Percepción de utilidad entre profesionales sanitarios de un servicio de consultoría ética clínica / Healthcare workers’ perception of the usefulness of a healthcare ethics consultation service

Antecedentes y objetivo Los servicios de consultoría en ética clínica (CEC) surgen de los comités de ética para la asistencia sanitaria (CEAS) para atender conflictos éticos en tiempo real. Nuestro objetivo es conocer la percepción de utilidad de la CEC entre los profesionales sanitarios tras un año de su creación, así como evaluar los cambios de tendencia en el uso de la CEC y de los CEAS entre 2015 y 2021. Material y método Estudio observacional transversal mediante una encuesta estandarizada a los profesionales sanitarios de un hospital terciario urbano. Se compararon estos resultados con los de una encuesta idéntica realizada sobre la misma población en 2015. Resultados Participaron 213 profesionales (edad media 44 ± 11 años, 69% mujeres). Los profesionales conocían más la existencia de los CEAS que la CEC (94 vs. 61%; p<0,001). Un total de 45 encuestados (21%) habían consultado a la CEC desde su puesta en marcha; el 95% de ellos reconocían la utilidad de la consulta. Los facultativos conocían y utilizaban más la CEC que otros grupos profesionales. El grado de conocimiento sobre los CEAS en 2021 aumentó significativamente respecto a 2015 (94 vs. 76%; p<0,001). Se identificaron como áreas de mejora la necesidad de una mayor difusión del servicio, garantizar recursos institucionales para su mantenimiento y fomentar mayor participación de distintos profesionales. Conclusiones En los últimos años ha aumentado el conocimiento de los CEAS y de la CEC entre los profesionales sanitarios quienes consideran a la CEC útil para la atención de problemas éticos cotidianos (AU)

Background and objective Clinical ethics consultation services (CEC) have arisen from healthcare ethics committees (HEC) to address ethical conflicts in real-time. Our aim was to determine the perception of usefulness of a CEC service among healthcare workers one year after its creation as well as to assess changes in trends in the use of the CEC and HEC between 2015 and 2021. Material and method This observational, cross-sectional study was based on a standardized survey of healthcare workers at an urban tertiary care hospital. The results were also compared to those from an identical survey conducted in the same population in 2015. Results A total of 213 professionals participated (mean age 44±11 years, 69% women). The professionals were more familiar with the HEC than the CEC service (94 vs. 61%; p<0.001). Forty-five individuals (21%) had consulted the CEC since its implementation; 95% of them found the consultation useful. Physicians knew about and used the CEC more than other groups of professionals. The degree of knowledge of the HEC increased significantly by 2021 compared to 2015 (94 vs. 76%; p<0.001). Some areas for improvement identified were the need for greater dissemination of the service, guaranteeing institutional resources to maintain the service, and encouraging greater participation from different professional groups. Conclusions Knowledge of the institutional HEC and CEC services has increased in recent years among healthcare workers, who considered the CEC service to be useful for addressing ethical conflicts in daily practice (AU)

Healthcare workers' perception of the usefulness of a healthcare ethics consultation service.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Clinical ethics consultation services (CEC) have arisen from Healthcare Ethics Committees (HEC) to address ethical conflicts in real-time. Our aim was to determine the perception of usefulness of a CEC service among healthcare workers one year after its creation as well as to assess changes in trends in the use of the CEC and HEC between 2015 and 2021. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational, cross-sectional study was based on a standardized survey of healthcare workers at an urban tertiary care hospital. The results were also compared to those from an identical survey conducted in the same population in 2015. RESULTS: A total of 213 professionals participated (mean age 44 ± 11 years, 69% women). The professionals were more familiar with the HEC than the CEC service (94% vs 61%; p < 0.001). Forty-five individuals (21%) had consulted the CEC since its implementation; 95% of them found the consultation useful. Physicians knew about and used the CEC more than other groups of professionals. The degree of knowledge of the HEC increased significantly by 2021 compared to 2015 (94% v. 76%; p < 0.001). Some areas for improvement identified were the need for greater dissemination of the service, guaranteeing institutional resources to maintain the service, and encouraging greater participation from different professional groups. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of the institutional HEC and CEC services has increased in recent years among healthcare workers, who considered the CEC service to be useful for addressing ethical conflicts in daily practice.

Descripción de la experiencia de un servicio de consultoría en ética clínica en el período 2019-2021 / Description of the experience of a clinical ethics consultation service from 2019-2021

Introducción La consultoría en ética clínica (CEC) es un modelo útil de asesoría ética, pero con escasa implantación en Europa. En el presente artículo se comparte la experiencia de uno de los primeros servicios de consultoría ética en España. Material y métodos Estudio observacional retrospectivo de todas las consultas recibidas por el servicio de CEC del Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (Madrid, España) entre el 1 de septiembre de 2019 y el 31 de agosto de 2021. Se analizaron variables demográficas, logísticas y éticas de los casos. Resultados Se analizaron 63 casos, en los que se identificaron un total de 124 conflictos éticos. El 41% (n=26) de las consultas eran de carácter urgente y el 38% (n=24), preferentes. La evaluación inicial se realizó en menos de 24horas en 50 casos (79%). El servicio que consultó con mayor frecuencia fue Medicina Intensiva (9; 14%). Los medios de contacto preferidos fueron el busca (36; 57%), el sistema electrónico de historia clínica (13; 21%) o la conversación directa con el equipo consultor (7; 11%). Los problemas éticos más comunes estaban relacionados con la adecuación de medidas terapéuticas (24; 19%), el rechazo del tratamiento (19; 15%), la comunicación con el paciente o su familia (29; 23%) o la competencia del paciente (13; 11%). Conclusiones Los servicios de CEC proporcionan una asistencia rápida y eficiente para la resolución de problemas éticos en la práctica habitual. Su implementación en España es factible (AU)

Introduction Clinical ethics consultation services (CEC) are useful model for ethical counselling, albeit with scarce implementation in European countries. This article shares the experience of one of the first ethics consultation services in Spain. Materials and methods This work is a retrospective, observational study of all consultations received by the CEC service at La Princesa University Hospital (Madrid, Spain) from September 1, 2019 to August 31, 2021. The demographic, logistic, and ethical variables of the cases were analyzed. Results A total of 63 cases were analyzed in which a total of 124 ethical conflicts were identified. Forty-one percent of the cases (n=26) were emergency consultations and 38% (n=24) were preferential inquiries. An initial evaluation was performed with 24hours in 50 cases (79%). The department that consulted most often was the Intensive Care Unit (9; 14%). The preferred contact methods were via pager (36; 57%), the electronic medical record system (13; 21%), or direct conversations with consulting team (7; 11%). The most common ethical conflicts were those related to the adequacy of treatment measures (24; 19%), refusal of treatment (19; 15%), communication with the patient or his/her family (29; 23%), or the patient's capacity (13; 11%). Conclusion CEC services provide quick, efficient assistance for resolving ethical problems in daily practice. Their implementation in Spain is feasible (AU)

Description of the experience of a clinical ethics consultation service from 2019 to 2021.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical ethics consultation services (CEC) are useful model for ethical counselling, albeit with scarce implementation in European countries. This article shares the experience of one of the first ethics consultation services in Spain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This work is a retrospective, observational study of all consultations received by the CEC service at La Princesa University Hospital (Madrid, Spain) from September 1, 2019 to August 31, 2021. The demographic, logistic, and ethical variables of the cases were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 63 cases were analyzed in which a total of 124 ethical conflicts were identified. Forty-one percent of the cases (n = 26) were emergency consultations and 38% (n = 24) were preferential inquiries. An initial evaluation was performed with 24 h in 50 cases (79%). The department that consulted most often was the Intensive Care Unit (9; 14%). The preferred contact methods were via pager (36; 57%), the electronic medical record system (13; 21%), or direct conversations with consulting team (7; 11%). The most common ethical conflicts were those related to the adequacy of treatment measures (24; 19%), refusal of treatment (19; 15%), communication with the patient or his/her family (29; 23%), or the patient's capacity (13; 11%). CONCLUSION: CEC services provide quick, efficient assistance for resolving ethical problems in daily practice. Their implementation in Spain is feasible.

¿Debe la industria farmacéutica participar en la formación médica continuada? / Should the pharmaceutical industry be involved in continuing medical education?

Introducción En julio del 2020 se presentó en el Congreso de los Diputados español una propuesta de ley que proponía que la formación médica continuada se financiase exclusivamente por las Administraciones públicas, prohibiendo la participación privada. Objetivos Recoger la opinión de médicos y farmacéuticos sobre la propuesta de ley, conocer qué piensan acerca de la financiación de la formación médica continuada y su posible conflicto de interés. Métodos Estudio descriptivo transversal a través de una encuesta de opinión, voluntaria y anonimizada, dirigida a médicos y farmacéuticos hospitalarios. Resultados Se analizan 435 encuestas, el 59,8% de mujeres. El 87,6% son facultativos especialistas y el 77,2% pertenece a especialidades médicas. El 55,2% no está de acuerdo con la propuesta de ley. El 92,4% se muestra de acuerdo con que el Estado y las instituciones privadas subvencionen la formación de sus trabajadores. El 54,2% está en desacuerdo con que cada profesional financie su formación, mientras que el 14% está de acuerdo. El 19,8% no se ha sentido cómodo cuando le han financiado un curso o congreso y el 74,5% considera que la participación privada de la financiación no influye en la prescripción. Conclusiones La mayoría de los encuestados no está de acuerdo con una propuesta de ley que pretende prohibir que la industria farmacéutica financie la formación médica continuada. Casi todos se muestran de acuerdo con que el Estado y las instituciones privadas subvencionen la formación de sus trabajadores. En general, los encuestados no detectan conflictos de interés en su relación con la industria (AU)

Introduction In July 2020, a draft bill was introduced in Spain's Congress which proposed that continuing medical education be funded exclusively by the Spanish government, barring involvement from private entities. Aims This work aims to gather physicians’ and pharmacists’ opinions on this draft bill, learn what they think about the funding of continuing medical education and possible conflicts of interest. Methods This work is a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted via voluntary anonymous surveys aimed at physicians and hospital pharmacists. Results Four hundred thirty-five surveys were analyzed, 59.8% of which were from women. Of the respondents, 87.6% were specialist physicians and 77.2% were part of a specialist department. A total of 55.2% did not agree with the draft bill while 92.4% agreed that the government and private institutes should subsidize training for their workers. Furthermore, 52.4% disagreed that each professional should pay for his or her own training while 14% agreed they should. A total of 19.8% have felt uncomfortable when a course or conference has been paid for by another entity and 74.5% believe that the involvement of private entities in funding does not influence prescribing. Conclusions The majority of those surveyed did not agree with a draft bill aimed at prohibiting the pharmaceutical industry from funding continuing medical education. Nearly all agreed that the government and private institutions should fund training for their workers. In general, those surveyed did not find conflicts of interest in their relationship with the industry (AU)

Should the pharmaceutical industry be involved in continuing medical education?

INTRODUCTION: In July 2020, a draft bill was introduced in Spain's Congress which proposed that continuing medical education be funded exclusively by the Spanish government, barring involvement from private entities. AIMS: This work aims to gather physicians' and pharmacists' opinions on this draft bill, learn what they think about the funding of continuing medical education and possible conflicts of interest. METHODS: This work is a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted via voluntary anonymous surveys aimed at physicians and hospital pharmacists. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-five surveys were analyzed, 59.8% of which were from women. Of the respondents, 87.6% were specialist physicians and 77.2% were part of a specialist department. A total of 55.2% did not agree with the draft bill while 92.4% agreed that the government and private institutes should subsidize training for their workers. Furthermore, 52.4% disagreed that each professional should pay for his or her own training while 14% agreed they should. A total of 19.8% have felt uncomfortable when a course or conference has been paid for by another entity and 74.5% believe that the involvement of private entities in funding does not influence prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of those surveyed did not agree with a draft bill aimed at prohibiting the pharmaceutical industry from funding continuing medical education. Nearly all agreed that the government and private institutions should fund training for their workers. In general, those surveyed did not find conflicts of interest in their relationship with the industry.

¿Cuáles son los conflictos éticos más frecuentes para los internistas españoles? / Which are the most prevalent ethical conflicts for Spanish internists?

Antecedentes y objetivo Los clínicos se enfrentan en su práctica diaria a multitud de conflictos éticos. No hay estudios sobre los tipos de conflictos éticos que se encuentran con más frecuencia y que preocupan más a los clínicos en España. El objetivo de este estudio es describir los conflictos éticos más frecuentes con los que se encuentran los internistas españoles, así como la importancia que los profesionales atribuyen a cada conflicto. Materiales y métodos Estudio observacional transversal a través de una encuesta voluntaria y anónima, dirigida a médicos internistas españoles y distribuida a través de una plataforma ad hoc de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna. Resultados Los problemas éticos más frecuentes y relevantes para los internistas españoles son los relacionados con: el final de la vida (decisiones de limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico, uso de tratamientos paliativos, instauración de órdenes de no reanimación cardiopulmonar); los conflictos que se producen en el seno de la relación clínica, bien con familiares o con pacientes, y la toma de decisiones con pacientes incompetentes. Estos resultados son similares a los de otras series anglosajonas y europeas. Los problemas éticos dificultan más la actividad asistencial a los clínicos que perciben con más frecuencia dichos problemas (50,3%) que los que no los perciben (16%). Conclusiones Los conflictos éticos más frecuentes y relevantes entre los internistas españoles son los relacionados con el manejo del final de la vida, seguidos de los derivados de la relación clínica y el manejo de pacientes incompetentes. Es prioritario diseñar programas de formación que permitan abordar y reconocer mejor dichos problemas (AU)

Background and objective Clinicians face a multitude of ethical conflicts in their daily practice. There have been no studies on the types of ethical conflicts encountered most frequently and that are of most concern to clinicians in Spain. The aim of this study is to report the most common ethical conflicts faced by Spanish internists, as well as the importance that the practitioners attribute to each conflict. Materials and Methods Our observational cross-sectional study employed a voluntary and anonymous survey aimed at Spanish medical internists and distributed through an ad hoc platform of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine. Results The most common and relevant ethical issues for Spanish internists are related to patients’ end of life (decisions limiting therapeutic effort, use of palliative treatments, the establishment of do-not-resuscitate orders), the conflicts arising within the doctor-patient/family relationship, and making decisions with noncompetent patients. These results are similar to those of other English and European series. The ethical problems further complicate the healthcare activity of clinicians who more often notice these problems (50.3%) than those who do not notice them (16%). Conclusions The most common and relevant ethical conflicts among Spanish internists are related to managing patients’ end of life, followed by those related to the doctor-patient relationship and the management of noncompetent patients. It is essential that training programs be designed to better address and recognise these problems (AU)

Which are the most prevalent ethical conflicts for Spanish internists?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Clinicians face a multitude of ethical conflicts in their daily practice. There have been no studies on the types of ethical conflicts encountered most frequently and that are of most concern to clinicians in Spain. The aim of this study is to report the most common ethical conflicts faced by Spanish internists, as well as the importance that the practitioners attribute to each conflict. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our observational cross-sectional study employed a voluntary and anonymous survey aimed at Spanish medical internists and distributed through an ad hoc platform of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine. RESULTS: The most common and relevant ethical issues for Spanish internists are related to patients' end of life (decisions limiting therapeutic effort, use of palliative treatments, the establishment of do-not-resuscitate orders), the conflicts arising within the doctor-patient/family relationship, and making decisions with noncompetent patients. These results are similar to those of other English and European series. The ethical problems further complicate the healthcare activity of clinicians who more often notice these problems (50.3%) than those who do not notice them (16%). CONCLUSIONS: The most common and relevant ethical conflicts among Spanish internists are related to managing patients' end of life, followed by those related to the doctor-patient relationship and the management of noncompetent patients. It is essential that training programs be designed to better address and recognise these problems.

Do internists know what limitation of therapeutic effort means?

OBJECTIVES: To ascertain whether internists know what limitation of therapeutic effort (LTE) means and whether training in palliative care affects this understanding. METHODS: A survey was administered to Spanish internists on their knowledge of LTE and training in palliative care. RESULTS: A total of 273 respondents completed the survey (mean age, 42±12 years), 80.2% of whom were associates. Some 23.8% of the respondents identified the complete definition of LTE. The most frequently selected responses were "not starting an active treatment" (85.0%) and "withdrawing an active treatment" (65.9%). Forty-three percent of the respondents lacked training in palliative care, 73.3% considered their level of understanding to be good or very good, 62.3% stated that they became anxious when addressing planning for end-of-life care with a patient, and 81.3% stated that they had experienced some conflict with their LTE decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Only 1 of every 4 internists knew the proper definition of LTE, with no association with the level of training in palliative care.

¿Saben los internistas qué es la limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico? / Do internists know what limitation of therapeutic effort means?

Objetivos Averiguar si los internistas saben qué es la limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico (LET) y si la formación en cuidados paliativos condiciona dicho conocimiento. Métodos Encuesta a los internistas españoles sobre el conocimiento de la LET y la formación en cuidados paliativos. Resultados Se recibieron 273 encuestas; edad media de los que respondieron 42±12 años; el 80,2% eran adjuntos. El 23,8% identificó la definición completa de la LET; las opciones más escogidas fueron «no iniciar un tratamiento activo» (85,0%) y «retirar un tratamiento activo» (65,9%). El 43% carece de formación en cuidados paliativos, el 73,3% considera que su nivel de conocimiento es bueno o muy bueno, al 62,3% le genera ansiedad afrontar la planificación de cuidados al final de la vida con el paciente y el 81,3% ha tenido algún conflicto con sus decisiones de la LET. Conclusiones Solo 1 de cada 4internistas conoce bien la definición de la LET, sin asociación con el grado de formación en cuidados paliativos (AU)

Objectives To ascertain whether internists know what limitation of therapeutic effort (LTE) means and whether training in palliative care affects this understanding. Methods A survey was administered to Spanish internists on their knowledge of LTE and training in palliative care. Results A total of 273 respondents completed the survey (mean age, 42±12 years), 80.2% of whom were associates. Some 23.8% of the respondents identified the complete definition of LTE. The most frecuently selected responses were «not starting an active treatment»(85.0%) and «withdrawing an active treatment» (65.9%). Forty-three percent of the respondents lacked training in palliative care, 73.3% considered their level of understanding to be good or very good, 62.3% stated that they became anxious when addressing planning for end-of-life care with a patient, and 81.3% stated that they had experienced some conflict with their LTE decisions. Conclusions Only 1 of every 4 internists knew the proper definition of LTE, with no association with level of training in palliative care (AU)

Características de los adultos con síndrome de Down ingresados en los servicios de medicina interna españoles en el periodo 2005-2014 / Characteristics of adults with Down syndrome hospitalised in Spanish internal medicine departments during 2005-2014

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: Los problemas clínicos de los adultos con síndrome de Down parecen diferir de los de la población general. Para entender mejor estas diferencias describimos las características demográficas y clínicas de los adultos con síndrome de Down que ingresaron en los servicios de Medicina Interna españoles en el periodo de 2005-2014. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional retrospectivo sobre datos recogidos en el conjunto mínimo básico de datos de los episodios de ingreso de adultos con síndrome de Down en los servicios de Medicina Interna del Sistema Nacional de Salud desde 2005 hasta 2014. Se analizaron variables epidemiológicas, clínicas y sociales. RESULTADOS: Se registraron 7.548 episodios de ingreso de 3.786 pacientes. El 56,6% eran varones con una edad media (± DE) de 47±13 años. Fallecieron 715 pacientes (18,9%). La mortalidad ajustada a la edad fue 26,6% y su estancia media fue de 9,6±12 días. En 3.684 episodios (48,8%) el ingreso fue por enfermedad respiratoria y en 760 (10%), de origen cardiológico. Las comorbilidades más frecuentes fueron el hipotiroidismo (27,1%; 2.043 episodios), la epilepsia (24,1%; 1.819 episodios) y la demencia (15,4%; 1.162 episodios). CONCLUSIONES: Los ingresos de adultos con síndrome de Down en los servicios de Medicina Interna han aumentado en la última década. Si bien los motivos de ingreso, estancia media y coste por episodio de esta población son similares a los de la población general atendida en Medicina Interna, la mortalidad intrahospitalaria ajustada por edad fue significativamente mayor

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The clinical problems of adults with Down syndrome seem to differ from those of the general population. To better understand these differences, we list the demographic and clinical characteristics of adults with Down syndrome admitted to Spanish internal medicine departments during 2005-2014. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted an observational retrospective study using data collected from the minimum basic data set on hospitalisation episodes of adults with Down syndrome in the internal medicine departments of Spain's National Health System from 2005 to 2014. We analysed the patients' epidemiological, clinical and societal data. RESULTS: A total of 7548 hospitalisation episodes from 3786 patients were recorded. Some 56.6% of the patients were male with a mean age (±SD) of 47±13 years, and 715 of the patients died (18.9%). The age-adjusted mortality was 26.6%, and the mean stay was 9.6±12 days. The hospitalisation was for respiratory disease in 3684 episodes (48.8%) and for cardiac origin in 760 (10%). The most common comorbidities were hypothyroidism (27.1%, 2043 episodes), epilepsy (24.1%, 1819 episodes) and dementia (15.4%, 1162 episodes). CONCLUSIONS: The hospitalisation of adults with Down syndrome in internal medicine departments has increased in the past decade. Although the reasons for hospitalisation, mean stay and cost per episode for this population are similar to those of the general population treated by internal medicine departments, the age-adjusted hospital mortality was significantly greater

Which are the most prevalent ethical conflicts for Spanish internists? / ¿Cuáles son los conflictos éticos más frecuentes para los internistas españoles?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Clinicians face a multitude of ethical conflicts in their daily practice. There have been no studies on the types of ethical conflicts encountered most frequently and that are of most concern to clinicians in Spain. The aim of this study is to report the most common ethical conflicts faced by Spanish internists, as well as the importance that the practitioners attribute to each conflict. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our observational cross-sectional study employed a voluntary and anonymous survey aimed at Spanish medical internists and distributed through an ad hoc platform of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine. RESULTS: The most common and relevant ethical issues for Spanish internists are related to patients' end of life (decisions limiting therapeutic effort, use of palliative treatments, the establishment of do-not-resuscitate orders), the conflicts arising within the doctor-patient/family relationship, and making decisions with noncompetent patients. These results are similar to those of other English and European series. The ethical problems further complicate the healthcare activity of clinicians who more often notice these problems (50.3%) than those who do not notice them (16%). CONCLUSIONS: The most common and relevant ethical conflicts among Spanish internists are related to managing patients' end of life, followed by those related to the doctor-patient relationship and the management of noncompetent patients. It is essential that training programs be designed to better address and recognise these problems.

Perfil hemodinámico de los adultos españoles con síndrome de Down / Haemodynamic profile of Spanish adults with Down syndrome

OBJETIVOS: Si bien se desconocen los motivos, la prevalencia de hipertensión arterial y de eventos cardiovasculares ateroscleróticos en la población adulta con síndrome de Down (SD) es anecdótica. Para entender mejor este hallazgo evaluamos las características hemodinámicas de una cohorte de adultos con SD. MÉTODOS: Estudio transversal en adultos con SD incluidos de modo consecutivo de las consultas externas del servicio de medicina interna entre junio y noviembre 2018. Se recogieron variables demográficas, clínicas y analíticas. Se utilizó un dispositivo de bioimpedancia torácica (HOTMAN® System) para las medidas hemodinámicas. Se realizó una monitorización ambulatoria de presión arterial en un subgrupo de sujetos. RESULTADOS: Veintiséis sujetos de edad media 45±11 años participaron en el estudio (50% varones). La presión arterial (PA) media en la muestra fue de 109/69±11/9mmHg, con una frecuencia cardiaca media de 60±12lpm. Ningún sujeto era hipertenso. El perfil hemodinámico predominante consistió en normodinamismo (65%), normotensión (96%), hipocronotropismo (46%), normoinotropismo (50%) e hipervolemia (54%), con valores normales de resistencias vasculares periféricas (58%). Se realizó una monitorización ambulatoria de la presión sarterial a 12 sujetos (46%). Los valores medios en 24horas de PA sistólica fueron 105±11mmHg, PA diastólica 67±11mmHg, PA media 80±11mmHg y frecuencia cardiaca media 61±6lpm. CONCLUSIONES: El perfil hemodinámico más frecuentemente observado en adultos con SD consistió en hipocronotropismo e hipervolemia, con valores normales de resistencias vasculares periféricas y valores medios óptimos de PA. No identificamos ningún sujeto hipertenso en nuestra muestra

OBJECTIVES: Although the reasons are unknown, the prevalence of arterial hypertension and atherosclerotic cardiovascular events in the adult population with Down syndrome (SD) is anecdotal. To better understand this finding, we evaluated the haemodynamic characteristics of a cohort of adults with SD. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of adults with SD recruited consecutively from the outpatient clinics of an internal medicine department between June and November 2018. We collected demographic, clinical and laboratory variables and employed a thoracic bioimpedance device (HOTMAN® System) for the haemodynamic measures. Outpatient blood pressure monitoring (OBPM) was conducted on a subgroup of participants. RESULTS: Twenty-six participants (mean age, 45±11years) participated in the study (50% men). The sample's mean blood pressure (BP) was 109/69±11/9mmHg, with a mean heart rate of 60±12bpm. None of the participants had hypertension. The predominant haemodynamic profile consisted of normal dynamism (65%), normal BP (96%), hypochronotropism (46%), normal inotropism (50%) and hypervolaemia (54%), with normal peripheral vascular resistance values (58%). Twelve participants underwent OBPM (46%). The mean 24-h systolic BP, diastolic BP, mean BP and mean heart rate were 105±11mmHg, 67±11mmHg, 80±11mmHg and 61±6bpm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The most common haemodynamic profile observed in adults with SD consisted of hypochronotropism and hypervolaemia, with normal values for peripheral vascular resistance and optimal mean BP values. There were no participants with hypertension in our sample

Do internists know what limitation of therapeutic effort means? / ¿Saben los internistas qué es la limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico?

OBJECTIVES: To ascertain whether internists know what limitation of therapeutic effort (LTE) means and whether training in palliative care affects this understanding. METHODS: A survey was administered to Spanish internists on their knowledge of LTE and the training in palliative care. RESULTS: A total of 273 respondents completed the survey (mean age, 42±12 years), 80.2% of whom were associates. Some 23.8% of the respondents identified the complete definition of LTE. The most often chosen responses were «not starting an active treatment¼(85.0%) and «withdrawing an active treatment¼ (65.9%). Forty-three percent of the respondents lacked training in palliative care, 73.3% considered their level of understanding to be good or very good, 62.3% stated that they became anxious when addressing the planning for end-of-life care with the patient, and 81.3% stated that they had had some conflict with their LTE decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Only 1 of every 4 internists knew the proper definition for LTE, with no association with the level of training in palliative care.

Characteristics of adults with Down syndrome hospitalised in Spanish internal medicine departments during 2005-2014. / Características de los adultos con síndrome de Down ingresados en los servicios de medicina interna españoles en el periodo 2005-2014.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The clinical problems of adults with Down syndrome seem to differ from those of the general population. To better understand these differences, we list the demographic and clinical characteristics of adults with Down syndrome admitted to Spanish internal medicine departments during 2005-2014. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted an observational retrospective study using data collected from the minimum basic data set on hospitalisation episodes of adults with Down syndrome in the internal medicine departments of Spain's National Health System from 2005 to 2014. We analysed the patients' epidemiological, clinical and societal data. RESULTS: A total of 7548 hospitalisation episodes from 3786 patients were recorded. Some 56.6% of the patients were male with a mean age (±SD) of 47±13 years, and 715 of the patients died (18.9%). The age-adjusted mortality was 26.6%, and the mean stay was 9.6±12 days. The hospitalisation was for respiratory disease in 3684 episodes (48.8%) and for cardiac origin in 760 (10%). The most common comorbidities were hypothyroidism (27.1%, 2043 episodes), epilepsy (24.1%, 1819 episodes) and dementia (15.4%, 1162 episodes). CONCLUSIONS: The hospitalisation of adults with Down syndrome in internal medicine departments has increased in the past decade. Although the reasons for hospitalisation, mean stay and cost per episode for this population are similar to those of the general population treated by internal medicine departments, the age-adjusted hospital mortality was significantly greater.

Haemodynamic profile of Spanish adults with Down syndrome. / Perfil hemodinámico de los adultos españoles con síndrome de Down.

OBJECTIVES: Although the reasons are unknown, the prevalence of arterial hypertension and atherosclerotic cardiovascular events in the adult population with Down syndrome (SD) is anecdotal. To better understand this finding, we evaluated the haemodynamic characteristics of a cohort of adults with SD. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of adults with SD recruited consecutively from the outpatient clinics of an internal medicine department between June and November 2018. We collected demographic, clinical and laboratory variables and employed a thoracic bioimpedance device (HOTMAN® System) for the haemodynamic measures. Outpatient blood pressure monitoring (OBPM) was conducted on a subgroup of participants. RESULTS: Twenty-six participants (mean age, 45±11years) participated in the study (50% men). The sample's mean blood pressure (BP) was 109/69±11/9mmHg, with a mean heart rate of 60±12bpm. None of the participants had hypertension. The predominant haemodynamic profile consisted of normal dynamism (65%), normal BP (96%), hypochronotropism (46%), normal inotropism (50%) and hypervolaemia (54%), with normal peripheral vascular resistance values (58%). Twelve participants underwent OBPM (46%). The mean 24-h systolic BP, diastolic BP, mean BP and mean heart rate were 105±11mmHg, 67±11mmHg, 80±11mmHg and 61±6bpm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The most common haemodynamic profile observed in adults with SD consisted of hypochronotropism and hypervolaemia, with normal values for peripheral vascular resistance and optimal mean BP values. There were no participants with hypertension in our sample.

El internista como consultor de ética clínica: un antídoto contra "la barbarie delespecialismo" en la práctica hospitalaria / The internist as clinical ethics consultant: An antidote to "the barbarism of specialization" in hospital practice

El desarrollo de la ética clínica hospitalaria en España depende casi exclusivamente de los comités de ética asistencial. Estos han sido criticados por su falta de cercanía a la cabecera del paciente en los conflictos éticos cotidianos y por su escasa operatividad práctica, que se refleja en el escaso número de consultas que reciben. En el presente trabajo reflexionamos sobre la necesidad de modificar el modelo actual de atención en ética clínica para reactivarlo y llamar la atención sobre el papel primordial del internista como motor de dicho cambio. Para ello proponemos un modelo en que los comités de ética asistencial incorporen consultores de ética, mejor posicionados para la discusión de casos a la cabecera del enfermo. Seguidamente analizamos las características que dichos consultores deberían poseer

The development of hospital clinical ethics in Spain depends almost exclusively on the healthcare ethics committees, which have been criticized for a lack of proximity to the patient's bedside in day-to-day ethical conflicts and for their scarce practical operation, reflected in the low number of consultations they receive. In this study, we reflect on the need to change the current healthcare model in clinical ethics so as to reactivate it and call attention to the essential role of internists as the engine for this change. To this end, we propose a model in which the healthcare ethics committees incorporate ethics consultants, who are better positioned to discuss cases at the patient's bedside. We then analyse the characteristics that these consultants should have

Limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico en pacientes hospitalizados en servicios de medicina interna / Limitation of therapeutic effort in patients hospitalised in departments of internal medicine

Introducción. Existe escasa información sobre la limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico (LET) en pacientes ingresados en unidades de hospitalización de medicina interna. Objetivos. Describir las pautas de LET indicadas en los servicios de medicina interna y las características de los pacientes que las reciben. Pacientes y métodos. Estudio observacional descriptivo y retrospectivo de 4 hospitales de la Comunidad de Madrid. Se recogieron datos demográficos, de comorbilidad y las órdenes de LET pautadas en todos los pacientes fallecidos en un periodo de 6 meses. Resultados. Se incluyeron 382 pacientes cuya edad media fue de 85±10 años; 204 eran mujeres (53,4%) y 222 (58,1%) procedían de su domicilio. El 51,1% eran enfermos terminales, el 43,2% tenían demencia moderada/grave y el 95,5% presentaban comorbilidad al menos moderada. En 318 pacientes (83,7%) se realizó algún tipo de LET, siendo las más frecuentes las órdenes de «no reanimación cardiopulmonar» (292 enfermos, 76,4%; IC 95%: 72,1-80,8), «no usar medidas agresivas» (113 pacientes, 16,4%; IC 95%: 13,7-19,4) y «no ingresar en unidad de cuidados intensivos» (102 casos, 14,8%; IC 95%: 12,3-17,7). Conclusiones. La LET es muy frecuente en los pacientes que fallecen en medicina interna. Las pautas más utilizadas son «no reanimación cardiopulmonar» y la expresión poco concreta de «no usar medidas agresivas». Los pacientes son de edad avanzada, con importante comorbilidad, enfermedad terminal y demencia avanzada (AU)

Introduction. There is little information on the limitation of therapeutic effort (LTE) in patients admitted to hospital internal medicine units. Objectives. To describe the indicated LTE regimens in the departments of internal medicine and the characteristics of the patients who undergo them. Patients and methods. An observational, descriptive retrospective study was conducted on 4 hospitals of the Community of Madrid. The study collected demographic and comorbidity data and the LTE orders prescribed for all patients who died during a period of 6 months. Results. The study included 382 patients with a mean age of 85±10 years; 204 were women (53.4%) and 222 (58.1%) came from their homes. Some 51.1% of the patients were terminal, 43.2% had moderate to severe dementia, and 95.5% presented at least moderate comorbidity. Some type of LTE was performed in 318 patients (83.7%); the most common orders were «No cardiopulmonary resuscitation» (292 patients, 76.4%; 95% CI 72.1-80.8), «Do not use aggressive measures» (113 patients, 16.4%; 95% CI 13.7-19.4) and «Do not transfer to an intensive care unit» (102 cases, 14.8%, 95% CI 12.3-17.7). Some type of LTE was performed in 318 patients (83.7%); the most common orders were «No cardiopulmonary resuscitation» (292 patients, 76.4%; 95% CI 72.1-80.8), «Do not use aggressive measures» (113 patients, 16.4%; 95% CI 13.7-19.4) and «Do not transfer to an intensive care unit» (102 cases, 14.8%, 95% CI 12.3-17.7). Conclusions. LTE is common among patients who die in Internal Medicine. The most widely used regimens were «No CPR» and the unspecific statement «Do not use aggressive measures». The patients were elderly and had significant comorbidity, terminal illness and advanced dementia (AU)

[Are we still our patients' keepers?: James Drane's contribution to clinical ethics in the current context]. / ¿Seguimos siendo guardianes de nuestros pacientes?: la contribución de James Drane a la ética clínica actual.

The current article analyzes the figure of the American bioethicist James Drane (1930). Drane not only played a crucial role in the birth of Bioethics in the United States, but was also instrumental in the inception and development of the field in Spain and Latin America. His «sliding scale¼ was the first dynamic tool encouraging a systematic evaluation of a patient's capacity to make healthcare-related decisions. However Drane's major contribution to the field was his application of virtue Ethics to the doctor-patient relationship. His proposal rests on the physician's compromise with the patient in all his/her dimensions. This goal will guide the physician's character and serve as compass, with which to exercise a virtuous practice, since only by exercising these virtues can doctors become truly good.