Pacing maneuvers from the aortic cusps: A useful technique during ablation of focal arrhythmias arising from the aortic root.

BACKGROUND: The ablation of arrhythmias arising near the His-bundle region in the non-coronary aortic cusp (NCAC) is challenging. Among the aortic sinuses of Valsalva, the NCAC is located between the right atrium and the left atrium. For this reason, pacing from the NCAC should result in atrial capture while pacing from the right and left coronary cusps (LCC) may result in ventricular capture. The objective of this study is to prove that atrial capture during pacing from the sinuses of Valsalva may be used to confirm a correct position in the non-coronary cusp. METHODS: A total of 30 patients with structurally normal heart undergoing left sided ablation procedures, underwent electrophysiological study of the aortic cusps. Each of the aortic valve cusps was paced with increasing outputs and analyzed offline to determine their unique electrocardiographic characteristics. RESULTS: In the NCAC, we obtained an atrial capture in 29 out of 30 patients (96.6%). The atrial capture was highly specific for a position in the NCAC (p < .001). The median output required to capture from the cusp was 10 mA (range 5-25 mA) at a pulse width of 2 ms. In the right coronary cusp (RCC) and LCC, we obtained ventricular capture in all patients (100%). The median output required to capture from the cusp was 10 mA (range 10-25 mA) in RCC and 25 mA (range 10-25 mA) in LCC at a pulse width of 2 ms. CONCLUSIONS: Atrial capture during a pacemapping from the aortic cusps can be considered proof of a correct position in NCAC.

Does Timing of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Affect Prognosis in Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator? Results From the Multicenter Randomized PARTITA Trial.

BACKGROUND: Optimal timing for catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia is an important unresolved issue. There are no randomized trials evaluating the benefit of ablation after the first implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shock. METHODS: We conducted a 2-phase, prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Patients with ischemic or nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and primary or secondary prevention indication for ICD were enrolled in an initial observational phase until first appropriate shock (phase A). After reconsenting, patients were randomly assigned 1:1 in phase B to immediate ablation (within 2 months from shock delivery) or continuation of standard therapy. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause or hospitalization for worsening heart failure. Amiodarone intake was not allowed except for documented atrial tachyarrhythmias. On July 23, 2021, phase B of the trial was interrupted as a result of the first interim analysis on the basis of the Bayesian adaptive design. RESULTS: Of the 517 patients enrolled in phase A, 154 (30%) had ventricular tachycardia, 56 (11%) received an appropriate shock over a median follow-up of 2.4 years (interquartile range, 1.4-4.4), and 47 of 56 (84%) agreed to participate in phase B. After 24.2 (8.5-24.4) months, the primary end point occurred in 1 of 23 (4%) patients in the ablation group and 10 of 24 (42%) patients in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.11 [95% CI, 0.01-0.85]; P=0.034). The results met the prespecified termination criterion of >99% Bayesian posterior probability of superiority of treatment over standard therapy. No deaths were observed in the ablation group versus 8 deaths (33%) in the control group (P=0.004); there was 1 worsening heart failure hospitalization in the ablation group (4%) versus 4 in the control group (17%; P=0.159). ICD shocks were less frequent in the ablation group (9%) than in the control group (42%; P=0.039). CONCLUSIONS: Ventricular tachycardia ablation after first appropriate shock was associated with a reduced risk of the combined death or worsening heart failure hospitalization end point, lower mortality, and fewer ICD shocks. These findings provide support for considering ventricular tachycardia ablation after the first ICD shock. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT01547208.

[The Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing - Annual report 2019]. / Registro Italiano Pacemaker e Defibrillatori - Bollettino Periodico 2019. Associazione Italiana di Aritmologia e Cardiostimolazione.

BACKGROUND: The pacemaker (PM) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) Registry of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing (AIAC) monitors the main epidemiological data in real-world practice. The survey for the 2019 activity collects information about demographics, clinical characteristics, main indications for PM/ICD therapy and device types from the Italian collaborating centers. METHODS: The Registry collects prospectively national PM and ICD implantation activity on the basis of European cards. RESULTS: PM Registry: data about 22 889 PM implantations were collected (19 621 first implants and 3268 replacements). The number of collaborating centers was 173. Median age of treated patients was 81 years (75 quartile I; 87 quartile III). ECG indications included atrioventricular conduction disorders in 33.3% of first PM implants, sick sinus syndrome in 16.4%, atrial fibrillation plus bradycardia in 11.6%, other in 38.7%. Among atrioventricular conduction defects, third-degree atrioventricular block was the most common type (18.3% of first implants). Use of single-chamber PMs was reported in 25.5% of first implants, of dual-chamber PMs in 67.1%, of PMs with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in 1.5%, and of single lead atrial-synchronized ventricular stimulation (VDD/R PMs) in 5.8%. ICD Registry: data about 17 328 ICD implantations were collected (12 129 first implants and 5199 replacements). The number of collaborating centers was 425. Median age of treated patients was 71 years (62 quartile I; 77 quartile III). Primary prevention indication was reported in 83.1% of first implants, secondary prevention in 16.9% (cardiac arrest in 5.9%). A single-chamber ICD was used in 26.1% of first implants, dual-chamber ICD in 28.0% and biventricular ICD in 45.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The PM and ICD Registry appears fundamental for monitoring PM and ICD utilization on a large national scale with rigorous examination of demographics and clinical indications. The PM Registry showed stable electrocardiographic and symptom indications, with an important prevalence of dual-chamber pacing. The use of CRT-PM regards a very limited number of patients. The ICD Registry documented a large use of prophylactic and biventricular ICD, reflecting a favorable adherence to trials and guidelines in clinical practice. In order to increase and optimize the cooperation of Italian implanting centers, online data entry (https://www.aiac.it/riprid) should be adopted at large scale.

Oral procainamide as pharmacological treatment of recurrent and refractory ventricular tachyarrhythmias: A single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Antiarrhythmic therapy for recurrent ventricular arrhythmias in patients who have undergone catheter ablation, and in whom amiodarone and/or beta-blockers were ineffective or contraindicated, is a controversial issue. OBJECTIVE: The present study sought to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of oral procainamide in patients with recurrent ventricular arrhythmias when the standard therapy strategy had failed. METHODS: All patients treated with procainamide for recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in our institution between January 2010 and May 2019 were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the total number of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) interventions after the beginning of procainamide therapy. Secondary endpoints were the total number of VTs and VFs recorded on the ICDs' controls and discontinuation of therapy. The events occurring during procainamide treatment were compared with a matched-duration period before the initiation of therapy with procainamide. Patients therefore served as self-controls. RESULTS: A total of 34 consecutive patients (32 male, 94.1%; mean age 74.4 ± 9.7 years) were included in the retrospective analysis. The mean time of procainamide treatment was 12.9 ± 13.7 months (median 9 [2-20] months). The mean dose of procainamide was 1207 ± 487 mg/day. Procainamide therapy significantly decreased ICD interventions (median 5 [0-22.5] vs 15.5 [3-32.25], P < .05). Procainamide also decreased the total number of VT/VF episodes (median 5.5 [0.75-30] vs 19 [7.5-30], P < .05). Only 3 patients (8.8%) presented severe side effects (dyspnea or hypotension), requiring discontinuation of therapy. CONCLUSION: Oral procainamide was associated with a significant decrease in ICD therapies and ventricular arrhythmias, showing an acceptable profile of tolerability.

Safety, efficacy, and reproducibility of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation guided by the ablation index: acute results of the FLAI study.

AIMS: Ablation index (AI) is a marker of lesion quality during catheter ablation that incorporates contact force, time, and power in a weighted formula. This index was originally developed for pulmonary vein isolation as well as other left atrial procedures. The aim of our study is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the AI for the ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) in patients presenting with typical atrial flutter (AFL). METHODS AND RESULTS: This prospective multicentre non-randomized study enrolled 412 consecutive patients with typical AFL undergoing AI-guided cavotricuspid isthmus ablation. The procedure was performed targeting an AI of 500 and an inter-lesion distance measurement of ≤6 mm. The primary endpoints were CTI 'first-pass' block and persistent block after a 20-min waiting time. Secondary endpoints included procedural and radiofrequency duration and fluoroscopic time. A total of 412 consecutive patients were enrolled in 31 centres (mean age 64.9 ± 9.8; 72.1% males and 27.7% with structural heart disease). The CTI bidirectional 'first-pass' block was reached in 355 patients (88.3%), whereas CTI block at the end of the waiting time was achieved in 405 patients (98.3%). Mean procedural, radiofrequency, and fluoroscopic time were 56.5 ± 28.1, 7.8 ± 4.8, and 1.9 ± 4.8 min, respectively. There were no major procedural complications. There was no significant inter-operator variability in the ability to achieve any of the primary endpoints. CONCLUSION: AI-guided ablation with an inter-lesion distance ≤6 mm represents an effective, safe, and highly reproducible strategy to achieve bidirectional block in the treatment of typical AFL.

Left atrial appendage thrombosis and persistent atrial fibrillation: combined treatment with a totally thoracoscopic approach

Abstract Minimally invasive surgical ablation is generally contraindicated in patients with atrial fibrillation and thrombosis of the left atrial appendage. We have treated three of these patients using an innovative technique based on a bilateral video-thoracoscopic approach, performing a continuous encircling lesion at the pulmonary veins outflow with radio-frequency ablation, simultaneously excluding the left atrial appendage. The postoperative course was uneventful, without neurologic events and all patients maintained a stable sinus rhythm at 1-year follow-up. This procedure represents a new mini-invasive method to treat persistent atrial fibrillation when partial thrombosis of the left atrial appendage contraindicates other ablation techniques.

Left Atrial Appendage Thrombosis and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: combined Treatment with a Totally Thoracoscopic Approach.

Minimally invasive surgical ablation is generally contraindicated in patients with atrial fibrillation and thrombosis of the left atrial appendage. We have treated three of these patients using an innovative technique based on a bilateral video-thoracoscopic approach, performing a continuous encircling lesion at the pulmonary veins outflow with radio-frequency ablation, simultaneously excluding the left atrial appendage. The postoperative course was uneventful, without neurologic events and all patients maintained a stable sinus rhythm at 1-year follow-up. This procedure represents a new mini-invasive method to treat persistent atrial fibrillation when partial thrombosis of the left atrial appendage contraindicates other ablation techniques.

Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation? Alternating technique for repeat procedures in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Which technique is better for repeat ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. The aim of the study was to compare long-term efficacy of repeat ablation using the alternative technique for the first redo ablation procedure: (a) cryoballoon (CB) re-ablation after a failed index pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency (RF) ablation, RF-then-CB group or (b) RF repeat ablation following a failed CB ablation, CB-then-RF group. METHODS: Within the 1STOP Italian Project, consecutive patients undergoing repeat ablation with a different technique from the index procedure were included. RESULTS: We studied 474 patients, 349 in RF-then-CB and 125 in CB-then-RF group. Less women (21% vs 30%; P = .041), more persistent AF (33% vs 22%; P = .015), longer duration of AF (60 vs 31 months; P < .001), and more hypertension (50% vs 36%; P = .007) were observed in the RF-then-CB cohort as compared with the CB-then-RF group. The number of reconnected PVs was 3.7 ± 0.7 and 1.4 + 1.3 in RF-then-CB and CB-then-RF group, respectively (P < .001). During the follow-up, significantly less AF recurrence occurred in the CB-then-RF group (22% vs 8%, HR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.24-0.92; P = .025). Cohort designation was the only independent predictor of AF recurrence. CONCLUSION: Alternation of energy source for repeat ablation was safe and effective, regardless the energy used first. However, patients initially treated with CB PVI undergoing repeat ablation with RF current had less AF recurrence at long-term follow-up as compared with those originally treated by RF ablation receiving a CB repeat ablation.

[The Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing - Annual report 2018]. / Registro Italiano Pacemaker e Defibrillatori - Bollettino Periodico 2018. Associazione Italiana di Aritmologia e Cardiostimolazione.

BACKGROUND: The pacemaker (PM) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) Registry of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing (AIAC) monitors the main epidemiological data in real-world practice. The survey for the 2018 activity collects information about demographics, clinical characteristics, main indications for PM/ICD therapy and device types from the Italian collaborating centers. METHODS: The Registry collects prospectively national PM and ICD implantation activity on the basis of European cards. RESULTS: PM Registry: data about 23 912 PM implantations were collected (20 084 first implants and 3828 replacements). The number of collaborating centers was 180. Median age of treated patients was 81 years (75 quartile I; 86 quartile III). ECG indications included atrioventricular conduction disorders in 34.5% of first PM implants, sick sinus syndrome in 18.3%, atrial fibrillation plus bradycardia in 13.0%, other in 34.2%. Among atrioventricular conduction defects, third-degree atrioventricular block was the most common type (19.2% of first implants). Use of single-chamber PMs was reported in 24.9% of first implants, of dual-chamber PMs in 67.6%, of PMs with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in 1.6%, and of single lead atrial-synchronized ventricular stimulation (VDD/R PMs) in 5.9%. ICD Registry: data about 18 353 ICD implantations were collected (13 944 first implants and 4359 replacements). The number of collaborating centers was 433. Median age of treated patients was 71 years (63 quartile I; 78 quartile III). Primary prevention indication was reported in 84.3% of first implants, secondary prevention in 15.7% (cardiac arrest in 5.3%). A single-chamber ICD was used in 27.9% of first implants, dual-chamber ICD in 31.9% and biventricular ICD in 40.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The PM and ICD Registry appears fundamental for monitoring PM and ICD utilization on a large national scale with rigorous examination of demographics and clinical indications. The PM Registry showed stable electrocardiographic and symptom indications, with an important prevalence of dual-chamber pacing. The use of CRT-PM regards a very limited number of patients. The ICD Registry documented a large use of prophylactic and biventricular ICD, reflecting a favorable adherence to trials and guidelines in clinical practice. In order to increase and optimize the cooperation of Italian implanting centers, online data entry (http://www.aiac.it/riprid) should be adopted at large scale.

A comparison of acute procedural outcomes within four generations of cryoballoon catheters utilized in the real-world multicenter experience of 1STOP.

INTRODUCTION: Four generations of the cryoballoon (CB) catheter were retrospectively evaluated in a real-world examination of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Four hundred eighty patients (27% female and 60 ± 10 years) suffering from AF, underwent pulmonary vein (PV) ablation with one-of-four generations of the CB catheter. The total cohort was divided into four groups of patients: 120 with first-generation (CB-1); 120 with second-generation (CB-2); 120 with third-generation (CB-3); and 120 with fourth-generation (CB-4). Equal group sizes were achieved by examining the last 120 patients treated in each cohort, attempting to minimize the effect of a learning curve between the generations of CB catheter. Baseline clinical and patient characteristics were similar between the four cohorts, excepting age and the number of tested antiarrhythmic drugs. Procedure, fluoroscopy, and left atrial dwell times were significantly lower in the CB-4 cohort compared to previous generations of the CB catheters, while the acute procedural success rate was comparable across all catheter groups (>99%). Total acute procedural complications were low (2.5%), and acute complications were comparable within the CB-2, CB-3, and CB-4 groups (0.8% reported in each cohort). The rate of time-to-isolation (TTI) visualization increased with later generations of the CB catheters. CONCLUSIONS: The novel CB-4 achieved significantly faster procedural ablation times in comparison to the previous generations, while still maintaining a low rate of acute complications. Also, the rate of TTI visualization was observed to be higher with the CB-4 catheter. Further long-term evaluation is necessary, including an assessment of AF recurrence and PV reconnection(s).

[The Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing - Annual report 2017]. / Registro Italiano Pacemaker e Defibrillatori Bollettino Periodico 2017 Associazione Italiana di Aritmologia e Cardiostimolazione.

BACKGROUND: The pacemaker (PM) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) Registry of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing (AIAC) monitors the main epidemiological data in real-world practice. The survey for the 2017 activity collects information about demographics, clinical characteristics, main indications for PM/ICD therapy and device types from the Italian collaborating centers. METHODS: The Registry collects prospectively national PM and ICD implantation activity on the basis of European cards. RESULTS: PM Registry: data about 23 457 PM implantations were collected (19 378 first implant and 4079 replacements). The number of collaborating centers was 185. Median age of treated patients was 81 years (75 quartile I; 86 quartile III). ECG indications included atrioventricular conduction disorders in 37.1% of first PM implants, sick sinus syndrome in 19.5%, atrial fibrillation plus bradycardia in 13.2%, other in 30.2%. Among atrioventricular conduction defects, third-degree atrioventricular block was the most common type (21.0% of first implants). Use of single-chamber PMs was reported in 25.6% of first implants, of dual-chamber PMs in 66.7%, of PMs with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in 1.4%, and of single lead atrial-synchronized ventricular stimulation (VDD/R PMs) in 6.3%. ICD Registry: data about 19 023 ICD implantations were collected (13 898 first implants and 5125 replacements). The number of collaborating centers was 437. Median age of treated patients was 71 years (63 quartile I; 78 quartile III). Primary prevention indication was reported in 81.8% of first implants, secondary prevention in 18.2% (cardiac arrest in 6.4%). A single-chamber ICD was used in 27.0% of first implants, dual-chamber in 33.6% and biventricular in 39.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The PM and ICD Registry appears fundamental for monitoring PM and ICD utilization on a large national scale with rigorous examination of demographics and clinical indications. The PM Registry showed stable electrocardiographic and symptom indications, with an important prevalence of dual-chamber pacing. The use of CRT-PM regards a very limited number of patients. The ICD Registry documented a large use of prophylactic and biventricular ICD, reflecting a favorable adherence to trials and guidelines in clinical practice. In order to increase and optimize the cooperation of Italian implanting centers, online data entry (http://www.aiac.it/riprid) should be adopted at large scale.

Prognostic role of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia detected with remote interrogation in a pacemaker population.

BACKGROUND: Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) can occur asymptomatically and can be incidentally detected in the internal records of pacemakers (PM). The clinical value of NSVT in the population of PM patients is still uncertain.Our aim was to assess the prevalence of NSVT detected by remote PM control, to describe the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with NSVT, and to assess the prognostic significance of NSVT in terms of both overall and cardiovascular mortality. METHODS: Consecutive patients followed with PM remote interrogations from September 2010 to December 2015 were included. The transmissions pertaining to the first 12 months of remote control were analysed and the patients were divided by those presenting NSVT and those without NSVT. The two groups were compared in terms of total mortality and cardiovascular mortality based on the administrative data provided by the regional administration of the Italian National Health System. RESULTS: The prevalence of NSVT in 408 patients (62% males, mean age 75.6; SD 10.6 years old) was 21% in a year. During a mean follow-up duration of 44 months, NSVT did not emerge as independently associated with overall mortality, but was associated with cardiovascular mortality in a competing risk regression model with older age, male gender, diabetes, chronic renal insufficiency, ischemic cardiomyopathy and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. CONCLUSIONS: We show that NSVT episodes recorded by remote control in a PM population are independently associated with cardiovascular mortality with possible implications for risk stratification and therapeutic options.

[The Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing - Annual report 2016]. / Registro Italiano Pacemaker e Defibrillatori - Bollettino Periodico 2016. Associazione Italiana di Aritmologia e Cardiostimolazione.

BACKGROUND: The pacemaker (PM) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) registry of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing (AIAC) monitors the main epidemiological data in real-world practice. The survey for the 2016 activity collects information about demographics, clinical characteristics, main indications for PM/ICD therapy and device types from the Italian collaborating centers. METHODS: The registry collects prospectively national PM and ICD implantation activity on the basis of European cards. RESULTS: PM Registry: data about 23 496 PM implantations were collected (19 003 first implant and 4493 replacements). The number of collaborating centers was 204. Median age of treated patients was 81 years (75 quartile I; 86 quartile III). ECG indications included atrioventricular conduction disorders in 39.8% of first PM implants, sick sinus syndrome in 22.1%, atrial fibrillation plus bradycardia in 14.1%, other in 24.0%. Among atrioventricular conduction defects, third-degree atrioventricular block was the most common type (22.18% of first implants). Use of single-chamber PMs was reported in 26.9% of first implants, of dual-chamber PMs in 65.0%, of PMs with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in 1.5%, and of single lead atrial-synchronized ventricular stimulation (VDD/R PMs) in 6.6%. ICD Registry: data about 20 350 ICD implantations were collected (14 763 first implants and 5587 replacements). The number of collaborating centers was 430. Median age of treated patients was 72 years (63 quartile I; 78 quartile III]. Primary prevention indication was reported in 79.0% of first implants, secondary prevention in 21.0% (cardiac arrest in 7.9%). A single-chamber ICD was used in 32.2% of first implants, dual-chamber in 31.1% and biventricular in 36.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The PM and ICD Registry appears fundamental for monitoring PM and ICD utilization on a large national scale with rigorous examination of demographics and clinical indications. The PM Registry showed stable electrocardiographic and symptom indications, with an important prevalence of dual-chamber pacing. The use of CRT-PM regards a very limited number of patients. The ICD Registry documented a large use of prophylactic and biventricular ICD, reflecting a favorable adherence to trials and guidelines in clinical practice.

Contiguity Between Ablation Lesions and Strict Catheter Stability Settings Assessed by VISITAGTM Module Improve Clinical Outcomes of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Ablation　- Results From the VISITALY Study.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to evaluate the clinical outcome of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation with contact force technology, using an automated lesion tagging system (VISITAGTM module) with strict criteria of catheter stability.Methods and Results:We enrolled 200 consecutive patients who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in 11 centers and were followed up for 12 months. The stability setting was within 3 mm for ≥10 s and for ≥15 s in 47% and 53% of patients, respectively. A mean of 67.2±21.9 VISITAGs was acquired. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias at follow-up was 77.5% (155/200), and the contiguity between lesions was associated with a higher chronic success rate (96% vs. 77.1%; log-rank P=0.036). Radiofrequency (RF), fluoroscopy times, and recurrence rates at the 12-month follow-up were significantly lower than in a comparison group of 80 patients without VISITAGTM module (42.7±14.5 vs. 50.9±23.6 min; P=0.032; 11.6±7.8 vs. 18.4±12.8 min; P=0.003 and 22.5% vs. 41.2%; P=0.02). Two major complications (1 cardiac tamponade and 1 minor stroke) were observed only in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Paroxysmal AF ablation with contact force technology and strict criteria of stability using the VISITAG module was a safe procedure, associated with an improvement in efficiency and a reduction of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence at the 12-month follow-up compared with manual annotation. Contiguity between lesions seemed to enhance effectiveness outcomes.

Management of untreatable ventricular arrhythmias during pharmacologic challenges with sodium channel blockers for suspected Brugada syndrome.

Pharmacologic challenge with sodium channel blockers is part of the diagnostic workout in patients with suspected Brugada syndrome. The test is overall considered safe but both ajmaline and flecainide detain well known pro-arrhythmic properties. Moreover, the treatment of patients with life-threatening arrhythmias during these diagnostic procedures is not well defined. Current consensus guidelines suggest to adopt cautious protocols interrupting the sodium channel blockers as soon as any ECG alteration appears. Nevertheless, the risk of life-threatening arrhythmias persists, even adopting a safe and cautious protocol and in absence of major arrhythmic risk factors. The authors revise the main published case studies of sodium channel blockers challenge in adults and in children, and summarize three cases of untreatable ventricular arrhythmias discussing their management. In particular, the role of advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation with extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation is stressed as it can reveal to be the only reliable lifesaving facility in prolonged cardiac arrest.

Comparison of strategies for catheter ablation of focal atrial tachycardia originating near the His bundle region.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested that para-Hisian atrial tachycardia (AT) can be successfully ablated from the right atrium (RA), left atrium (LA), or noncoronary cusp (NCC) in the aorta; however, the best approach remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare different approaches to radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of para-Hisian AT. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 68 consecutive patients (49[72%] women; mean age 61 ± 13 years) treated with RFCA for this type of AT. Mapping of the RA (n = 68), LA (n = 21), and NCC (n = 52) was performed during AT to identify the earliest activation site and to apply RFCA. RESULTS: RFCA successfully terminated AT in the RA in 13 of 28 patients (46.4%), in the LA in 4 of 16 patients (25.0%), and in the NCC in 46 of 52 patients (88.5%) after 1 procedure (P < .05). Atrioventricular block occurred only during RFCA in the RA in 4 of 28 patients (14.3%). After a mean follow-up of 33.5 ± 25.4 months, AT recurrence was observed in 5 of 13 patients (38.5%) ablated in the RA, 1 of 4 (25.0%) ablated in the LA, and 2 of 46 (4.4%) ablated in the NCC (P < .05). RFCA in the LA was effective only if the local activation time (LAT) was earlier than that in the RA. RFCA in the NCC was successful regardless of the LAT (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Mapping and ablation in the NCC should be always considered in cases of AT originating from the His bundle region, regardless of the LAT.

[The Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing - Annual report 2015]. / Registro Italiano Pacemaker e Defibrillatori - Bollettino Periodico 2015. Associazione Italiana di Aritmologia e Cardiostimolazione.

BACKGROUND: The pacemaker (PM) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) Registry of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing (AIAC) monitors the main epidemiological data in real-world practice. The survey for the 2015 activity collects information about demographics, clinical characteristics, main indications for PM/ICD therapy and device types from the Italian collaborating centers. METHODS: The Registry collects prospectively national PM and ICD implantation activity on the basis of European cards. RESULTS: PM Registry: data about 24 285 PM implantations were collected (19 194 first implant and 5091 replacements). The number of collaborating centers was 218. Median age of treated patients was 81 years (75 quartile I; 86 quartile III). ECG indications included atrioventricular conduction disorders in 42.8% of first PM implants, sick sinus syndrome in 22.9%, atrial fibrillation plus bradycardia in 15.1%, other in 19.2%. Among atrioventricular conduction defects, third-degree atrioventricular block was the most common type (23.8% of first implants). Use of single-chamber PMs was reported in 26.9% of first implants, of dual-chamber PMs in 63.4%, of PMs with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in 1.8%, and of single lead atrial-synchronized ventricular stimulation (VDD/R PMs) in 7.9%. ICD Registry: data about 15 363 ICD implantations were collected (11 453 first implants and 3910 replacements). The number of collaborating centers was 434. Median age of treated patients was 71 years (63 quartile I; 78 quartile III]. Primary prevention indication was reported in 77.3% of first implants, secondary prevention in 22.7% (cardiac arrest in 8.0%). A single-chamber ICD was used in 29.3% of first implants, dual-chamber in 34.6% and biventricular in 36.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The PM and ICD Registry appears fundamental for monitoring PM and ICD utilization on a large national scale with rigorous examination of demographics and clinical indications. The PM Registry showed stable electrocardiographic and symptom indications, with an important prevalence of dual-chamber pacing. The use of CRT-PM regards a very limited number of patients. The ICD Registry documented a large use of prophylactic and biventricular ICD, reflecting a favorable adherence to trials and guidelines in clinical practice.

Efficacy and Safety of Catheter Ablation of Atrial Tachycardia Through a Direct Approach from Noncoronary Sinus of Valsalva.

Noncoronary aortic cusp (NCAC) in the aorta represents a challenging location for catheter ablation of focal atrial tachycardias (ATs) arising near the His-bundle region. The purpose of this study was to provide an updated report on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation of ATs originating from NCAC. The study population includes 23 patients (18 women [78%], mean age 65 ± 12 years) with highly symptomatic AT. The atrial mapping was performed during tachycardia to define the earliest atrial activation site. Electrophysiological mapping of the right atrium was initially performed, followed by aortic root mapping when earliest activation was recorded in the proximal electrode of the His-bundle catheter. A direct ablation approach from NCAC was used in every patient independently by the local activation time. Ablations were performed using a steerable 4-mm tip nonirrigated catheter in all patients. Radiofrequency energy resulted in the disappearance of arrhythmias in 22 of the 23 patients (95%). In all procedures, there were no complications. During a mean follow-up of 41 ± 25 months, no patient presented with a recurrence, except the 1 patient where the ablation was not effective. In conclusion, catheter ablation of para-hisian ATs through a direct approach from NCAC shows to be safe and effective after 1 procedure per patient.

[The Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing--Annual report 2014]. / Registro Italiano Pacemaker e Defibrillatori--Bollettino Periodico 2014. Associazione Italiana di Aritmologia e Cardiostimolazione.

BACKGROUND: The pacemaker (PM) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) Registry of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing (AIAC) monitors the main epidemiological data in real-world practice. The survey for the 2014 activity collects information about demographics, clinical characteristics, main indications for PM/ICD therapy and device types from the Italian collaborating centers. METHODS: The Registry collects prospectively national PM and ICD implantation activity on the basis of European cards. RESULTS: PM Registry: data about 24 680 PM implantations were collected (19 480 first implant and 5200 replacements). The number of collaborating centers was 208. Median age of treated patients was 81 years (75 quartile I; 86 quartile III). ECG indications included atrioventricular conduction disorders in 45.3% of first PM implants, sick sinus syndrome in 23.1%, atrial fibrillation plus bradycardia in 11.7%, other in 19.9%. Among atrioventricular conduction defects, third-degree atrioventricular block was the most common type (22.7% of first implants). Use of single-chamber PMs was reported in 26.9% of first implants, of dual-chamber PMs in 63.6%, of PMs with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in 1.7%, and of single lead atrial-synchronized ventricular stimulation (VDD/R PMs) in 7.8%. ICD Registry: data about 17 116 ICD implantations were collected (11 274 first implants and 5842 replacements). The number of collaborating centers was 424. Median age of treated patients was 71 years (62 quartile I; 77 quartile III). Primary prevention indication was reported in 72.3% of first implants, secondary prevention in 27.7% (cardiac arrest in 10.1%). A single-chamber ICD was used in 32.2% of first implants, dual-chamber in 37.1% and biventricular in 30.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The PM and ICD Registry appears fundamental for monitoring PM and ICD utilization on a large national scale with rigorous examination of demographics and clinical indications. The PM Registry showed stable electrocardiographic and symptom indications, with an important prevalence of dual-chamber pacing. The use of CRT-PM regards a very limited number of patients. The ICD Registry documented a large use of prophylactic and biventricular ICD, reflecting a favorable adherence to trials and guidelines in clinical practice.