A Small Number of Surgeons Perform the Large Majority of Uncommon Nerve Decompression Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Notable surgeon-to-surgeon variation in rates of uncommon surgery can reflect appropriate concentration of expertise with technically difficult or risky procedures that address problematic impairment due to objective pathophysiology. Examples include vascularized tissue transfer or transplantation to address complex tissue loss and release of bony elbow ankylosis. Perhaps more problematic is notable variation in straightforward, discretionary surgeries intended to alleviate pain, offered in the absence of objectively measurable pathophysiology, and without experimental evidence of benefit over placebo and other nonspecific effects. Evidence of concentration of this type of surgery in the hands of a few surgeons might point to inordinate influence of surgeon opinions on patient behavior. A study of variation in operations for upper extremity peripheral mononeuropathy has the potential to uncover potentially problematic variation. There are billing codes specific to common surgeries that can benefit patients with objectively verifiable neuropathies. And there are billing codes that represent less common nerve decompression surgeries that in many cases are offered in the absence of both objective evidence of pathophysiology as well as experimental evidence that surgery alleviates pain better than simulated surgery. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked the following questions: (1) Among surgeons who billed a mean of at least 10 carpal tunnel releases (CTRs) per year in patients with Medicare insurance in the United States, how many also performed at least one less common peripheral nerve release and cubital tunnel release (CubTR) per year? (2) Among surgeons who billed a mean of at least one less common peripheral nerve release or CubTR on average per year, what is the median and range of the number of less common peripheral nerve releases and CubTRs and the relative proportion of these compared with CTRs per year? (3) Are there any differences in gender, specialty, and number of CTRs and CubTRs between surgeons who performed at least one less common nerve decompression and surgeons who, on average, performed none? METHODS: Using the Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners - by Provider and Service database, we identified surgeons who perform a minimum of 10 CTRs per year. Because this database has all surgeries billed to Medicare performed in any setting by individual surgeons, it is well suited to the study of surgeon-specific operative rates among Medicare patients. Among 7259 clinicians who billed one or more nerve procedure to Medicare between January 2013 and December 2019, we excluded 120 nonsurgical clinicians, 47 podiatrists, and 1561 clinicians who billed procedures as an organization. Among the remaining 5531 surgeons, 5439 performed at least 10 CTRs on average per year, which we considered representative of surgeons who include nerve decompression surgery as a part of their practice. Among these 5439 surgeons, we calculated the mean number of CTRs, CubTRs, and less common peripheral nerve releases (including decompression of a digital nerve, nerve in hand or wrist, ulnar nerve at the wrist, brachial plexus, and unspecified nerve) per year between 2013 and 2019. Decompression of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel, the ulnar nerve at the cubital tunnel, and, much less frequently, the ulnar nerve at the wrist typically addresses measurable neuropathy. The other nerve releases are often performed for illnesses characterized by pain that are defined, in part, by the absence of experimentally verifiable pathophysiology such as radial tunnel and pronator (or lacertus) syndromes. We counted the number of surgeons who billed an average of at least one less common peripheral nerve release and CubTR per year; the median and range of the number of less common nerve releases and CubTRs and their relative proportion among those subsets of surgeons; and differences in the number of surgeons who performed one or none less common surgery by gender, specialty, and volume of CTR/CubTR surgery. RESULTS: Of 5439 surgeons who performed a mean of at least 10 CTRs per year, 2% (93) performed a mean of at least one less common peripheral nerve release per year among patients on Medicare, 14% (775) at least one CubTR, and 1% (47) performed both. Surgeons who performed a mean of at least one less common peripheral nerve release per year performed a median (IQR) of 7 (3 to 17) per year (with a maximum of 153 per year), representing approximately one less common peripheral nerve release for every five CTRs. Sixty-five percent (4076 of 6272) of all less common nerve procedures were performed by the top 20 billing surgeons. Gender was not associated with doing one or more uncommon nerve releases (women 1% [6 of 413], men 2% [87 of 5026]; p = 0.84), but specialty was, with plastic surgeons leading (6% [20 of 340] compared with 1% [73 of 5087] for other types of surgeons; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The observation that a relatively small number of surgeons perform a large majority of the surgery for nerve syndromes conceptualized as accounting for arm pain suggests that most surgeons are cautious about ascribing pain to conceptual nerve compression syndromes and offering surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An approach to surgical care founded on ethical principles regards this type of notable variation as a signal of inordinate influence of surgeon opinion on patient behavior, suggesting that professional conduct may be supported by safeguards such as checklists that help guide patients to choices consistent with their values unclouded by surgeon beliefs, false hope, and common misconceptions.

Potential Misinformation in the Official Disability Guidelines About the Diagnosis and Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy.

OBJECTIVE: We selected statements in the Official Disability Guidelines (ODG) that had the potential to reinforce misconceptions regarding symptoms from rotator cuff tendinopathy (RCT). These statements were revised and presented with the original statement to specialists. METHODS: Twelve statements regarding RCT were identified as deviating from principles based on ethics, values, and the evidence regarding both pathophysiology and human illness behavior. One hundred fifteen upper extremity surgeons reviewed both original and revised versions of the statements and indicated their preference. RESULTS: We found that upper extremity surgeons preferred 3 revised statements, 4 ODG statements, and 5 were rated as neutral between the 2 statements. CONCLUSION: Statements revised for evidence, ethics, and healthy mindset were not preferred by specialists, which may indicate limited awareness about how negative thoughts and distressing symptoms impact human illness.

The Impact of a Computer-Based Interactive Informed Consent for Surgery on Decision Conflict.

PURPOSE: Informed consent for surgery can address the legal aspects of care while also being simple, informative, and empathic. We developed interactive informed consents and compared them with standard printed informed consents asking: (1) are there any factors associated with lower decision conflict or greater patient-rated clinician empathy including consent format? (2) Are there any factors associated with rating the consent process as informative, comfortable, and satisfying including consent format? METHODS: Ninety-four adult patients accepted an offer of surgery from one of three hand surgeons to address one of six common hand surgery diagnoses: carpal tunnel release, cubital tunnel release, trigger finger release, plate and screw fixation of a distal radius fracture, removal of a benign mass, including a ganglion cyst, and Dupuytren contracture release. Fifty-three patients were randomized to complete an interactive consent, and 41, a standard written consent. Symptoms of anxiety, depression, and unhelpful thoughts were measured. Patients completed the Decision Conflict Scale and the Jefferson Scale of Patient's Perceptions of Physician Empathy and rated the consent as informative, comfortable, and satisfactory on a scale of 0-10. RESULTS: Greater decisional conflict was slightly associated with greater patient unhelpful thoughts about symptoms and was not associated with consent format. A higher rating of comfort with the consent process was slightly associated with patient choice to proceed with surgical treatment, but not with consent format. Accounting for potential confounding in multivariable analysis, a higher rating of the consent process as informative was slightly associated with patient preference for surgical over nonsurgical treatment, CONCLUSIONS: The observation that an interactive consent form was not related to decision conflict or other aspects of patient experience suggests that such tools may not have much weight relative to the interaction between patient and clinician. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Efforts to improve informed consent may need to focus on the dialog between patient and surgeon rather than how information is presented.

Surgeon Prioritization of Mental, Social, and Pathophysiological Aspects of Health Among People With Traumatic and Nontraumatic Musculoskeletal Conditions.

BACKGROUND: There is mounting evidence that, among musculoskeletal patients, variation in capability has more notable associations with variations in mental and social health factors than with variation in pathophysiology severity. This study sought factors that could limit the integration of this evidence into more comprehensive care models. METHODS: In two scenario-based experiments, surgeon participants in an international collaborative, the Science of Variation Group, reviewed scenarios of (a) nontraumatic (83 participants) and (b) trauma-related (130 participants) pathophysiologies for which tests and treatments were discretionary. The following demographic, mental, and social health elements were varied randomly: sex, age, race/ethnicity, mindsets, social health aspects, and specific pathophysiologies. For each scenario, participants rated their likelihood to offer surgery (continuous) and their sense of presence of an opportunity to address better mental or social health in treatment (yes or no). Factors associated with each rating were sought in multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Greater likelihood to offer discretionary surgery for nontraumatic pathophysiologies was associated with greater pathophysiology severity, trapeziometacarpal arthritis, and greater distress and unhelpful thoughts regarding symptoms. Lateral elbow enthesopathy was associated with a lower likelihood. For trauma-related pathophysiologies, an ankle fracture with slight articular subluxation was associated with greater likelihood to offer surgery, and several other trauma-related pathophysiologies were associated with a lower likelihood. For both nontraumatic and trauma-related pathophysiologies, surgeons noticed unhelpful thinking, distress, and social issues as reasons to consider addressing mental and social health in treatment, relatively independent of pathophysiology. CONCLUSION: Surgeons seem to recognize opportunities to address mental and social needs but ultimately base their decision to offer discretionary surgery on pathophysiological factors. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Comprehensive, whole-person care for musculoskeletal illness might be supported by strategies for ensuring that aspects of stress and distress that contribute to greater symptom intensity are not misinterpreted as a reflection of greater pathophysiology severity.

The Effect of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs on Union Rates Following Joint Arthrodesis: A Meta-Analysis.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most widely used and prescribed medications because of their important role in reducing inflammation and pain, in addition to their non-addictive properties and safety profiles. However, some studies have documented an association between NSAIDs and delayed union or nonunion of joint arthrodesis procedures due to a potential inhibition of the bone's inflammatory healing response. As a result, some orthopedic surgeons hesitate to prescribe NSAIDs after an arthrodesis procedure. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to review all relevant literature regarding the effect of NSAIDs on union rates after arthrodesis and determine if NSAID therapy increases the risk of non-union in the setting of arthrodesis procedures. The study hypothesis was that NSAIDs would not have a significant effect on the risk of nonunion after arthrodesis. A thorough systematic review of Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Web of Science identified 3,050 articles to be screened. The variables of interest encompassed demographic factors, procedural details, type and administration of NSAIDs, the number of patients exposed to NSAIDs with and without successful union (case group), as well as the number of patients who did not receive NSAIDs with and without successful union (control group). All the data were analyzed using a maximum likelihood random-effects model. The number of non-union events versus routine healing from each study was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) of successful healing after arthrodesis procedures with versus without NSAID therapy. Thirteen articles met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. NSAID exposure showed an increased risk of nonunion, delayed union, or both following arthrodesis procedures; however, this did not meet statistical significance (OR, 1.48; confidence interval [CI], 0.96 to 2.30). A sub-analysis of pediatric and adult studies showed a significant increase in non-union risk in adults (OR, 1.717; CI, 1.012 to 2.914) when removing the pediatric cohort (p = 0.045). This meta-analysis provides evidence that NSAIDs can increase the risk of nonunion, delayed union, or both following arthrodesis procedures in adults. However, the study did not identify a risk of nonunion, delayed union, or both following arthrodesis procedures in the pediatric population.

Medical Metaphors That May Reinforce Misconceptions Are Associated With Increased Trust in the Clinician.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study measured patient reactions to medical metaphors used in musculoskeletal specialty offices and asked: (1) Are there any factors associated with patient thoughts and emotions in response to common metaphors? (2) Is there a difference between patient ratings of metaphors rated as potentially reinforcing misconceptions and those that are more neutral? METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 228 patients presenting to multiple musculoskeletal specialty offices rated reactions to 4 metaphors presented randomly from a set of 14. Two were categorized as potentially reinforcing common misconceptions and 2 as relatively neutral. Bivariate tests and multivariable regression identified factors associated with patient ratings of levels of emotion (using the standard assessment manikins) and aspects of experience (communication effectiveness, trust, and feeling comfortable rated on 11-point ordinal scales) in response to each metaphor. RESULTS: Levels of patient unhelpful thinking or distress regarding symptoms were not associated with patient ratings of patient emotion and experience in response to metaphors. Metaphors that reinforce misconceptions were associated with higher ratings of communication effectiveness, trust, and comfort (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The observation that metaphors that validate a person's understanding of his or her illness may elicit trust even if those metaphors have the potential to reinforce misconceptions may account for the common usage of such metaphors. Clinicians can work to incorporate methods for building trust without reinforcing misconceptions.

Steroid versus placebo injections and wrist splints in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials compared the effectiveness of corticosteroid injections with placebo injections and wrist splints for carpal tunnel syndrome, focusing on symptom relief and median nerve conduction velocity. Within 3 months of the corticosteroid injection, there was a modest statistically significant difference in symptom relief compared to placebo injections and wrist splints, as measured by the Symptom Severity Subscore of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire; however, this did not meet the minimum clinically important difference. Pain reduction with corticosteroids was slightly better than with wrist splints, but it also failed to reach clinical significance. Electrodiagnostic assessments showed transient changes in distal motor and sensory latencies in favour of corticosteroids at 3 months, but these changes were not evident at 6 months. The best current evidence suggests that corticosteroid injections provide minimal transient improvement in nerve conduction and symptomatology compared with placebo or wrist splints.

Understanding the Orthopedic Conditions for Which Patients Are Seeking Medical Cannabis Certification.

BACKGROUND: Amid the ongoing national crisis of opioid misuse in the United States, medical cannabis (MC) has emerged as a potential alternative for chronic pain conditions. This study was performed to understand which orthopedic conditions patients are seeking MC certification for. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted at the Department of Medical Cannabis, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA. It included consecutive patients with chronic musculoskeletal noncancer pain who were certified for MC, following the Pennsylvania state certification process. Data collected included demographic data, diagnoses, anatomic site of pain, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) global health scale. The outcome measures from the PROMIS global health scale were used to generate Global Physical Health (GPH) quality of life (QoL) T scores and Global Mental Health (GMH) QoL T scores. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients were available for analysis following initial MC certification, with 50 (64%) being female and 28 (36%) male. The average age was 63 years with 60% of patients in the 65+ age group. Ethnically, 73 (92%) identified as White, and 70 (90%) were not of Hispanic or Latino origin. The most common reason for seeking MC certification was low back pain (56%), followed by neck pain (21%) and then extremity complaints. The mean GPH QoL T score was 43.71 with a standard deviation of ± 9.86 (p-value = 0.001), while the mean GMH QoL T score was 46.85 with a standard deviation of 8.28 (p-value = 0.0015). CONCLUSION: MC cannabis certification was more often sought by women than men and most common for spinal complaints, specifically lower back followed by cervical spine concerns.. This cohort of patients had lower GPH QoL and GMH QoL T scores compared the US general population, representing a significant reduction in the overall physical and mental health.

Surgeon Implicit Association of Women With Supportive Roles in Medicine.

BACKGROUND: In a previous study, we documented patient implicit bias that surgeons are men. As a next step, we tested the implicit bias of surgeons that women in medicine have leading (chair, surgeon) or supporting roles (medical assistant, physician assistant). QUESTIONS/PURPOSE: (1) What is the relationship between the implicit associations and expressed beliefs of surgeons regarding women as leaders in medicine? (2) Are there factors associated with surgeon implicit association and explicit preference regarding the roles of women in medicine? METHODS: A total of 102 musculoskeletal surgeon members of the Science of Variation Group (88 men and 12 women) completed an implicit association test (IAT) of implicit bias regarding sex and lead/support roles in medicine and a questionnaire that addressed respondent demographics and explicit preference regarding women's roles. The IAT consisted of seven rounds with five rounds used for teaching and two rounds for evaluation. RESULTS: On average, there was an implicit association of women with supportive roles (D-score: -48; SD 4.7; P < 0.001). The mean explicit preference was for women in leadership roles (median: 73; interquartile ranges: 23 to 128; P < 0.001). There was a correlation between greater explicit preference for women in a leading role and greater implicit bias toward women in a supporting role (ρ = 0.40; P < 0.001). Women surgeons and shoulder and elbow specialists had less implicit bias that women have supporting roles. CONCLUSION: The observation that musculoskeletal surgeons have an explicit preference for women in leading roles in medicine but an implicit bias that they have supporting roles-more so among men surgeons-documents the gap between expressed opinions and ingrained mental processing that is the legacy of the traditional "roles" of women in medicine and surgery. To resolve this gap, we will need to be intentional about promotion of and emersion in experiences where the leader is a woman. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Surgeons Have an Implicit Preference for Specific Disease Over Nonspecific Illness.

BACKGROUND: Many symptoms are not associated with a specific, measurable pathophysiology. Such nonspecific illnesses may carry relative social stigma that biases humans in favor of specific diseases. Such a bias could lead musculoskeletal surgeons to diagnose a specific disease in the absence of a specific, measurable pathology, resulting in potential overdiagnosis and overtreatment. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What factors are associated with surgeon implicit preference for specific disease over nonspecific illness? (2) What factors are associated with surgeon explicit preference for specific disease over nonspecific illness? (3) Is there a relationship between surgeon implicit and explicit preferences for specific disease over nonspecific illness? METHODS: One hundred three members of the Science of Variation Group participated in a survey-based experiment that included an Implicit Associations Test (IAT) to assess implicit preferences for specific, measurable musculoskeletal pathophysiology (specific disease) compared with symptoms that are not associated with a specific, measurable pathophysiology (nonspecific illness), and a set of four simple, face valid numerical ratings of explicit preferences. The Science of Variation Group is an international collaborative of mostly United States and European (85% [88 of 103] in this study), mostly academic (83% [85 of 103]), and mostly fracture and upper extremity surgeons (83% [86 of 103]), among whom approximately 200 surgeons complete at least one survey per year. The human themes addressed in this study are likely relatively consistent across these variations. Although concerns have been raised about the validity and utility of the IAT, we believe this was the right tool, given that the timed delays in association that form the basis of the measurement likely represent bias and social stigma regarding nonspecific illness. Both measures were scaled from -150, which represents a preference for nonspecific illness, to 150, which represents a preference for specific disease. The magnitude of associations can be assessed relative to the standard deviation or interquartile range. We used multivariable linear regression to identify surgeon factors associated with surgeon implicit and explicit preference for specific disease or nonspecific illness. We measured the relationship between surgeon implicit and explicit preferences for specific disease or nonspecific illness using Spearman correlation. RESULTS: Overall, there was a notable implicit bias in favor of specific diseases over nonspecific illness (median [IQR] 70 [54 to 88]; considered notable because the mean value is above zero [neutral] by more than twice the magnitude of the IQR), with a modestly greater association in the hand and wrist subspecialty. We found no clinically important explicit preference between specific disease and nonspecific illness (median 8 [-15 to 37]; p = 0.02). There was no correlation between explicit preference and implicit bias regarding specific disease and nonspecific illness (Spearman correlation coefficient -0.13; p = 0.20). CONCLUSION: Given that our study found an implicit bias among musculoskeletal specialists toward specific diseases over nonspecific illness, future research might address the degree to which this bias may account, in part, for patterns of use of low-yield diagnostic testing and the use of diagnostic labels that imply specific pathophysiology when none is detectable. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patients and clinicians might limit overtesting, overdiagnosis, and overtreatment by anticipating an implicit preference for a specific disease and intentionally anchoring on nonspecific illness until a specific pathophysiology accounting for symptoms is identified, and also by using nonspecific illness descriptions until objective, verifiable pathophysiology is identified.

Contralateral Arm Pain as a Sign of Distress Regarding Symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Pain intensity and magnitude of incapability are associated with common unhelpful thoughts about symptoms such as catastrophic thinking and kinesiophobia. To determine whether reports of pain in the upper limb contralateral to a non-trauma condition were associated with unhelpful thoughts, we measured the relationship between pain intensity in the opposite limb and levels of unhelpful thinking. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 152 new and return patients seeking care of an upper-limb musculoskeletal condition completed measures of upper-extremity-specific magnitude of capability, pain intensity of the involved and contralateral arms, unhelpful thoughts regarding symptoms, symptoms of distress regarding symptoms, and general symptoms of depression. Factors associated with contralateral and ipsilateral pain intensity and upper-extremity-specific magnitude of capability were assessed using multivariable statistics. RESULTS: In bivariate analysis, contralateral arm pain was associated with symptoms of distress regarding pain, but not in multivariable analysis. Accounting for potential confounding in negative binominal regression analysis, greater pain intensity of the affected side was independently associated with greater feelings of distress regarding symptoms and no prior surgery. Greater upper-extremity-specific capability was independently associated with less distress regarding symptoms, married/partnered, men, and no prior surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The observation that greater pain intensity in the opposite arm was associated with greater distress regarding symptoms suggests that, in combination with other verbal and non-verbal signs of distress, patient concerns about pain in the contralateral limb can help direct patients and surgeons to evidence-based care strategies for alleviating stress regarding symptoms.

Do Items Addressing Thoughts and Emotions Regarding Symptoms Measure Distinct Aspects of Musculoskeletal Health?

A prior experiment identified separate thought and feeling item groupings among items in measures of unhelpful thinking (ie, catastrophic thinking, kinesiophobia). This study sought to confirm the utility of separating these factors using a subset of selected items. One hundred and thirty-six adult patients visiting a musculoskeletal specialist completed the surveys. Confirmatory factor analysis measured the association between variation in scores on a specific item with variation in scores in separate groupings for thoughts and feelings, and a combined item grouping. Cronbach alpha (internal consistency) and Spearman correlation with magnitude of capability were also measured for the three separate item groupings. The association of variation in specific items with variation in a group of items addressing thoughts, a group of items addressing feelings, and the combination of all items was comparable. The internal consistency and strength of association with magnitude of capability were also comparable. The finding of no advantage to separation of items addressing thoughts and feelings regarding symptoms suggests that just a few items may be able to represent unhealthy mindsets regarding musculoskeletal symptoms.

Inordinate attention to minor pathophysiology variations in musculoskeletal research: example of rotator cuff tendinopathy.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests variation in pathophysiology is less relevant to musculoskeletal illness than variation in mental health factors. For diseases such as rotator cuff tendinopathy, attention may be placed on aspects of tendon thinning and suture techniques when studies show that variations in muscle quality and defect size have limited association with comfort and capability compared with variations in thoughts and feelings regarding symptoms. Using rotator cuff tendinopathy as an example, we studied the degree to which research addresses relatively minor degrees of variation in pathophysiology and relatively minor differences in treatments to better understand the relative emphasis on pathophysiology. We asked the following questions: What factors are associated with relative pathophysiology severity in comparative therapeutic studies of musculoskeletal conditions? What factors are associated with relative differences in interventions in comparative therapeutic studies of musculoskeletal conditions? METHODS: We systematically reviewed clinical trials of patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy for the relative severity of pathophysiology (low, moderate, or high) and variation in interventions (minimal, moderate, or large). An example of a relatively minor variation in rotator cuff tendon pathophysiology is bursal- vs. articular-sided thinning of the tendon. An example of a relatively minor variation in treatment is single- vs. double-row defect closure. RESULTS: Most studies of rotator cuff tendinopathy treatment addressed low (39%) or medium (50%) levels of pathophysiology. Greater relative pathology severity was independently associated with operative treatment (odds ratio, 12 [95% confidence interval, 3.2-45]; P < .001). Of 127 studies, 113 (89%) were rated as comparing treatments with minimal difference. CONCLUSION: Despite the evidence of limited variation in comfort and capability due to pathophysiological variations, a large percentage of research on rotator cuff tendinopathy addresses relatively limited severity of pathophysiology and relatively minor variations in treatment. This may be typical of musculoskeletal research and suggests a possibility of focusing, on the one hand, on more impactful interventions such as treatments that can delay or avoid rotator cuff arthropathy and, on the other hand, on management strategies that optimize accommodation of common age-related changes in the rotator cuff tendons.

Factors Associated With Concerns the Day After Office Hand Surgery.

PURPOSE: Pain after minor hand surgery can be misinterpreted as a problem. The sense that something may be wrong intensifies the pain. Some surgeons anticipate these feelings and call patients the evening or day after surgery to guide them through the recovery process. A study of routine, next day, postoperative phone calls can help determine the frequency of concerns and associated factors. We asked: 1) What factors are associated with concern the day after office hand surgery? 2) What factors are associated with pain intensity, satisfaction with care, and patient's perceived recovery trajectory the day after office hand surgery? METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 82 patients who had office hand and upper extremity surgery completed a survey recording age, gender, insurance, income level, measures of symptoms of depression and anxiety, a measure of catastrophic thinking regarding pain, 10-point ordinal ratings of pain intensity and satisfaction with care, whether the patient was concerned about their hand (yes or no) and whether they felt their recovery was on track (yes or no). RESULTS: Ten patients (12%) were concerned about their hand. In bivariate analysis, concern the day after surgery was associated with greater catastrophic thinking and male gender. Greater pain intensity was associated with greater catastrophic thinking. There was insufficient variation in satisfaction or a sense that recovery was on track for a meaningful analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The finding that concerns were common the day after minor office hand surgery supports the practice of contacting patients for support and helping to reorient unhelpful catastrophic thoughts. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Clinician Interruptions and Patient-Rated Clinician Empathy in Specialty Visits.

INTRODUCTION: Clinicians tend to interrupt patients when they are describing their problem, which may contribute to feeling unheard or misunderstood. Using transcripts of audio and video recordings from musculoskeletal (MSK) specialty visits, we asked what factors are associated with (1) Perceived clinician empathy, including the time a patient spends describing the problem and time to the first interruption, (2) duration of patient symptom description, and (3) duration between the end of greeting and first nonactive listening interruption. METHODS: We analyzed transcripts of 194 adult patients seeking MSK specialty care with a median age (Interquartile range [IQR]) of 47 (33 to 59) years. Participants completed postvisit measures of perceived clinician empathy, symptoms of depression, accommodation of pain, and health anxiety. A nonactive listening interruption was defined as the clinician unilaterally redirecting the topic of conversation. Factors associated with patient-rated clinician empathy, patient problem description duration, and time until the first nonactive listening interruption were sought in bivariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: The patient's narrative was interrupted at least one time in 144 visits (74%). The duration of each visit was a median of 12 minutes (IQR 9 to 16 minutes). The median time patients spent describing their symptoms was 139 seconds before the first interruption (IQR 84 to 225 seconds). The median duration between the end of the initial greeting and the first interruption was 60 seconds (IQR 30 to 103 seconds). Clinician interruption was associated with shorter duration of symptom description. Greater perceived clinician empathy was associated with greater accommodation of pain (regression coefficient [95% confidence interval] = 0.015 [0.0005-0.30]; P = 0.04). DISCUSSION: Clinician interruption was associated with shorter symptom presentation, but not with diminished perception of clinician empathy. Although active listening and avoidance of interruption are important communication tactics, other aspects of the patient-clinician relationship may have more effect on patient experience.

The relationship of perceived empathy with levels of pain intensity and incapability among patients visiting a musculoskeletal specialist.

BACKGROUND: People that have more intense symptoms and greater incapability might have less rapport with the clinicians that care for them. OBJECTIVE: This study tested the hypothesis that perceived clinician empathy is related to pain intensity and magnitude of incapability among people seeing a musculoskeletal specialist. PATIENT INVOLVEMENT: After a consult with a musculoskeletal specialist, 211 adult patients completed a survey recording demographics, and measures of pain intensity, incapability, and perceived clinician empathy. RESULTS: Higher perceived empathy was associated with being in a committed relationship and, to a modest degree (r = -0.16) lower pain intensity in bivariate and multivariable analyses. DISCUSSION: People experiencing greater pain may be slightly less likely to perceive the clinician as empathetic. PRACTICAL VALUE: Study of the relationship between the patient's experience of care and patient and clinician personal factors can inform efforts to improve patient experience. Advances may depend on experience measures with more normal distributions and less ceiling effect.

Factors Associated With Comfort Using Telemedicine for Upper Limb Specialty Care.

PURPOSE: There is a growing interest in diagnosis and treatment through telemedicine because of its convenience, accessibility, and lower costs. There are clinician and patient barriers to wider adoption of telemedicine. To support the effective and equitable use of telemedicine, we investigated the patient, illness, and surgeon factors associated with the specialist level of comfort in providing upper limb care via telemedicine. METHODS: Seventy-five upper-extremity musculoskeletal specialists completed an online survey-based experiment in which they viewed 12 patient scenarios with randomized patient age, gender, diagnosis, pain intensity, and patient preference for surgical treatment (yes or no) and rated their comfort with telemedicine from 0, no comfort, to 10, complete comfort. The participants were able to provide a rationale for their stance in open text boxes. We recorded the following specialist factors: gender, location of practice, years in practice, subspecialty, the supervision of trainees, and surgeon-rated importance of a physical examination. RESULTS: In a multivariable analysis, greater surgeon comfort using telemedicine was associated with nontrauma conditions, four specific diagnoses, and patients who did not have severe pain. Lower surgeon comfort with telemedicine was associated with the higher clinician-rated importance of a hands-on physical examination and supervising trainees. Text-based reasons provided for relative comfort with telemedicine included nonsurgical treatment and facility of diagnosis based on interviews alone. Text-based reasons for relative discomfort with telemedicine included a perceived need for a hands-on physical examination and a preference for an in-person conversation for specific discussions, including scheduling surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Greater specialist enthusiasm for telemedicine is associated with personal preferences regarding the upper-extremity condition, patients with less severe pain, and a willingness to forego a hands-on examination. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Utilization of telemedicine for upper-extremity specialty care may be facilitated by diagnosis-specific care strategies and strategies for video examination, with a focus on tactics that are effective for people with more intense symptoms.

Do surgeons postpone offer of discretionary surgery when patients are experiencing difficult life events?

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: There is substantial surgeon-to-surgeon variation in offering discretionary surgery. Part of this variation may relate to awareness of, and sensitivity to, mental and social health priorities. This survey-based experiment randomized features of patient scenarios to measure the relative association of a patient's difficult life event (DLE) in the last year on surgeon decision to (1) delay consideration of discretionary surgery and (2) suggest prioritizing mental and social health with appropriate referral. METHODS: We invited hand and upper extremity surgeon members of the Science of Variation Group to review six scenarios of patients considering discretionary surgery for de Quervain tendinopathy, lateral epicondylitis, trapeziometacarpal arthritis, wrist osteoarthritis, non-displaced scaphoid wrist fracture and displaced partial articular radial head fracture and 106 participated. The following aspects of the scenarios were randomized: gender, age, symptoms and limitations, socioeconomic status, feelings of worry and despair regarding symptoms, and experience of a DLE in the last 12 months. Multi-level logistic regression was used to seek patient and surgeon factors associated with offer of operative treatment now (vs. postponing) and formal referral for counselling. RESULTS: Accounting for potential confounders, surgeons were less likely to offer discretionary surgery to patients who experienced a DLE in the last year, women and non-trauma diagnosis. Surgeon referral for mental and social health support was associated with disproportionate symptom intensity and magnitude of incapability, notable symptoms of worry or despair and a DLE in the last year. CONCLUSION: The observation that a recent DLE is associated with surgeon delay in offer of discretionary surgery reflects that surgeons may prioritize mental and social health in this context.

Is there an association between sleep quality and magnitude of capability?

PURPOSE: Given the stigma surrounding mental health, a discussion of how symptoms interfere with sleep might be a useful first step to identify unhelpful thoughts or feelings of distress. We asked: 1) Does sleep quality have an association with magnitude of incapability and pain intensity independent of mental health? and 2) Are mental health factors associated with sleep quality? METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of one hundred and fifty-four patients seeking musculoskeletal care who completed measures of magnitude of capability, pain intensity, unhelpful thoughts regarding symptoms (catastrophic thinking, negative pain thoughts), distress (symptoms of anxiety and depression), and sleep disturbance. We tested factors associated with the magnitude of capability and pain intensity, accounting for sleep quality and mental health in multivariable models. RESULTS: Accounting for potential confounding in multivariable analysis, lower magnitude of capability was independently associated with greater sleep disturbance, more unhelpful thoughts about symptoms (negative pain thoughts), and older age. Greater pain intensity was independently associated with greater unhelpful thoughts about symptoms (catastrophic thinking) and not using of an electronic device before bed. Greater sleep disturbance was independently associated with use of sleep medication, greater symptoms of anxiety, and greater unhelpful thoughts regarding symptoms (PCS). CONCLUSION: Given the observation that sleep disturbance is associated with feelings of anxiety, clinicians can consider starting mental health discussions by focusing on sleep quality. App and web-based cognitive behavioral therapy-based treatments for sleep are readily available and have the potential to improve mental health.

Magnitude of Incapability and Pain Intensity are Associated More with Unhelpful Thoughts Than Stressful Life Events.

Prior studies show that stressful life events are associated with greater magnitude of incapability and symptom intensity. We sought to understand the association of such events (i.e., both adverse childhood experiences and recent difficult life events [DLEs]) alongside feelings of worry or despair and unhelpful, on the magnitude of incapability and symptom intensity in musculoskeletal patients. One hundred and thirty-six patients presenting for musculoskeletal specialty care completed measures of incapability, pain intensity, adverse childhood experiences, DLEs in the last year, unhelpful thoughts, symptoms of anxiety and depression, and sociodemographic factors. Factors associated with the magnitude of incapability and pain intensity were sought in multivariable analysis. Accounting for potential confounders, greater incapability was associated with greater unhelpful thoughts (RC = -0.81; 95% CI = -1.2 to -0.42; P ≤ .001), but not with stressful life events (either during childhood or more recently). Greater pain intensity was associated with greater unhelpful thoughts(RC = 0.25; 95% CI = 0.16 to 0.35; P ≤ .001) and being divorced or widowed (RC = 1.8; 96% CI = 0.43 to 3.2; P = .011), but again, not with stressful life events. The strong association of unhelpful thoughts with magnitude of incapability and pain intensity can motivate musculoskeletal specialists to anticipate patients expressing negative pain thoughts and behaviors. Future studies might account for social and environmental context behind stressful life events and the influence of resiliency and pain-coping strategies on these interactions. Level of Evidence: Level III, prognostic study.