Clinical outcome of short-term compression after sclerotherapy for telangiectatic varicose veins.

BACKGROUND: Sclerotherapy is considered to be the method of choice for the treatment of telangiectatic varicose veins (C1 veins). Whereas the use of compression stockings after sclerotherapy is recommended, little is known about the impact of compression on the outcome of sclerotherapy. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of compression on the outcome of injection sclerotherapy of C1 varicose veins. METHODS: There were 100 legs of 50 consecutive patients with chronic venous insufficiency (C1) included. After randomization per patient, both legs were treated with sclerotherapy in a predefined area of the thigh (measuring 100 cm2), followed by eccentric compression for 24 hours. Group A received no further compression, whereas group B was additionally equipped with compression stockings of 18 to 20 mm Hg above the ankle and continued wearing these for 1 week. Photodocumentation was performed before, 1 week after, and 4 weeks after sclerotherapy, and the clinical outcome was assessed at these postprocedure follow-up dates. The photographs were reviewed by an internal unblinded rater and an independent blinded external rater. RESULTS: There was no discernible difference between the groups in terms of clinical outcome or side effects after 4 weeks. Whereas inter-rater reliability was high, there was no correlation between the raters and patients in terms of outcome. In 55% of the treated legs, the patients deemed the result of the treatment to be good; in 27% of the treated legs, fair; and in 18%, poor. Postprocedure hyperpigmentation occurred in 13% of patients and was comparable in both groups. Compression therapy was found to be comfortable by the majority (58%) of patients. CONCLUSIONS: One week of postinterventional compression therapy had no clinical benefit compared with no compression.

Comparison of Four Haemodynamic Tests that Quantify Superficial Venous Insufficiency.

OBJECTIVES: Reflux assessment with ultrasound (U/S) is usually qualitative. Quantitative measurements of superficial venous insufficiency (SVI) include the venous arterial flow index (VAFI), recirculation index (RCI), venous filling index (VFI), and the postural diameter change (PDC) of the saphenous trunk. The aim was to investigate their relationship. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an observational study performed on patients with varicose veins and hospital employees. Four haemodynamic parameters were measured in 21 legs from 16 subjects. Legs were divided into no reflux (n = 7) and reflux (n = 14). The VAFI is the U/S ratio of common femoral vein volume flow divided by the common femoral artery volume flow, performed supine. The RCI is the U/S ratio of reflux volume over antegrade volume within the saphenous trunk after calf compression, standing. The VFI is the rate of calf volume increase on dependency measured in mL/s, using air plethysmography. The PDC is the percentage reduction of the saphenous trunk diameter from standing to lying, using U/S. RESULTS: The clinical part of the CEAP classification was: C0 = 3, C1 = 4, C2 = 5, C3 = 1, C4a = 1, C4b = 6, C5 = 1. All four tests demonstrated significant differences between the two groups with minimal overlap (Mann Whitney U test): VAFI (p = .028), RCI (p < .0005), VFI (p = .001), and PDC (p = .014). Furthermore, significant correlations were observed with the tests: VAFI vs. RCI (r = .532, p = .015), VFI (r = .489, p = .025) and PDC (r = -.474, p = .030); RCI vs. VFI (r = .446, p = .043) and PDC (r = -.527, p = .014). CONCLUSIONS: Superficial venous drainage insufficiency should not be confined to an U/S assessment of the presence of reflux, which is qualitative. Quantitative data may be provided using the VAFI, RCI, VFI, and PDC. Understanding why there are significant correlations among these parameters and the preferred objective reference test requires further work.