Heterogeneity of the immune response to adenovirus-mediated factor VIII gene therapy in different inbred hemophilic mouse strains.

BACKGROUND: The development of anti-factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies (inhibitors) is a critical concern when considering gene therapy as a potential treatment modality for hemophilia A. We used a hemophilia A mouse model bred on different genetic backgrounds to explore genetically controlled differences in the immune response to FVIII gene therapy. METHODS: C57BL/6 FVIII knockout (C57-FVIIIKO) mice were bred with normal BALB/c (BAL) mice, to generate a recombinant congenic BAL-FVIIIKO model of hemophilia A. Early generation adenoviral (Ad) vectors containing the canine FVIII B-domain-deleted transgene under the control of either the CMV promoter or a tissue-restricted (TR) promoter were administered to C57-FVIIIKO, C57xBAL(F1)-FVIIIKO crosses, and BAL-FVIIIKO mice. FVIII expression, inhibitor development, inflammation, and vector-mediated toxicity were assessed. RESULTS: In response to administration of Ad-CMV-cFVIII, C57-FVIIIKO mice attain 3-fold higher levels of FVIII expression than BAL-FVIIIKO. All strains injected with Ad-CMV-FVIII displayed FVIII expression lasting only 2 weeks, with associated inhibitor development. C57-FVIII-KO mice that received Ad-TR-FVIII expressed FVIII for 12 months post-injection, whereas FVIII expression was limited to 1 week in C57xBAL(F1)-FVIIIKO and BAL-FVIIIKO mice. This loss of expression was associated with anti-FVIII inhibitor development. BAL-FVIIIKO mice showed increased hepatotoxicity with alanine aminotransferase levels reaching 4-fold higher levels than C57-FVIIIKO mice. However, C57-FVIIIKO mice initiate a more rapid and effective cell-mediated clearance of virally transduced cells than BAL-FVIIIKO, as evidenced by real-time PCR analysis of transduced tissues. Overall, strain-dependent differences in the immune response to FVIII gene delivery were only noted in the adaptive response, and not in the innate response. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the genetic background of the murine model of hemophilia A influences FVIII expression levels, the development of anti-FVIII inhibitors, clearance of transduced cells, and the severity of vector-mediated hepatotoxicity.

Preclinical animal models for hemophilia gene therapy: predictive value and limitations.

Hemophilia A and B are excellent candidate disorders for the application of somatic cell gene therapy. One of the major advantages in the preclinical development of hemophilia gene therapy strategies has been the availability of several animal models for both hemophilia A and B. These models recapitulate many of the phenotypic aspects of human hemophilia and have proven to be very informative in exploring the efficacy and safety of gene therapy. Considerable progress has been made in the design of gene therapy protocols, and over the last 5 years it has been shown that long-term phenotypic correction, with sustained therapeutic levels of factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX), can be attained in FVIII- and FIX-deficient mice and dogs using various viral vector-mediated gene therapy approaches. These animal models also have elucidated potential complications of gene therapy protocols, including acute vector-associated toxicities and the induction of neutralizing antibodies to the FVIII and FIX transgene products. Nevertheless, although the preclinical paradigm of hemophilic mouse followed by hemophilic dog studies has proven to be extremely helpful in evaluating the efficacy and safety of potential clinical gene therapy protocols, several limitations to these animal models still exist. This review presents a summary of the animal models available for hemophilia gene therapy, and highlights the various strengths and weaknesses of these models.