Promoting research integrity in Africa: an African voice of concern on research misconduct and the way forward.

African researchers and their collaborators have been making significant contributions to useful research findings and discoveries in Africa. Despite evidence of scientific misconduct even in heavily regulated research environments, there is little documented information that supports prevalence of research misconduct in Africa. Available literature on research misconduct has focused on the developed world, where credible research integrity systems are already in place. Public attention to research misconduct has lately increased, calling for attention to weaknesses in current research policies and regulatory frameworks. Africa needs policies, structural and governance systems that promote responsible conduct of research. To begin to offset this relative lack of documented evidence of research misconduct, contributors working in various research institutions from nine African countries agreed to share their experiences to highlight problems and explore the need to identify strategies to promote research integrity in the African continent. The experiences shared include anecdotal but reliable accounts of previously undocumented research misconduct, including some 'normal misbehavior' of frontline staff in those countries. Two broad approaches to foster greater research integrity are proposed including promotion of institutional and individual capacity building to instil a culture of responsible research conduct in existing and upcoming research scientist and developing deterrent and corrective policies to minimize research misconduct and other questionable research practices. By sharing these experiences and through the strategies proposed, the authors hope to limit the level of research misconduct and promote research integrity in Africa.

Notifying partners of patients with early syphilis in Madagascar: case-finding effectiveness and public health implications.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the case-finding effectiveness of a clinic-based partner notification effort for early syphilis in Madagascar. METHODS: We asked index cases who had proven early syphilis to identify and provide contact information of recent sex partners (in the past 3, 6, and 12 months for primary, secondary, and early latent syphilis, respectively). Named sex partners were contacted by index cases (patient notification) or, if approved by the index case, clinic staff members (provider notification); notified of their potential exposure to syphilis; and asked to come to the clinic for evaluation. We assessed case-finding effectiveness and calculated the 'brought-to-treatment' index (number of newly-diagnosed syphilis cases per number of index cases interviewed). RESULTS: Of 565 index cases, 534 reported recent sex with at least one sex partner. A total of 3167 sex partners were reported, of whom 276 were contactable (9% of 3167). Providers notified 76% and cases notified 24% of these partners. 270 partners were contacted (98% of 276), and of these, 199 presented to the clinic for evaluation (74% of 270). A total of 99 partners tested positive for syphilis and received treatment (50% of 199). The 'brought-to-treatment' index was 0.18 (99 diagnoses per 565 index cases). CONCLUSION: Partner notification was possible in this setting, resulting in treatment of syphilis-infected individuals who otherwise would likely have remained untreated. However, given <10% of the partners reported by index cases were contactable; the results highlight the limitations of partner notification and the need for additional sexually transmitted infection control strategies.