Etoposide and carbo-or cisplatin combination therapy in refractory or relapsed Ewing sarcoma: a large retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with Ewing sarcoma (EWS) who develop refractory or relapsed disease have limited treatment options. In some sarcoma centres in Europe the combination of etoposide with carbo- or cisplatin is being used for these patients, however, there are no published data available yet. Here we investigated the outcome of the combination treatment for patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma in progression after standard treatment. PROCEDURE: All patients diagnosed with EWS between 1980 and 2012 in one of six major sarcoma centres in Europe and treated with either carboplatin and etoposide or cisplatin and etoposide were included and data were retrospectively collected for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients enrolled in this study of which 61 received the combination of etoposide and carboplatin and 46 received etoposide and cisplatin. The median overall survival (OS) was 23 months for both patient groups and the 5-year OS was 24.5% for the patients who received carboplatin and etoposide and 20% for those who received cisplatin and etoposide. The progression free survival was better in patients treated with the combination of carboplatin and etoposide (14.5 vs. 6.3 months P = 0.023). CONCLUSION: This is a retrospective study on the combination treatment of etoposide and carbo- or cisplatin in refractory Ewing sarcoma. The results justify exploring the combination in a prospective study with relapsed patients.

The value of high-dose chemotherapy in patients with first relapsed Ewing sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Prognosis of patients with relapsed Ewing sarcoma (ES) is poor. The 5-year overall survival (OS) is 13%. We analyzed high-dose chemotherapy (HDtx) versus conventional chemotherapy (CHtx) in patients with relapsed ES. PROCEDURE: Data from 239 patients with first relapse, registered during 2000-2011 in the ES relapse registry of the Cooperative Ewing Sarcoma Study Group (CESS) were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 239 patients, 200 received various non-HDtx second-line CHtx regimens. Seventy-three patients had additional HDtx followed by autologous stem cell rescue. The 2-year event-free survival (EFS) was 10% (SE = 0.02) in patients treated without HDtx and 45% (SE = 0.09) in patients treated with HDtx. In a second step, we focused on those patients who achieved complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) after four to six cycles of conventional second-line CHtx. Here, the 2-year EFS was 31% (SE = 0.08) without additional HDtx and 44% (SE = 0.09) with additional HDtx. In addition, multivariate regression analysis indicates absence of HDtx treatment, with a Hazard ratio (HR) of 2.90 (95% CI 1.41-6.0), and early relapse, with a HR of 4.76 (95% CI 2.31-9.78), as independent prognostic factors for EFS. CONCLUSION: Additional HDtx may contribute to further reduce the risk of further events in patients who respond to conventional second-line CHtx.