Hexamoll® DINCH: Lack of in vivo evidence for obesogenic properties.

Hexamoll® DINCH is an important alternative to phthalate plasticizers. Although regulatory reviews have not identified any potential hazards even in sensitive populations, an in vitro study by Campioli et al. (2015) suggested Hexamoll® DINCH might alter fat storage in adipocytes resulting in obesity. To evaluate this hypothesis, data from studies with Hexamoll® DINCH were reviewed for evidence of deposition in fat, changes in body weight, or changes in serum chemistry reflecting altered metabolic status. Body weights of F1 and F2 pups in a two-generation study did not differ from controls even at 1000 mg Hexamoll® DINCH/kg body weight. Mean relative liver weights from the 1000 and 300 mg/kg bw groups were increased, but without histopathologic changes. Triglyceride and cholesterol levels in serum were not affected. In addition, subchronic and chronic studies in rats did not give evidence of an obesogenic effect. Radioactivity from 20 or 1000 mg/kg bw 14C-labelled Hexamoll® DINCH dosed orally remained 2-3 times longer in adipose tissue than in well-perfused tissues; however, levels were 20-500% below other tissues at 1 and 8 h post dosing. Radioactivity concentrations in organs and tissues excluding the GI tract declined rapidly and continuously, and decreased in parallel to the concentration in plasma during the following 20 h. Both, initial and terminal half-lives of radioactivity concentration do not indicate a potential for accumulation. Furthermore, a metabolomic comparison of Hexamoll® DINCH with DEHP and other phthalates shows complete separation of the metabolomic profile of these two chemical classes, meaning that their effects on the body and the body's reaction to the substance are different. Hence, comprehensive in vivo data do not show any evidence of Hexamoll® DINCH altering fat metabolism or having obesogenic properties.

Short-term rat inhalation study with aerosols of acrylic ester-based polymer dispersions containing a fraction of nanoparticles.

Aqueous polymer dispersions are important raw materials used in a variety of industrial processes. They may contain particles with diameters ranging from 10 to 1500 nm. Polymer exposure alone may cause pulmonary lesions after inhalation exposure. Polymer dispersions with increased proportions of nano-sized particles are being developed for improved material characteristics, and this may pose even increased pulmonary hazards upon potential inhalation exposure. In a 5-day screening study, male rats were nose-only exposed to aerosols generated from 2 dispersions of acrylic ester polymers with identical chemical composition but different nano-sized particle proportions at particle concentrations of 3 and 10 mg/m³. Immediately and 19 days after the end of inhalation, necropsies were conducted with major emphasis on respiratory tract histopathology. Three and 23 days after the end of inhalation, bronchoalveolar lavage was performed to screen for early pulmonary injury and inflammation. In contrast to the adverse effects known for other materials in short-term inhalation studies, none of the tested preparations of acrylic ester polymers elicited any adverse effect at the end of the inhalation or postinhalation periods. No shift in toxicity could be observed by the increased proportion of nano-sized polymer particles. Under the conditions of this study, the no observable adverse effect levels for both preparations were >10 mg/m³, that is 2- to 3-fold beyond current nuisance dust threshold limit values.

A 1-year toxicity study in dogs is no longer a scientifically justifiable core data requirement for the safety assessment of pesticides.

A review of publications on pesticides assessing the need for 1-year toxicity studies in dogs was performed. Four key peer-reviewed papers with different approaches investigated the value of a 1-year dog study in addition to a 3-month study. Despite different databases and approaches, each concluded with the recommendation to limit the testing of pesticides in dogs to a duration of 3 months. The combined weight of evidence presented in this review reinforces these independent conclusions. Therefore, the routine inclusion of a 1-year dog study as a mandated regulatory requirement for the safety assessment of pesticides is no longer justifiable and a globally harmonized approach should be taken to match the latest legislation of the European Union and the US EPA.