RESUMO
Results of the surgical treatment of 172 patients with tumors of the proximal part of the stomach and colon are analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the method of forming the esophago-intestinal and colono-intestinal anastomoses. Suture incompetence and peritonitis were shown to appear much more rarely after using a microsurgical technique than after using surgical methods.
Assuntos
Colectomia/métodos , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Gastrectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Microcirurgia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Peritonite/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/prevenção & controle , Técnicas de SuturaRESUMO
At different stages of examination and treatment in esophageal cancer patients there arise a large number of diagnostic errors, making from 28.3% to 32.7% as shown by our findings. A primary x-ray examination fails to detect tumor in 13.8-19.2% of patients. Most frequently diagnostic errors were due to underestimation of the clinical symptoms (first of all dysphagia and pains in food passage along the esophagus); a long period of time elapsed since patients' referral till roentgenological examination, poor potentialities of the latter in terms of detecting early esophageal cancer. If esophageal cancer is reasonably suspected then esophagoscopy is felt to be mandatory in all cases with negative roentgenological findings. To timely recognize esophageal tumors and lessen the number of diagnostic errors, it seems rational to establish special centers for endoscopic examination (fiberoptic esophagogastroscopy), where this category of patients should be referred to.