The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on students' views of a career in general practice.

BACKGROUND: General Practice (GP) is an essential part of healthcare systems in the UK and internationally but continues to struggle with recruitment. Despite these concerns about GP recruitment, few studies have explored factors that influence medical students' career choices around primary care. AIM: We aimed to re-visit factors previously proposed following new ways of working adopted since the COVID-19 pandemic, including the impact of these changes on learning experiences in primary care. DESIGN & SETTING: A qualitative study using focus groups across three English medical schools. METHOD: Eight focus groups involving thirty-three final and penultimate year medical students. Qualitative data analysed using a framework approach. Transcripts coded independently by two researchers from a different institution before themes identified. RESULTS: Six themes were identified: students' prior career aspirations, their experience of the medical school curriculum, conceptualisation of general practice, future career predictions, views on the school's curriculum philosophy and the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic. The curriculum philosophy of each school appeared was important in this journey and changes since the COVID-19 had an impact on all themes. CONCLUSION: Our study has confirmed previous findings that clinical experiences, the perceived narrative of the school, work-life balance and working environment remain important to students in making career plans. However, in addition, we have found the changing landscape in general practice since the covid pandemic, including remote consulting, workload, continuity of care and team-working are additional factors that concern students.

Facilitators and barriers to teaching undergraduate medical students in general practice.

CONTEXT: Globally, primary health care is facing workforce shortages. Longer and higher-quality placements in primary care increase the likelihood of medical students choosing this specialty. However, the recruitment and retention of community primary care teachers are challenging. Relevant research was predominantly carried out in the 1990s. We seek to understand contemporary facilitators and barriers to general practitioner (GP) engagement with undergraduate education. Communities of practice (CoP) theory offers a novel conceptualisation, which may be pertinent in other community-based teaching settings. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 24 GP teachers at four UK medical schools. We purposively sampled GPs new to teaching, established GP teachers and GPs who had recently stopped teaching. We undertook NVivo-assisted deductive and inductive thematic analysis of transcripts. We used CoP theory to interpret data. RESULTS: Communities of practice theory illustrated that teachers negotiate membership of three CoPs: (i) clinical practice; (ii) the medical school, and (iii) teaching. The delivery of clinical care and teaching may be integrated or exist in tension. This can depend upon the positioning of the teaching and teacher as central or peripheral to the clinical CoP. Remuneration, workload, space and the expansion of GP trainee numbers impact on this. Teachers did not identify strongly as members of the medical school or a teaching community. Perceptions of membership were affected by medical school communication and support. The findings demonstrate gaps in medical school recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: This research demonstrates the marginalisation of primary care-based teaching and proposes a novel explanation rooted in CoP theory. Concepts including identity and membership may be pertinent to other community-based teaching settings. We recommend that medical schools review and broaden recruitment methods. Teacher retention may be improved by optimising the interface between medical schools and teachers, fostering a teaching community, increasing professional rewards for teaching involvement and altering medical school expectations of learning in primary care.

Exposure of undergraduates to authentic GP teaching and subsequent entry to GP training: a quantitative study of UK medical schools.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that the quantity of exposure to general practice teaching at medical school is associated with future choice of a career as a GP. AIM: To examine the relationship between general practice exposure at medical school and the percentage of each school's graduates appointed to a general practice training programme after foundation training (postgraduate years 1 and 2). DESIGN AND SETTING: A quantitative study of 29 UK medical schools. METHOD: The UK Foundation Programme Office (UKFPO) destination surveys of 2014 and 2015 were used to determine the percentage of graduates of each UK medical school who were appointed to a GP training programme after foundation year 2. The Spearman rank correlation was used to examine the correlation between these data and the number of sessions spent in placements in general practice at each medical school. RESULTS: A statistically significant association was demonstrated between the quantity of authentic general practice teaching at each medical school and the percentage of its graduates who entered GP training after foundation programme year 2 in both 2014 (correlation coefficient [r] 0.41, P = 0.027) and 2015 (r 0.3, P = 0.044). Authentic general practice teaching here is described as teaching in a practice with patient contact, in contrast to non-clinical sessions such as group tutorials in the medical school. DISCUSSION: The authors have demonstrated, for the first time in the UK, an association between the quantity of clinical GP teaching at medical school and entry to general practice training. This study suggests that an increased use of, and investment in, undergraduate general practice placements would help to ensure that the UK meets its target of 50% of medical graduates entering general practice.