Up to 10 years clinical performance of zirconia ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed partial dentures: A retrospective study.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Completely veneered zirconia ceramic (ZC) fixed partial dentures (FPDs) have been reported to have a higher incidence of ceramic chipping than the standard metal-ceramic FPDs. However, data from comparative long-term studies are sparse. PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the long-term survival, chipping-free survival, and success of ceramic-veneered high noble metal alloy (HN), base metal alloy (cobalt-chromium alloy) (CC), and ZC FPDs and to isolate risk factors for the incidence of failure, veneer chipping, and overall complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from 289 study participants (58.7% women; mean age, 57.97 ±11.51 years) provided with a total of 400 FPDs comprising 197 (49.3%) HN FPDs, 121 (30.3%) CC FPDs, and 82 (20.5%) ZC FPDs fabricated from presintered 3 mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia (mean time of service, 6.85 ±3.25 years) were evaluated. Of these, 278 (69.5%) FPDs were provided by dentists and 122 (30.5%) by dental students. Five- and 10-year survival, chipping-free survival, and success rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Risk factors were assessed using Cox regression analysis. The study was exploratory, so all P values were considered exploratory and descriptive. RESULTS: The 5- and 10-year survival rates were 94.7% and 77.8% for HN, 93.7% and 81.2% for CC, and 92.9% and 53.3% for ZC FPDs, respectively, indicating no clear difference in survival among the framework materials. The 5- and 10-year chipping-free rates were 94.1% and 82.8% for HN, 96.1% and 78.9% for CC, and 82.6% and 62.2% for ZC FPDs, respectively, indicating a difference between HN and ZC, and CC and ZC restorations. The 5- and 10-year success rates were 83.7% and 55.3% for HN, 86.5% and 51.4% for CC, and 68.9% and 30.2% for ZC FPDs, respectively, indicating a difference between HN and ZC, and CC and ZC restorations. The Cox regression model indicated framework material as an influencing risk factor for success, and this influence persisted when chipping was investigated. Compared with zirconia, the use of a metal alloy reduced the risk of chipping or the occurrence of complications by up to one-third. CONCLUSIONS: All FPDs showed high 5-year survival rates and acceptable 10-year survival rates with no strong differences among the materials. Higher success and chipping-free rates were observed for both HN and CC restorations compared with ZC restorations. Metal frameworks had a lower risk for complications or veneer chipping than zirconia frameworks.

Validity of patient self-reports and clinical signs in the assessment of sleep bruxism based on home-recorded electromyographic/electrocardiographic data.

BACKGROUND: Reliable and suitable bruxism assessment would be desirable, but available studies presented heterogeneous results. OBJECTIVE: To determine the agreement of patient self-reports and clinical signs of sleep bruxism (SB) with electromyographic/electrocardiographic data. METHODS: Two hundred individuals from a German dental clinic population (120 women and 80 men) participated in the study. Participants completed different SB questionnaires, had a clinical examination to evaluate bruxism signs and used the Bruxoff® device to record electromyographic/electrocardiographic data for five nights. To investigate interrater reliability for clinical diagnosis of bruxism, 126 of the 200 participants were assessed for clinical signs of bruxism by two independent uncalibrated examiners. Statistical evaluation included calculation of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy and of Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: Based on the Bruxoff® data, 106 participants were identified as bruxers and 94 as non-bruxers. The 106 bruxers were further classified into 47 moderate and 59 intense bruxers. The highest accuracy and sensitivity values were recorded for the overall score for clinical bruxism signs (accuracy: 72.0% and sensitivity: 70.8%). The best specificity (96.8%) was seen for the question regarding tooth grinding in the last two weeks reported by others, but concurrent sensitivity was very low (3.8%). Analysis of interrater reliability revealed a substantial agreement (Cohen's kappa of 0.6). CONCLUSION: The study results indicate that self-report questionnaires and clinical signs have moderate sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for diagnosing bruxism comparing with an ambulatory device for current SB (Bruxoff®). Regarding interrater reliability for clinical signs of SB, substantial agreement was found between the two examiners. CLINICAL TRIAL NO: NCT03039985.

Clinical Performance of Posterior Inlay-Retained and Wing-Retained Monolithic Zirconia Resin-Bonded Fixed Partial Dentures: Stage One Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the clinical performance of posterior inlay-retained and wing-retained monolithic zirconia fixed partial dentures (FPDs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: After simple randomization, 30 participants received either one inlay-retained (n = 15; mean age: 56.38 ± 12.70 years; 10 men [66.7%]) or one wing-retained (n = 15; mean age: 45.90 ±13.24 years; 7 men [46.7%]) FPD. The restorations, which predominantly replaced first molars, were fabricated from translucent, 3 mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia and attached with self-etching resin cement. Restorations and abutment teeth were clinically followed up for complications one week and 3, 6, and 12 months after cementation. Plaque and gingival scores, probing pocket depths, and attachment levels were recorded for the abutment and contralateral reference teeth both before treatment and during follow-up examinations. The restorations were also assessed in accordance with FDI World Dental Federation criteria. Statistical analyses were conducted with R (α = 0.05). An adaptive, 2-stage study design based on the incidence of failure-free survival in the groups after 12 months (stage 1) was implemented. Predefined decision rules were used to determine whether further recruitment (stage 2) would enable the detection of a statistically significant difference between the restoration designs with sufficient power. RESULTS: During 12 months, only one wing retainer debonded which required removal of the FPD. Failure-free survival was thus 93.3% for wing-retained and 100% for inlay-retained FPDs (log-rank test, p = 0.317). Moderate aftercare resulted in intervention-free rates of 78.8% and 86.7% for inlay-retained and wing-retained restorations, respectively (log-rank test, p = 0.605). Based on FDI World Dental Federation criteria, all restorations were acceptable at the 12-month follow-up (Fisher-Boschloo test, p = 0.161). Plaque, gingival, and periodontal scores remained practically unchanged from before treatment to the 12-month follow-up. Recruitment was stopped after stage 1 because, based on the small difference in the incidence of failure-free survival in the groups, it was accepted that it would not be possible to recruit the necessary number of participants to show a statistically significant difference between the retainer designs. CONCLUSIONS: Both inlay-retained and wing-retained monolithic zirconia resin-bonded FPDs performed well for the 12-month, short-term follow-up period.

Veneered zirconia inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses: 10-Year results from a prospective clinical study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 10-year clinical performance of zirconia-based inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses (IRFDP). METHODS: For replacement of a molar in 27 patients, 30 IRFDP were luted by use of different cements, Panavia F (Kuraray Europe GmbH) or Multilink Automix (Ivoclar Vivadent GmbH), with use of inlay/inlay, inlay/full-crown, or inlay/partial-crown retainers for anchorage. Frameworks were milled from yttria-stabilized zirconia (IPS e.maxZirCAD; Ivoclar Vivadent GmbH) and fully veneered with pressable ceramic (IPS e.max ZirPress; Ivoclar Vivadent GmbH). Before luting, the IRFDP were silica-coated (Rocatec; 3M Espe) and silanized (Monobond S; Ivoclar Vivadent GmbH). Complications (for example, chipping or delamination of the veneering ceramic, debonding, secondary caries, endodontic treatment, and abutment tooth fracture) and failure were reported, by use of standardized report forms, 2 weeks, 6 months, and 1, 2, and 10 years after cementation. Statistical analysis included Kaplan-Meier survival and success (complication-free survival) and Cox regression analysis (α=0.05 for all). RESULTS: During the 10-year observation period, the complications most often observed were chipping of the veneer and debonding. Twenty-five restorations failed and one participant dropped out. Cumulative 10-year survival and success were 12.1% and 0%, respectively. The design of the retainer, use of a dental dam, choice of cement, and location in the dental arch had no statistically significant effect on the occurrence of complications. CONCLUSIONS: Use of fully veneered zirconia-based IRFDP with this technique cannot be recommended. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: A large incidence of complications and poor survival were observed for fully veneered zirconia-based IRFDP, revealing an urgent need for further design improvements for this type of restoration. This, again, emphasizes the need for testing of new restoration designs in clinical trials before implementation in general dental practice.