Outcomes of presumed malignant glioma treated without pathological confirmation: a retrospective, single-center analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tissue diagnosis is essential in the usual management of high-grade glioma. In rare circumstances, due to patient preference, performance status, comorbidities, or tumor location, biopsy is not feasible. Sometimes a biopsy is nondiagnostic. Many neuro-oncology clinics have patients like this, but these patients' outcomes and responses to treatment are not known. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records from adult patients diagnosed with presumed high-grade glioma of the brain without definitive pathology, diagnosed between 2004 and 2016. We recorded several clinical variables including date of first diagnostic imaging and date of death. RESULTS: We identified 61 patients and subclassified them to brainstem glioma (n = 32), supratentorial presumed glioblastoma (n = 24), presumed thalamic diffuse midline glioma (n = 2), gliomatosis cerebri (n = 2), and cerebellar glioma (n = 1). Most brainstem glioma patients had no biopsy because of tumor location. Supratentorial presumed glioblastoma patients had no biopsy predominantly because of comorbidities. Median survival, from first diagnostic imaging, was 3.2 months (95% CI: 2.9 to 6.3 months) in the supratentorial glioblastoma group and 18.5 months (95% CI: 13.0 to 44.1 months) in the brainstem group. Treatment with radiation or chemotherapy did not alter the median survival of the supratentorial glioblastoma group (hazard ratio 1.41, uncorrected P = .5). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with imaging diagnoses of high-grade glioma have similar, if not worse, survival than those with pathological confirmation. Based on these uncontrolled data, it is unclear how effective radiation or chemotherapy is in this population.