Influence of Preoperative Deformity on Flexion Gap Asymmetry in Measured Resection Technique: A Theoretical Study in Navigated Gap Balancing Total Knee Arthroplasties, Done for Varus Knee Osteoarthritis.

INTRODUCTION: Disagreement exists on (a) achieving a symmetrical flexion gap and (b) the influence of varus deformity on the flexion gap asymmetry (FGA) in measured resection (MR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We aimed to determine the FGA and influence of preoperative deformity on the FGA, based on the MR technique, in varus knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: In 321 navigated TKAs, we released the soft tissues in extension. In 90° flexion, with the tensioner in situ, we calculated the FGA, the angle between the posterior femoral cut (planned 3° external rotation to the posterior condylar line, parallel to the surgical transepicondylar axis, or perpendicular to the Whiteside line) and the proximal tibial resection plane. RESULTS: The FGA values varied widely, and the risk of >2° and >3° FGA was present in at least 60% and 40% knees, respectively. These risks were high in knees with moderate and severe varus deformity. CONCLUSIONS: In varus knee osteoarthritis, the risk of FGA (based on the MR technique) was high, especially when the deformity was moderate to severe. Caution is required in MR TKA, and surgeons must consider safer alternatives (gap balancing or hybrid technique) to achieve a symmetrical flexion gap in these knees.

Notching is less, if femoral component sagittal positioning is planned perpendicular to distal femur anterior cortex axis, in navigated TKA.

PURPOSE: In navigated TKA, the risk of notching is high if femoral component sagittal positioning is planned perpendicular to the sagittal mechanical axis of femur (SMX). We intended to determine if, by opting to place the femoral component perpendicular to distal femur anterior cortex axis (DCX), notching can be reduced in navigated TKA. METHODS: We studied 171 patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral computer-assisted TKA. Femoral component sagittal positioning was planned perpendicular to SMX in one knee (Femur Anterior Bowing Registration Disabled, i.e. FBRD group) and perpendicular to DCX in the opposite knee (Femur Anterior Bowing Registration Enabled, i.e. FBRE group). Incidence and depth of notching were recorded in both groups. For FBRE knees, distal anterior cortex angle (DCA), which is the angle between SMX and DCX, was calculated by the computer. RESULTS: Incidence and mean depth of notching was less (p = 0.0007 and 0.009) in FBRE versus FBRD group, i.e. 7% versus 19.9% and 0.98 mm versus 1.53 mm, respectively. Notching was very high (61.8%) in FBRD limbs when the anterior bowing was severe (DCA > 3°) in the contralateral (FBRE) limbs. CONCLUSION: Notching was less when femoral component sagittal positioning was planned perpendicular to DCX, in navigated TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level II.

No influence of obesity on mid-term clinical, functional, and radiological results after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty using a gap balancing technique.

OBJECTIVE: In obese patients, thick subcutaneous tissue can introduce errors during registration and leg weight can influence gap balancing in navigated TKA. Present study is done to determine if computer navigated TKA using a gap balancing technique can achieve consistent accuracy for limb and component alignment, and similar clinical and functional results in obese patients like in non-obese patients. METHODS: We prospectively compared the radiological, clinical, and functional results of 78 knees in 57 non-obese patients and 79 knees in 58 obese patients who underwent computer-assisted TKA. Non-obese individuals were defined as those having BMI of <30 kg/m2 and obese individuals as BMI ≥30 kg/m2. The degree of knee deformity was calculated by Hip - Knee - Ankle (HKA) angle and clinical and functional assessment was done using the Knee Society Score - clinical knee score and Knee Society Score - function score, respectively. All these were documented before and at 6 months, 2 year, and 5 years after TKA. RESULTS: The outlier rate of postoperative limb alignment (HKA angle) was 8.9% in the obese group which was not significantly different (p =1.00) from that of the non-obese group (7.7%). Mean clinical knee scores were not significantly different between the non-obese and obese groups preoperatively (58.8 vs 57.4, p = 0.14) and at 6 months (92.7 vs 91, p = 0.06), 2 years (91.4 vs 90, p = 0.07), and 5 years (92.4 vs 91.3, p = 0.1) post-surgery. Similarly, mean functional scores were not significantly different between the non-obese and obese groups preoperatively (50.9 vs 49.9, p = 0.31) and at 6 months (92.7 vs 90.9, p = 0.06), 2 years (91.3 vs 92, p = 0.44), and 5 years (90.6 vs 91.1, p = 0.51) post-surgery. CONCLUSION: Obesity has no influence on mid-term clinical, functional, and radiological results after computer navigated TKA, done by gap balancing technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level II.

Performing high flexion activities does not seem to be crucial in developing early femoral component loosening after high-flexion TKA.

BACKGROUND: It is still unclear whether high flexion (HF) activities correlated with the early loosening of the femoral component and whether HF activities are possible. We investigated what is the capability for performing various HF activities, and whether high flexion activities increase the chance of aseptic loosening after HF-TKA. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 260 patients who underwent HF-TKA using the NexGen LPS Flex between 2001 and 2009. The mean follow-up was 6.7 years (range, 5-13). We evaluated range of motion, Knee Society scores, WOMAC, and serial radiographs for aseptic loosening. Responses to questions on individual HF activities were recorded on 5-point Likert scales based on difficulty (0-4). Patients were divided two groups based on their responses to squatting and kneeling, which were important weight-bearing HF activities in Asian population (HF group vs. non-HF group) for comparisons of aseptic loosening and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: More than 80 % of patients positively responded for various HF activities. The capability of HF activities showed that cross-legged sitting, squatting, and kneeling were 97.7, 51.1 and 52.7 % at the latest follow-up, respectively. Aseptic loosening was identified in two tibial components (0.8 %) but none in femoral components in non-HF group. There was no significant difference of aseptic loosening based on HF activities (0.8% vs. 0%, p = 0.063). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that HF activities do not seem to be associated with aseptic loosening of femoral component after HF-TKA.