Long-term health-related quality of life in living liver donors: A south Asian experience.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term health-related quality of life (HRQOL), changes in lifestyle, and complications in living liver donors at a single transplant center from southern India. METHODS: A total of 64 consecutive living liver donors from 2008 to 2011 were evaluated; 46 of 64 donors completed the short form 36 (SF-36) via telephonic interviews or clinic consultations. Mean follow-up was 48 months (range: 37-84 months). RESULTS: There was no mortality in the donors evaluated. Overall morbidity was 23%, which included wound infections (4.3%), incisional hernia (2.1%), biliary leak (4.3%), and nonspecific complaints regarding the incision site (15.2%). All 46 donors who completed the SF-36 had no change in career path or predonation lifestyle. A total of 40 of 46 (87%) donors had no limitations, decrements, or disability in any domain, while six of 46 (13%) had these in some domains of which general health (GH) was most severely affected. CONCLUSIONS: Living donor hepatectomy is safe with acceptable morbidity and excellent long-term HRQOL with no change in career path or significant alteration of lifestyle for donors.

Better innovate than compromise: a novel hepatic outflow reconstruction technique in pediatric living donor liver transplantation.

Pediatric LDLT using donors with unfavorable vascular anatomy is challenging in terms of donor safety, and complexity of reconstruction in the recipient. We describe an innovative technique of hepatic venous outflow reconstruction involving the recipient RHV, in the presence of a rudimentary RHV in the donor. The postoperative course of the donor and recipient was uneventful with satisfactory venous outflow in both. This technique avoided the use of prosthetic material, an important consideration given the recipient age and requirement for growth. This shows that donors previously considered unsuitable for donation can be utilized safely as long as principles of vascular anastomosis are adhered to. Moreover, it highlights that innovation is sometimes necessary to avoid compromise in donor safety.

Profile and outcome of patients with liver cirrhosis requiring mechanical ventilation.

OBJECTIVE: Few studies have addressed the outcome of patients with cirrhosis requiring mechanical ventilation (MV). We aimed to investigate the short-term outcome of such patients. METHODS: Retrospective review of data of 73 consecutive patients with cirrhosis requiring MV over a 2-year period (2006-2008). Data on patient's characteristics, reason for MV, the presence of other organ failure, and first day Acute Physiology Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Child-Pugh (CP), and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores were collected, with 30-day mortality being the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: Observed mortality in ICU and at 30 days was 75.3% and 87.7%, respectively. Area under curve was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.65-0.86) for APACHE II, 0.94 (95% CI, 0.85-0.98) for SOFA, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.7-0.96) for CP, and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.85-0.98) for MELD (P = .096) in predicting 30-day mortality. By univariate analysis, indication for intubation (P = .001), need for vasopressor support (P = .002), the presence of renal failure (P < .03), and duration of MV (P < .001) were significantly associated with mortality. On multivariate analysis, only duration of MV (adjusted odds ratio 0.63, 95% CI: 0.42-0.95, P = .03) was the independent predictor of mortality with a majority of patients, 51/64 (79.7%), dying in the first 48 hours of intubation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cirrhosis requiring MV have a dismal prognosis. Such patients and their families should be informed about the overall outcome to assist their decisions about life support and intensive care, outside the transplant setting. Prognostic scores, especially SOFA and MELD, may aid in determining which patients may benefit from aggressive therapy.

Critical care issues in adult liver transplantation.

Over the last decade, liver transplantation has become an operational reality in our part of the world. As a result, clinicians working in an intensive care unit are more likely to be exposed to these patients in the immediate postoperative period, and thus, it is important that they have a working knowledge of the common complications, when they are likely to occur, and how to deal with them. The main focus of this review is to address the variety of critical care issues in liver transplant recipients and to impress upon the need to provide favorable circumstances for the new liver to start functioning and maintain the function of other organs to aid in this process.

Role of steroids in septic shock: assessment of knowledge, attitudes and practices among intensivists practising in Hyderabad.

CONTEXT: Use of steroids in septic shock is an issue of contention, more so with two major trials reporting conflicting results. AIMS: To assess the current knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) related to the role of steroids in septic shock among intensivists practising in Hyderabad. SETTING, DESIGN, MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaires containing 10 questions pertaining to the role of steroids in septic shock, were distributed to 76 intensivists during the monthly critical care meeting. RESULTS: A great majority of intensivists (82%) agreed that the role of steroids is restricted to septic shock not responding to vasopressors. There was no clear consensus regarding the role of corticotropin stimulation test or the timing of total cortisol level testing, if it has to be performed. Hydrocortisone was clearly the choice of steroid for most intensivists and intravenous bolus injection being the preferred route of administration. There was no agreement regarding the dose of steroids, the role of fludrocortisone and whether steroids should be tapered. Most of the respondents did not extend the steroid therapy beyond seven days and the most common side effect reported was hyperglycemia. CONCLUSION: There is a lot of ambiguity in the knowledge, attitudes or practices regarding role of steroids in septic shock among intensivists in Hyderabad. Uniform policies and protocols need to be devised at institutional level, with multispecialty inputs, and doctors need to be familiarized accordingly.

Outcome of patients with liver cirrhosis admitted to a specialty liver intensive care unit in India.

PURPOSE: The study aimed to describe the clinical outcome of patients with liver cirrhosis admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) and to compare the performance of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) in predicting mortality. METHODS: In this prospective study of patients with cirrhosis admitted to the ICU, demographic data, APACHE II score, SOFA score, presence of acute renal failure (ARF), need for organ support, and mortality were collected. RESULTS: The observed mortality in ICU and at 30 days among 104 patients was 42.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.7%-52.0%) and 56.7% (95% CI, 47.0%-66.4%), respectively. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for first-day APACHE II in predicting 30-day mortality was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83-0.96) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.88-0.98) for SOFA score (P = .24). On multivariate analysis, ARF (adjusted odds ratio, 7.7; 95% CI, 1.09-54.64) and mechanical ventilation (adjusted odds ratio, 277.6; 95% CI, 12.83-6004.94) were significantly associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of ARF and need for mechanical ventilation are associated with high mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis admitted to the ICU. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and SOFA are good prognostic models in predicting 30-day mortality and do not differ in performance.