Preventive and therapeutic effects of a moisturizer. An experimental study of human skin.

The effect of a moisturizer was tested on experimentally irritated human skin in two studies. In a prevention study, 12 volunteers had both hands immersed into a 0.375% sodium lauryl sulphate solution, 10 min twice daily for 2 days. Before each immersion one hand was treated with the moisturizer; the other hand served as control. In a therapeutic study, 12 volunteers had both hands immersed in the same way as mentioned above. After the last immersion one hand was treated for 5 days with the moisturizer; the other hand served as control. Skin barrier function was evaluated by transepidermal water loss (Evaporimeter), and blood flow was evaluated by laser Doppler flowmetry and skin hydration by electrical capacitance (Corneometer). A significant preventive effect was obtained on the treated hand, compared to the control hand, judged by all measured parameters. A significant therapeutic effect was observed on skin barrier function and on skin hydration on the treated hand, compared to the control hand, while no difference between the hands in blood flow was observed after the end of treatment. The moisturizer could prevent irritant skin reactions induced by a detergent, and it could also accelerate regeneration of the barrier function of irritated skin.

Effect of water on experimentally irritated human skin.

The effect of water on experimentally irritated skin was studied in 21 healthy volunteers to evaluate water as a primary irritant. Volunteers had one hand exposed to water 15 min twice daily for 2 weeks, while the other hand served as control. The transepidermal water loss and the electrical capacitance were measured reflecting skin barrier function and skin hydration, respectively. The blood flow and the erythema index were measured reflecting inflammation. Water did not significantly influence transepidermal water loss, but caused a significant increase in skin blood flow, as evaluated by laser Doppler flowmetry. It is concluded that exposure to water 30 min daily for 2 weeks does not influence the barrier of previously subclinically irritated skin. It does, however, elicit an increase in skin blood flow.

Effect of glove occlusion on human skin (II). Long-term experimental exposure.

Gloves are indispensable in many occupations. Irritant skin reactions from gloves have, however, been reported. In the present study, the effect of long-term glove occlusion on normal skin (6 h/day for 14 days) was studied and, in addition, the effect of a cotton glove worn under the occlusive glove was also studied. 2 studies were performed (studies A and B). Study A: 19 volunteers wore an occlusive glove on normal skin 6 h/day for 14 days. They wore the glove on one hand only, while the other hand served as control. Study B: 18 volunteers wore occlusive gloves on both hands on normal skin. A cotton glove was worn under the occlusive glove on either the left or the right hand. Skin barrier function was evaluated by measurement of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) (Evaporimeter), skin hydration by electrical capacitance (Corneometer) and inflammation by erythema index (Derma-Spectrometer). The gloves used were hypoallergenic non-latex gloves. Results. Study A: glove occlusive on normal skin 6 h/day for 14 days had a significant negative effect on skin barrier function, as measured by TEWL. Study B: the negative effect on skin barrier function from occlusive gloves was prevented by the use of a cotton glove. It is concluded that gloves may be a substantial factor in the pathogenesis of cumulative irritant contact dermatitis, and that recommendations as to their use are important.

Effect of glove occlusion on human skin. (I). short-term experimental exposure.

UNLABELLED: Skin barrier function was studied after use of occlusive gloves on normal and compromised skin. 2 studies were performed (Study A and B), and the effects were evaluated by non-invasive methods. Participants in the studies were instructed to wear an occlusive glove on one hand, while the other hand served as control. The gloves used were hypoallergenic, non-latex. Study A: 20 volunteers wore a glove on normal skin 6 h/day for 3 days. Study B: 20 volunteers wore a glove on sodium lauryl sulfate(SLS)-compromised skin 6 h/day for 3 days. Skin barrier function was evaluated by measurement of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) (Evaporimeter), skin hydration by electrical capacitance (Corneometer) and inflammation was evaluated by erythema index (DermaSpectrometer). RESULTS: Study A. Glove occlusion on normal skin 6 h/day for 3 days caused no significant influence on the water barrier function. Study B: Glove occlusion on SLS-compromised skin for the same period of time had a significantly negative effect on the water barrier function. It is concluded that occlusion may be an additional factor in the pathogenesis of cumulative irritant contact dermatitis.

Permeability of protective gloves to sodium lauryl sulfate. Release chambers used as an in vitro test system.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Gloves are important and necessary in many occupations especially in wet work. They may offer a protection against harmful materials, but many substances may also penetrate protective gloves. METHODS: The permeability of 6 different commonly used protective gloves to the anionic detergent sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) was investigated. The gloves were tested as membranes in diffusion cells at 32°C. ((35) S)SLS 1% was used as permeant and synthetic sweat was used as recipient. Samples were counted on a scintillation counter. RESULTS: During a test period of 24 h, none of the gloves tested were found to be permeable to SLS. CONCLUSIONS: The gloves tested were found to offer protection against SLS. The difussion cells were useful for in vitro testing of protective gloves under controlled experimental conditions.

Efficacy of topical corticosteroids on irritant skin reactions.

Topical corticosteroids are frequently used in the treatment of irritant contact dermatitis (ICD). The efficacy of this treatment has, however, not been thoroughly established, and experimental studies on the topic have provided conflicting results. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of potent topical corticosteroids on experimentally-induced irritant skin reactions in a double-blind, vehicle-controlled study. 16 healthy volunteers had sodium lauryl sulfate patch tests symmetrically applied to the upper arms. After removal of patch tests, a potent topical corticosteroid (betamethasone-17-valerate) was applied to the irritant skin reaction on one arm, while the corresponding vehicle was applied to the irritant skin reaction on the opposite arm 2x daily for 7 days. Reactions were evaluated by measurement of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and erythema. After 7 days, statistically significant lower values of TEWL and erythema were found in corticosteroid-treated, compared to the vehicle-treated, skin reactions. The results indicate that topical corticosteroids improve healing of ICD.