Durable ventricular assist devices for patients with advanced heart failure: the New Zealand experience.

AIMS: The prevalence of heart failure in New Zealand is increasing. A small number of select patients with predicted poor short-term survival are candidates for advanced heart failure therapies such as transplantation and durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS). The aim of our study was to introduce left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) to the wider clinicians and highlight their role in managing patients with advanced heart failure in New Zealand. METHOD: A retrospective audit of all ventricular assist device (VAD) recipients from January 2005 to December 2022 was conducted. Data were collated using electronic medical and paper records. The primary outcome was survival to transplantation or successful explant of VAD. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients received VADs; 32 were male and seven female. Mean age was 45 years (range 10-64 years). Most recipients were NZ European (25), six were Maori, four were Pacific peoples and four were of other ethnicities. The majority of LVADs were implanted for those with dilated cardiomyopathy (67%). At the time of data collection, 24 (62%) had survived to heart transplantation, seven (18%) died while on VAD support, five from right ventricular failure and two from strokes, one patient had their VAD explanted due to recovery and seven (18%) VAD recipients continue on support awaiting transplant. CONCLUSION: This audit has provided an opportunity to inform New Zealand clinicians of our durable MCS programme and the expanding role of VAD support in patients with advanced heart failure. The programme will need to continue to audit and report its practice in order to provide equitable allocation of this very limited resource to a growing population in need.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Discussed by the Multidisciplinary "Heart Team" According to Treatment Allocation.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an alternative and effective contemporary intervention to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for patients with severe aortic valve disease at increased surgical risk. Guidelines recommend a multidisciplinary "Heart Team" (MHT) review of patients considered for a TAVI procedure, but this has been little studied. We reviewed the characteristics, treatments and outcomes of such patients reviewed by the MHT at our centre. METHODS: Data on consecutive patients with severe aortic valve stenosis discussed by the Auckland City Hospital MHT from June 2011 to August 2016 were obtained from clinical records. Patient characteristics, treatment and outcomes were analysed using standard statistical methods. RESULTS: Over the 5-year period 243 patients (mean age 80.2 ± 8.0 years, 60% male) were presented at the MHT meeting. TAVI was recommended for 200, SAVR for 26 and medical therapy for 17 patients, with no significant difference in mean age (80.2 ± 8.3, 80.4 ± 6.1, 80.4 ± 7.3 years, respectively) or EuroSCORE II (6.5 ± 4.7%, 5.3 ± 3.6%, 6.7 ± 4.3%, respectively). Over time, there was an increase in the number of patients discussed and treated, with no change in their mean age, but the mean EuroSCORE II significantly decreased (TAVI p = 0.026, SAVR p = 0.004). Survival after TAVI and SAVR was similar to that of the age-matched general population, but superior to medical therapy p = 0.002 (93% (n = 162), 84% (n = 21) and 73% (n = 18) at one year and 85% (n = 149), 84% (n = 21) and 54% (n = 13) at 2 years, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: An increasing number of patients were discussed at the MHT meeting with the majority undergoing TAVI, with a similar age and EuroSCORE II to those allocated SAVR or medical therapy. Survival following TAVI and SAVR was superior to medical therapy and similar to the age-matched general population. These findings suggest that the MHT process is robust, consistent and appropriately allocating a limited treatment resource.