Effect of single follow-up home visit on readmission in a group of frail elderly patients - a Danish randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Unplanned hospital admissions are costly and prevention of these has been a focus for research for decades. With this study we aimed to determine whether discharge planning including a single follow-up home visit reduces readmission rate. The intervention is not representing a new method but contributes to the evidence concerning intensity of the intervention in this patient group. METHODS: This study was a centrally randomized single-center controlled trial comparing intervention to usual care with investigator-blinded outcome assessment. Patients above the age of 65 were discharged from a single Danish hospital during 2013-2014 serving a rural and low socioeconomic area. For intervention patients study and department nurses reviewed discharge planning the day before discharge. On the day of discharge, study nurses accompanied the patient to their home, where they met with the municipal nurse. Together with the patient they reviewed cognitive skills, medicine, nutrition, mobility, functional status, and future appointments in the health care sector and intervened if appropriate. Readmission at any hospital in Denmark within 8, 30, and 180 days after discharge is reported. Secondary outcomes were time to first readmission, number of readmissions, length of stay, and readmission with Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions, visits to general practitioners, municipal services, and mortality. RESULTS: One thousand forty-nine patients aged > 65 years discharged from medical, geriatric, emergency, surgical or orthopedic departments met inclusion criteria characteristic of frailty, e.g. low functional status, need of more personal help and multiple medications. Among 945 eligible patients, 544 were randomized. Seven patients died before discharge. 56% in the intervention group and 54% in the control group were readmitted (p = 0.71) and 23% from the intervention group and 22% from the control group died within 180 days. There were no significant differences between intervention and control groups concerning other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: There was no effect of a single follow-up home visit on readmission in a group of frail elderly patients discharged from hospital. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT02318680), retrospectively registered December 11, 2014.

[Potentially preventable deaths in a medium sized community hospital]. / Potentielt forebyggelige dødsfald på et mellemstort centralsygehus.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to estimate the occurrence and causes of potentially preventable deaths at a medium sized community hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of a consecutive series of records of 48 deceased patients (age 58-98 years, median 81 years, 40% males) was conducted by four observers, followed by a consensus conference in which the deaths were classified as potentially preventable according to a checklist, focusing on the occurrence of adverse events or failure to comply with evidence-based procedures. RESULTS: 10 of the 48 deaths were considered potentially preventable; in two cases the potential was considered significant, but the age and underlying diseases of the patients suggest that the potential number of saved life years is modest. The main reasons for preventability were unintended delays, ineffective treatment plans, and lack of reactions to new and important diagnostic information. CONCLUSION: The review of the deaths revealed a considerable number of potentially preventable cases. Furthermore, a number of suggestions for improvement were identified: (1) early identification and aggressive treatment of impending sepsis; (2) employment of routines to ensure that new diagnostic information is reviewed and acted upon and (3) systematic updating of competences in all staff members.

[Appropriate use of hospital days in medical wards]. / Hensigtsmaessig anvendelse af sengedage på medicinske afdelinger.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the incidence of inappropriate use of bed days in Danish medical wards using the European Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP). Several European countries have used the AEP to assess the appropriateness of hospitalisation days. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was carried out in four Danish medical wards from October 2004 to January 2005. On pre-selected days a doctor and nurse performed case record analyses of all hospitalised patients with registration of the AEP criteria. To assess activities during the entire day, the screening comprised activities from the previous day. RESULTS: Altogether, 738 patients were reviewed. On average, 32.1% of hospitalisation days on the four wards were assessed as inappropriate (range 19.2-39.2%). Lack of alternative facilities (different outpatient services, rehabilitation, home nursing, etc.) and internal waiting time for diagnostic tests were the most common causes of inappropriate bed use. 6.4% of bed days were considered appropriate from a clinical point of view even though no AEP criteria were met. CONCLUSION: In order to reduce the number of inappropriate hospital days, it is necessary to optimise the cooperation with the primary health care sector and ensure immediate availability of diagnostic tests.

[Measurement of lung function in patients admitted to hospital with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma]. / Måling af lungefunktion hos patienter indlagt med akut forvaerring af kronisk obstruktiv lungesygdom eller astma.

INTRODUCTION: Acute exacerbation of COPD or asthma leads to many acute hospital admissions every year. Even though the pathogenesis of these diseases differs, in both cases the cardinal manifestation is increased airway obstruction, which can be measured using peak expiratory flow measurement (PEF) or measurement of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this paper we report on findings from the third examination of the project "The Good Medical Department", in which we investigated the prevalence of PEF and FEV1 measurements in patients admitted acutely because of exacerbation of asthma or COPD. RESULTS: In all, 581 patients were admitted for COPD and 16 due to asthma. Only 104 COPD patients (17.9%) had either PEF or FEV1 measured during hospital admission, whereas the corresponding figure for asthma was 6 (37.5%). The measurements were performed more often if the admission was in a pulmonary ward as compared to a nonpulmonary ward: 11.5% versus 7.9% (ns) for PEF and 27.7% versus 12% (p<0.01) for FEV1. DISCUSSION: We conclude that measurements of PEF and FEV1 among patients with acute dyspnea and exacerbation of asthma and COPD are used too seldom in Danish hospitals.

[Patient-experienced quality assessed in two national surveys]. / Patientoplevet kvalitet belyst ved to nationale undersøgelser.

INTRODUCTION: Surveys of patients' experiences can be used for other purposes than to disclose patients' overall satisfaction. They can, for example, also be used to select focus areas in the health care sector. In this article two large national surveys of patient-experienced quality are compared. The advantages and disadvantages of the applied methods and various applications of the surveys are discussed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Danish National Patient Satisfaction Survey was based on a questionnaire with questions about patients' experiences. The questionnaires were sent to the patients after discharge. All 62 public Danish hospitals were included. The Patient Reports Survey was based on a questionnaire with questions about whether the patient had received certain services. The questionnaire was given to each patient on the day of discharge and returned before the patient left the hospital. All medical wards were invited to participate in the survey. RESULTS: Despite differences in questions, design and methods, the two surveys showed agreement in the areas where patients experienced flaws in the quality of services. CONCLUSION: In future surveys the advantages and disadvantages of data feedback, inclusion on the basis of data registers, sample sizes and the possibility of being supplied with ward-specific data should be taken into consideration. The advantages and disadvantages of involving employees should be counterbalanced in each survey. The Danish National Patient Satisfaction Survey is suitable for external evaluation and benchmarking between hospitals, while the applied methods in the Patient Reports Survey are best suited to internal self-evaluation and quality improvement within hospital departments.

[Structured documentation of patients' medical records. A new record structure for emergency admissions is coming]. / Synlig struktureret planlaegning i patientjournalen. En ny journalstruktur for akutte indlaeggelsesforlob pa vej.

INTRODUCTION: In recent years a range of efforts to shorten the length of stay (LOS) for patients admitted to hospitals has been tested. Some studies indicate that this might be accomplished by rigorous planning of patient pathways and structured documentation of medical records. In this study the effect of a structured case record model was tested. METHODS: The new record structure was developed using predefined requirements for content, placement and presentation of documentation. Instruction of staff was followed by a switch to the new model from one day to the next. Collection of data was carried out three months before and five to eight months after implementation of the model. RESULTS: The department succeeded in including well over 50% of all includable patients. However, the analysis encompassed all includable patients (''intention to treat'' principle). The number of cases analysed was 340 before and 353 after implementation of the model. Average LOS was reduced by 1.1 day from before implementation to after implementation. This was not statistically significant. However, the model was subsequently kept in use by the department. DISCUSSION: This pilot study shows a non-significant tendency to shotening of LOS by using a structured case record model. It is important to pay attention to the practical difficulties of implementing new documentation tools.

Repeated measurements of generic indicators: a Danish national program to benchmark and improve quality of care.

OBJECTIVE: To measure performance on the basis of generic (non-diagnoses related) standards of care developed in a national Danish quality improvement programme in departments of internal medicine, and to determine the power of repetitive national audits to increase levels of performance. DESIGN: Multifaceted intervention: national audits in 2001 and 2002 based on the standards of the program, combined with direct contact with heads of departments and a national conference to discuss audit results. SETTING: Seventy-nine and 82 wards in 2001 and 2002, respectively, covering 71% of Danish hospitals receiving medical emergencies. The wards participated on a voluntary basis. PARTICIPANTS: In the first audit round, 3950 patients were admitted as emergencies, while 4068 patients were admitted as emergencies in the second audit. Patients were included without reference to diagnoses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correct initial diagnostic assessment, early interdisciplinary action plans, correct drug prescriptions, waiting times for examinations, documented patient information, readmissions, and content and processing time for discharge letters. RESULTS: For the 70 wards participating in both rounds, the general level of performance improved significantly between the two audits: the proportion of patients with correct initial diagnostic assessment increased from 75.9% to 79.4%, the proportion of patients with correct drug prescriptions increased from 83.8% to 85.9%, and the proportion of sufficiently informed patients increased from 32.4% to 36.2% (P < 0.05). The proportion of medical records containing action plans for selected clinical problems (nutritional and functional problems, fever, and treatment of pain) increased from 72.8% to 75.9% (P < 0.05). Length of stay in hospital was significantly related to a correct initial assessment and to waiting time for examinations. Wards with a common medication chart for physicians and nurses had significantly more correct drug prescriptions than wards that did not use a medication chart. Fifty-four (75%) of the participating departments indicated that the result of the first audit round had led to organizational changes in the department. CONCLUSION: Professional self-regulation guided by a multidisciplinary audit tool developed in cooperation with professionals can improve quality of care. It is possible to conduct and repeat a national audit on a voluntary basis.