Are small-sized mechanical valves adequate for patients with small aortic roots?

AIM: Concerns have been raised over patient outcomes following implantation of small aortic valves (size: 19 and 17 mm). However, in patients with a smaller body surface area, these valves may be adequate. The aim of th study was to assess the hemodynamic and functional performance of these valves and their impact on clinical outcomes in patients with a small aortic root. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective observational study that included all consecutive patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) with a small-sized aortic valve over a 3-year period. Patients were followed up at 1 week, 6 weeks, and 1 year. Functional and clinical evaluation along with echocardiography was carried out for hemodynamic assessment. In-hospital mortality and hemodynamic outcomes at 1-year follow-up were recorded. RESULTS: Isolated AVR with a size 17 mm valve was carried out in 15 (25%) and with a 19 mm valve in 45 (75%) patients. The mean annular size was 19.12 ± 2.03 mm. The mean indexed effective orifice area was 1.08 ± 0.16 cm2/m2. Satisfactory decrease in peak and mean trans-prosthetic gradient were evident (peak gradient preoperatively was 92.15 ± 26.2 mmHg, and 25.68 ± 12.28 mmHg at 1 year, mean gradient was 55.31 ± 17.41 mmHg preoperatively and 13.71 ± 7.39 mmHg at 1 year). The functional status of patients also showed significant improvement post AVR. Left ventricular ejection fraction pre-operatively was 59.67% ± 10.38% and 59.57% ± 7.98% at 1-week, 59.15% ± 8.17% at 6 weeks, and 59.59% ± 7.48% at 1 year. CONCLUSION: When confronted with a small aortic root, AVR with a small-sized prosthesis provides a satisfactory hemodynamic and functional outcome. In patients with small body surface area, implantation of a small-sized valve is a viable option.

On-pump beating heart versus off-pump myocardial revascularization-a propensity-matched comparison.

OBJECTIVE: On-pump beating heart (OP-BH) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is often undertaken as an alternative between off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) and conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (On-pump CABG), especially in India. However, outcome data following OP-BH surgery is sparse. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of OP-BH CABG with OPCAB. METHODS: From our institutional database, all patients undergoing OP-BH CABG (n = 531) were identified. A propensity-matched cohort undergoing OPCAB (n = 531) was identified from the database. Nearest neighbor matching technique was used and the groups were matched for variables including age, gender, body mass index, EuroSCORE, history of recent myocardial infarction or unstable angina, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive airway disease, diabetes, pre-op renal impairment, pre-op neurological events, and left ventricular function. RESULTS: The propensity-matched groups were well matched in terms of baseline characteristics. The mean EuroSCORE was 3.17 and 3.20 in the OP-BH and the OPCAB groups. The unadjusted 30-day mortality in the propensity-matched OPCAB group was 2.07% (11/531) while mortality in the on-pump beating heart group was significantly higher at 6.9% (37/531). Multivariate analysis showed that OP-BH CABG was an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality as well as major adverse post-operative outcomes including renal, neurological, and respiratory outcomes and post-operative atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: OP-BH CABG is associated with worse clinical outcomes compared to patients undergoing OPCAB.

Preoperative Glycosylated Hemoglobin: A Risk Factor for Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of diabetes in the population of patients presenting with coronary artery disease continues to rise. The aim of this study was to assess whether high Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was associated with adverse outcomes in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: A retrospective observational study on prospectively collected data in 4,678 patients undergoing elective, isolated coronary artery bypass graft procedures in a single institution over a 4-year period was conducted. Patients were grouped into those with adequate preoperative control of hyperglycemia (HbA1c <6.5%) and those with suboptimal control (HbA1c ≥6.5%). Multivariable analysis using HbA1c as a binary independent variable was undertaken in the whole group. A subgroup analysis in diabetic patients and in nondiabetic patients was performed. The effect of HbA1c on outcomes at higher levels (HbA1c ≥8.0% and HbA1c ≥9.0%) was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 4,678 patients (mean age, 58.8; male, 4,254) were included in the study. HbA1c was less than 6.5% in 2,476 (52.93%) patients and 6.5% or higher in 2,202 (47.07%) patients. On multivariate analysis, there was no difference in mortality rates between the groups (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95 to 1.953; p = 0.08). Overall, an HbA1c of 6.5% or higher was an independent risk factor for respiratory complications (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.008 to 4.631; p = 0.01) and sternal dehiscence (odds ratio, 2.161; 95% CI, 1.008 to 4.63; p = 0.04). An association between HbA1c levels and adverse outcomes was not seen in nondiabetic patients. No additional adverse postoperative complications were seen with increasing HbA1c levels (HbA1c ≥8.0% and HbA1c ≥9.0%). CONCLUSIONS: An HbA1c level of 6.5% or higher in patients presenting for coronary artery bypass grafting was associated with a significant increase in the incidence of deep sternal wound infection and respiratory complications.