RESUMO
Understanding the underlying causes of congenital anomalies (CAs) can be a complex diagnostic journey. We aimed to assess the efficiency of exome sequencing (ES) and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in patients with CAs among a population with a high fraction of consanguineous marriage. Depending on the patient's symptoms and family history, karyotype/Quantitative Fluorescence- Polymerase Chain Reaction (QF-PCR) (n = 84), CMA (n = 81), ES (n = 79) or combined CMA and ES (n = 24) were performed on 168 probands (66 prenatal and 102 postnatal) with CAs. Twelve (14.28%) probands were diagnosed by karyotype/QF-PCR and seven (8.64%) others were diagnosed by CMA. ES findings were conclusive in 39 (49.36%) families, and 61.90% of them were novel variants. Also, 64.28% of these variants were identified in genes that follow recessive inheritance in CAs. The diagnostic rate (DR) of ES was significantly higher than that of CMA in children from consanguineous families (P = 0·0001). The highest DR by CMA was obtained in the non-consanguineous postnatal subgroup and by ES in the consanguineous prenatal subgroup. In a population that is highly consanguineous, our results suggest that ES may have a higher diagnostic yield than CMA and should be considered as the first-tier test in the evaluation of patients with congenital anomalies.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is a severe pulmonary disease predominantly affects preterm newborns. Polymorphisms of surfactant-protein genes have been mostly evaluated as the candidate contributors in genetics of RDS. However the results are divers in different studies. We aimed at investigating the association of surfactant protein B (SPB) gene 9306 A/G polymorphism (rs7316) with RDS development. METHOD: Three hundred and eighty newborns with gestational age of less than 34 weeks were included in a multicenter case-control study. Respiratory distress (RD) was scored according to Downes' scoring system. Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method was used for genotyping. RESULT: One hundred and eighty-four neonates showed RDS and 196 did not. Gestational age (GA) was significantly lower in the RDS group compared with the controls. AA genotype and A allele were found more frequently in the RDS group than the controls (96.2% versus 63.8% and 98.1% versus 80.6%, respectively) (p =.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of association of SFTPB rs7316 polymorphism with RDS development in Iranian newborns. The current study suggests that GA <28-weeks is the most important factor in predisposition to RDS. Genetic background in terms of SP-B gene might be involved in predisposition to RDS in premature neonates.
