Variability in COVID-19 Symptom Presentation During Pregnancy and its Impact on Maternal and Infant Outcomes Across the Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: With the dominance of different SARS-CoV-2 variants, the severity of COVID-19 has evolved. We aimed to investigate the difference in symptom prevalence and the association between symptoms and adverse pregnancy outcomes during the dominance of Wild-type/Alpha, Delta, and Omicron. METHODS: COVID-19 related symptom prevalence, maternal and specific neonatal outcomes of 5431 pregnant women registered in this prospective study were compared considering the dominant virus variant. Logistic regression models analyzed the association between specific symptoms and intensive care unit (ICU) admission or preterm birth. RESULTS: Infection with the Delta variant led to an increase in the symptom burden compared to the Wild-type/Alpha variant and the highest risk for respiratory tract symptoms, feeling of sickness, headache, and dizziness/drowsiness. An infection with the Omicron variant was associated with the lowest risk of dyspnea and changes in smell/taste but the highest risk for nasal obstruction, expectoration, headaches, myalgia, and fatigue compared to the Wild-type/Alpha and Delta variant dominant periods. With the progression of the Wild-type/Alpha to the Delta variant neonatal outcomes worsened. Dyspnea and fever were strong predictors for maternal ICU admission and preterm birth independent of vaccination status or trimester of infection onset. CONCLUSION: The symptom burden increased during the Delta period and was associated with worse pregnancy outcomes than in the Wild-type/Alpha area. During the Omicron dominance there still was a high prevalence of less severe symptoms. Dyspnea and fever can predict a severe maternal illness.

Resuscitation of Term Compromised and Asphyctic Newborns: Better with Intact Umbilical Cord?

The authors hypothesize that particularly severely compromised and asphyctic term infants in need of resuscitation may benefit from delayed umbilical cord clamping (after several minutes). Although evidence is sparse, the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms support this assumption. For this review the authors have analyzed the available research. Based on these data they conclude that it may be unfavorable to immediately clamp the cord of asphyctic newborns (e.g., after shoulder dystocia) although recommended in current guidelines to provide quick neonatological support. Compression of the umbilical cord or thorax obstructs venous flow to the fetus more than arterial flow to the placenta. The fetus is consequently cut off from a supply of oxygenated, venous blood. This may cause not only hypoxemia and consecutive hypoxia during delivery but possibly also hypovolemia. Immediate cord clamping may aggravate the situation of the already compromised newborn, particularly if the cord is cut before the lungs are ventilated. By contrast, delayed cord clamping leads to fetoplacental transfusion of oxygenated venous blood, which may buffer an existing acidosis. Furthermore, it may enhance blood volume by up to 20%, leading to higher levels of various blood components, such as red and white blood cells, thrombocytes, mesenchymal stem cells, immunoglobulins, and iron. In addition, the resulting increase in pulmonary perfusion may compensate for an existing hypoxemia or hypoxia. Early cord clamping before lung perfusion reduces the preload of the left ventricle and hinders the establishment of sufficient circulation. Animal models and clinical trials support this opinion. The authors raise the question whether it would be better to resuscitate compromised newborns with intact umbilical cords. Obstetric and neonatal teams need to work even closer together to improve neonatal outcomes.

Serum midkine as non-invasive biomarker for detection and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer.

Lung cancer continues to be the leading cause for cancer-related deaths in men and women worldwide. Sufficient screening tools enabling early diagnosis are essential to improve patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate serum midkine (S-MK) both as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This single-center analysis included 59 NSCLC patients counting 30 squamous cell cancers and 29 adenocarcinomas. Preoperative S-MK concentration was determined using ELISA. Patients were followed up to five years. S-MK was found to be significantly overexpressed in patients with NSCLC compared to healthy controls (p < 0.001). The discriminative power of S-MK to differentiate NSCLC subjects from controls was fairly high with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.83 (p < 0.001). Optimal sensitivity of 92% and reasonable specificity of 68% was reached at a threshold of 416 pg/ml S-MK. Patients with high S-MK concentration showed a significantly shorter overall survival compared to patients with low S-MK expression (p < 0.05). In conclusion, S-MK is overexpressed in patients with NSCLC and serves as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival. S-MK may thus be considered as an additional non-invasive biomarker not only for NSCLC screening but also for outcome prediction.