Comparison of insertion characteristics of LMA ProSeal from the front and head-end of the patient: A randomized pilot study.

Background and Aims: LMA ProSeal (PLMA) is a commonly used airway maintenance device in elective procedures and is routinely inserted from the head-end of the patient. It is also used in pre-hospital emergencies where it may not always be possible to access the head-end. This study aims to compare the insertion characteristics of PLMA when inserted while standing, either at the head-end or from the front. Material and Methods: After institutional ethics committee approval, 60 consenting patients of either sex, between 18 and 60 years, ASA class I/II, and scheduled to undergo elective surgeries were randomly allocated to either group H (head-end insertion) or group F (front-end insertion). Patients with anticipated difficult airway, chronic respiratory disease, obesity, and who were pregnant were excluded. Insertion time, ease of insertion, fiber optic view, ease of drain tube insertion, number of attempts and success rate were noted. Normally distributed quantitative variables were compared using t-test, and qualitative variables were compared using Chi-squared test. A P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Insertion time in group H (23.76 ± 4.48 s) was lesser than in group F (30.53 ± 6.23s) (P = 0.027). Ease of insertion (P = 0.052), fiber optic view, ease of drain tube placement (P = 1.000), and number of attempts (P = 1.000) were comparable among the groups. Conclusion: Although the insertion time from the front is longer than from the head-end, the other insertion characteristics of PLMA including ease of its insertion, placement and success rate of placement are similar when it is inserted from the front or from the head-end. It is an appropriate airway device for securing the airway when the head-end is inaccessible.

Suppression of perioperative stress response in elective abdominal surgery: A randomized comparison between dexmedetomidine and epidural block.

Background and Aims: Stress response after surgery induces local and systemic inflammation which may be detrimental if it goes unchecked. Blockade of afferent neurons or inhibition of hypothalamic function may mitigate the stress response. Material and Methods: A total of 50 consenting adult ASA I/II patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery were randomized to receive either dexmedetomidine (Group D) or epidural bupivacaine (Group E) in addition to balanced general anesthesia. Laparoscopic surgery, contraindications to epidural administration, history of psychiatric disorders, obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2), on beta blockers or continuous steroid therapy for >5 days over last 1 year, and known case of endocrine abnormalities or malignancy were excluded. Serum cortisol, blood glucose, and blood urea were estimated. Hemodynamic parameters, total dose of dexmedetomidine, bupivacaine, emergence characteristics, and analgesic consumption over 24 h postoperatively were recorded. Statistical comparisons were done using Student's t-test, repeated measure analysis of variance followed by Dunnett's test, generalized linear model and Chi-square/Fisher's exact test. A P value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Serum cortisol levels were significantly lower in group E than group D 24 h after surgery (P = 0.029). Intraoperative and postoperative glucose level was lower in group E compared with group D. Time to request of first rescue analgesic was longer in group E than group D (P = 0.040). There was no significant difference between the number of doses of paracetamol required in the postoperative period (P = 0.198). Conclusion: Epidural bupivacaine was more effective than intravenous dexmedetomidine for suppression of neuroendocrine and metabolic response to surgery. Dexmedetomidine provided better hemodynamic stability at the time of noxious stimuli and postoperatively.

Efficacy of fixed-dose phenylephrine bolus for treating post-spinal hypotension: Comparison between pre-eclamptics and normotensives.

Background and Aims: Pre-eclamptic parturients may have an exaggerated response to vasopressors. This study compares the efficacy of a 50 µg fixed bolus of phenylephrine for treatment of post-spinal hypotension in pre-eclamptic versus normotensive parturients. Material and Methods: After written informed consent and ethics committee approval, 30 normotensive and 30 pre-eclamptic parturients between 18 and 40 years with singleton term pregnancy about to undergo cesarean section (CS) under spinal anesthesia were included. Post-spinal hypotension was treated with a 50 µg fixed bolus of phenylephrine. The cumulative dose of phenylephrine, the number of boluses, and the median dose required to treat the first hypotensive episode, total number of hypotensive episodes, maternal side effects, neonatal appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration (APGAR) scores, and umbilical arterial cord blood pH were noted. Statistical analysis was done using Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, Chi-square test/Fisher's exact test as appropriate. A P <0.05 was considered significant. Results: The cumulative dose and number of boluses of phenylephrine required to treat post-spinal hypotension were comparable. The median dose required to treat the first episode of post-spinal hypotension was also similar (p = 0.792). The time to develop the first hypotensive episode was significantly earlier for group N (p = 0.002). The efficacy of a single fixed bolus of 50 µg phenylephrine was similar in both groups (p = 1.000). Neonatal median APGAR scores at 1 min after birth were significantly higher for group N (p = 0.016). Conclusion: A fixed-dose bolus of 50 µg phenylephrine is safe and effective in treating post-spinal hypotension in pre-eclampsia. The efficacy of phenylephrine is comparable in pre-eclamptic and normotensive parturients.

Comparative assessment of dexmedetomidine and butorphanol for attenuation of etomidate-induced myoclonus: A double-blind, randomised controlled study.

Background and Aims: Etomidate is a popular induction agent, but its use is associated with myoclonus in 50%-80% of non-premedicated patients. This study aims to compare dexmedetomidine and butorphanol for their relative efficacy in preventing etomidate-induced myoclonus. Methods: This randomised study was conducted after obtaining institutional ethical committee clearance and written informed consent from sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or II consenting patients between 18 and 60 years of age of either sex who had been scheduled for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg/kg (Group D) or butorphanol 0.015 mg/kg (Group B). Both the drugs were given as an infusion over a period of 10 min before induction of anaesthesia. The primary outcome was the incidence of myoclonic movements after etomidate, and the secondary outcomes were the severity of myoclonus, changes in the haemodynamic parameters and incidence of airway complications. Normally distributed variables were compared using Student's t-test, and non-normally distributed variables were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Qualitative data were analysed using Chi-square/Fisher's exact test. A P-value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: The incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus was significantly higher in group B compared to group D (P = 0.035). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) of myoclonus grade in patients of group D was 0.00 (0.00-3.00), and group B was 2.50 (0.00-3.00) (P = 0.035). Haemodynamics and airway-related complications were comparable between the groups. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine was more effective than butorphanol in preventing etomidate-induced myoclonus.

Comparison of Intrathecal Chloroprocaine With Bupivacaine in Short Gynecological Procedures: A Randomized Double-Blind Study.

Background Neuraxial anesthesia, compared to general anesthesia, offers better patient comfort, early ambulation, and discharge with excellent post-operative pain relief for short gynecological procedures. Recently chloroprocaine, a short-acting local anesthetic agent became available for intrathecal use. This study aimed to compare intrathecal chloroprocaine with bupivacaine in short gynecological procedures. Methodology Consecutive patients undergoing short gynecological procedures, patients belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I and II, between 18 and 60 years of age, and patients with a height between 150 cm and 180 cm were included in the study. Randomization was done using a computer-generated random number table. Patients were allocated to one of the two study groups. Group B received 4 mL of isobaric bupivacaine (0.25%) 10 mg intrathecal, and Group C received 4 mL of isobaric chloroprocaine (1%) 40 mg intrathecal. The primary outcome criteria were time to ambulation and discharge readiness. The secondary outcome criteria were onset, duration, and intensity of sensory and motor blockade, time to voiding, and any adverse effects. Results Patients receiving chloroprocaine had a significantly (p=0.001) faster time (158±31 min) to ambulation compared to bupivacaine (241±23 min). The regression of sensory blockade was substantially faster (p=0.001) with chloroprocaine (60±13 min) than with bupivacaine (94±24 min). Mean time to motor onset was significantly (p=0.05) faster in chloroprocaine (8±3 min) than bupivacaine (12±3 min) group. Significantly faster (p=0.001) recovery of motor blockade was observed with chloroprocaine (130±32 min) than bupivacaine (211±22 min). The time to first voiding was also significantly earlier with stable hemodynamics and no adverse effects in chloroprocaine group. Conclusion Intrathecal chloroprocaine may be an attractive alternative and is superior to isobaric bupivacaine as it provides early ambulation and discharge readiness for daycare anesthesia in short gynecological procedures.

Comparison of Two Different Doses of Nalbuphine With Isobaric Ropivacaine in Patients Undergoing Lower Segment Cesarean Section Under Subarachnoid Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Obstetric analgesia and anesthesia is a challenge in itself. It requires an understanding of the physiological changes during pregnancy and labor and the effect of anesthetic agents on the fetus and newborn. Because neuraxial techniques provide superior analgesia and materno-fetal benefits, their use have increased significantly over the past three decades or so. A combination of local anesthetics like ropivacaine with opioids like nalbuphine has been shown to have additive beneficial effects in subarachnoid block (SAB) in lower segment cesarean section (LSCS). However, the optimal dose combination of ropivacaine and nalbuphine to maximize their benefits and minimize side effects remains to be established. Our study has compared the clinical efficacy and safety of 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine (15 mg) with two different doses of nalbuphine (0.4 mg and 0.6 mg) when given intrathecally for LSCS in terms of quality of sensory and motor blocks, hemodynamic parameters, duration of effective analgesia, Apgar score in newborn, and associated side effects. METHOD AND MATERIALS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, a total of 69 parturients between the age of 20-45 years, belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and II, undergoing cesarean section under SAB were evaluated. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups of 23 each by using the draw-of-lots technique. The patient and the observer were kept blinded as to which dose of drug (intrathecal) was being given to the patient. Patients in Group A received 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine 15 mg (2 ml) + 0.3 ml normal saline; patients in Group B received 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine 15 mg (2 ml) + 0.4 mg of nalbuphine (0.2 ml) + 0.1 ml normal saline; patients in Group C received 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine 15 mg (2 ml) + 0.6 mg of nalbuphine (0.3 ml). The total volume of drug solution in all three groups was 2.3 ml. RESULT:  We found that the time to onset of sensory block was shortest in Group A (5.87±1.290 minutes) followed by Group C (6.00±1.087 minutes) and Group B (6.17±1.696 minutes); time to two-segment regression of sensory block was longest in Group C (101.74±8.996 minutes) followed by Group B (85.87±15.348 minutes) and Group A (65.00±7.071 minutes); duration of effective analgesia was longest in Group C (206.09±18.766 minutes) followed by Group B (183.91±15.880 minutes) and Group A (121.74±11.833 minutes); and time from SAB to complete regression of motor block was longest in Group C (216.52±15.553 minutes) followed by Group B (203.48±20.138 minutes) and Group A (174.78±14.731 minutes). Side effects were comparable among all three groups. CONCLUSION: The optimal dose combination in SAB for cesarean section was 15 mg of 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine + 0.6 mg nalbuphine, with minimal side effects.

Comparison of insertion characteristics of LMA ProSeal and Ambu AuraGain in adult patients under controlled ventilation: A randomised study.

Background and Aims: Supraglottic devices are preformed or flexible, and the insertion characteristics of the two types may be different. This study aims to compare the insertion characteristics of Ambu AuraGain (AAG), preformed) and LMA ProSeal (PLMA), flexible, requires an introducer tool for placement. Methods: Forty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II patients of either sex between 18 and 60 years with no anticipated airway difficulty were randomly allocated to either group AAG or PLMA (n = 20 each). Pregnant females, known case of chronic respiratory disorders and gastroesophageal reflux were excluded. After induction of anaesthesia and muscle relaxation, appropriately sized AAG or PLMA was inserted. Time for successful insertion (primary outcome), ease of device insertion and gastric drain insertion, first attempt success rate (secondary outcomes) were recorded. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 20.0. Quantitative parameters were compared using Student's t-test, and qualitative parameters were compared using Chi-square test. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Time taken for successful insertion of PLMA was 22.94 ± 6.12 s and for AAG was 24.32 ± 4.96 s, (P = 0.458). Device insertion was significantly easy in PLMA group (P < 0.002). First attempt success rate was achieved in 17 (94.4%) cases in PLMA group compared to 15 (78.9%) cases in AAG group (P = 0.168). Ease of drain tube insertion was comparable among the groups (P = 0.298). The haemodynamic variables were also comparable. Conclusion: PLMA is easier to insert as compared to AAG, but the insertion time and first attempt success rate are similar. The preformed curvature in AAG does not provide any added advantage over the non-preformed PLMA.

Evaluation of postoperative analgesic efficacy and perioperative hemodynamic changes with low dose intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy - A randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Dexmedetomidine is a α2-agonist with sedative, sympatholytic and analgesic properties and hence, it can be a very useful adjuvant in anesthesia as stress response buster, sedative and analgesic. We aimed to evaluate the effects of low dose dexmedetomidine infusion (0.5 mcg/kg/h) on postoperative analgesic efficacy along with the perioperative hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical grades I and II undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated into two groups of 40 patients each. Group I (Normal Saline group) patients received normal saline and group II (Dexmedetomidine group) patients received dexmedetomidine infusion at 0.5 mcg/kg/h respectively, starting 15 min before induction and continued till the end of surgery. Parameters noted were heart rate, mean arterial pressure, oxygen saturation, post-operative pain was evaluated using VAS and analgesic requirement. Statistical tests such as ANOVA test for continuous variables, post-hoc test for intergroup comparison, and Chi-square test for discrete values were applied. RESULTS: Post-operative efficacy was found to be limited in the dexmedetomidine group in terms of VAS score. The analgesic requirement in 24-hour was observed to be reduced in dexmedetomidine group when compared to the NS group; however, not statistically significant. In group NS, significant hemodynamic stress response was seen following laryngoscopy, tracheal intubation, creation of pneumoperitoneum and extubation. On intergroup comparison, the hemodynamic response was significantly attenuated in the dexmedetomidine group when compared to the NS group. No significant side effects were noted. CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine IV in an infusion dose of 0.5 µg/kg/hr is effective in providing postoperative analgesia in terms of significant reduction in analgesic consumption in 24 hours and in addition to the effective obtundation of the pneumoperitoneum-induced hemodynamic changes.

Isobaric ropivacaine with or without dexmedetomidine for surgery of neck femur fracture under subarachnoid block.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Dexmedetomidine has a promising role as an intrathecal adjuvant. However it's role as an adjuvant to ropivacaine has not been evaluated extensively. This study is designed to find out the effect of addition of dexmedetomidine 5 µg to isobaric ropivacaine 18.75 mg on block characteristics and hemodynamic parameters in patients undergoing surgeries for fracture neck of femur under subarachnoid block (SAB). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-one American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class I or II patients between 18-60 years undergoing surgeries for fracture neck of femur under SAB were recruited and randomized into two groups. Thirty patients in Group RN received 2.5 ml isobaric ropivacaine 0.75% (18.75 mg) with 0.5 ml normal saline (NS) to make a total volume of 3 ml, while 31 patients in Group RD received 2.5 ml isobaric ropivacaine 0.75% with dexmedetomidine 5 µg diluted with NS to make a total volume of 3 ml. The block characteristics, hemodynamic parameters, and side effects were recorded in both the groups. RESULTS: Patients in Group RD had significantly longer duration of sensory block (202.90 ± 50.2 min) compared to Group RN (157.33 ± 31.6 min), P < 0.001. Time to first rescue analgesia request was significantly longer in the Group RD compared to Group RN (265.16 ± 71.4 min vs 203.67 ± 35.6 min, respectively) (P < 0.001). However, the sensory block onset, maximum block height, time to two dermatomal regression, and motor block intensity remained unaltered. Incidence of side effects like hypotension, bradycardia, nausea, vomiting, and shivering were statistically similar in both the groups. CONCLUSION: Addition of 5 µg dexmedetomidine enhances the analgesic effect of intrathecal 18.75 mg isobaric ropivacaine for the conduct of fracture neck of femur surgeries with minimal adverse events.

Subcutaneous emphysema: Unique presentation of a foreign body in the airway.

Foreign body airway (FBA) is a common problem among the children. Variable presentation makes it difficult to diagnose a case of FBA, particularly, when no definite history of aspiration is available. Subcutaneous emphysema (SCE) and pneumomediastinum are rare presentations. We report a case of FBA who presented with SCE without any history of aspiration. A 3-year-old female child was admitted with respiratory distress, fever and SCE over the right side of chest, neck and face. Initially, she was diagnosed as a case of pneumonitis with barotrauma. X-ray of the chest revealed SCE with pneumomediastinum without pneumothorax. Diagnostic bronchoscopy with rigid ventilating bronchoscope was done under general anesthesia. A plastic foreign body with sharp projections embedded in the mucosa was detected and retrieved from right main bronchus. Postoperatively SCE regressed gradually.

Is midazolam superior to triclofos and hydroxyzine as premedicant in children?

BACKGROUND: Search for an ideal premedicant drug for children is still on. A prospective, randomized trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of midazolam, triclofos and hydroxyzine as premedication in children undergoing lower abdominal surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists I or II patients 2-8 years of age, scheduled for elective lower abdominal surgery were included. The patients were randomly divided into three groups M, T and H of 20 children each who received midazolam 0.5 mg/kg, triclofos 75 mg/kg and hydroxyzine 0.5 mg/kg respectively, orally 60 min before surgery. The acceptability of drugs, level of sedation, anxiety during separation and on mask application was assessed. RESULTS: The acceptability of midazolam and hydroxyzine was better than triclofos. Hydroxyzine was found to have lesser sedative effect as compared to both midazolam and triclofos. No major adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSION: Midazolam was found to be a better premedicant in terms of sedation, anxiolysis and safety.