RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We analyzed center-level outcome correlations between valve surgery and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in New York (NY) State and how volume-outcome effect differ between case types. METHODS: We used the 2014-2016 NY cardiac surgery outcomes report. Center-level observed to-expected (observed-to-expected ratio [O/E]) ratio for operative mortality provided risk-adjusted operative outcomes for isolated CABG and valve operations. Correlation coefficient characterized the concordance in center-level outcomes in CABG and valve. Discordant outcomes were defined as having O/E ratio greater than 2 in one operation type with O/E ratio ≤1 in another. Linearized slope of volume-outcome effect in case types offered insights into centers with discordant performances between procedures. RESULTS: Among 37 NY centers, annual center volumes were 220 ± 120 cases for CABG and 190 ± 178 cases for valve operations. Modest center-level correlation between CABG and valve O/E ratio was shown (R2 = 0.31). Two centers had discordant performance between valve and CABG (O/E ≤ 1 for CABG while O/E > 2 for valve procedures). No centers had CABG O/E ratio greater than 2 while valve O/E ratio ≤1. Linearized slope describing volume-outcome effects showed stronger effect in valve operations compared to CABG: O/E ratio declined 0.1 units per 100 CABG volume increase, while O/E ratio declined 0.33 units per 100 valve volume increase. CONCLUSION: In NY hospitals, favorable valve outcomes may indicate good CABG outcomes but good CABG outcomes may not ensure valve outcomes. Outcome variation in valve operation could be related to stronger volume-outcome effect in valve operations relative to CABG. Valve operations may benefit from regionalization.
