of resources in collaboration with NIH. The goal of this meeting was to connect clinicians, basic scientists, patients, patient advocates, and industry partners. The reimagined community of pediatric dermatology research is a synergistic space for all members to better understand, prevent, treat, and cure dermatologic diseases and conditions in children. This two-and-a-half-day conference with over 300 attendees featured educational seminars including a keynote address, didactic lecture and panel sessions, skill-building workshops, 13 topic-specific breakout sessions, and an interactive poster session where 108 active and finished research projects could be discussed.

Reactive infectious mucocutaneous eruption - repeat etanercept after intravenous immunoglobulin: A case report.

Reactive infectious mucocutaneous eruption is a recently distinguished mucosal-predominant blistering eruption triggered by respiratory infections. We describe a previously healthy 11-year-old Black female with rapidly progressive mucocutaneous blistering after prodromal respiratory infection symptoms. Reactive infectious mucocutaneous eruption was suspected and treated with systemic corticosteroids followed by etanercept. Twenty-four hours after etanercept, the diagnosis of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children was raised and intravenous immunoglobulin was given. Rapidly worsening mucocutaneous disease ensued but was controlled by a second dose of etanercept. Our case highlights the following: (1) the novel observation of possible interaction/neutralization of etanercept by intravenous immunoglobulin, (2) the challenging differential diagnosis of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children for reactive infectious mucocutaneous eruption patients in the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and (3) the role of early treatment to prevent dyspigmentation.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome in children.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The concept of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) in children is evolving. This manuscript reviews recent advances with the lens of new terminology namely infection-triggered reactive infectious mucocutaneous eruption and drug-induced epidermal necrolysis, with the objective of integrating this novel terminology practically. RECENT FINDINGS: Traditionally considered to exist on a spectrum with toxic epidermal necrolysis, SJS in children is more often caused or triggered by infections instead of medications. Proposed pediatric-specific terminology can be applied to literature to gain further insights into blistering severe cutaneous adverse reactions. SUMMARY: Distinguishing infection-triggered from drug-triggered blistering reactions is useful for 3 main reasons: (1) early clinically recognizable different features such as isolated or predominant mucositis, (2) different initial management depending on trigger, (3) avoiding the label of a drug reaction on cases triggered by infection.

Management of Drug-Induced Epidermal Necrolysis (DEN) in Pediatric Patients: Moving from Drug-Induced Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, Overlap and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis to a Single Unifying Diagnosis of DEN.

Pediatric Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare but life-threating blistering diseases triggered by medications that affect the skin and mucosae. Drug-induced epidermal necrolysis is a better term for medication-triggered cases because there is a spectrum of disease severity that otherwise is divided into the separate entities of SJS, overlap SJS/TEN, and TEN. This manuscript reviews the management of drug-induced epidermal necrolysis (DEN), including diagnosis, investigations to exclude differential diagnoses, and treatment. Diagnosis of DEN relies on clinical features and a detailed medication history. The primary differential diagnosis is reactive infectious mucocutaneous eruption, which can be clinically distinguished by its disproportionate mucous membrane involvement relative to (sparse or absent) skin lesions. Identification and discontinuation of culprit medications is the mainstay of treatment of DEN. Early initiation of immunomodulatory therapy may prevent progression, reducing maximal disease severity and the risk of sequelae. A checklist approach to detailed management of DEN is proposed.

A rare case of suspected lupus erythematous panniculitis as the presenting skin feature of juvenile dermatomyositis: A case report.

Juvenile dermatomyositis is a rare autoimmune myopathy of childhood, associated with systemic vasculopathy, primarily affecting the capillaries. Panniculitis is seen histologically in about 10% of patients with dermatomyositis; however, its clinical presentation is rare, with only 30 cases presented in the literature to date. The histopathology overlaps with other inflammatory disease states, and is almost identical to the panniculitis seen in lupus erythematous panniculitis. In the cases with both panniculitis and dermatomyositis, skin and muscle inflammation is usually the first clinical manifestation. We present a case of a 16-year-old female with panniculitis as the initial presenting feature of juvenile dermatomyositis in the context of a prior diagnosis of indeterminate colitis.

Porokeratotic eccrine ostial and dermal duct nevus associated with an 11 megabase 3p deletion.

Porokeratotic eccrine ostial and dermal duct nevus (PEODDN) is a rare eccrine hamartoma; the etiology is incompletely understood. A patient presented with congenital, widespread PEODDN. Clinical assessment, histopathologic, cytogenetic, and molecular genetic investigations on affected cells were pursued. Histopathology confirmed PEODDN, and chromosomal microarray on affected tissues identified a mosaic 3p26.3p25.3 deletion in affected tissues. This 11Mb deletion encompasses 47 OMIM genes. We propose that this and other chromosomal deletions may be implicated in some cases of PEODDN, suggesting locus heterogeneity and underscoring the importance of incorporating cytogenetic and molecular investigations into the multidisciplinary care of individuals with suspected mosaic genetic skin disorders.

Psoriasiform dermatitis during dupilumab treatment for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in children.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Psoriasiform eruptions after initiation of dupilumab have been previously described in adults. This report details the risk of developing or unmasking psoriasiform eruptions after initiation of dupilumab in children. METHODS: Records of patients ≤18 years of age with atopic dermatitis who developed psoriasiform dermatitis during treatment with dupilumab were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Six children, 4-18 years of age, on dupilumab for severe atopic dermatitis developed new-onset psoriasiform dermatitis at a median duration of 8 months (range, 6-12 months) after dupilumab initiation. Typical locations of psoriasis were involved (face, scalp, trunk, and extensor extremities). The majority showed clearance or near clearance with the use of medium-strength to potent topical corticosteroid ointments and 83% continued use of the dupilumab. A 7th patient had psoriasis, in addition to severe atopic dermatitis, and the psoriasis was unmasked by its failure to respond to dupilumab. CONCLUSION: Although unusual, psoriasiform lesions can appear during effective treatment with dupilumab for atopic dermatitis, potentially reflecting a shift toward cutaneous IL-23/TH 17 pathway activation with dupilumab-induced suppression of type 2 immunity.

The treatment and management of atopic dermatitis in the pediatric emergency department: Highlighting physician practices and the desire for patient-centered resources.

Atopic dermatitis is a common, complex skin disorder with significant morbidity. The management of atopic dermatitis is multifactorial and often varies by physician experience and comfort level. We conducted a single-institution survey of pediatric emergency medicine physicians regarding their perceived confidence in managing atopic dermatitis, knowledge of treatment options, and interest in patient-centered clinical resources. The results of our survey suggest that many pediatric emergency physicians at our center are somewhat confident managing atopic dermatitis and that topical corticosteroids represent the mainstay of treatment of AD. Our survey identified common AD therapies used by emergency department physicians and highlights the desire for further patient-centered resources in the emergency care setting.