Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Front Neurol ; 13: 993559, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36237628

RESUMO

Introduction: Carotid free-floating thrombus (CFFT) is a rare cause of stroke and is thought to be associated with a high risk of recurrent cerebrovascular ischaemic events. The existing data on the natural history and optimal treatment modalities of CFFT is scanty and no clear recommendations exist. Objective: A retrospective analysis, single-center cohort of consecutive patients diagnosed with CFFT was conducted, investigating the risk for recurrent cerebrovascular ischaemic events. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective analysis including all patients presenting at our tertiary center between January 2005 and December 2020 with symptoms consistent with ischaemic stroke and/or transient ischaemic attack. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA), computed tomography angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) were used to diagnose CFFT. In all included patients, CFFT was confirmed with a second imaging modality. CFFT was defined on imaging as a defect in contrast filling extending into the carotid lumen. We gathered information on vascular risk factors, diagnosis and follow-up methods, modality of treatment and neurological outcome. A survival analysis was performed, assessing the risk for recurrent cerebrovascular events. Results: In total, N = 62 patients presenting with symptomatic CFFT were included. Mean age was 68 years, 69% (43/62) of patients were male, 52% (32/62) current or previous smokers, 76% (47/62) suffered from arterial hypertension, 68% (42/62) from dyslipidaemia, and 31% (19/62) from diabetes mellitus. Overall, 71% (44/62) of patients received any kind of intervention [endovascular or surgical carotid thrombo-endartectomy (CEA)] at any time point during follow-up. Sixteen percent of patients (10/62) received intervention within 48 h after diagnosis of CFFT. The survival analysis and Kaplan-Meier model censoring patients at the time of intervention or last follow-up showed that the risk for any recurrent ischaemic stroke was 19.7% within the first 7 days and 27.4% within 3 months after diagnosis. No patients experienced a new ischaemic stroke beyond 11 days after diagnosis of CFTT (n = 17). Conclusion: The risk of recurrent ischaemic events in patients with CFFT is high, especially in the first week after diagnosis. Prospective studies are needed to further investigate the optimal management of these patients.

3.
Rheumatol Int ; 37(2): 293-298, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27873008

RESUMO

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. We aimed to evaluate arterial stiffness and the ankle brachial index (ABI), two markers of subclinical cardiovascular disease, in SLE. We studied 55 patients with SLE (12.7% males, age 53.3 ± 15.3 years) and 61 age- and gender-matched controls. Arterial stiffness was evaluated by measuring pulse wave velocity (PWV), augmentation index (AIx) and central systolic, diastolic, pulse and mean blood pressure (BP). Peripheral arterial disease was defined as ABI ≤ 0.90. Regarding markers of arterial stiffness, patients with SLE had lower PWV and AIx than controls (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). However, after adjusting for differences in cardiovascular risk factors between patients with SLE and controls, PWV and AIx did not differ between the two groups. Central systolic, diastolic, pulse and mean BP also did not differ between the two groups. In patients with SLE, PWV correlated independently with systolic BP (B = 0.05, p < 0.001) and waist/hip ratio (B = 6.72, p < 0.05). Regarding ABI, the lowest ABI was lower in patients with SLE than in controls (p < 0.005). However, after adjusting for differences in cardiovascular risk factors between patients with SLE and controls, the lowest ABI did not differ between the two groups. The prevalence of PAD also did not differ between patients with SLE and controls (10.0 and 5.4%, respectively; p = NS). Markers of arterial stiffness and the ABI do not appear to differ between patients with SLE and age- and gender-matched controls. However, given the small sample size, larger studies are needed to clarify whether SLE promotes arterial stiffness and PAD.


Assuntos
Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/complicações , Doença Arterial Periférica/complicações , Rigidez Vascular/fisiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Índice Tornozelo-Braço , Velocidade do Fluxo Sanguíneo/fisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença Arterial Periférica/fisiopatologia , Análise de Onda de Pulso
4.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 21(9): 1042-8, 2009 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20139856

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Antibodies to infliximab may lead to loss of response to infliximab (IFX) in Crohn's disease. Azathioprine (AZA) coadministration prevents the formation, whereas hydrocortisone (HC) premedication reduces the levels of antibodies to IFX. This pilot study aims at assessing the efficacy of these strategies to prevent loss of response to IFX. METHODS: Eligible patients had active steroid-dependent luminal Crohn's disease and received IFX (5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, and 6 for induction and then scheduled q8 week for remission maintenance). Patients were stratified in a 1 : 1 ratio to oral AZA (2-2.5 mg/kg/day, stratum A) or HC premedication (250 mg intravenously, stratum B). Stratum A included only patients naive to AZA; stratum B included both AZA naive and intolerant patients. Steroids were tapered within 6-8 weeks. Patients were followed up with monthly clinical assessments, laboratory tests, Crohn's Disease Activity Index calculations, adverse-events check up, and adherence to treatment. RESULTS: Overall, 23 patients received IFX/HC and 23 IFX/AZA. There were no differences at baseline in any patient-related or disease-related parameters. Seventeen (74%) patients on IFX/AZA completed the study; six patients were withdrawn for primary nonresponse (one patient), lost response to IFX (two patients), or AZA-related adverse events. Eighteen (78%) patients on IFX/HC completed the study; five patients were withdrawn for primary nonresponse (one patient), loss of response (two patients), or infusion reactions to IFX. No significant differences emerged between strata in clinical remission rates or lost response to IFX. CONCLUSION: This prospective 2-year pilot study has not confirmed superiority of any available strategy to maintain the efficacy of IFX.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Azatioprina/uso terapêutico , Doença de Crohn/tratamento farmacológico , Hidrocortisona/administração & dosagem , Pré-Medicação/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Infliximab , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...