Base triplet nonisomorphism strongly influences DNA triplex conformation: effect of nonisomorphic G* GC and A* AT triplets and bending of DNA triplexes.

Structural understanding of DNA triplexes is grossly inadequate despite their efficacy as therapeutic agents. Lack of structural similarity (isomorphism) of base triplets that figure in different DNA triplexes brings in an added complexity. Recently, we have shown that the residual twist (Deltat degrees ) and the radial difference (Deltar A) adequately define base triplet nonisomorphism in structural terms and allow assessment of their role in conferring stability as well as sequence-dependent structural variations in DNA triplexes. To further corroborate these, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are carried out on DNA triplexes comprising nonisomorphic G* GC and A* AT base triplets under different sequential contexts. Base triplet nonisomorphism between G* GC and A* AT triplets is dominated by Deltat degrees (9.8 degrees ), in view of small Deltar (0.2 A), and is in contrast to G* GC and T* AT triplets where both Deltat degrees (10.6 degrees ) and Deltar (1.1A) are prominent. Results show that Deltat degrees alone enforces mechanistic influence on the triplex-forming purine strand so as to favor a zigzag conformation with alternating conformational features that include high (40 degrees ) and low (20 degrees ) helical twists, and high anti(G) and anti(A) glycosyl conformation. Higher thermal stability of this triplex compared to that formed with G* GC and T* AT triplets can be traced to enhanced base-stacking and counterion interactions. Surprisingly, it is found for the first time that the presence of a nonisomorphic G* GC or A* AT base triplet interrupting an otherwise mini A* AT or G* GC isomorphic triplex can induce a bend/curvature in a DNA triplex. These observations should prove useful in the design of triplex-forming oligonucleotides and in the understanding the binding affinities of this triplex with proteins.

Targeting neighbouring poly(purine.pyrimidine) sequences located in the human bcr promoter by triplex-forming oligonucleotides.

Most poly(purine.pyrimidine) [poly(R.Y)] sequences in eukaryotic genomes are interrupted by one or more base pair inversions. When the inversions are centrally located, the poly(R.Y) sequences can be regarded as the sum of two abutting sites, each potentially capable of forming a triple helix. Employing band-shift, footprinting and modeling methods we examined the formation of triple helices at a critical 27 bp poly(R.Y) sequence interrupted by two adjacent CG inversions, and located in the promoter of the human bcr gene at transcription initiation. We designed several 13-mer and 14-mer triplex-forming oligonucleotides (TFOs) capable of binding the bcr abutting sites, thereby generating different base juxtapositions at the triple helical junction, to examine whether triplex formation occurs in a cooperative manner. It is found that in 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl2, 2 mM spermine, 37 degrees C, the 13-and the 14-mer TFOs bind to one half of the bcr site with Delta G between -30 and -35 kJ x mol-1. However, when different 13-mer/14-mer combinations of TFOs were directed against the abutting poly(R x Y) sites, triplex formation has been found to be enhanced only for the triple helical junction formed by the 5'-A-T-3' base juxtaposition, in keeping with a partial stacking suggested from modeling analysis. On the other hand, a longer 24-mer TFO, binding noncooperatively to the same abutting sites, forms a much more stable triplex (Delta G = -51 kJ x mol-1), notwithstanding the two T x CG triads in the middle. Modeling investigations reveal that there is no continuity or propagation of base stacking involving adjacent bases of the third strand at the site of base inversion as well as on the 5' side. The data indicate that the entropy penalty of forming a triplex with two oligonucleotides is much higher than the energy gained from base stacking interactions at the triplex junction formed between the two TFOs.