Microdissection testicular sperm extraction and IVF-ICSI outcome in nonobstructive azoospermia.

We evaluated the efficiency of microdissection testicular sperm extraction (MicroTESE) in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) and their pregnancy outcomes in a programme based on in vitro fertilisation (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Fifty-six MicroTESE procedures were performed in 53 patients with NOA. Pre-operative levels of luteinising hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), testosterone and prolactin were obtained and a Doppler sonography examination was conducted. Sperm retrieval rate, mean age of female partner, mean ICSI and fertilisation rate, number and quality of embryos transferred, implantation, pregnancy and miscarriage rates were calculated. Samples for testicular histological analysis were taken trans-operatively in every case. Sperm retrieval rate, mean ICSI per case and fertilisation rate were 57.1%, 7.4% and 58.4% respectively. A significant difference in pre-operative testicular volume (P = 0.001), serum FSH (P = 0.008) and total testosterone levels (P = 0.021) was found in patients from whom sperm could be retrieved. Mean 1.9 type A embryos were transferred per cycle. Implantation, clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates were 20%, 40% and 18.7% respectively. It is concluded that MicroTESE is a viable option for men with NOA, offering excellent results in couples undergoing IVF-ICSI. Pre-operative serum FSH, testicular volume and total testosterone levels may have a prognostic value, although more data are needed to determine their significance and whether or not patients should be excluded from an initial sperm retrieval attempt.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparison study in the canine model.

The aim of this study was to compare live donor nephrectomy by hand-assisted laparoscopy to standard laparoscopy in a canine model. Fourteen dogs underwent a left laparoscopic nephrectomy; a standard laparoscopic nephrectomy technique was utilized in seven dogs. In a second group of seven dogs, a hand-assisted laparoscopic technique was used with a Dexterity Pneumo Sleeve hand port. All nephrectomies were performed as "donor" nephrectomies, dividing the vessels last. Total blood loss, operative warm ischemia, time and organ retrieval times were assessed for each group. The average operative time was significantly shorter for hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (32 +/- 8 minutes vs. 61 +/- 8 minutes; p = .02) than for the standard technique. The average warm ischemia (86 +/- 24 seconds vs. 224 +/- 52 seconds; p = .03) and average organ delivery times (4 +/- 3 seconds vs. 45 +/- 9 seconds; p < .01) also were shorter using the hand-assisted laparoscopic technique. No significant differences in average blood loss were found between the two groups (9 +/- 2 cc vs. 6 +/- 1 cc; p = 0.16, NS). Good parenchymal, ureteral, and vascular preservation was achieved by both techniques. Hand-assisted laparoscopy permits shorter operating times and warm ischemia times than standard laparoscopy in a canine model of donor nephrectomy. Hand assistance makes donor laparoscopic nephrectomy technically easier and significantly quicker to perform. If hand-assisted laparoscopy donor nephrectomy is confirmed to be a rapid and safe technique for removing an intact organ, laparoscopic nephrectomy will be a more widely accepted technique among urologists who participate in living related donor kidney transplantation.