Central Nervous System Tuberculosis: Risk Factors for Mortality in a Propensity Score-Matched Case-Control Study.

Background: Despite advancements in tuberculosis (TB) control and treatment in the United States (US), patients with central nervous system TB (CNS-TB) continue to experience significantly higher mortality rates than those without CNS-TB. This raises concerns regarding clinical management and the need for a deeper understanding of the risk factors contributing to these deaths. This study aimed to determine the predictors of mortality in patients with CNS-TB. Methods: We conducted a retrospective 1:2 propensity score-matched case-control study. Cases were TB patients diagnosed with TB of the meninges, brain, spinal cord, or peripheral nerves, as documented in the Florida Department of Health (FDOH) TB registry, between 2009 and 2021. Controls were TB patients without CNS-TB, also reported in the FDOH TB registry during the same timeframe. We employed conditional logistic regression models to investigate the factors contributing to mortality in cases compared with controls. Results: We analyzed data from 116 cases and 232 matched controls. Patients with CNS-TB had a 5.69-fold higher risk of death than those without CNS-TB (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.69 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.91-11.6]). Increased risk of death was associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection (aOR, 1.93 [95% CI, .82-4.37]) and diabetes (aOR, 3.13 [95% CI, 1.28-7.47]). Miliary TB and non-HIV immunosuppression were significantly associated with being a case, while cavitary TB was less likely to be associated with being a case. Conclusions: Clinical management should prioritize screening and close monitoring of patients with HIV coinfection and diabetes to improve patient outcomes.

DEI co-mentoring circles for clinical research professionals: A pilot project and toolkit.

Background: There have been a number of federal policies and guidance's impacting diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEI) in clinical research. While these are needed, they have not diminished the gaps related to clinical trial recruitment, research professional's capacity for cultural competence, and clinical research professional role development. Mentoring and co-mentoring circles have traditionally been used in Medicine, but until now had not been used for workforce development of clinical research professionals (CRPs). Materials/Methods: We designed a six-session, monthly co-mentoring circle to take place at two academic medical centers to pilot an interinstitutional co-mentoring circle centered on storytelling videos of Black Voices in Clinical Research. This provided a DEI framework for discussions on role experiences, cultural competence, and role progression. Results: Seven CRPs completed the DRC pilot. The participants positively evaluated the experience and made recommendations for future iterations. Discussion: Co-mentoring circles can be useful tools to connect CRPs across complex research medical centers and provide support that may have a positive impact on role satisfaction and retention. Conclusion: This framework for developing co-mentoring circles can serve as a toolkit for future CRP co-mentoring circles within and across institutions for workforce development. The Black Voices in Clinical Research storytelling videos provide a rich foundation for future discussion on DEI issues for CRPs and collaborating with participants.