Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Obstet Gynaecol India ; 72(5): 402-408, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35528222

RESUMO

Introduction: Outcomes of pregnancy in COVID 19-infected mothers are worse than in the general population. Due to immunological changes, antenatal women are more vulnerable to severe complications. The India has experienced two waves of the disease. We analysed whether the second wave of the disease had affected pregnancy outcomes differently by comparing pregnancy outcomes with those of the first wave. Materials and Method: The study population included all the women delivered in the same tertiary centre during both the waves. Maternal outcome parameters include maternal oxygen requirement, maternal ICU admission and maternal death. Foetal outcome parameters include APGAR scores, preterm deliveries and NICU admissions, maternal and foetal outcome parameters between the first and the second waves were compared. Results: Demographic parameters were similar in both the waves of COVID 19. No significant differences were found in pre-pregnancy comorbidities, high-risk pregnancies and mode of deliveries between the two waves. Maternal oxygen requirement increased in the second wave [first wave 6(4.7%) vs second wave 25(40.3%) (p-value < 0.001)]. There was also a significant increase in ICU admission [4(3.1%) vs 8(12.9%)], which was in positive correlation with maternal oxygen requirement during the second wave (r = 0.81, p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in maternal death [2(1.6%) vs 2(3.2%)]. No significant change noted in neonatal outcomes except for an increase in neonatal sepsis [0 vs 5(8.1%)]. Conclusion: Mothers had more severe diseases during the second wave. But this did not translate into significant increase in maternal mortality and poor neonatal outcomes, possibly due to better preparedness.

2.
Clin Pract ; 11(4): 841-849, 2021 Nov 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34842626

RESUMO

Introduction: Placental calcification, identified before the 36th week of gestational age, is known as premature placental calcification (PPC). PPC could be a clue for the poor fetal outcome. However, its association with adverse perinatal outcomes is yet to be confirmed. Objective: The primary objective was to determine and compare the perinatal outcomes in pregnancies with and without documented premature placental calcification. Methodology: The present study was a prospective cohort study performed from October 2017 to September 2019. We consecutively enrolled 494 antenatal women who presented to our antenatal OPD after taking consent to participate in our study. Transabdominal sonographies were conducted between 28-36 weeks of gestation to document placental maturity. We compared maternal and fetal outcomes between those who were identified with grade III placental calcification (n = 140) and those without grade III placental calcification (n = 354). Results: The incidence of preeclampsia, at least one abnormal Doppler index, obstetrics cholestasis, placental abruption, and FGR (fetal growth restriction) pregnancies were significantly higher in the group premature placental calcification. We also found a significantly increased incidence of Low APGAR (Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, and Respiration) scores, NICU (Neonatal Intensive Care Unit) Admission, Abnormal CTG (cardiotocography), meconium-stained liquor, and low birth weight babies in those with grade III placental calcification. Conclusion: Clinicians should be aware of documenting placental grading while performing ultrasonography during 28 to 36 weeks. Ultrasonographically, the absence of PPC can define a subcategory of low-risk pregnant populations which probably need no referral to specialized centers and can be managed in these settings.

3.
J Midlife Health ; 10(2): 105-107, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31391763

RESUMO

Angiomyofibroblastoma is an unusual tumor of pelvic and vulval region. It is often diagnosed in the middle-aged women. Although benign owing to its location and morphology, it has a few benign and malignant mimics. Here, we present such a case where a 42-year-old female presented with a vulval mass.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...