RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In December 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued emergency use authorization for the combination monoclonal antibodies tixagevimab and cilgavimab (Evusheld - AstraZeneca) for COVID-19 pre-exposure prophylaxis. While COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, there is concern for insufficient antibody response in patients receiving B-cell depleting therapies. The literature is sparse regarding the safety and efficacy of Evusheld use in MS patients. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the administration, safety, and efficacy of Evusheld in MS patients. METHODS: Participants were consecutively recruited from the UCSD MS Center from July 2022 to October 2022. We conducted both a review of medical records and a prospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria included prior diagnosis of MS and eligibility for Evusheld injection due to use of B-cell depleting disease modifying therapy (DMT). All eligible patients were evaluated to determine uptake of Evusheld use. Participant surveys were distributed to Evusheld recipients that evaluated for potential Evusheld side effects and COVID-19 vaccination and infection history. The proportion of COVID-19 infections among participants with or without Evusheld use were compared using Fisher's exact test, and a negative binomial regression analysis was used to evaluate risk for COVID-19 infection after Evusheld administration. RESULTS: A review of medical records showed that 79 MS patients were offered Evusheld by their clinicians during the recruitment period; 48 patients ultimately received the injection. Forty-two participants consented to the prospective cross-sectional study (mean age 46.4 years, 71.8 % female), of which 33 individuals received Evusheld. All participants received at least one COVID-19 vaccination dose, with 92.3 % receiving the initial series and at least one booster dose. One-third (30.8 %) of participants had a previous COVID-19 infection. DMTs included ocrelizumab, rituximab, and ofatumumab. Of the 33 participants who received Evusheld, 10 (30.3 %) reported experiencing at least one side effect. Injection site reactions included pain (most common), itchiness, and redness. General side effects included fatigue (most common), headache, muscle pain, and weakness. Of the 33 participants who received Evusheld, seven participants (21.2 %) tested positive for COVID-19 within 6 months of Evusheld injection. In an unadjusted binomial regression analysis, Evusheld administration was associated with a reduction in COVID-19 infection risk (OR 0.22, 95 % CI 0.05 - 1.02, p = 0.05). After adjusting for age and sex, Evusheld administration was still associated with a lower COVID-19 infection risk though it did not achieve nominal significance (OR 0.21, 95 % CI 0.04 - 1.09, p = 0.06). Of the 9 participants who were offered but did not receive Evusheld, five (55.6 %) tested positive for COVID-19 (p = 0.04 with Pearson's chi square test and p = 0.09 on Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSIONS: Our medical records data demonstrated that only 61 % of MS patients offered Evusheld received the injection. Evusheld seems to be largely well-tolerated. No serious adverse effects were reported. The use of Evusheld was associated with fewer COVID-19 infections, but this did not reach nominal statistical significance in the modest sample size. The lessons learned from the initial Evusheld experience may be applied to future interventions directed at infection prevention in MS patients on immunomodulatory therapies.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: It is not uncommon for patients requiring vascular surgery, and in particular aortic surgery, to have increased requirements for blood transfusion. However, studies examining the effects of perioperative transfusion for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) are limited. Using large multicenter data, we aimed to study the impact of perioperative blood transfusion on 30-day mortality and complications after TEVAR. METHODS: A total of 9,263 patients who underwent TEVAR were included in this retrospective study from the multicenter Vascular Quality Initiative cohort spanning 2010-2022. We excluded patients who were post-traumatic, anemic (World Health Organization criteria: hemoglobin < 12 g/dl and < 13 g/dl for females and males respectively), who underwent open conversions or presented with ruptured aneurysms. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and stroke. Secondary outcomes were postop congestive heart failure (CHF), respiratory complications, spinal cord ischemia (SCI), myocardial infarction (MI) and any postop complications (composite variable). Poisson regression with robust variance was performed to determine the risk of post op outcomes comparing patients who received red blood cells (RBCs) to those who did not. RESULTS: Comparing patients without any transfusion (n = 8,223), perioperative transfusion of 1-3 units (n = 735) was associated with 3-fold increased risk of 30-day mortality (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 3.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.39,4.57, P < 0.001), almost 2-fold increased risk of stroke (aRR 1.98, 95% CI 1.24,3.15, P = 0.004), 2.7-fold increased risk of SCI (aRR 2.66, 95% CI 1.87-3.77, P < 0.001), 3-fold increased risk of MI (aRR 3.40, 95% CI 2.30, 5.03, P < 0.001), 2-fold increased risk of CHF (aRR 2.04, 95% CI 1.09, 3.83, P = 0.03), 3.5-fold increased risk of respiratory complications (aRR 3.49, 95% CI 2.67, 4.56, P < 0.001), and 2-fold increased risk of any postop complication (aRR 2.36, 95% CI 2.04, 2.73, P < 0.001). These effects were even higher in patients transfused 4 or more units (n = 305) than seen in the effects seen in those transfused 1-3 units; comparing each group to patients who received none. CONCLUSIONS: In hemodynamically stable patients undergoing TEVAR for nonemergent/emergent and nontraumatic indications, transfusion of any amount perioperatively is associated with worse 30-day mortality, stroke, SCI, MI, CHF, and respiratory complications. A conservative transfusion approach and multidisciplinary care to identify complications and rescue TEVAR patients who receive any amount of RBCs perioperatively might help improve outcomes. Future studies to understand the mechanisms of outcomes for transfused patients are needed.
