Restorations performance after selective caries removal to soft dentine: 18-month follow-up of a controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: This randomized controlled clinical trial aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of composite resin restorations placed after selective caries removal to soft dentin (SCRSD) or stepwise excavation (SW) over an 18-month period. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were patients with permanent molars and/or premolars presenting deep caries lesions (≥50 % of the dentin thickness). Teeth were submitted to SCRSD (n = 76) or SW (n = 76). Evaluations were performed based on FDI (World Dental Federation) criterion. Survival analysis was performed to estimate the survival of restorations and its association with clinical variables and socio-demographic characteristics (adjusted Weibull regression model). The study was registered on Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos (ReBEC 65ntbc). RESULTS: The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 18 months (mean ± SD 16.3 ± 3.4 months). Patients' ages ranged from 9 to 55 years (mean ± SD 29 ± 10.5 years). A total of 135 teeth (SCRSD = 72; SW = 63) from 101 patients were evaluated. There were 4 failures in the SCRSD group (2 loss of restoration in need of replacement and 2 marginal fractures in need of repair) and 2 in the SW group (fracture in need of repair). The association between explanatory variables and restoration failure showed similar success rates for SW (99.4 %) and SCRSD (97.9 %) (p = 0.16). Patients presenting gingivitis (≥20 % of sites with gingival bleeding) had 8.50 times more risk for failure than those with <20 % of bleeding sites (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: This study showed that placing a composite resin restoration over soft dentin (after SCRSD) did not affect its clinical performance after 18 months. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: SCRSD is a feasible treatment option for the management of deep caries lesions in permanent teeth as it preserves tooth vitality and tooth structure without compromising restoration longevity.

Food consumption of users of the Brazilian Unified Health System by type of assistance and participation in the "Bolsa Família". / Consumo alimentar de usuários do Sistema Único de Saúde segundo o tipo de assistência e participação no Bolsa Família.

A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate and compare dietary intake, type of assistance (Basic Health Units - UBS and Family Health Strategies - ESF) and participation in the "Bolsa Família" Program (PBF) among users of the Brazilian Unified Health System, (SUS). The sample was composed of individuals of both sexes between 18 and 78 years of age in Porto Alegre, state of Rio Grande do Sul. Socioeconomic, clinical and food consumption data were collected via a questionnaire adapted from the SISVAN and VIGITEL national surveys. The analyses were conducted using R3.1 software. Of the 187 patients, 91 were affiliated to the ESF, 96 to UBS and 40 were registered with the PBF. A healthy eating pattern was identified in only 41% of SUS users. It was observed that 55% did not consume raw salad (37% p = 0.04) and vegetable consumption was lower among the PBF users (67.5% versus 75.9%; p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in food consumption considering the kind of assistance (ESF or UBS). A healthy consumption pattern was not associated with demographic and socioeconomic variables. The majority of beneficiaries of the PBF did not admit to healthy eating patterns. Therefore, effective health promotion and prevention is needed for this population, mainly among the beneficiaries of the PBF.

Foi realizado estudo transversal com objetivo de avaliar e comparar o consumo alimentar de usuários do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), segundo tipo de assistência (Unidades Básicas de Saúde-UBS e Estratégias de Saúde da Família-ESF) e participação no Programa Bolsa Família (PBF). A amostra foi composta por indivíduos de 18 a 78 anos, de ambos sexos, de Porto Alegre-RS. Foram coletados dados socioeconômicos, clínicos e de consumo alimentar através de questionário adaptado dos inquéritos nacionais SISVAN e VIGITEL. As análises foram realizadas no software R3.1. Dos 187 entrevistados, 91 pertenciam à ESF, 96 à UBS e 40 eram beneficiários do PBF. O padrão alimentar saudável foi identificado em apenas 41% dos usuários do SUS. Entre os beneficiários do PBF, consumo de hortaliças foi menor (67,5% vs 75,9;p = 0,02) e 55% não consumiam salada crua (37%;p = 0,04). Não houve diferença significativa no consumo considerando o tipo de assistência recebida (ESF ou UBS). O padrão de consumo saudável não foi associado às variáveis demográficas e socioeconômicas. A maioria dos beneficiados pelo PBF também não demonstrou padrão alimentar saudável. Portanto, maiores esforços para efetiva promoção e prevenção da saúde são necessários para essa população, principalmente entre os beneficiados pelo PBF.

Consumo alimentar de usuários do Sistema Único de Saúde segundo o tipo de assistência e participação no Bolsa Família / Food consumption of users of the Brazilian Unified Health System by type of assistance and participation in the "Bolsa Família"

Resumo Foi realizado estudo transversal com objetivo de avaliar e comparar o consumo alimentar de usuários do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), segundo tipo de assistência (Unidades Básicas de Saúde-UBS e Estratégias de Saúde da Família-ESF) e participação no Programa Bolsa Família (PBF). A amostra foi composta por indivíduos de 18 a 78 anos, de ambos sexos, de Porto Alegre-RS. Foram coletados dados socioeconômicos, clínicos e de consumo alimentar através de questionário adaptado dos inquéritos nacionais SISVAN e VIGITEL. As análises foram realizadas no software R3.1. Dos 187 entrevistados, 91 pertenciam à ESF, 96 à UBS e 40 eram beneficiários do PBF. O padrão alimentar saudável foi identificado em apenas 41% dos usuários do SUS. Entre os beneficiários do PBF, consumo de hortaliças foi menor (67,5% vs 75,9;p = 0,02) e 55% não consumiam salada crua (37%;p = 0,04). Não houve diferença significativa no consumo considerando o tipo de assistência recebida (ESF ou UBS). O padrão de consumo saudável não foi associado às variáveis demográficas e socioeconômicas. A maioria dos beneficiados pelo PBF também não demonstrou padrão alimentar saudável. Portanto, maiores esforços para efetiva promoção e prevenção da saúde são necessários para essa população, principalmente entre os beneficiados pelo PBF.

Abstract A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate and compare dietary intake, type of assistance (Basic Health Units - UBS and Family Health Strategies - ESF) and participation in the "Bolsa Família" Program (PBF) among users of the Brazilian Unified Health System, (SUS). The sample was composed of individuals of both sexes between 18 and 78 years of age in Porto Alegre, state of Rio Grande do Sul. Socioeconomic, clinical and food consumption data were collected via a questionnaire adapted from the SISVAN and VIGITEL national surveys. The analyses were conducted using R3.1 software. Of the 187 patients, 91 were affiliated to the ESF, 96 to UBS and 40 were registered with the PBF. A healthy eating pattern was identified in only 41% of SUS users. It was observed that 55% did not consume raw salad (37% p = 0.04) and vegetable consumption was lower among the PBF users (67.5% versus 75.9%; p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in food consumption considering the kind of assistance (ESF or UBS). A healthy consumption pattern was not associated with demographic and socioeconomic variables. The majority of beneficiaries of the PBF did not admit to healthy eating patterns. Therefore, effective health promotion and prevention is needed for this population, mainly among the beneficiaries of the PBF.