Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acta Vet Scand ; 62(1): 53, 2020 Sep 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32943076

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSI) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. To lower the incidence of SSI, antimicrobial prophylaxis is given 30-60 min before certain types of surgeries in both human and veterinary patients. However, due to the increasing concern of antimicrobial resistance, the benefit of antimicrobial prophylaxis in clean orthopaedic and neurosurgeries warrants investigation. The aims of this retrospective cross-sectional study were to review the rate of SSI and evaluate the compliance with antimicrobial guidelines in dogs at a veterinary teaching hospital in 2012-2016. In addition, possible risk factors for SSI were assessed. RESULTS: Nearly all dogs (377/406; 92.9%) received antimicrobial prophylaxis. Twenty-nine dogs (7.1%) did not receive any antimicrobials and only four (1.1%) received postoperative antimicrobials. The compliance with in-house and national protocols was excellent regarding the choice of prophylactic antimicrobial (cefazolin), but there was room for improvement in the timing of prophylaxis administration. Follow-up data was available for 89.4% (363/406) of the dogs. Mean follow-up time was 464 days (range: 3-2600 days). The overall SSI rate was 6.3%: in orthopaedic surgeries it was 6.7%, and in neurosurgeries it was 4.2%. The lowest SSI rates (0%) were seen in extracapsular repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture, ulnar ostectomy, femoral head and neck excision, arthrotomy and coxofemoral luxation repair. The highest SSI rate (25.0%) was seen in arthrodesis. Omission of antimicrobials did not increase the risk for SSI (P = 0.56; OR 1.7; CI95% 0.4-5.0). Several risk factors for SSI were identified, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius carriage (P = 0.02; OR 9.0; CI95% 1.4-57.9) and higher body temperature (P = 0.03; OR 1.69; CI95% 1.0-2.7; mean difference + 0.4 °C compared to dogs without SSI). CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial prophylaxis without postoperative antimicrobials is sufficient to maintain the overall rate of SSI at a level similar to published data in canine clean orthopedic and neurosurgeries.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia/veterinária , Cefazolina/uso terapêutico , Doenças do Cão/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/veterinária , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/veterinária , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/veterinária , Animais , Antibioticoprofilaxia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Doenças do Cão/epidemiologia , Doenças do Cão/microbiologia , Cães , Incidência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/microbiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle
2.
Acta Vet Scand ; 61(1): 54, 2019 Nov 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31727124

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Infection with Serratia spp. have been associated with mastitis outbreaks in dairy cattle herds. Environmental contamination or a point source, like a teat dip product, have often been observed to be potential sources of such outbreaks. We describe two Serratia marcescens associated mastitis outbreaks associated with a contaminated teat dip containing a tertiary alkyl amine, n,n-bis (3-aminopropyl) dodecylamine in two dairy cattle farms in Finland. S. marcescens strains isolated from milk and environmental samples were identified by the MALDI-TOF method. RESULTS: Six specimens (n = 19) on Herd 1 and all specimens (n = 9) on Herd 2 were positive for S. marcescens. Positive specimens were from mastitis milk and teat dip liquid and equipment. Bacteria were not isolated from the unopened teat dip canister. The same clone of S. marcescens was isolated from milk samples and teat dip samples within the farms. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis results to the S. marcescens isolates from these two different herds were tested with unweighted pair-group method using arithmetic average clustering analysis. The isolates were not same clone in both herds, because similarity in that test was only 75% when cut-off value to similarity is 85%. CONCLUSIONS: Our investigation showed that the post milking teat dip and/or temporary containers were contaminated with S. marcescens and these were most likely the sources for new mastitis cases. The negative result from the unopened teat dip canister and positive results from refillable containers demonstrated that the product itself was not contaminated with S. marcescens at the production unit, but became contaminated at the farm level.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças/veterinária , Mastite Bovina/epidemiologia , Infecções por Serratia/veterinária , Serratia marcescens/isolamento & purificação , Animais , Bovinos , Indústria de Laticínios , Eletroforese em Gel de Campo Pulsado , Feminino , Finlândia , Mastite Bovina/microbiologia , Infecções por Serratia/epidemiologia , Infecções por Serratia/microbiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...