RESUMO
Background: The AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) introduced a new trochanteric fracture classification in January 2018, concerning the lateral wall integrity. It suggested the intramedullary nail fixation in patients with an incompetent lateral wall fracture. Objective: To determine the reliability of lateral wall-thickness measurement and the fracture parameters associated with lateral wall integrity. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated patients with an intertrochanteric fracture who had had surgery in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital between January 2014 and January 2019. The lateral wall was measured by anteroposterior plain radiography by four raters, two times each. The demographic data and fracture parameters were assessed and compared with respect to lateral wall integrity. Result: In a total of 236 femurs and 232 patients having the 2018 AO/OTA-specified 31A1 and 31A2 intertrochanteric fractures, the lateral wall-thickness measurement showed excellent inter-rater reliability at 0.944 (0.927-0.957) and good-to-excellent intra-rater reliability ranging from 0.835 to 0.972. The parameters associated with lateral wall incompetence as per the multivariate logistic regression analysis were fracture angle (odds ratio [OR] = 0.95), distal greater trochanter involvement (OR = 9.47), and fragments at the intertrochanter area (OR = 4.49) and at the lesser trochanter (OR = 2.6). Conclusion: Some of the parameters related to trochanteric fractures are associated with lateral wall incompetence. Lateral wall-thickness measurement is a reproducible method, which has been suggested for use by the AO/OTA 2018 classification. It is easy to use and can help select the appropriate treatment for intertrochanteric fracture patients.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The prepsoas lateral approach for spinal fusion, oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF), is considered one of the minimally invasive spinal fusion methods and is gaining popularity due to improved outcomes with copious supporting evidence. To date, no publication has studied the various positions of the left hip in actual patients which might affect the retroperitoneal oblique corridor (ROC). The study aimed to find the relevancy of the left hip position and the size of ROC. METHODS: We recruited 40 consecutive patients who needed diagnostic MRI from the out-patient clinic. MRI scan from L2 to L5 was performed in the supine, right lateral decubitus with hip flexion, and right lateral decubitus with hip in a neutral position. The retroperitoneal oblique corridor (ROC) was measured at the intervertebral disc level and compared. RESULTS: ROC of the hip in neutral position was significantly larger than hip flexion in all levels (p < 0.05); there was no significant difference in the ROC among levels (p = 0.22). ROC seems to be largest at L2/3 followed by L3/4 and L4/5 respectively in all positions. CONCLUSIONS: The retroperitoneal oblique corridors of L2 to L5 were significantly increased when the hip is in the neutral position, while the psoas cross-sectional area and anterior thickness were minimized in this position. Surgeons might benefit from a neutral position of the left hip in the oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) procedure. In conclusion, the retroperitoneal oblique corridors of L2 to L5 were significantly increased when the hip is in the neutral position, while the psoas cross-sectional area and anterior thickness were minimized in this position. Surgeons might benefit from a neutral position of the left hip in the oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedure.
