Converting from general anesthesia to cervical block anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy.

Between January 1, 1992 and June 30, 1998, vascular and general surgery residents performed 401 carotid endarterectomies (185 cervical block, 216 general anesthesia) under supervision of vascular attending surgeons. In January 1995, cervical block anesthesia was newly instituted. Initially anesthesiologists were randomly assigned to these cases and anesthetic technique was not standardized. At the surgeons' insistence later in the series, three specially trained anesthesiologists routinely administered cervical block anesthesia. As experience grew, surgeons realized that operating time greater than 2 hours and high neck dissections requiring mandibular retraction were poorly tolerated by cervical block anesthesia patients but that repeat carotid endarterectomies could be safely performed. Shunts were selectively inserted if significant electroencephalographic changes occurred or carotid stump pressures were less than 50 mm Hg systolic when general anesthesia was used; neurologic changes occurred when cervical block anesthesia was used; or there was a history of ipsilateral stroke for either anesthetic method. Despite an initial learning curve with cervical block anesthesia, the stroke-mortality rate was similar between the two groups (general anesthesia: 1.9% [four cerebrovascular accidents, two deaths]; cervical block anesthesia: 1.6% [two cerebrovascular accidents, two deaths]). Eight (12%) of the first 66 cervical block anesthesia patients were converted to general anesthesia compared to 2 (1.7%) of the most recent 119 patients with cervical block anesthesia (p = 0.03). After cervical block anesthesia was initiated, seven of the first eight repeat carotid endarterectomies were performed using general anesthesia compared to one of the most recent six repeat cases (p = 0.02). As surgeons' comfort with cervical block anesthesia increased, 94% (100) of the most recent consecutive 106 carotid endarterectomies were performed using this technique. These results suggest that carotid endarterectomy can be performed as safely using cervical block anesthesia as general anesthesia, specialized anesthesiologists are essential to achieve a successful outcome, selected repeat carotid endarterectomies can be performed using cervical block anesthesia, very cephalad lesions are best treated using general anesthesia, and surgical trainees can safely perform carotid endarterectomy under attending surgeon supervision if the operation is carried out expeditiously.

Should duplex ultrasonography be performed for surveillance of femoropopliteal and femorotibial arterial prosthetic bypasses?

Duplex ultrasonography (DU) has been shown to be beneficial for surveillance of lower extremity vein bypasses. However, DU as part of surveillance program for prosthetic grafts is not widely accepted. The purpose of this report was to determine if DU could reliably detect failing prosthetic infrainguinal arterial bypasses and if there were differences in predictability between femoropopliteal (FP) and femorotibial (FT) prosthetic grafts. Between January 1992 and December 1997, 89 infrainguinal grafts in 66 patients were entered into our postoperative prosthetic graft surveillance protocol, which included clinical evaluation, segmental pressures, pulse volume recordings, and DU performed every 3 months. Patients with follow-up of less than 3 months were excluded unless the graft thrombosed. An abnormal DU considered predictive of graft failure included (1) peak systolic velocity (PSV) > 300 cms/sec at inflow or outflow arteries, in the graft or at an anastomosis (unless an adjunctive arteriovenous fistula had been performed); (2) adjacent PSV ratio > 3.0; (3) uniform PSVs < 45 cms/sec; or (4) monophasic signals throughout the graft. DU was considered to have correctly diagnosed a failing graft if a stenosis > 75% the luminal diameter of the graft, at an anastomosis, or in an inflow/outflow artery was confirmed by operative or arteriographic findings or if the graft thrombosed after an abnormal DU but before intervention. Our results support the routine use of DU as a part of a graft surveillance protocol for femorotibial, but not femoropopliteal, prosthetic grafts.

Has arteriography gotten a bad name? Current accuracy and morbidity of diagnostic contrast arteriography for aortoiliac and lower extremity arterial disease.

Recently, contrast arteriography has been challenged as the diagnostic test of choice for lower extremity arterial disease because of its associated morbidity and questionable accuracy in identifying suitable distal outflow arteries. The purpose of this report was to analyze our experience to determine if these concerns were justified. We reviewed 500 consecutive contrast arteriograms performed at our hospital for aortoiliac and lower extremity arterial disease between November 1994 and November 1998. Arteriograms performed in conjunction with therapeutic procedures such as balloon angioplasty, stent placement, and thrombolysis were excluded, leaving 244 diagnostic cases for analysis. Forty-six percent (112) of patients had diabetes mellitus, 14% (34) had an elevated baseline serum creatinine (> or =1.5 mg/dL), and an additional 7% (17) were dialysis dependent. Radiologists limited contrast volume by imaging only the symptomatic extremity when appropriate and using digital subtraction techniques as indicated. Our results showed that diagnostic contrast arteriography is associated with an acceptably low morbidity, has an accuracy that is unlikely to be surpassed by other modalities, and remains the diagnostic test of choice for lower extremity arterial disease.

A strategy to improve quality of outpatient education for residents and medical students on a vascular surgery service.

In the current era of same-day admissions and decreased length of hospitalization for major vascular operations, education of residents and medical students in the outpatient setting has become an increasingly challenging problem. We developed a strategy to provide improved outpatient experience for advanced vascular surgery residents (VSRs), general surgery residents (GSRs), and medical students (MSs) on a vascular surgery service. A survey of program directors and VSRs at accredited vascular surgery fellowships in the United States and Canada was undertaken to determine the manner in which outpatient education was accomplished and the amount of time devoted to pre- and postoperative patient evaluation. The survey revealed that VSRs, GSRs, and MSs spent 1 or more days in clinic at approximately half of accredited vascular surgery programs. There were no appreciable differences in time spent in clinic for different levels of trainees. VSRs preoperatively evaluated at least half of their patients at approximately two-thirds of the programs, while at the other third of the programs they preoperatively evaluated one-quarter or less of their patients before surgery. GSRs preoperatively evaluated at least half of their patients at 50% of programs, according to program directors, and at 69% of programs, according to VSRs. Because of recent changes in health care delivery and the effect of these changes on resident training, outpatient education of VSRs, GSRs, and MSs will require increased attention on the part of vascular surgeons involved with their education. increasing time demands and decreasing reimbursements for vascular surgeons as a result of managed health care may make this goal increasingly difficult to accomplish. Improved strategies and extra efforts are necessary to ensure that trainees obtain sufficient experience to evaluate vascular patients pre- and postoperatively and maintain high quality of care for vascular surgery patients.

Comparison of intraoperative and postoperative duplex ultrasound for carotid endarterectomy.

Intraoperative (IO) duplex ultrasound (DU) is used to identify correctable technical defects at the time of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Postoperative (p.o.) DU is used to evaluate recurrent or residual stenosis. We compared IO and p.o. DU to determine the value and significance of these studies in the management of patients undergoing CEA. We performed completion IO DU following CEA and p.o. DU a mean of 8 weeks after surgery in 78 patients. IO studies were performed by the operating surgeon and p.o. studies were performed in an accredited vascular laboratory. Peak systolic velocity (PSV) was measured in the internal carotid (ICA), external carotid, and common carotid (CCA) arteries. The criteria used for an abnormal study were an ICA PSV > 150 cm/sec and a ratio of ICA to CCA PSVs(ICA/CCA) > 3.0. Completion angiograms were also performed on all patients intraoperatively. Technical defects identified on DU or angiogram were corrected whenever possible. From our results, we concluded that in many patients, early p.o. DU will demonstrate an elevated ICA PSV compared to the IO PSV. If the ICA/CCA remains normal, this increase is unlikely to represent a clinically relevant recurrent or residual stenosis. A postoperative ICA/CCA ratio > 3.0 may be a more reliable indicator of significant stenosis and a lesion that is likely to progress or occlude than PSVs alone.

Endovascular versus surgical treatment for thrombosed hemodialysis grafts: A prospective, randomized study.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcome and costs for two widely used treatment strategies for hemodialysis graft thrombosis. METHODS: During a 4-year period, 80 patients with thrombosed dialysis grafts were randomly assigned to surgical thrombectomy with or without graft revision (SURG) or thrombolytic therapy with urokinase with the pulse-spray technique (ENDO), with adjunctive percutaneous transluminal angioplasty as indicated. All the procedures were performed in an endovascular operating suite with fistulography. The clinical and cost data were tabulated, and the outcome was analyzed with the life-table method. RESULTS: Fifty-six women and 24 men ranged in age from 33 to 90 years (mean, 63.7 years). The patients had undergone a mean of 2.8 prior access procedures in the ipsilateral extremity. All the grafts were upper extremity expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. Lesions that were presumed to be the primary cause of graft thrombosis were identified in 73 of 80 grafts, and 60 of these were at the venous anastomosis. The procedure time averaged 99 minutes for the patients in the SURG group and 113 minutes for the patients in the ENDO group (P =.12). Eleven patients in the ENDO group crossed over to surgical revision as compared with two patients in the SURG group who required adjunctive percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (P =.005). The mean cost of treatment (including room and supply costs but not professional fees) was significantly higher for the ENDO group than for the SURG group ($2945 vs $1512; P <.001). There were no procedure-related complications in either group. At a median follow-up time of 24 months, there was no difference in primary or assisted primary patency between groups, which averaged 6 and 7 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although thrombolytic therapy combined with endovascular treatment can extend the life of dialysis grafts with results similar to surgical revision, there is a high rate of technical failure necessitating surgery and a substantially higher cost for thrombolysis.

Postoperative blood pressure changes associated with cervical block versus general anesthesia following carotid endarterectomy.

The purpose of this report was to determine if cervical block anesthesia (CBA) was associated with fewer hypertensive and hypotensive episodes and decreased need for ICU monitoring following carotid endarterectomy, compared with general anesthesia (GA). A retrospective review of carotid endarterectomies performed using GA (n = 118) versus CBA (n = 116) was carried out and perioperative blood pressure changes and morbidity and mortality rates were analyzed. With increasing emphasis in today's health care market concerning cost containment without sacrificing safety, our results suggest that CBA should be considered preferable to GA for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Fewer significant postoperative hemodynamic changes occurred and costly intensive care monitoring may be avoided.

Five-step protocol for carotid endarterectomy in the managed health care era.

BACKGROUND: We developed a protocol combining 5 cost-effective strategies to determine whether elective carotid endarterectomy (CEA) could be performed safely without adversely affecting well-established low morbidity and mortality rates and with significant hospital cost savings. METHODS: Between April 1, 1995, and December 31, 1996, 109 of 141 patients were prospectively enrolled as candidates into a 5-step CEA protocol: (1) duplex ultrasonography (DU) performed at an accredited vascular laboratory as the sole diagnostic carotid preoperative study, (2) admission the day of operation, (3) cervical block anesthesia to eliminate intraoperative electroencephalogram monitoring, (4) transfer from the recovery room after a 4-hour observation period to the vascular ward, and (5) discharge the first postoperative morning. The other 32 patients were excluded from analysis; 16 patients were treated by vascular surgeons not participating in the protocol, 9 were treated concomitantly for other medical problems, and 7 were admitted emergently. RESULTS: One patient died of carotid hemorrhage the first postoperative morning, and one had an intraoperative embolic stroke for a combined mortality-stroke rate of 1.8% (2 of 109). Of the 109 patients, 70% (76) underwent operation using DU as the sole diagnostic study, 95% (104) were admitted the day of operation, 76% (83) had cervical block anesthesia, 59% (64) were transferred to the floor the day of operation, and 83% (90) were discharged the morning after operation. None of the 109 patients were adversely affected by these 5 cost-saving strategies except potentially the patient who bled the first postoperative morning. The predicted charges of a patient treated with a perioperative protocol that many vascular surgeons currently use (preoperative arteriography, general anesthesia with intraoperative electroencephalogram monitoring, overnight intensive care unit stay, discharge on postoperative day 2) was $16,073 compared with $10,437 for a patient who completed all 5 steps of the protocol detailed above. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of these results documenting significant cost savings and acceptably low morbidity and mortality rates, this 5-step protocol may be considered the standard for performing CEA in this era of cost containment. These results may be compared with endovascular intervention, which has recently been proposed as a less expensive technique to treat carotid disease.

Value of an endovascular suite in the operating room.

The purpose of this study is to describe the advantages and value of an endovascular suite in the operating room from a vascular surgeon's perspective. All endovascular procedures were performed in a specially equipped operating room by vascular surgeons using digital fluoroscopic imaging equipment. Between January 1, 1994 and August 31, 1996, intraoperative balloon angioplasties were attempted by vascular surgeons in 102 patients with insertion of 22 stents. Angioplasties were performed for stenoses in 50 arterial bypasses and 25 iliac, 17 femoral and 10 popliteal arteries proximal or distal to arterial grafts. Sixty-two procedures were performed concomitantly with a surgical bypass and 40 were performed as the sole procedure (30 percutaneous, 10 open) in patients who had previously undergone a bypass. There were five technically unsatisfactory results which were converted to surgical procedures and one postoperative hematoma that required surgical repair. Ninety of the 102 grafts remained patent more than 1 month after the procedure. Establishment of an endovascular operating room suite enables vascular surgeons to perform adjunctive endovascular procedures concomitantly with vascular surgery and treat unexpected findings in the operating room amenable to endovascular intervention without requesting other interventionalists to participate on an emergent basis.

Is balloon angioplasty indicated for "short" stenoses of failing vein grafts?

Previous reports have suggested "short" focal stenoses in peripheral vein grafts (PVGs), namely less than 2 cm long, can be successfully balloon dilated with good long-term patency rates. We questioned if enthusiasm for balloon angioplasty of these lesions in failing PVGs is warranted. Between August 1, 1993 and December 31, 1996, we performed balloon angioplasty of "short" stenoses in 19 PVGs in 16 patients. Bypasses included seven femoropopliteal, six femorotibial, and six popliteal-tibial or -pedal PVGs. All bypasses were originally performed for limb salvage. Single lesions were present in 13 grafts and two lesions in six grafts. Ten lesions were located at an anastomosis, 10 were located in the body of the graft, and five were peri-anastomotic. Fifteen procedures were performed percutaneously. Four angioplasties were performed using an open surgical approach because a percutaneous attempt failed in one case and three grafts were either in situ or tunneled subcutaneously making them easy to expose. Completion arteriogram documented excellent initial results in all 19 grafts. Cumulative one-year primary patency rate was 39%. The assisted primary patency rate at one year was 73%. Only five grafts remained patent 7-20 months (mean, 10 months) during follow-up without requiring further revision. One patient died with a patent graft 23 months post-balloon angioplasty. Complications included two hematomas following a percutaneous approach that required surgical repair. These results when compared to publications detailing patency following surgical revision suggest that balloon angioplasty of "short" stenoses less than 2 cm long in PVGs may be better treated by surgical revision. We reserve balloon angioplasty for "short" lesions when surgical revision is associated with inordinate difficulty such as a scarred groin wound in an obese patient.

Do distal arteriovenous fistulae improve patency rates of prosthetic infrapopliteal arterial bypasses?

We retrospectively analyzed if distal anastomotic adjunctive arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) improved patency rates of prosthetic bypasses to infrapopliteal arteries. Between July 1, 1991 and June 30, 1996, we performed 43 polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) bypasses to infrapopliteal (19 peroneal, 13 anterior tibial, 11 posterior tibial) arteries. All bypasses were performed for limb salvage when autologous vein was not available for a conduit. Adjunctive AVFs were performed in 21 bypasses (PTFE-AVF) and 22 bypasses did not have a fistula (PTFE-ONLY). Patients were allocated to the PTFE-AVF or PTFE-ONLY groups at the discretion of the surgeons, with adjunctive AVFs being performed for small arteries with poor run-off. There were no significant differences in age, sex, site of the proximal anastomosis, or indication for surgery (p > 0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the site of distal anastomosis and quality of arterial run-off based on the Society for Vascular Surgery Ad Hoc Committee on Reporting Standards criteria (p < 0.05). All patients were placed on heparin 500 units/hour postoperatively, maintained on life-long Coumadin and followed every 3 months with duplex ultrasonography to assess graft patency. Aggressive intervention was carried out for failing grafts suspected by duplex scanning. The hospital mortality rate was 2.3% (1/43; 1 PTFE-AVF). Two-year primary patency rates were significantly better for PTFE-AVF grafts than for PTFE-ONLY grafts (23% versus 5%) (p = 0.04). Although statistical significance was not reached, there was a suggestion of higher assisted primary (34% versus 15%) (p > 0.05) and secondary (61% versus 48%) (p > 0.05) patency rates in the PTFE-AVF group versus the PTFE-ONLY group, although limb salvage rates were similar (74% versus 71%) (p > 0.05). Two AVFs required ligation because of steal resulting in diminished distal perfusion. These results support the use of adjunctive distal AVFs to improve overall two-year patency rates of prosthetic infrapopliteal arterial bypasses.

Selective use of duplex ultrasound to replace preoperative arteriography for failing arterial vein grafts.

PURPOSE: In an effort to minimize costs and patient discomfort, we determined whether duplex ultrasound (DU) could selectively replace preoperative arteriography performed in the radiology suite to diagnose failing arterial bypass grafts (FABs) constructed of autogenous vein. METHODS: Between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 1996, we treated 106 FABs. Graft revision solely on the basis of DU was performed only if a focal stenosis was clearly identified in the graft (peak systolic velocity [PSV] > 300 cm/sec, ratio of adjacent PSVs > 3.0) or in inflow or outflow arteries (resulting in uniform graft PSVs < 45 cm/sec). Intraoperative arteriograms were frequently obtained to confirm DU findings. Preoperative arteriograms were obtained if DU revealed multiple or ill-defined stenoses, diffuse inflow or outflow arterial disease, uniformly low PSVs without an identifiable lesion, or equivocal stenosis despite clinical evidence of an FAB. RESULTS: Seventy-three (69%) FABs with 81 lesions were revised on the basis of DU only. Of 76 stenotic lesions, an intraoperative arteriogram or surgical findings confirmed a diameter stenosis of 75% to 99% in 69 grafts (91%) and stenosis of 50% to 74% in three grafts (4%). DU incorrectly identified the site of stenosis or underdiagnosed the extent of disease in four grafts (5%). DU correctly identified the site of missed arteriovenous fistulas in five grafts. The 73 FABs were treated with intraoperative balloon angioplasty (30 grafts), patch angioplasty (20), interposition or jump grafts (12), ligation of arteriovenous fistula (3), a new bypass graft (1), or a combination of these interventions (7). A significant change in intraoperative strategy potentially could have been avoided if a preoperative arteriogram had been obtained in three of the 73 FABs (4.1%). CONCLUSIONS: DU can reliably be used to revise FABs and avoid the morbidity, discomfort, and cost of confirmatory arteriography in two thirds of cases.

Same-day admissions and other cost-saving strategies for elective aortoiliac surgery.

PURPOSE: We retrospectively analyzed whether same-day admissions and other resource utilization methods for patients undergoing elective infrarenal aortoiliac surgery (AoIS) were safe and cost-effective. METHODS: Morbidity and mortality rates and costs were compared between 71 patients admitted before the day of surgery (group I) and 57 patients admitted the day of surgery (group II) who underwent elective AoIS between July 1, 1992, and December 31, 1995. After January 1, 1994, a concerted effort was made to decrease hospital costs by performing out-patient preoperative assessment, admitting patients the morning of surgery, and planning early discharge through implementation of clinical pathways. Patients were excluded (total, 33; 20%) from analysis if they were admitted before the day of surgery for intravenous hydration (5), optimizing cardiac function (4), or prolonged preoperative antibiotics (2), or if they required emergency surgery (10) or were transferred from another service or hospital (12). After exclusion, there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) between groups I and II in terms of age, sex, race, diabetes, hypertension, pulmonary disease, cardiac disease, renal insufficiency, type of incision (midline or retroperitoneal), indication for surgery (aneurysm or occlusive disease), or inflow site (aorta or common iliac artery). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups I and II in terms of mortality rate (0%); cardiac (1.4% [1/71] vs 0%), pulmonary (9.9% [7/71] vs 5.3% [3/57]), or renal (1.4% [1/71] vs 0%) complications; or readmission rates within 30 days (5.6% [4/71] vs 5.2% [3/57]), respectively (p > 0.05). There were significant decreases in length of hospital stay (mean, 6.4 vs 11.2 days; p < 0.0001) and hospital cost per patient ($34,198 vs $45,694; p = 0.001) for group II compared to group I, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients who require elective infrarenal aortoiliac surgery can be admitted the day of surgery and undergo early discharge with significant hospital cost savings and without apparent increase in morbidity or mortality rates.

Use of arm and lesser saphenous vein compared with prosthetic grafts for infrapopliteal arterial bypass: are they worth the effort?

PURPOSE: Arm and lesser saphenous veins (ALSVs) are generally considered to be the best alternative for infrapopliteal arterial bypass grafts when greater saphenous vein is not available. The need for additional incisions and repositioning of the patient, along with occasional use of general anesthesia for arm vein harvesting, led to our perception that the use of ALSVs increased operative time and possibly patient discomfort. Therefore, we compared the outcome of ALSVs with that of prosthetic infrapopliteal arterial bypass procedures performed at our hospital. METHODS: Between July 1, 1991, and Dec. 31, 1996, we performed 96 infrapopliteal arterial bypass procedures using 45 ALSVs (28 arm vein, 17 lesser saphenous) and 51 polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts. Seventy grafts were single-length ALSV or PTFE bypass grafts, and 26 grafts were placed as the distal segment of a sequential or composite bypass graft. Every attempt was made to use ALSV and avoid the use of PTFE, even if a short segment of the vein graft measured less than 4.0 mm in diameter. There were no significant differences between patients with ALSV compared with PTFE grafts in terms of age, sex, indication for surgery, or number of previous revascularization procedures (2.1 vs 1.7), respectively (p > 0.05). However, ALSV grafts had more factors associated with an expected worse outcome: they were more commonly anastomosed to pedal arteries (17% [8 of 45] vs 0%; p = 0.0009), less commonly single-segment grafts (62% [28 of 45] vs 82% [42 of 51]; p = 0.03), had higher average runoff resistance values (2.3 vs 1.5; p = 0.001), and were less frequently treated with lifelong warfarin (65% [29 of 45] vs 95% [48 of 51]; p = 0.0001). RESULTS: The hospital mortality rate was 3.1% (3 of 96; 3 PTFE). All deaths were cardiac-related. Despite the potential factors associated with worse patency rates for ALSVs, 2-year assisted primary patency rates tended to be higher for arm veins (46%) than for lesser saphenous veins (23%) and PTFE grafts (26%), although this difference was not statistically significant. Limb salvage rates were similar between ALSV and PTFE grafts (76% vs 71%, respectively). The average operative time was significantly longer for ALSV bypass procedures (mean, 6.2 hours) than for PTFE bypass procedures (mean, 4.9 hours; p = 0.003), and for single-length conduits when revision of previously placed grafts was not attempted, the operative time was 4.0 hours for ALSV grafts and 2.5 hours for PTFE grafts. CONCLUSION: In our experience ALSV bypass grafts to infrapopliteal arteries do not function as well as reported by some others. In spite of the extra effort involved, arm vein grafts are preferred over PTFE grafts for their likely higher assisted primary patency rates and equivalent, if not better, limb salvage rates.

Thrombolytic and endovascular treatment of peripartum iliac vein thrombosis: a case report.

This case report details the multidisciplinary treatment of peripartum left iliac vein thrombosis using percutaneous catheter-directed urokinase thrombolysis and balloon thromboplasty. Enhanced chances for long-term patency and the normalization of venous function make these minimally invasive procedures accepted options for the treatment of iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis in selected peripartum patients.

Duplex ultrasonography to diagnose failing arterial prosthetic grafts.

BACKGROUND: Although several reports have documented the usefulness of a surveillance program with duplex ultrasonography (DU) to diagnose failing autologous vein bypasses, the effectiveness of DU to detect failing arterial prosthetic grafts has not been confirmed. We attempted to determine whether our program, which included DU and other noninvasive techniques (NonDU), was useful for this purpose. METHODS: Between July 1, 1991, and September 30, 1994, 85 prosthetic bypasses in 59 patients performed for lower extremity ischemia were entered into a graft surveillance protocol. There were 35 femoropopliteal, 16 femorotibial, 15 iliofemoral, 13 axillofemoral, and 6 femorofemoral bypasses. Both DU and NonDU were performed 1 week and every 3 months after the initial bypass or after graft revision. NonDU criteria of a failing graft included changes in symptoms or pulses, decreased ankle/brachial index greater than 0.15, or diminution of ankle pulse volume recordings greater than 50%. Normal grafts were bypasses that had less than 50% stenosis documented by arteriography or remained patent. Problem grafts were those that required revision or thrombosed before intervention. Follow-up of patient grafts ranged between 3 and 36 months (mean, 11 months). RESULTS: DU predicted 17 (81%) of 21 problem grafts versus only 5 (24%) diagnosed by NonDU (p = 0.001). Lesions associated with these 21 grafts were perianastomotic in 10 cases, in adjacent inflow or outflow arteries in 8 cases, and intrinsic to the graft in 3 cases. The likelihood of a graft thrombosing in the presence of a normal test was 7% (4 of 58) for DU compared with 21% (16 of 76) for NonDU (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: DU is more sensitive than NonDU in predicting failure of prosthetic grafts. This study suggests that DU should routinely be performed as part of a surveillance program for peripheral arterial prosthetic bypasses.

Role of nursing personnel in implementing clinical pathways and decreasing hospital costs for major vascular surgery.

Collaboration with key nursing personnel is essential to successfully implement clinical pathways, establish a dedicated vascular wing, and achieve significant hospital cost savings while still maintaining quality care with low morbidity and mortality rates. Key nursing personnel met once a month during a 1-year period with vascular surgeons, hospital administrators, and health care advisors to plan strategies to develop clinical pathways and establish a dedicated vascular ward. The pathways were then implemented. We compared morbidity, mortality, readmission rates, adn hospital costs among two groups of patients admitted for major vascular surgery. Nursing personnel, attending staff, and surgical residents found that treating patients who had undergone major vascular surgery was more straightforward and efficient after clinical pathways and a dedicated vascular wing were established. In addition, there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of overall mortality or pulmonary, neurologic, or cardiac complications despite shorter hospital stay and decreased hospital costs. Also there were no significant differences in readmission rates within 30 days.

Safety and cost-efficiency of 24-hour hospitalization for carotid endarterectomy.

The safety and cost savings of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) were determined with guidelines developed after vascular "critical pathways" were implemented. Using these guidelines, our goal was to admit patients the day of surgery and to discharge them the next morning. Morbidity, mortality, readmission rates, same-day admissions, duration of stay, and hospital costs were compared between patients undergoing CEA who were electively admitted between September 1, 1992 and August 31, 1993 (group 1) and January 1, 1994 and March 31, 1995 (group 2). Between these two time periods, vascular critical pathways were instituted and all preoperative examinations were performed on an outpatient basis. The majority of CEAs were performed with the patient under general anesthesia. We found no significant differences between group 2 (n = 68) vs. group 1 (n = 40) in terms of mortality (1.5% [1 of 68] vs. 2.5% [1 of 40]), cardiac events (2.9% [2 of 68] vs. 2.5% [1 of 40]), neurologic events (2.9% [2 of 68] vs. 2.5% [1 of 40]), or readmission rate (1.5% [1 of 68] vs. 0% [0 of 40]). Same-day admissions were significantly higher (94% [64 of 68] vs. 5% [2 of 40]; p < 0.0001), and average duration of stay was significantly lower (1.3 vs. 5.1 days; p < 0.0001) in group 2 vs. group 1, respectively. Hospital charges were decreased by $5510 per patient in group 2. We conclude that hospital costs can be significantly reduced for most patients undergoing CEA when they are admitted on the day of surgery and discharged the following morning, with no negative impact on morbidity and mortality.

Impact of clinical pathways on hospital costs and early outcome after major vascular surgery.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether major vascular surgery could be performed safely and with significant hospital cost savings by decreasing length of stay and implementation of vascular clinical pathways. METHODS: Morbidity, mortality, readmission rates, same-day admissions, length of stay, and hospital costs were compared between patients who were electively admitted between September 1, 1992, and August 30, 1993 (group 1), and January 1 to December 31, 1994 (group 2), for extracranial, infrarenal abdominal aortic, and lower extremity arterial surgery. For group 2 patients, vascular critical pathways were instituted, a dedicated vascular ward was established, and outpatient preoperative arteriography and anesthesiology-cardiology evaluations were performed. Length-of-stay goals were 1 day for extracranial, 5 days for aortic, and 2 to 5 days for lower extremity surgery. Emergency admissions, inpatients referred for vascular surgery, patients transferred from other hospitals, and patients who required prolonged preoperative treatment were excluded. RESULTS: With this strategy same-day admissions were significantly increased (80% [145/177] vs 6.2% [9/145]) (p < 0.0001), and average length of stay was significantly decreased (3.8 vs 8.8 days) (p < 0.0001) in group 2 versus group 1, respectively. There were no significant differences between group 1 and group 2 in terms of overall mortality rate (2.1% [3/145] vs 2.3% [4/177]), cardiac (3.4% [5/145] vs 4.0% [7/177]), pulmonary (4.1% [6/145] vs 1.7% [3/177]), or neurologic (1.4% [2/145] vs 0% [0/177]) complications, or readmission within 30 days (11.3% [16/142] vs 9.2% [16/173]) (p > 0.05). There were also no differences in morbidity or mortality rates when each type of surgery was compared. Annual hospital cost savings totalled $1,267,445. CONCLUSION: Same-day admission and early hospital discharge for patients undergoing elective major vascular surgery can result in significant hospital cost savings without apparent increase in morbidity or mortality rates.

Pulmonary risk factors of elective abdominal aortic surgery.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively identify risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic surgery via a midline incision. METHODS: We reviewed 181 consecutive patients who underwent operation between July 1986 to December 1992. Preoperative factors analyzed included age, sex, diabetes mellitus, history of smoking, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity, indication for surgery (aneurysm [126] or aortoiliac occlusive disease [AIOD] [55]), history of coronary artery disease, length of preoperative hospital stay, American Society of Anaesthesiologists class, and pulmonary function tests. Intraoperative factors analyzed included endotracheal tube diameter, percent of inspired oxygen, blood loss, blood and crystalloid replacement, total operative time, epidural analgesia, and stress ulcer prophylaxis. RESULTS: Although the operative mortality rate was only 1.7% (3 of 181), major pulmonary complications occurred in 29 (16%) patients, including two lung-related deaths. Pneumonia occurred in 17 (9%) patients, prolonged intubation greater than 24 hours occurred in nine (5%), and reintubation caused by pulmonary insufficiency occurred in three (2%). On univariate analysis, the following were associated with major pulmonary complications (p < 00.05): American Society of Anaesthesiologists class IV, age greater than 70 years, ideal body weight greater than 150%, forced vital capacity of 80% or less predicted, forced expiratory flow rate (25 to 75) of 60% or less predicted, crystalloid replacement greater than 6 L, and total operative time greater than 5 hours. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of these pulmonary risk factors, notably increased age and weight, decreased forced vital capacity and forced expiratory flow rate (25 to 75), and expected prolonged operative time, influences our decision not to proceed with surgery for small aortic aneurysms or for AIOD causing claudication. Patients at high pulmonary risk with AIOD who require revascularization for limb salvage would be more likely to undergo extraanatomic bypass. Pulmonary risk factors may play as important a role as cardiac factors in elective aortic surgery.