[Diagnostics and treatment of suicidality; a matter of customization]. / Diagnostiek en behandeling van suïcidaliteit; een kwestie van maatwerk.

This article illustrates the importance of conducting a comprehensive analysis of suicidality through the case study of an adolescent patient dealing with both depressive disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder. The aim of treating suicidality is to address the underlying psychiatric conditions and factors contributing to the disorder. This necessitates a thorough evaluation of the treatment environment, the establishment of continuous care, and ensuring safety. By utilizing a new model to distinguish various forms of suicidal behavior and examining suicidality as a distinct phenomenon, it becomes possible to create individualized diagnostic and treatment approaches, along with effective risk assessments. In the presented patient, intrusive thoughts significantly impacted her suicidality. The treatment approach for patient A involved employing eye movement dual task (EMDT), exposure therapy and strategies to enhance autonomy. This approach aims to reduce suicidality, facilitate recovery, and alleviate the fear of losing control.

[The best intervention for depression is early detection and prevention in youth]. / De beste behandeling voor depressie is vroegsignalering en preventie bij jeugdigen.

Background A more preventive and proactive approach in youth mental health care can contribute to reduce the severity of psychological problems in young people and help to reduce the risk on treatment resistance. Aim To show opportunities to organize youth mental health care more proactively. Method Discuss new approaches based on existing literature and examples from clinical practice. Results It is essential that young people receive treatment that is appropriate for the severity of their problems. Early detection and prevention can be systematically carried out in collaboration with public health service and schools. In addition, it is imperative that young people receive appropriate (specialized) mental health care based on their prognosis. Conclusion Committing to the right care at the right time is essential to prevent the development of co-morbidities, stagnation in development tasks and therapy resistance. Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie 63(2021)2, 111-114.

[The validity of acute assessments of psychiatric conditions made by psychiatric emergency staff]. / De validiteit van acute inschattingen van toestandsbeelden door ggz-crisisdienstmedewerkers.

BACKGROUND: Earlier research carried out by the outreach psychiatric emergency team in the region of Uden / Veghel in the Netherlands indicated that the preliminary diagnosis of patients in crisis was associated with aggressive behaviour during the later contact between the patient and the staff of the psychiatric emergency team. An accurate diagnosis by the staff of the psychiatric emergency team is important because it should guide the patient towards the right type of treatment by the most appropriate team. The staff of the psychiatric emergency service who make the initial diagnosis are pressed for time and have only limited information.
AIM: To find out what differences there are between the crisis team's initial diagnosis of the psychiatric condition of the patient in crisis and the later diagnosis made after more extensive psychiatric tests are carried out following the regular intake procedure.
METHOD: Our study was based om 129 patients who, in the period of 2009 and 2010, were not known to mental health service and had not had any previous contact with the psychiatric emergency service. The first assessment of a patient's psychiatric condition made by a member of the psychiatric emergency service was compared with the later diagnosis made by a professional psychiatrist after the regular intake procedure. We then investigated the degree of agreement between the two diagnoses using Cohen's kappa so that we could test the validity of the initial screening of the patient's condition.
RESULTS: We found that the staff of the psychiatric emergency team was able to achieve a result that was better than could be expected on the basis of chance. The Cohen's kappas varied between 0.81 for psychotic disorders to 0.31 for borderline personality disorders. Borderline personality disorders, however, tended to be overestimated by the psychiatric emergency staff.
CONCLUSION: Although there was only limited agreement regarding various conditions, it is encouraging that the psychiatric emergency staff were able to assess psychotic disorders accurately on the basis of the initial information they had received. This result is important because in other studies psychotic symptoms were found to be associated with a higher likelihood of aggression during the later outreach consultation.

[Leisure-time activity for patients with a psychotic disorder: audiobooks as a useful alternative to reading]. / Vrijetijdsbesteding voor patiënten met een psychotische stoornis: haalbaarheidsstudie naar gebruik van audioboeken.

BACKGROUND: Psychotic disorders are frequently associated with reduced concentration. As a result, reading often becomes impossible for patients with a psychotic disorder. AIM: To ascertain whether audiobooks can take the place of reading as a leisure activity for patients with a psychotic disorder. METHOD: In a feasibility study we investigated whether patients suffering from a psychotic disorder found listening to audiobooks an enjoyable alternative to reading. RESULTS: Fifteen out of 20 participants found listening to audiobooks to be a positive experience. CONCLUSION: When reading becomes impossible for patients with a psychotic disorder, audiobooks could be a useful alternative.

[Assessing aggressive behaviour at the psychiatric emergency service with a checklist: a replication study]. / Inschatten van agressie tijdens contacten met de ggz-crisisdienst met een checklist: een replicatiestudie.

BACKGROUND: In an earlier study it was found that aggressive behaviour by patients treated by the psychiatric emergency service could be predicted by the use of a newly developed instrument, the Checklist of Risks/ Crisis team (CRC). In this earlier study it was suggested that a replication study, with a larger database, was definitely needed in order to check these findings. AIM: To find out in what circumstances patients (aggressive or non-aggressive) make contact with the crisis team and to ascertain the predictive validity of the CRC. METHODS: During a period of four years (from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2009) staff members completed the CRC before paying outreach visits to patients experiencing psychiatric crises in the community. In addition, if patients showed any aggressive behaviour during the visit, this was documented by means of the Staff Observation Aggression Scale-Revised (SOAS-r). RESULTS: Our study replicated the earlier finding that the structured clinical risk assessment made on a visual analogue scale (VAS) of the CRC, together with the additional item about whether there were any potentially dangerous persons in the vicinity of the patient, seem to be useful "predictors" of aggression in the future (with correct classification in respectively 91 and 92%). CONCLUSION: The class CRC, detailed monitoring of aggressive incidents by means of the SOAS-r, and the weekly discussions about these incidents all seem to be good instruments for analysing incidents and for increasing the safety of staff members. The methods and techniques introduced at the beginning of the project have gone hand in hand with the reduction in the number of aggressive acts directed at members of the psychiatric emergency service.