The reliability of adductor tubercle as an anatomical landmark for joint line restoration in revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Joint line (JL) restoration is one of the major challenges in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). There is debate regarding the most reliable methodology for the assessment of JL level during revision surgery. Among the strategies, the use of adductor tubercle (AT) as an anatomical landmark has been proposed. The purpose of this paper is to systematically review the available literature to understand the reliability of AT ratio to identify the JL, and the advantages and drawbacks of its application. A research was performed on the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases based on the following inclusion criteria for articles' selection: (I) clinical reports of any level of evidence, (II) written in the English language, (III) published from 2010 to 2020, (IV) dealing with the use of the adductor tubercle as a landmark to restore JL in revision TKA. All relevant data were extracted by two independent investigators, and discrepancies were resolved by discussion and consensus. A total of 13 studies were included: nine were radiographic evaluations, 3 clinical reports and 1 was an ex-vivo study. Radiographic studies highlighted that AT is a landmark easy to identify, with high intra and inter-observer agreement, irrespective of gender, age and size of the patient. The comparison with other bony landmarks revealed superior reliability in favor of AT. Also during surgical procedures, AT can be safely located and some clinical studies confirmed that AT ratio helps surgeon in re-establishing a correct JL and achieve ligament balancing even in complex revision cases. AT is a reliable and easily detectable landmark, and AT ratio is a valid tool to determine the JL level and help surgeons to restore the JL and simultaneously achieve knee ligament balancing in r-TKA.

In vitro validation of a novel inertial-based cutting guide for tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Correct component alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is crucial for implant functionality and longevity. Several devices have been developed to help surgeons to achieve optimal component positioning. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of a novel inertial-based cutting guide used to perform tibial resection in TKA taking into account users with different levels of experience. METHODS: Seven operators (raters) with different levels of experience participated in the study. To evaluate the accuracy, the varus/valgus (VV) and slope (SL) angles obtained with this novel device were compared with the reference angles obtained with the navigation system. To calculate intra-(rater) reliability repeated measurements of VV and SL angles by the same operator were used. To calculate inter-(rater) reliability repeated measurements of VV and SL by different operators were used. RESULTS: A total of 140 acquisitions were performed. In this study both for the VV and for the SL the maximum mean absolute error (MAE) that the inertial system registered was <1°. Intra-inter reliability was evaluated by calculating the Fleiss' Kappa coefficient, which recorded values close to 0.75 (75%) with regard to the VV and the SL for intra-reliability, while values were recorded around 0.9 (90%) for the inter subject reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The Perseus system is accurate, reliable and surgeon-friendly and could be very useful in improving results in low-volume centers.

Early Failure in Medial Unicondylar Arthroplasty: Radiographic Analysis on the Importance of Joint Line Restoration.

Survivorship of unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) remains a drawback, especially compared with the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. This could be improved by identifying and correcting failure mechanisms. To this purpose, this study aimed at exploring failure modalities of UKA, with particular focus on the role of joint line (JL) position and alignment as variable to be optimized for a successful outcome. This study explored modes of failure in 266 medial UKAs. Radiological comparison was performed between 24 failures and 24 matched controls, to determine the importance of UKA positioning in terms of femorotibial angle (FTA), tibial plateau angle, and posterior tibial slope (PTS). Radiographic comparative analysis showed statistically significant differences in the failure group compared with the control group in terms of variation in FTA (p = 0.0222), PTS (p = 0.0025), and JL height (p = 0.0022). Variations not only in FTA but also PTS and JL height were correlated with failures observed in this series. Thus, based on the results of this study, it emerges that JL position should be carefully controlled in all planes while implanting a UKA. This is a Level III, case-control study.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients over 75 years: a definitive solution?

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to perform a mid-long-term clinical and radiographic evaluation of the results obtained in patients older than 75 years treated with minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The hypothesis was that UKA is a viable solution for the definitive treatment of localized disease in this age group, with good results and a low failure rate. METHODS: An all-poly tibial component UKA was applied with a minimally invasive technique. Sixty-seven knees in patients with a minimum age of 75 years were evaluated at mean 9 years' follow-up. The Oxford knee score, Knee Society Score, WOMAC score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain self-assessment and range of motion (ROM) were determined, as well as weight-bearing antero-posterior and laterolateral radiographs. RESULTS: All clinical scores, as well as VAS and ROM, improved significantly at 9-year follow-up, and the outcome was considered good or excellent in 92.6% of the patients. Radiographic results showed that both tibial plateau angle and posterior tibial slope angles were maintained, whereas femoro-tibial angle was significantly changed at follow-up. Further analysis showed no significant correlation between clinical scores and body mass index, whereas the clinical outcome was correlated with the ROM obtained. Only two failures and one major post-operative complication were observed. CONCLUSIONS: UKA is a viable option for treating unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. With the proper indications and an accurate technique UKA may be indicated also in very elderly patients with reduced complications and morbidity, and excellent survivorship.

Good survivorship of all-polyethylene tibial component UKA at long-term follow-up.

PURPOSES: To determine the long-term survival rate of an all-polyethylene tibial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in a large series of consecutive patients and to investigate the possible factors that could influence the outcome. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of 273 patients at 6-13 years of follow-up was performed. Clinical evaluation was based on KSS and WOMAC scores. Subjective evaluation was based on a visual analogue scale for pain self-assessment. Radiographic evaluation was performed to assess femoral-tibial angle (FTA), posterior tibial slope (PTS) and tibial plateau angle (TPA). A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed assuming revision for any reason as primary endpoint. RESULTS: The 10-year implant survivorship was 87.6%. Twenty-five revisions (9.2%) were performed, and aseptic loosening of the tibial component was the most common failure mode (11 cases, 4%). The comparison of survival rate according to age at surgery did not show significant difference. Age at surgery, FTA, TPA and PTS were not related to higher risk of revision. No correlations were found between BMI, age at surgery and clinical scores. Finally, no statistical differences of radiographic measurements were found between revisions and non-revisions. CONCLUSIONS: The present study has demonstrated on a large series of patients that UKA with an all-polyethylene tibial component, with an accurate technique and a proper patient selection, can provide a satisfactory clinical and functional outcome and a good overall survivorship of the implant at long-term follow-up. These advantages could be achieved at a lower cost. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective Therapeutic Study, Level IV.

The adductor tubercle: an important landmark to determine the joint line level in revision total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The restoration of the physiological femoro-tibial joint line (JL) is important to obtain a good outcome in revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA). However, its assessment is challenging. The ratio of the distance between the adductor tubercle (AT) JL (ATJL) and the trans-epicondylar femoral width (FW) was proposed as a reliable method. The purpose of this study was to check whether this ratio is a reliable tool to restore the prosthetic JL height in challenging prosthetic revision cases. METHODS: Twenty-one patients (mean age 65.8 years) were recruited. During surgery, FW was measured and ATJL distance was calculated using 0.53 (SD 0.03) as the ratio. After implant positioning, the obtained ATJL line was measured to verify the accuracy of the surgical procedure. Thirteen patients presented a healthy contralateral knee: a comparative radiograph examination was performed to verify the appropriateness of the restored JL height. RESULTS: The intra-operatively calculated ATJL was not significantly different with respect to the measured ATJL obtained after prosthetic component implantation. The comparative analysis between the restored JL and the JL of the contralateral not operated knee was also not statistically significant, thus confirming the appropriateness of the restored JL height. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the method which uses an AT to JL distance/FW ratio to determine the JL level, previously applied in primary TKA, is valid when using intra-operatively acquired measurements in RTKA. This is clinically relevant since it represents a reliable tool which helps surgeons to restore the JL level in challenging prosthetic revision cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, Level IV.

Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis: an effective tool to predict implant survival after an all-poly unicompartmental knee arthroplasty-a 10 year follow-up study.

PURPOSE: The main purpose of the present study was to determine long-term implant fixation of 15 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKAs) with an all-poly tibial component using Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) at a mean 10-year follow-up. The secondary purpose was to investigate whether the progressive loss of implant's fixation correlates with a reduction in Knee society score (KSS). METHODS: Fifteen non-consecutive patients with primary knee osteoarthritis received a UKA with an all-poly tibial component were assessed using KSS scores pre-operatively and post-operatively and RSA on day 2 after surgery, then at 3, 6, and 12 months and yearly thereafter. The mean last follow-up was 10 years. RESULTS: An increase in maximum total point motion (MTPM) values from 6 months to 1 year post-operatively was found respect to post-operative reference. Implants' displacement values were always <2 mm during the first 6 months, and then, two different trends were noticed in revised and non-revised implants. MTPM increase between 1 and 2 years of follow-up in non-revised UKAs was always <0.2 mm, whereas it was >0.2 mm in revised UKAs. A linear and negative correlation with statistical significance was found between MTPM and both clinical and functional KSS scores (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Also in a long-term follow-up evaluation, RSA is an effective tool to predict functional results after an all-poly UKA providing also a relevant predictive value at 1 year follow-up, and this can be very useful for both patients and surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic studies, Level III.

Deep-dished highly congruent tibial insert in CR-TKA does not prevent patellar tendon angle increase and patellar anterior translation.

PURPOSE: Starting from the hypothesis that a deep-dished highly congruent tibial insert in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty would prevent the increase in patellar tendon angle and anterior patellar translation by reducing the paradoxical anterior femoral translation, the main purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of this prosthesis design, and secondary to assess the clinical outcomes at 6-month follow-up. METHODS: Twenty patients treated with cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty with navigation technique were enrolled and prospectively followed up at 6 months. The median value of age was 71 years (57-83). Before and after surgery, the following parameters were calculated: patellar tendon angle, anterior-posterior and medio-lateral patellar translation, patellar height and range of motion. All patients were assessed with the SF-36 Physical Functioning and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score ADL scores. RESULTS: Patellar tendon angle and anterior patellar translation significantly increased in post-operative conditions (p < 0.0001); a statistically significant medial patellar translation was found (p < 0.0001), while patellar height did not show any difference between pre- and post-operative conditions (n.s). A significant correlation was found between patellar tendon angle and anterior patellar translation and the clinical scores (p < 0.0417). There was a significant post-operative decrease (p < 0.0033) in the range of motion. CONCLUSIONS: The present study failed to demonstrate that deep-dished highly congruent tibial insert prevents the anterior translation of the patella in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty, thus causing inferior clinical scores. It provided useful information about the biomechanical role of the patella in total knee arthroplasty, allowing to choose the most appropriate surgical approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, Level IV.

Minimum thickness of all-poly tibial component unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years does not increase revision rate for aseptic loosening.

PURPOSE: Management of unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis in middle-aged patients is a challenging problem. Despite its functional advantages, UKA still raises questions concerning implant survivorship and an increased revision risk for aseptic loosening mainly due to polyethylene wear. The main purpose of the present study was to investigate whether using the minimum thickness of an all-poly tibial UKA in patients under 60 years of age increases the revision rate for aseptic loosening. The secondary purposes were to compare implant survivorship with data reported in literature and to prospectively evaluate the clinical outcome in this selected group of patients. METHODS: Thirty-three consecutive patients under 60 years of age at the time of surgery with isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis underwent a unilateral medial UKA from 2002 to 2005 and were prospectively followed. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine the 8-year implant survivorship with revision for any reason as endpoint. KSS, WOMAC, Tegner-Lysholm, Tegner and VAS scores were prospectively evaluated at 3- to 8-year follow-up. Weight-bearing radiographs were collected pre-operatively and at 3- to 8-year follow-up to prospectively evaluate hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), femoro-tibial angle (FTA), tibial plateau angle and posterior tibial slope. RESULTS: The 8-year Kaplan-Meier survivorship with revision for any reason as endpoint was 83 %. Five failures were reported, and in 3 patients' aseptic loosening of the tibial component was the reason for failure. All clinical scores significantly improved at 3-year follow-up, and no further modification was demonstrated up to 8-year follow-up. HKA, FTA and TPA had a significant difference at 3-year follow-up with respect to pre-operative values (p < 0.01) and no further difference at 8-year follow-up was found. CONCLUSIONS: The present study failed to demonstrate an increased revision rate for aseptic loosening of the implant in patients under 60 years of age, who received an all-poly tibial component UKA using the minimum thickness of the implant in all cases.

The adductor tubercle: a reliable landmark for analysing the level of the femorotibial joint line.

PURPOSE: The ratio of femoral width and distance from medial epicondyle to joint line helps estimate the femoral joint line position from femoral width. The approximately radial position of the medial epicondyle on femoral condyle spheres is probably responsible for this relationship, The adductor tubercle approximately lies diametrically opposite to the joint line on condylar sphere. Then, a linear correlation could also exist between the femoral width and distance of adductor tubercle to joint line and is the purpose of the current study. METHODS: Femoral width, along with the distance to joint line from the medial epicondyle, the adductor tubercle and fibular pole, was measured on 110 standard antero-posterior knee radiographs. Correlation between femoral width and these measurements was evaluated. The individual ratio of FW with adductor tubercle joint line, medial epicondyle joint line and fibula joint line was calculated using linear regression analysis. Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability was assessed. RESULTS: Linear correlation was found between femoral width and distance of adductor tubercle to joint line (r = 0.83). It was more reliable than the correlation between femoral width and distance from medial epicondyle to joint line (r = 0.52). Inter-observer repeatability was better for distance from adductor tubercle to joint line than for distance from medial epicondyle to joint line. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that adductor tubercle can be used as a morphologic landmark to determine the knee joint line position, because a linear correlation between femoral width and distance from the adductor tubercle to the joint line was found.

Arthrodesis After Infected Revision TKA: Retrospective Comparison of Intramedullary Nailing and External Fixation.

BACKGROUND: Infection after revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for previous septic TKA can be a challenging problem to treat due to loss of bone stock and soft tissue integrity. In these cases, arthrodesis is a well-recognized salvage procedure. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the results as described by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Lequesne Algofunctional Score (LAS) of knee arthrodeses performed by using either an external fixator (EF) or an intramedullary nail (IM). METHODS: The study included 34 knee arthrodesis divided in two groups: first group included 12 patients treated with EF and the second group of 22 patients dealt with IM nail. Clinical and functional evaluation was performed using the VAS and the LAS. Full-length radiographs were used to verify limb length discrepancy. RESULTS: VAS and LAS results showed a substantial improvement relative to preoperative condition in both groups. However, the LAS was significantly better in the IM nail group. The mean leg length discrepancy was significantly greater (4.5 cm) in the first group than in the second one (0.8 cm). No recurrence of infection was observed in the EF group while there were three recurrent infections in the IM nail group. CONCLUSION: Our study supported the existing literature and found that reinfection after revision TKA can be effectively treated with arthrodesis. In presence of massive bone loss, we recommend arthrodesis with IM nail used as an endoprosthesis, without bone-on-bone fusion, to produce a stable and painless knee, while preserving the limb length. Use of an IM nail allowed us to get a better functional result than EF.