Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Laryngoscope ; 133(12): 3396-3402, 2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37161918

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Depression remains prevalent in patients undergoing head and neck cancer (HNCA) operations. The present study aimed to assess the impact of depression on perioperative and readmission outcomes following HNCA resection. METHODS: All elective hospitalizations involving HNCA resection were identified from the 2010-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients were stratified by history of depression. To perform risk-adjustment in assessing perioperative and readmission outcomes, 3:1 nearest neighbor matching was performed. A subpopulation analysis was also conducted to assess interval development of depression in the postoperative period. RESULTS: Of an estimated 133,018 patients undergoing HNCA operations, 8.9% (n = 11,855) had comorbid depression. Over the decade-long study period, the prevalence of depression in this population increased (7.8% in 2010 vs. 10.0% in 2019, NPTrend<0.001). Among 24,938 propensity matched patients, those with depression had similar incidence of in-hospital mortality (0.4 vs. 0.7%, p = 0.14) as well as perioperative medical (22.0 vs. 21.9%, p = 0.93) and surgical (10.2 vs. 10.3, p = 0.84) complications, though had higher rates of non-home discharge (16.9 vs. 13.5%, p < 0.001) and 30-day readmission (13.6 vs. 11.8%, p = 0.030). Predictors of depression in the postoperative period included primary coverage by Medicare or Medicaid as well as comorbid anxiety or drug use disorder. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of depression in HNCA patients continues to increase. Although depression was not associated with increased in-hospital mortality and complications, it did impact rates of rehospitalization as well as non-routine discharge. Screening and therapeutic interventions addressing such postoperative events may serve to improve long-term clinical and financial outcomes in this at-risk population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3-Retrospective cohort study Laryngoscope, 133:3396-3402, 2023.


Assuntos
Depressão , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Humanos , Idoso , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Medicare , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Readmissão do Paciente , Fatores de Risco
2.
Laryngoscope ; 132(8): 1600-1608, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34953151

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Psychosocial distress is common among patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) and is associated with poorer quality of life and clinical outcomes. Despite these risks, distress screening is not widely implemented in HNC care. In this study, we investigated the prevalence of psychosocial distress and its related factors in routine care of patients with HNC. METHODS: Data from medical records between September 2017 and March 2020 were analyzed. Psychosocial distress was measured by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network's Distress Thermometer (DT), and a modified HNC-specific problem list; depression and anxiety were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-4. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were conducted to report prevalence of distress, depression and anxiety, and factors associated with clinical distress. Implementation outcomes, including rates of referrals and follow-up for distressed patients, are also reported. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty seven HNC patients completed the questionnaire (age 64.3 ± 14.9 years), with a mean distress score of 4.51 ± 3.35. Of those, 57% (n = 163) reported clinical distress (DT ≥ 4). Pain (odds ratio [OR] = 3.31, 95% CI = 1.75-6.26), fatigue (OR = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.1.7-5.05), anxiety (OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.30-2.05), and depression (OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.04-2.18) were significantly associated with clinical distress (P < .05). Of patients identified as distressed, 79% received same-day psychosocial evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical distress was identified in 57% of patients who completed the questionnaire, suggesting that an ultra-brief psychosocial screening protocol can be implemented in routine ambulatory oncology care, and identifies patients whose distress might otherwise go unrecognized. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 132:1600-1608, 2022.


Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Neoplasias , Idoso , Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Ansiedade/etiologia , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/etiologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/complicações , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Estresse Psicológico/diagnóstico , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Estresse Psicológico/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...