Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 9(2): 194-201, 2020 Apr 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30849175

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: MMR II (M-M-R II [Merck & Co, Inc.]) is currently the only measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine licensed in the United States. A second MMR vaccine would mitigate the potential risk of vaccine supply shortage or delay. In this study, we assessed the immunogenicity and safety of another MMR vaccine (MMR-RIT [Priorix, GlaxoSmithKline]) compared with those of the MMR II in 12- to 15-month-old children who received it as a first dose. METHODS: In this phase III, observer-blinded, noninferiority, lot-to-lot consistency clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01702428), 5003 healthy children were randomly assigned to receive 1 dose of MMR-RIT (1 of 3 production lots) or MMR II along with other age-recommended routine vaccines. We evaluated the immunogenicity of all vaccines in terms of antibody concentrations (by using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or electrochemiluminescence assay) and/or seroresponse rates 43 days after vaccination. We also assessed the reactogenicity and safety of the vaccines. RESULTS: Immunoresponses after vaccination with MMR-RIT were robust and noninferior to those after vaccination with the MMR II. Immunogenicity of the 3 production lots of MMR-RIT was consistent; more than 97% of the children had a seroresponse to MMR components. The coadministered vaccines elicited similar immunoresponses in the MMR-RIT and MMR II groups. Both MMR vaccines resulted in comparable reactogenicity profiles, and no safety concerns were detected. CONCLUSIONS: If licensed, the MMR-RIT could provide a valid option for the prevention of measles, mumps, and rubella in children in the United States and would reduce potential risks of a vaccine shortage.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Exantema/etiologia , Feminino , Febre/etiologia , Regulamentação Governamental , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Sarampo/imunologia , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/efeitos adversos , Caxumba/imunologia , Caxumba/prevenção & controle , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/imunologia , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle , Método Simples-Cego , Estados Unidos , Vacinação
2.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 12(2): 503-11, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26308112

RESUMO

Open-label, multicenter, randomized study (NCT00289913) evaluated immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of Vaqta (hepatitis A vaccine) administered with PedvaxHIB (Haemophilus b conjugate vaccine [Meningococcal protein conjugate]) & Infanrix (diphtheria/tetanus/acellular pertussis vaccine) in healthy, 15-month-old children. Five groups were evaluated: Group 1 received Vaqta/Infanrix PedvaxHIB on Day-1 and Vaqta at Week-24; Group 2 received Infanrix PedvaxHIB on Day-1, Vaqta at Week-4, and Vaqta at Week-28; Group 3 received Vaqta/PedvaxHIB on Day-1 and Vaqta Week-24; Group 4 received PedvaxHIB on Day-1, Vaqta at Week-4, and Vaqta at Week-28; and Group 5 (safety only) received Vaqta on Day-1 and Vaqta at Week-24. Hepatitis A seropositivity rate (SPR: ≥10 mIU/mL), Hib capsular polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP) antibody response (>1.0 µg/mL), and geometric mean titers (GMT) to pertussis toxin (PT), pertussis filamentous hemagglutinin antibody (FHA), and pertactin were examined. Non-inferiority statistical criteria required a difference >10% in Hepatitis A SPR, PRP >1.0 µg/mL, and a GMT ratio of >0.67 for pertussis antigens. Injection-site and systemic adverse events (AEs) and daily temperatures were collected. Hepatitis A SPRs were 100% for Groups 1-4, regardless of initial serostatus. Anti-PRP titers were comparable (98.1% - 97.0%) for Groups 1-4. GMT and mean fold-rise were comparable for all 3 pertussis antigen components between concomitant and nonconcomitant groups. Criteria for non-inferiority of immune responses for concomitant vs nonconcomitant administration were met for Hepatitis A, Hib, and pertussis antigens. No statistically significant incidence differences of individual AEs were found between concomitant and nonconcomitant groups. No serious vaccine-related AEs or deaths were reported; no subject discontinued due to an AE. Immune responses to Vaqta, PedvaxHIB, and Infanrix given concomitantly were non-inferior to nonconcomitant responses. Vaqta administered with PedvaxHIB & Infanrix had an acceptable safety profile in 15-month-old children.


Assuntos
Proteínas da Membrana Bacteriana Externa/imunologia , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/imunologia , Vacinas Anti-Haemophilus/imunologia , Vacinas contra Hepatite A/imunologia , Imunogenicidade da Vacina/imunologia , Polissacarídeos Bacterianos/imunologia , Vacinas Combinadas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Combinadas/imunologia , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Proteínas da Membrana Bacteriana Externa/efeitos adversos , Difteria/imunologia , Difteria/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/efeitos adversos , Infecções por Haemophilus/imunologia , Infecções por Haemophilus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Anti-Haemophilus/efeitos adversos , Hepatite A/imunologia , Hepatite A/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Hepatite A/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Lactente , Polissacarídeos Bacterianos/efeitos adversos , Tétano/imunologia , Tétano/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Conjugadas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Conjugadas/imunologia , Fatores de Virulência de Bordetella/imunologia , Coqueluche/imunologia , Coqueluche/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...