Case report: unravelling the puzzle of unicuspid aortic valve with multimodality imaging.

Background: Unicuspid aortic valve (UAV) represents a rare congenital anomaly characterized by two subtypes: acommissural unicuspid aortic valve and unicommissural unicuspid aortic valve. Acommissural UAV is often diagnosed and corrected during the neonatal period due to haemodynamic instability. Unicommissural UAV leads to aortic stenosis (AS) in early adulthood. The diagnostic challenge associated with UAV primarily stems from its eccentric orifice opening and valvular calcification, resulting in difficult visualization of the commissures and localization of the orifice plane. This case report aims to demonstrate the unique morphological features of UAV through a comprehensive analysis using multimodality imaging. Case summary: A 61-year-old woman presented to the emergency department for recurrent episodes of dyspnoea. Severe AS was diagnosed on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) by Doppler haemodynamic measurement. However, follow-up transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and CT transcatheter aortic valve replacement showed moderate AS by planimetry. Following this, patient was monitored closely, but her dyspnoea kept worsening. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was performed due to persistent dyspnoea, identifying UAV with eccentric loophole orifice with unicommissural attachment and opposite free leaflet edge. The patient was managed medically. Discussion: TTE is the test of choice for AS that defines valvular morphology by direct visualization and grades the severity by haemodynamic measurement. However, the accuracy of TTE can be limited by poor acoustic windows and heavy valvular calcification. TEE measures aortic valve area (AVA) by planimetry that requires accurate localization of the AV orifice plane. Similarly, it applies to multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). While CMR is expensive and mainly available in tertiary centres, it can provide additional information when there is discordance.

Anesthetic management for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A national anesthesia clinical outcomes registry analysis.

Background: General anesthesia has traditionally been used in transcatheter aortic valve replacement; however, there has been increasing interest and momentum in alternative anesthetic techniques. Aims: To perform a descriptive study of anesthetic management options in transcatheter aortic valve replacements in the United States, comparing trends in use of monitored anesthesia care versus general anesthesia. Settings and Design: Data evaluated from the American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) Anesthesia Quality Institute's National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry. Materials and Methods: Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors associated with use of monitored anesthesia care compared to general anesthesia. Results: The use of monitored anesthesia care has increased from 1.8% of cases in 2013 to 25.2% in 2017 (p = 0.0001). Patients were more likely ages 80+ (66% vs. 61%; p = 0.0001), male (54% vs. 52%; p = 0.0001), ASA physical status > III (86% vs. 80%; p = 0.0001), cared for in the Northeast (38% vs. 22%; p = 0.0001), and residents in zip codes with higher median income ($63,382 vs. $55,311; p = 0.0001). Multivariable analysis revealed each one-year increase in age, every 50 procedures performed annually at a practice, and being male were associated with 3% (p = 0.0001), 33% (p = 0.012), and 16% (p = 0.026) increased odds of monitored anesthesia care, respectively. Centers in the Northeast were more likely to use monitored anesthesia care (all p < 0.005). Patients who underwent approaches other than percutaneous femoral arterial were less likely to receive monitored anesthesia care (adjusted odds ratios all < 0.51; all p = 0.0001). Conclusion: Anesthetic type for transcatheter aortic valve replacements in the United States varies with age, sex, geography, volume of cases performed at a center, and procedural approach.

Evaluating Gender-based Differences in Clinical Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: A Single Centre Experience.

There is emerging recent data that has shown women to be more prone to in-hospital major adverse events after trans catheter left atrial appendage occlusion. Institutional LAAO registry at West Virginia University (WVU) was reviewed from January 2016 to October 2021 to identify 271 women and 293 men who underwent successful LAAO device implantation. Patients were evaluated for gender-based differences in baseline characteristics, CHA2DS2-VASc Score, HAS-BLED score, procedural data, in-hospital, and follow-up outcomes. Compared to men, women had lower baseline comorbidities including coronary artery disease (135 (49.6%) vs 172 (58.7%), P = 0.03), myocardial infarction (MI) (56 (20.5%) vs 85 (29%), P = 0.02) and coronary artery bypass surgery (10 (3.6%) vs 27 (9.2%), P = 0.008). Women were noted to have a higher CHA2DS2-VASc Score (5.3 ± 1.4 vs 4.4 ± 1.4, P < 0.001), and left ventricular ejection fraction (57.9 ± 7.7 vs 52.7 ± 12.4, P < 0.001). Women were noted to have a significantly higher rate of in-hospital composite adverse events (74 (27.2%) vs 58 (19.8%), P = 0.03); bleeding events (38 (10.2%) vs 19 (6.4%), P = 0.003) and associated blood transfusion (6 vs 0, P = 0.001) compared with men. No statistically significant differences were noted between both genders regarding the follow-up outcome. Our single center study shows women to have higher in-hospital composite adverse events as well as higher bleeding events during the index hospital admission.

Snare and track (SNACK) technique: a novel approach for successful placement of an intracardiac echocardiogram catheter in the left atrium: a case report.

Background: Placing an intracardiac echocardiogram (ICE) catheter in the left atrium allows for excellent visualization of the left atrial appendage to guide left atrial (LA) appendage occlusion (LAAO). Nonetheless, it requires a separate septal puncture or a unique set of skills to navigate the ICE through a previously prepared septal puncture, which can be challenging. Case summary: This report describes a novel method to insert an ICE in the left atrium through a single septal puncture utilizing a snare technique. A 76-year-old male underwent LAAO by ICE guidance. After obtaining a standard atrial septal puncture, we were unable to advance the ICE into the left atrium. Therefore, we used a loop snare to grasp the ICE catheter-tip in the right atrium and direct it into the left atrium via the prepared septal puncture by tracking a pigtail wire that we routinely place as part of the procedure. Afterward, the left atrial appendage was successfully occluded with a Watchman device (Boston Scientific, Galway, Ireland), and the patient was discharged home without complications. Discussion: The described technique could be a helpful tool for ICE placement to the left atrium in a controlled fashion, especially when challenging anatomy is encountered.

Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography for Device-Related Thrombus Assessment After WATCHMAN FLX™ Occluder Device Implantation: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Device-related thrombosis (DRT) is one of the greatest challenges of transcatheter left atrial appendage device occlusion. Due to the invasive nature of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is being increasingly utilized in several centers for assessing adequate left atrial appendage closure and monitoring for DRT. There is a paucity of data regarding the standardized definition of DRT on CCTA for the WATCHMAN FLX™ device. METHODS/MATERIALS: A retrospective review was conducted on 43 patients receiving WATCHMAN FLX™ device implantation with CCTA performed at the first follow-up at our institution. A comparative review of DRT predictors was performed on 10 patients who had both CCTA and TEE at the time of follow-up. RESULTS: Hypoattenuated thickening (HAT) was a common finding on CCTA and was noted to be present in 95.35% of the patients. The combination of a large device size, peridevice gap >4 mm, and HAT located on the device gutter and 1 shoulder were characteristics present on CCTA observed in 2 patients with confirmed DRT on TEE. CONCLUSION: CCTA is a noninvasive imaging modality for DRT monitoring, with guidelines still in development. We report potential predictors of DRT on CCTA. Additional studies are needed to further determine standardized parameters for DRT detection on CCTA and the significance of HAT with multimodality correlation.

3D Transesophageal Echocardiography for Guiding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Without Prior Cardiac Computed Tomography in Patients With Renal Dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Pre-procedural chronic kidney disease (CKD) and in-hospital acute kidney injury (AKI) are associated with worse outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We tested the feasibility of reducing overall AKI by avoiding pre-procedural cardiac CT angiography (CCTA) by using direct 3D-TEE guidance in TAVR patients with known CKD. METHODS: An institutional TAVR database was examined from January 2016 to June 2020 to identify 396 patients in whom CCTA sizing was performed and 54 patients with creatinine (Cr) of >1.6 mg/dL in whom direct 3D-TEE, without prior CCTA, was used for TAVR guidance. Baseline demographics, procedural, echocardiographic, and clinical endpoints were compared as defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria. RESULTS: Baseline demographics and risk factors were similar in both groups other than the creatinine level in CCTA vs. TEE groups (1.33 ± 1.1 vs 1.76 ± 0.7 mg/dL, p = 0.005). Procedural contrast volume was significantly lower in the TEE group compared to the CCTA group. No differences were noted in echocardiographic and clinical endpoints for both groups. Despite higher baseline Cr, patents in the TEE group experienced a similar pattern of changes in Cr compared to the CCTA group, with an overall renal improvement noted at the time of discharge for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with baseline CKD, careful avoidance of large contrast loads associated with CCTA and intra-procedural aortography by using TEE guidance may help reduce AKI following TAVR.

CT assessment of the left atrial appendage post-transcatheter occlusion - A systematic review and meta analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the standard imaging modality used to assess the left atrial appendage (LAA) after transcatheter device occlusion. Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) offers an alternative non-invasive modality in these patients. We aimed to conduct a comparison of the two modalities. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive systematic review of the current literature pertaining to CCTA to establish its usefulness during follow-up for patients undergoing LAA device closure. Studies that reported the prevalence of inadequate LAA closure on both CCTA and TEE were further evaluated in a meta-analysis. 19 studies were used in the systematic review, and six studies were used in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: The use of CCTA was associated with a higher likelihood of detecting LAA patency than the use of TEE (OR, 2.79, 95% CI 1.34-5.80, p â€‹= â€‹0.006, I2 â€‹= â€‹70.4%). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of peridevice gap ≥5 â€‹mm (OR, 3.04, 95% CI 0.70-13.17, p â€‹= â€‹0.13, I2 â€‹= â€‹0%) between the two modalities. Studies that reported LAA assessment in early and delayed phase techniques detected a 25%-50% higher prevalence of LAA patency on the delayed imaging. CONCLUSION: CCTA can be used as an alternative to TEE for LAA assessment post occlusion. Standardized CCTA acquisition and interpretation protocols should be developed for clinical practice.

Usefulness of Semisupervised Machine-Learning-Based Phenogrouping to Improve Risk Assessment for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Semisupervised machine-learning methods are able to learn from fewer labeled patient data. We illustrate the potential use of a semisupervised automated machine-learning (AutoML) pipeline for phenotyping patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation and identifying patient groups with similar clinical outcome. Using the Transcatheter Valve Therapy registry data, we divided 344 patients into 2 sequential cohorts (cohort 1, n = 211, cohort 2, n = 143). We investigated patient similarity analysis to identify unique phenogroups of patients in the first cohort. We subsequently applied the semisupervised AutoML to the second cohort for developing automatic phenogroup labels. The patient similarity network identified 5 patient phenogroups with substantial variations in clinical comorbidities and in-hospital and 30-day outcomes. Cumulative assessment of patients from both cohorts revealed lowest rates of procedural complications in Group 1. In comparison, Group 5 was associated with higher rates of in-hospital cardiovascular mortality (odds ratio [OR] 35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4 to 309, p = 0.001), in-hospital all-cause mortality (OR 9, 95% CI 2 to 33, p = 0.002), 30-day cardiovascular mortality (OR 18, 95% CI 3 to 94, p <0.001), and 30-day all-cause mortality (OR 3, 95% CI 1.2 to 9, p = 0.02) . For 30-day cardiovascular mortality, using phenogroup data in conjunction with the Society of Thoracic Surgeon score improved the overall prediction of mortality versus using the Society of Thoracic Surgeon scores alone (AUC 0.96 vs AUC 0.8, p = 0.02). In conclusion, we illustrate that semisupervised AutoML platforms identifies unique patient phenogroups who have similar clinical characteristics and overall risk of adverse events post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Outcomes of Routine Intracardiac Echocardiography to Guide Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the safety and hospital charges between intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)- and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). BACKGROUND: TEE has been the gold standard imaging modality to guide LAAO. Although ICE has emerged as an alternative to guide LAAO, data on the safety, and cost effectiveness of its routine remain limited. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent LAAO with ICE or TEE guidance at the West Virginia University Clinic were compared for the following endpoints: 1) technical success; 2) procedure-related events; 3) hospital charges; and 4) peri-device leak, device embolization, or device thrombus at 45 days. RESULTS: After excluding patients who underwent a concomitant non-LAAO intervention, 286 patients (n = 196 TEE, n = 90 ICE) were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were similar. Technical success was achieved in 97.8% and 97.4% of the patients in the ICE and TEE groups, respectively (p = 0.88). No patients in the ICE group required conversion to TEE or general anesthesia. Major procedure-related events occurred in 3.3% and 4.1% of the patients in the ICE and TEE groups, respectively (p = 0.76). Procedural and fluoroscopy times were similar (35.2 ± 11.3 min vs. 36.6 ± 15.6 min; p = 0.42 and 14.2 ± 3.6 min vs. 13.8 ± 8.9 min; p = 0.67, respectively). However, in-room time was shorter with ICE (78.7 ± 19.5 min vs. 113.6 ± 18.1 min; p < 0.001). Hospital charges were higher with ICE ($76,366 ± $8,028 vs. $71,114 ± $10,802; p < 0.001), whereas professional fees were higher with TEE ($6,033 ± $1,081 vs. $2,654 ± $395; p < 0.001). However, global charges were similar with ICE and TEE ($79,020 ± $8,241 vs. $77,147 ± $10,941; p = 0.15). Follow-up imaging at 45 ± 15 days showed similar rates of peri-device leaks, device thrombi, and iatrogenic atrial septal defects. CONCLUSIONS: ICE-guided LAAO is associated with similar outcomes and hospital charges compared with TEE-guided LAAO.

Incidence and Clinical Impact of Device-Related Thrombus Following Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the incidence and clinical impact of device related thrombus (DRT) following precautions left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). BACKGROUND: Device-related thrombus is a known complication of LAAO. However, data on the incidence of DRT and its impact on outcomes are limited. METHODS: The authors performed a meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies to calculate the pooled incidence of DRT and the pooled odds ratio (OR) of ischemic events in patients with DRT and those without DRT. RESULTS: In the 66 included studies; the incidence of DRT was 351/10, 153 (3.8%, range 0% to 17%, I2 = 56.8). The diagnosis was made in <90, 90 to 365, and >365 days in 42%, 57%, and 1% of patients, respectively. There was no difference in DRT rates between the AMPLATZER (AMPLATZER, AGA Medical Corporation, Golden Valley, Minnesota) and WATCHMAN (WATCHMAN, Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts) devices (3.6% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.24). In a meta-regression, age, gender, heart failure, diabetes, CHA2DS2-VASc score, previous stroke, and post-LAAO antithrombotic regimen did not explain the heterogeneity in the incidence of DRT. The pooled incidence of ischemic events in studies that compared outcomes of patients with and without DRT (32 studies; n = 7,689) was 13.2% (37 of 280) in patients with DRT and 3.8% (285 of 7,399) in those without DRT (OR: 5.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.66 to 7.59; p < 0.001, I2 = 0). In a sensitivity analysis including randomized trials and prospective multicenter registries, the incidence of DRT was 3.7%, and DRT remained associated with higher rates of ischemic events (13.5% vs. 4.4%, OR: 4.15, 95% CI: 2.77 to 6.22; p < 0.001, I2 = 0). CONCLUSIONS: DRT after LAAO is uncommon (3.8%) but is associated with a 4- to 5-fold increase in ischemic events. Further studies are needed to understand the underlying mechanisms and the optimal surveillance and management of DRT.

1-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Mitral Annular Calcification.

BACKGROUND: The risk of surgical mitral valve replacement in patients with severe mitral annular calcification (MAC) is high. Several patients worldwide with severe MAC have been treated successfully with transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) using balloon-expandable aortic transcatheter valves. The TMVR in MAC Global Registry is a multicenter registry that collects data on outcomes of these procedures. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate 1-year outcomes in this registry. METHODS: This study was a multicenter retrospective review of clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 116 extreme surgical risk patients with severe MAC underwent TMVR; 106 had a procedure date >1 year before data-lock and were included in the analysis. Their mean age was 73 ± 12 years, and 68% were female. The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 15.3 ± 11.6%, and 90% were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV. Thirty-day and 1-year all-cause mortality was 25% and 53.7%, respectively. Most patients who survived 30 days were alive at 1 year (49 of 77 [63.6%]), and the majority (71.8%) were in New York Heart Association functional class I or II. Echocardiography data at 1 year were available in 34 patients. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 58.6 ± 11.2%, mean mitral valve area was 1.9 ± 0.5 cm2, mean mitral gradient was 5.8 ± 2.2 mm Hg, and 75% had zero or trace mitral regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS: TMVR with balloon-expandable aortic valves in extreme surgical risk patients with severe MAC is feasible but associated with high 30-day and 1-year mortality. Most patients who survive the 30-day post-procedural period are alive at 1 year and have sustained improvement of symptoms and transcatheter valve performance. The role of TMVR in patients with MAC requires further evaluation in clinical trials.

Circulating miRNA in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome and coronary artery disease (CAD) is the cardiac manifestation of metabolic syndrome. NAFLD is strongly linked to CAD and hepatic steatosis is an independent risk factor for CAD and cardiac mortality. The pathogenic mechanism underlying this association remains poorly understood. In this study, we explored expression of circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) in patients with NAFLD and associated CAD. RESULTS: When compared to patients with NAFLD without CAD, patients with NAFLD and CAD had lower circulating levels of miR-132 (0.24±0.16 vs 0.30±0.11, p=0.03), while the circulating levels of miR-143 were higher (0.96±0.90 vs 0.64±0.77, p=0.02). The levels in circulation demonstrated trends opposite to previously observed intracellular levels in patients with CAD. In obese patients with NAFLD, lower circulating levels of miR-145 (1.42±1.00 vs 2.41±1.80), miR-211 (41.26±20.40 vs 57.56±25.45), miR-146a (2.13±1.40 vs 2.90±1.36) and miR-30c (6.92±4.99 vs 11.0±6.92) were detected when compared to lean patients with NAFLD. For miR-161 (0.59±1.19 vs 0.15±0.14) and miR-241 (0.28±0.29 vs 0.16±0.13), higher circulatory levels were detected in the obese patients with NAFLD. These observations suggest altered circulating levels of miRNAs that may serve to balance intracellular levels of miRNA in target tissues. Additional studies examining paired samples of target and producing tissues as well as respective plasma samples will help delineate the regulatory circuits governing the secretion and the uptake of miRNA in multitissue diseases.

The Effect of Initiation of a Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Program in the Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis.

We assessed the effect of a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) program and Heart Team concept on our approach to severe isolated symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) with regard to surgical practice, patient selection, perioperative outcomes, 1-year survival, and AVR volume. TAVR program began in August 2011. Patients having isolated surgical AVR between January 2008 and August 2011, when the program began (n = 282, 42 months), were compared with those after the program began until February 2015 (n = 344, surgical AVR and n = 126, TAVR, 42 months). Isolated surgical AVR accounted for 21% of all valve procedures (isolated and concomitant) before and after the TAVR program. However, the volume of all isolated AVR (surgical and transcatheter) increased to 27% of all valve procedures (isolated and concomitant) after the TAVR program implementation. Mean Society Of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)-predicted mortality risk was similar among patients who had surgical AVR pre-TAVR and post-TAVR implementation (2.3% vs 2.1%, P = 0.227), but addition of patients who had TAVR (STS risk = 7.1%) increased STS-predicted risk for all isolated AVR (surgical and transcatheter) procedures (2.3% vs 3.4%, P < 0.001). A similar trend was found for age, including a slight decrease in octogenarians for surgical AVR post-TAVR (18% vs 13%, P = 0.084). Operative mortality for isolated surgical AVR was similar in pre-TAVR and post-TAVR (2.1% vs 1.8%, P = 0.798), as were observed/expected (O/E) ratios (0.91 vs 0.82). For all isolated AVR, O/E ratio was 0.91 pre-TAVR and 0.82 post-TAVR (n = 470), including O/E = 0.79 for patients who had TAVR. No changes were found in proportion of isolated surgical AVR cases or patient risk and outcomes after introduction of TAVR program and Heart Team. However, volume of patients with severe AS treated increased significantly post-TAVR. Our results reflect growing awareness of TAVR availability and accompanying increases in patients referred to our Heart Team for AS treatment.