Patient satisfaction with spinal cord stimulation for predominant complaints of chronic, intractable low back pain.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Results of subsequent surgical intervention in patients with intractable pain after lumbar spine surgery are typically worse than for initial surgery, particularly in those with predominant complaints of back pain rather than lower extremity pain. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been found to yield good results in patients with primary complaints of intractable lower extremity pain. Technological advances have broadened the indications for this treatment. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction after SCS in the treatment of patients with predominant complaints of chronic, intractable, low back pain. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Data were collected from retrospective chart review and patient follow-up questionnaire. Patients were treated at a spine specialty center. PATIENT SAMPLE: The study group consisted of the consecutive series of our first 41 patients who underwent SCS for predominant complaints of low back pain. The mean symptom duration was 82.9 months, and the mean age was 47.9 years (range, 28-83 years). All but three patients had previously undergone lumbar spine surgery (mean, 2.3 prior surgeries). OUTCOME MEASURES: At the time of follow-up (5.5-19 months after SCS implantation), patients completed questionnaires assessing their satisfaction with their outcome, if they would have the procedure again knowing what their outcome would be and if they would recommend SCS to someone with similar problems. In determining outcome, a negative response was assigned for patients who had the device removed. A worst-case analysis was also conducted in which a negative response was assigned for patients lost to follow-up or who failed to respond to a particular question. Data were also collected on complications and re-operations. METHODS: All trial stimulation procedures were performed under local anesthetic with the patient providing feedback concerning pain relief achieved with various lead placements and settings. If one lead did not provide acceptable relief in all the areas needed, placement of a second lead was pursued. If the patient failed to maintain acceptable pain relief (> or =50% pain relief) during a multiday trial period, the leads were removed. If adequate relief was maintained during the trial period, the receiver was implanted. RESULTS: Responses to the follow-up questionnaire indicated that 60% of patients considered themselves improved from their preoperative condition and the remaining 40% did not; 78.1% of patients would recommend SCS to someone with similar problems, 69.0% were satisfied, 75.0% would have the procedure performed again if they had known their outcome before implantation. Among the 36 patients in whom the system was implanted, it was later removed in 4 because of lack of sufficient pain relief. Other re-operations included repositioning of the leads to regain pain relief in the areas needed, replacement of a malfunctioning unit and revision of lead extension wires. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, the majority of patients were satisfied with the results of SCS and would have the procedure again knowing what their outcome would be. These results suggest that further investigation of SCS is warranted in this difficult to treat patient population presenting with predominant complaints of chronic, intractable, axial low back pain.

The use of presurgical psychological screening to predict the outcome of spine surgery.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Several previous studies have shown that psychosocial factors can influence the outcome of elective spine surgery. PURPOSE: The purpose of the current study was to determine how well a presurgical screening instrument could predict surgical outcome. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: The study was conducted by staff of a psychologist's office. They performed preoperative screening for spine surgery candidates and collected the follow-up data. PATIENT SAMPLE: Presurgical screening and follow-up data collection was performed on 204 patients who underwent laminectomy/discectomy (n=118) or fusion (n=86) of the lumbar spine. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measures used in the study were visual analog pain scales, the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, and medication use. METHODS: A semi-structured interview and psychometric testing were used to identify specific, quantifiable psychological, and "medical" risk factors for poor surgical outcome. A presurgical psychological screening (PPS) scorecard was completed for each patient, assessing whether the patient had a high or low level of risk on these psychological and medical dimensions. Based on the scorecard, an overall surgical prognosis of "good," "fair," or "poor" was generated. RESULTS: Results showed spine surgery led to significant overall improvements in pain, functional ability, and medication use. Medical and psychological risk levels were significantly related to outcome, with the poorest results obtained by patients having both high psychological and medical risk. Further, the accuracy of PPS surgical prognosis in predicting overall outcome was 82%. Only 9 of 53 patients predicted to have poor outcome achieved fair or good results from spine surgery. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that PPS should become a more routine part of the evaluation of chronic pain patients in whom spine surgery is being considered.

A controlled biochemical and immunohistochemical study of human synovial-type (group II) phospholipase A2 and inflammatory cells in macroscopically normal, degenerated, and herniated human lumbar disc tissues.

STUDY DESIGN: Group II phospholipase A2 enzyme activity was studied biochemically and immunohistochemically in tissue samples from disc prolapses, degenerated discs, and macroscopically normal discs. In parallel, phospholipase A2 and inflammatory cells were studied by indirect immunocytochemistry. OBJECTIVES: To compare phospholipase A2 activity in normal discs and abnormal discs by an identical assay for phospholipases A2, and to compare the occurrence of inflammatory cells with phospholipase A2 activity and immunoreactivity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: It has been suggested that a high phospholipase A2 enzyme activity in herniated disc tissue could be significant in abnormal states such as sciatica and discogenic pain. No comparison between healthy disc tissue and samples of abnormal discs (degenerated or herniated) has been carried out. In particular, an identical assay for phospholipase A2 for such tissue samples, supported by immunohistochemical staining data, has never been applied in parallel to normal and abnormal disc tissue, and neither have such results been compared with the demonstration of inflammatory cells. METHODS: Group II phospholipase A2 enzyme activity was determined, in parallel, using an identical assay for tissue samples from 11 macroscopically normal discs, 33 disc herniations, and six discs showing degeneration by discography. For determination of phospholipase A2 enzyme activity, a radioassay using 1-palmitoyl-2-(1-14C)linoleoyl-L-3-phosphatidylethanolamine as the phospholipid substrate was used. Total tissue DNA as an estimate of total tissue cell number was measured in parallel with phospholipase A2 activity. All tissue samples also were studied by indirect immunocytochemistry, locating phospholipase A2 and T and B lymphocytes. RESULTS: Neither degenerated nor herniated disc tissue samples demonstrated a higher phospholipase A2 activity than control disc tissue samples. Average phospholipase A2 activity was actually higher in the control samples than in herniated disc samples (Mann-Whitney test, P < 0.001), possibly a result of a higher total DNA (P < 0.005). The observed level of phospholipase A2 activity was lower than that of inflammatory human synovial fluid. Neither was there marked immunoreactivity for phospholipase A2, which was observed in chondrocytes in areas of cartilage and occasional disc cells, supporting the biochemical results. Lymphocytes were more numerous only in herniated disc samples (15%), and their presence showed little overlap with phospholipase A2 immunoreactivity. CONCLUSIONS: Synovial-type (Group II) phospholipase A2 enzyme activity is not particularly high in disc tissue and does not appear to be higher in herniated or degenerated discs than control disc tissue. Immunoreactivity to phospholipase A2 is seen only occasionally and is strong only when cartilage tissue is present. Neither are inflammatory lymphocytes commonly observed.

Prospective outcome evaluation of spinal cord stimulation in patients with intractable leg pain.

STUDY DESIGN: The results of spinal cord stimulation were prospectively evaluated using both subjective patient self-report measures and objective physical functional testing. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate prospectively the effects of spinal cord stimulation implantation, performed with the patient awake and providing feedback, in patients with primary reports of intractable leg pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinal cord stimulation has been used for treating chronic pain of many types. However, even among those with intractable lower extremity pain, the outcome results have shown great variability. METHODS: The surgical procedure was performed with the patient awake and providing feedback to ensure optimal pain relief from the lead placement. The study group comprised 40 patients, ranging in age from 28 to 86 years. The average symptom duration was 65.4 months, and the average number of prior lumbar spine surgeries was 2.3 (range, 1 to 8). The primary data collection periods were preoperative, 6 weeks after, and 12 and 24 months after surgery. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvement in isometric lower extremity function was demonstrated 6 weeks after the spinal cord stimulation implantation. In the more painful leg, the performance increased from 457.5 ft-lb-sec to 629.8 ft-lb-sec (P < 0.01). The performance remained significantly improved at the 12- and 24-month follow-ups. Significant improvement was demonstrated on the physical scale of the Sickness Impact Profile at 6 weeks. At 24 months, all three scales (physical, psychological, and other) as well as the total score were significantly improved. Statistically significant decreases in pain, assessed by changes in visual analog scale scores, were noted in the legs, when walking, and in overall lifestyle. The use of narcotic medication decreased at all follow-up periods. At least 66% of the patients who were taking narcotics before spinal cord stimulation were taking reduced amounts or no narcotics 2 years later. At the time of the 24-month follow-up, at least 70% of patients reported that the procedure helped them, and would recommend it to someone with similar symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal cord stimulation implantation can result in improved physical function and decreased pain in patients who are carefully screened and in whom the implantation is performed with the patient awake to help ensure optimal pain-relieving lead placement.

The effect of sensory deprivation in the reduction of pain in patients with chronic low-back pain.

Patients who suffer from persistent pain for prolonged periods of time (6 months or more) are often influenced to an increasing extent by psychological factors. Patients begin to focus on their pain as the problem rather than its physical origin. This study evaluated the effectiveness of sensory deprivation in reducing pain in patients with chronic low-back pain. Sixty patients were divided into two groups of 30 patients each: One group underwent 1 hour of sensory deprivation; the other received a lecture on relaxation skills. In the group receiving sensory deprivation, statistically significant decreases in pain and stiffness were noted. Sensory deprivation is an effective treatment to reduce pain and thus interrupt the pain cycle in patients with chronic low-back pain.

Techniques for lumbar discography and computed tomography/discography in clinical practice.

The technique for lumbar discography is not well standardized. To better understand lumbar pathology, we have developed a consistent, reproducible, and relatively simple procedure for lumbar discography. We describe our technique and discuss variables that may differ among individual lumbar discography procedures.

Pain provocation and disc deterioration by age. A CT/discography study in a low-back pain population.

The computed tomography (CT)/discograms and discographic pain provocation reports of 291 clinical patients, 790 discs (mean age, 38; range, 17-79) were collected. The CT/discograms were classified separating anular disruption and degeneration and recording the pain provoked during discography as no pain, dissimilar, similar, or exact reproduction of the patient's clinical pain. Nondegenerated discs usually were found to be painless, and deteriorated discs painful. The proportion of severely degenerated but painless discs increased with age, as did the discs producing dissimilar pain. This may help explain the poor correlation of low-back pain with radiographic degenerative changes reported in previous epidemiologic studies.

Disc deterioration in low-back syndromes. A prospective, multi-center CT/discography study.

Disc deterioration and pain provocation in different low-back pain syndromes was studied using computed tomography (CT) discography. Data were prospectively collected for 300 patients (816 discs). Patients were classified by their pre-discography diagnosis of disc herniation (DH), degenerated disc (DD), lumbar syndrome (LS), lumbar radicular syndrome (LRS), or other. The CT/discograms were classified by discographic pain response, the amount of degeneration and annular disruption. Eighty-two percent of DH patients, 80% of DD, 56% of LS, and 59% of LRS patients had both positive discographic pain provocation and moderate or severe disc deterioration. The study indicates that intradiscal pathology plays a major role in nonspecific low-back pain syndromes.

Discitis after discography.

A series of nine patients with post-discography discitis were evaluated to help delineate the clinical course. The most consistent sign was the marked exacerbation of neck or back pain. This then was followed by an elevated sedimentation rate at an average of 20 days, followed by a positive bone scan at an average of 33 days. Of note is that seven patients initially had negative bone scans at an average of 18 days. Five out of nine patients had changes on plain roentgenograms between 14 and 51 days after discography. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in six patients; two of these patients were scanned twice. Three scans were negative and five were positive (2 patients initially had negative scans that later became positive). The course of lumbar discitis ranged from 8 to 11 weeks, and cervical discitis from 6 to 7 weeks, with the latter usually resulting in spontaneous fusion.

A comparison of CT/discography, pain response and radiographic disc height.

CT/discograms of 107 low-back patients were classified by annular degeneration, annular disruption, and pain response. These parameters were compared with the heights of the corresponding discs. Disc height correlated significantly with degenerative annular changes. Comparison of the painless and exact reproduction groups at the L5-S1 level showed a significant increase in exact pain reproduction in narrow discs compared with normal discs. Discs demonstrating slight degenerative changes were often painful but narrowing was detected only when degeneration increased to moderate or severe levels. Some severely degenerated discs were painless and only part of the severe group was narrow. Measuring disc height is a poor method for detecting early, painful degeneration changes.

Extraosseous spinal lesions mimicking disc disease.

To identify characteristics of patient presentation that would help distinguish extraosseous spinal tumors from the more common herniated disc, nine cases of intraspinal tumors were reviewed. These nine patients were identified in a group of 744 patients who presented with symptoms similar to disc herniation but failed to respond to conservative care and underwent spinal surgery. This study indicates that intraspinal tumor should be suspected in patients with the following characteristics: 1) painless neurological deficit; 2) night pain or pain which increases in the supine position; 3) pain disproportionate to that normally expected with lumbar disc disease; 4) no change in symptoms after successful surgery for herniated disc; 5) elevated spinal fluid protein; or 6) a teenager with symptoms of disc herniation. Myelography is an effective radiologic procedure for the diagnosis of spinal tumor but MRI should be equally effective if the procedure includes a scan of the conus as well as cauda equina.

Proplast reconstruction of iliac crest defects.

Proplast reconstruction of iliac crest defects resulting from bone grafts taken for anterior lumbar and cervical fusions is described. The procedure improves the cosmetic result, prevents postoperative muscle herniation and may decrease postoperative donor site pain. It is a simple procedure with low complication rate when performed in the manner described.

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

This is a report of 85 patients who underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) for treatment of painful disc disruption (PDD) or symptomatic pseudarthrosis. The fusion rate was 80% by disc. The pseudarthrosis rate increased from 16% at L5-S1 to 21% and 31% at L4-5 and L3-4, respectively. There was a significant increase in pseudarthrosis rate in patients who smoked more than one pack per day. There was no difference in the fusion rate whether autogenous or cadaveric iliac crest graft or dowel versus tricortical block graft was used. Sixty-eight percent of patients were "able to work" after ALIF. The complication rate was low and retrograde ejaculation occurred in only one patient.

The relationship of pain provocation to lumbar disc deterioration as seen by CT/discography.

The CT/discographic findings from 225 discs in 91 low-back pain patients were compared to the pain provocation during the injection of contrast into the disc. The radiographic appearance of disc deterioration demonstrating disc degeneration and annular disruption of each disc was classified separately using a fourpoint scale: normal, slight, moderate, or severe. Pain reaction to the discogram at each level was recorded as follows: no pain, dissimilar pain, similar pain, or exact reproduction of the patient's clinical pain. This more precise analysis demonstrated a significant relationship between pain and deterioration of discs. The CT/discogram presents an axial view of the disc that allows a subgrouping of disc deterioration that can discriminate between peripheral deterioration (degeneration) and internal deterioration (disruption). The disruption supposedly occurs earlier and is more likely to be the source of exact pain reproduction.

Dallas discogram description. A new classification of CT/discography in low-back disorders.

A new classification method for CT/discography was developed. The Dallas discogram description (DDD) related five separate categories of information. Degeneration and annular disruption were regarded as separate phenomena. Additionally, provoked pain response, contrast volume, and miscellaneous information were recorded. Discogram findings of 59 patients with low-back and/or leg pain were graded according to the new method and compared with standard methods using routine anteroposterior and lateral discographic images. Findings from routine discography and CT/discography were graded and correlated with myelographic and plain computerized axial tomography (CAT) scans. This study demonstrated that the contrast-enhanced axial view provided by CT/discography served as a useful projection for demonstrating disc pathology. CT/discography analyzed according to DDD offered a more sensitive discriminator of disc degeneration from annular disruption (disc protrusion/leaking). This evaluation can be recommended as the procedure of choice when revision of spine surgery is considered or when there is an equivocal or negative correlation between clinical information and myelography or CAT scan.

The role of osmic acid in the treatment of immune synovitis.

Thirty-seven New Zealand rabbits were observed for up to 1 year after their knee joints were instilled with 1 ml of 1% osmic acid. A selective destruction of synovial lining cells occurred with a concurrent synovitis, but lining cell regenerated by the eighth week. Nonprogressive abnormalities were also present in the cartilage. When an immune synovitis was induced in both knees of 16 rabbits, the osmic acid treated joint demonstrated a significantly greater synovitis and progressive aberrations compared to the untreated knee.