Attitudes and Beliefs of Working and Work-Disabled People with Chronic Pain Prescribed Long-Term Opioids.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to gain insight into the apparent contradiction between the perspectives of researchers and policy makers, who have questioned the efficacy and safety of chronic opioid therapy for non-cancer pain patients, and the patients themselves, who often indicate that the therapy has value. SUBJECTS: A convenience sample of 54 patients on chronic opioid therapy was studied. METHODS: Participants completed a questionnaire specifically designed for the study, and also several standard instruments that addressed functional interference, emotional functioning, and possible misuse of opioids. Their treating physicians rated the participants on the severity of their disability and the success of their opioid therapy. RESULTS: Although participants reported significant ongoing pain, they gave positive global ratings to their opioid therapy, and reported little concern about addiction or side effects of opioids. They strongly endorsed the beliefs that opioids helped them control their pain and allowed them to participate in important activities such as work. They expressed the belief that their pain would be severe if they did not have access to opioids, and reported negative experiences with tapering or discontinuing opioids in the past. Work-disabled participants reported higher levels of affective distress, catastrophizing, and functional interference than working participants, and were judged by their physicians to be relatively less successful in managing their pain. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest several tentative hypotheses about why patients on chronic opioid therapy value opioids, and identified several areas for systematic investigation in the future.

Chronic opioid therapy urine drug testing in primary care: prevalence and predictors of aberrant results.

BACKGROUND: Urine drug tests (UDTs) are recommended for patients on chronic opioid therapy (COT). Knowledge of the risk factors for aberrant UDT results could help optimize their use. OBJECTIVE: To identify primary care COT patient and opioid regimen characteristics associated with aberrant UDT results. DESIGN: Population-based observational. SAMPLE: 5,420 UDTs for Group Health integrated group practice COT patients. MEASURES: Group Health database measures of patient demographics, medical history, COT characteristics, and UDT results. RESULTS: Thirty percent of UDTs had aberrant results, including prescribed opioid non-detection (12.3%), tetrahydrocannabinol (THC; 11.2%), non-prescribed opioid (5.3%), illicit drug (excluding THC; 0.6%), non-prescribed benzodiazepine (1.7%), and dilute (4.8%). Adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) of any aberrant result were higher for males than females (1.24 [1.07, 1.43]), patients with versus without prior substance use disorder diagnoses (1.42 [1.17, 1.72]), and current smokers versus non-smokers (1.50 [1.30, 1.73]). Odds ratios were lower for patients aged 45-64 (0.77 [0.65, 0.92]) and 65+ (0.40 [0.32, 0.50]) versus patients aged 20-44 and for patients on long-acting opioids only (0.72 [0.55, 0.95]) or long-acting plus short-acting (0.67 [0.54, 0.83]) versus short-acting only. Adjusted odds of prescribed opioid non-detection were lower for patients aged 45-64 (0.79 [0.63, 0.998]) and 65+ (0.44 [0.32, 0.59]) versus patients aged 20-44, for those on 40-<120 mg daily morphine-equivalent dose (0.52 [0.39, 0.70]) or 120+ mg (0.22 [0.11, 0.43]) versus <40 mg, and for patients on long-acting (0.35 [0.21, 0.57]) or long-acting plus short-acting (0.35 [0.24, 0.50]) opioids (versus short-acting only); and odds ratios were higher for patients with versus without prior diagnoses of substance use disorder (1.70 [1.31, 2.20]). CONCLUSIONS: In this primary care setting, results were aberrant for 30% of UDTs of COT patients, largely because of prescribed opioid non-detection and THC. Aberrant results of almost all types were more likely among patients under the age of 45. Other risk factors varied across aberrancies, but commonly included current smoking and prior substance use disorder diagnosis.

Chronic opioid therapy risk reduction initiative: impact on urine drug testing rates and results.

BACKGROUND: In response to epidemic levels of prescription opioid overdose, abuse, and diversion, routine urine drug tests (UDTs) are recommended for patients receiving chronic opioid therapy (COT) for chronic pain. However, UDT ordering for COT patients is inconsistent in primary care, and little is known about how to increase UDT ordering or the impact of increased testing on rates of aberrant results. OBJECTIVE: To compare rates and results of UDTs for COT patients before versus after implementation of an opioid risk reduction initiative in a large healthcare system. DESIGN: Pre-post observational study. PATIENTS: Group Health patients on COT October 2008-September 2009 (N = 4,821), October 2009-September 2010 (N = 5,081), and October 2010-September 2011 (N = 5,498). INTERVENTION: Multi-faceted opioid risk reduction initiative. MAIN MEASURES: Annual rates of UDTs and UDT results. KEY RESULTS: Half of COT patients received at least one UDT in the year after the initiative was implemented, compared to only 7 % 2 years prior. The adjusted odds of COT patients having at least one UDT in the first year of the opioid initiative were almost 16 times (adjusted OR = 15.79; 95 % CI: 13.96-17.87) those 2 years prior. The annual rate of UDT detection of marijuana and illicit drugs did not change (12.6 % after initiative implementation), and largely reflected marijuana use (detected in 11.1 % of all UDTs in the year after initiative implementation). In the year after initiative implementation, 10.7 % of UDTs were negative for opioids. CONCLUSIONS: The initiative appeared to dramatically increase urine drug testing of COT patients in the healthcare system without impacting rates of aberrant results. The large majority of aberrant results reflected marijuana use or absence of opioids in the urine. The utility of increased urine drug testing for COT patient safety and prevention of diversion remains uncertain.

Acute pain management in patients with prior opioid consumption: a case-controlled retrospective review.

The patient with a history of current opioid consumption presenting in the acute postoperative setting presents a challenge for pain management. Standard treatment dosages and strategies are often ineffective in providing pain relief. This retrospective case-control study reviews 4 years' experience of the Acute Pain Service (APS) at our institution providing care for 202 chronic pain and opioid-consuming (CPOC) patients, 6.6% of 3058 patients undergoing urologic, gynecologic, orthopedic and general surgical procedures. Controls matched for age, gender, date and type of surgery, and postoperative pain relief modality were found for 180 (89%) of these patients. Patients were provided patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), or epidural opioid analgesia (EOA with boluses of preservative-free morphine or bupivacaine (1:16% + 2 micrograms/ml fentanyl (B/F)). Records were reviewed for patient demographics, diagnoses, surgical procedures, pre-operative opioid use, days-on-service, analgesic requirement, pain scores and incidence of moderate/severe side effects. Patient demographics were similar between CPOC and control groups. When considering PCA alone, mean 24-h usage in controls was 42.8 (32.0) mg morphine (MS) equivalents differing significantly from CPOC patients' use of 135.8 (68.5) mg MS equivalents (P = 0.0001). EOA and B/F case studies showed similar results. Moderate sedation was experienced by 50% of CPOC patients receiving PCA. Differences in opioid usage, side effects, pain scores, sedation and prescribed treatment with anxiolytics were shown between CPOC patients and matched controls.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)