Optimizing a mentorship program from the perspective of academic medicine leadership - a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Effective mentorship is an important contributor to academic success. Given the critical role of leadership in fostering mentorship, this study sought to explore the perspectives of departmental leadership regarding 1) current departmental mentorship processes; and 2) crucial components of a mentorship program that would enhance the effectiveness of mentorship. METHODS: Department Division Directors (DDDs), Vice-Chairs, and Mentorship Facilitators from the Department of Medicine at the University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine were interviewed between April and December 2021 using a semi-structured guide. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim, then coded. Analysis occurred in 2 steps: 1) codes were organized to identify emergent themes; then 2) the Social Ecological Model (SEM) was applied to interpret the findings. RESULTS: Nineteen interviews (14 DDDs, 3 Vice-Chairs, and 2 Mentorship Facilitator) were completed. Analysis revealed three themes: (1) a culture of mentorship permeated the department as evidenced by rigorous mentorship processes, divisional mentorship innovations, and faculty that were keen to mentor; (2) barriers to the establishment of effective mentoring relationships existed at 3 levels: departmental, interpersonal (mentee-mentor relationships), and mentee; and (3) strengthening the culture of mentorship could entail scaling up pre-existing mentorship processes and promoting faculty engagement. Application of SEM highlighted critical program features and determined that two components of interventions (creating tools to measure mentorship outcomes and systems for mentor recognition) were potential enablers of success. CONCLUSIONS: Establishing 'mentorship outcome measures' can incentivize and maintain relationships. By tangibly delineating departmental expectations for mentorship and creating systems that recognize mentors, these measures can contribute to a culture of mentorship.

Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown on Occurrence of Acute Complications of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes and Overall Glycemic Management.

OBJECTIVES: The association of diabetes, and COVID-19 infection has been studied extensively; however, the occurrence of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) or hyperglycemic/hyperosmolar states (HHS) in adults during the lockdown has not been well characterized. In this study, we aimed to identify the impact of the lockdown on occurrence and severity of DKA/HHS admissions and glycemic management. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients admitted to Hamilton Health Sciences with a diagnosis of DKA or HHS from April to September 2019 (pre-lockdown) and from April to September 2020 (lockdown). Adult (≥18 years old) nonpregnant patients with a single admission in the study period were included for study. RESULTS: There were 229 admissions related to diabetes, with 171 admissions meeting the inclusion criteria (n=92 pre-lockdown, n=79 lockdown). In the lockdown group, 51.8% of the patients had type 2 diabetes mellitus, with 96.2% of admissions secondary to DKA. When comparing the 2 periods, the lockdown group trended toward higher rates of death (5.4% vs 10.1%, p=0.247) and euglycemic DKA (17.6% vs 24.4%, p=0.403). There were more new diagnoses of type 1 diabetes mellitus in the lockdown group compared with the pre-lockdown group (7.3% vs 16.7%, p=0.230). The average glycated hemoglobin was lower in the lockdown group compared with the pre-lockdown group (11.8% vs 10.4%, p=0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study is among the first in Canada to assess the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on admissions due to DKA and HHS. Although no significant differences were noted in severity of admissions, there was a trend toward more new diagnoses of type 1 diabetes mellitus presenting in DKA during the lockdown period.