A New Way of Evaluating Effectiveness of URM Summer Pipeline Programs.

PURPOSE: Many academic medical centers fund educational opportunities (pipeline programs) for students who are underrepresented in medicine (URM). However, there is a sparsity of published literature on pipeline programs and an even smaller body of published literature that investigates program effectiveness. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study (n=12) of the Provost's Summer Mentorship Program-Medicine (SMPM), we evaluated students' rating of program effectiveness, students' rating of the program's impact on their mindsets, and SAT scores. Several program mindsets, including sense of belonging (inclusiveness) in the health professions and connection to mentors in the medical field, reflect common barriers that prevent URM students from pursuing careers in medicine as outlined in pipeline literature. We describe program effectiveness using mean and median ratings of SMPM effectiveness, ratings of mindsets, and SAT scores. We used Wilcoxon Rank Sum to assess pre and post program differences in ratings of mindsets and SAT scores. RESULTS: SMPM was effective for learners. The overall mean rating for SMPM effectiveness was 4.27. Mindsets for confidence, interest, sense of belonging, college mentorship, and physician mentorship were statistically different from the start to the end of SMPM (p<0.05), with mean improvement of about 34%, 41%, 44%, 180%, and 140% respectively. The mean pre and post SMPM SAT scores as well as 4-month follow-up SAT mean scores were 713 (SD:155), 813 (SD:83), and 1058 (SD:147), respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between all three SAT scores (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In addition to providing educational support, our pipeline program effectively increased students' sense of belonging in the medical field and their connections to physician mentors, which are two common barriers for URM students who are interested in medicine.

"In the Clinic They Know Us": Preferences for Clinic-Based Financial and Employment Services in Urban Pediatric Primary Care.

OBJECTIVE: To understand views of adolescent and adult caregivers on integrating employment and financial services into a pediatric primary care clinic serving low-income families. METHODS: Eighteen in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted among caregivers of pediatric patients. Participants were recruited from those who completed a survey assessing financial and employment needs. Audio-recorded transcripts were analyzed using line-by-line coding of emerging themes. RESULTS: Adolescent and adult caregivers expressed difficulty managing financial stress. They cited having a criminal history, limited financial literacy, and lack of available quality jobs as barriers to achieving financial stability. A clinic-based employment and financial program was highly acceptable among potential users for the convenience it offers and the established trust and understanding between patients and clinical providers. Participants preferred one-on-one counseling for sensitive employment and financial issues, although they did believe that some topics, such as building a resume, could be accomplished in group workshops. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers attending a pediatric clinic expressed interest in and anticipated value from clinic-based employment and financial services if implemented services are relevant, accessible, and provide options for group and individualized approaches.