A Randomized Parallel-group Study of Digital Gut-directed Hypnotherapy vs Muscle Relaxation for Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Gut-directed hypnotherapy (GDH) is effective for treating irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but access limits its widespread use. We report the first randomized controlled trial comparing the safety and efficacy of a self-administered, digital GDH treatment program with that of digital muscle relaxation (MR) in adults with IBS. METHODS: After a 4-week run-in period, patients were randomized to 12 weeks of treatment with digital GDH (Regulora), or digital MR accessed via a mobile app on a smartphone or tablet. The primary endpoint was abdominal pain response, defined as ≥30% reduction from baseline in average daily abdominal pain intensity in the 4 weeks following treatment. Key secondary outcomes included mean change from baseline in abdominal pain, stool consistency, and stool frequency. RESULTS: Of 378 randomized patients, 362 were treated and included in the efficacy analysis. A similar proportion of the GDH (30.4%) and MR (27.1%) groups met the primary endpoint, with no significant difference between the groups (P = .5352). Significantly more patients treated with GDH than MR were abdominal pain responders during the last 4 weeks of treatment (30.9% vs 21.5%; P = .0232) and over the entire treatment period (29.3% vs 18.8%; P = .0254). Improvements in abdominal pain, stool consistency, and stool frequency were consistent across IBS subtypes. No patients experienced serious adverse events or adverse events leading to study discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with a digital GDH program led to an improvement in abdominal pain and stool symptoms in patients with IBS, supporting a role for this intervention as part of integrated care for IBS. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier NCT04133519.

Twenty-Five Years' Experience and Beyond with Cultured Epidermal Autografts for Coverage of Large Burn Wounds in Adult and Pediatric Patients, 1989-2015.

This report summarizes the characteristics of 954 burned patients treated with cultured epidermal autografts (CEA), the largest number of patients to date. Data collected include patient demographics, survival, and final graft take. Source data were provided by the treating physician or attending burn team. Safety data were provided by the treating physician, attending burn team, and the pharmacovigilance database. In this dataset collected between 1989 and 2015, 954 patients were treated with cultured epidermal autographs for burns. Three hundred twenty-five (34%) were pediatric patients and 628 (66%) were adult (≥22 years of age); age unknown for one patient. The mean percentage total BSA (TBSA) burned was 67% (±17), median graft take at discharge was 75%, and overall survival at discharge was 84% (804/954). Survival rates were similar for pediatric and adult patients (89% vs 82%, respectively) and higher than the similar patient population reported in the National Burn Repository. Median graft take at discharge was also similar for pediatric and adult patients (80% vs 73%, respectively). The most frequently reported adverse reactions were infections in both pediatric and adult patients. There were no signals of increased risk of adverse reactions in pediatric compared with adult patients. When used as an adjunct to conventional split-thickness skin grafting for treatment of large burns in pediatric and adult patients, the analysis in this report shows an increased survival rate for patients treated with CEA compared with that reported for patients in the National Burn Repository with comparable burns.

Matrix-Applied Characterized Autologous Cultured Chondrocytes Versus Microfracture: Five-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Matrix-based cell therapy improves surgical handling, increases patient comfort, and allows for expanded indications with better reliability within the knee joint. Five-year efficacy and safety of autologous cultured chondrocytes on porcine collagen membrane (MACI) versus microfracture for treating cartilage defects have not yet been reported from any randomized controlled clinical trial. PURPOSE: To examine the clinical efficacy and safety results at 5 years after treatment with MACI and compare these with the efficacy and safety of microfracture treatment for symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: This article describes the 5-year follow-up of the SUMMIT (Superiority of MACI Implant Versus Microfracture Treatment) clinical trial conducted at 14 study sites in Europe. All 144 patients who participated in SUMMIT were eligible to enroll; analyses of the 5-year data were performed with data from patients who signed informed consent and continued in the Extension study. RESULTS: Of the 144 patients randomized in the SUMMIT trial, 128 signed informed consent and continued observation in the Extension study: 65 MACI (90.3%) and 63 microfracture (87.5%). The improvements in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain and Function domains previously described were maintained over the 5-year follow-up. Five years after treatment, the improvement in MACI over microfracture in the co-primary endpoint of KOOS pain and function was maintained and was clinically and statistically significant ( P = .022). Improvements in activities of daily living remained statistically significantly better ( P = .007) in MACI patients, with quality of life and other symptoms remaining numerically higher in MACI patients but losing statistical significance relative to the results of the SUMMIT 2-year analysis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation of structural repair was performed in 120 patients at year 5. As in the 2-year SUMMIT (MACI00206) results, the MRI evaluation showed improvement in defect filling for both treatments; however, no statistically significant differences were noted between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic cartilage knee defects 3 cm2 or larger treated with MACI were clinically and statistically significantly improved at 5 years compared with microfracture treatment. No remarkable adverse events or safety issues were noted in this heterogeneous patient population.

Ixmyelocel-T for patients with ischaemic heart failure: a prospective randomised double-blind trial.

BACKGROUND: Ixmyelocel-T is an expanded, multicellular therapy produced from a patient's own bone marrow by selectively expanding two key types of bone marrow mononuclear cells: CD90+ mesenchymal stem cells and CD45+ CD14+ auto-fluorescent+ activated macrophages. Early phase clinical trials suggest that intramyocardial delivery of ixmyelocel-T might improve clinical, functional, symptomatic, and quality-of-life outcomes in patients with heart failure due to ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of catheter-based transendocardial injection of ixmyelocel-T cell therapy in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fractions. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2B trial (ixCELL-DCM), patients from 31 sites in North America with New York Heart Association class III or IV symptomatic heart failure due to ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy, who had left ventricular ejection fraction 35% or less, an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator, and who were ineligible for revascularisation procedures were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ixmyelocel-T or placebo at the time of bone marrow aspiration and followed for 12 months. Randomisation was done through an interactive (voice/web) response system. The pharmacist, treating physician, and coordinator at each site were unblinded, but the the follow-up team was completely blinded. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, cardiovascular admission to hospital, and unplanned clinic visits to treat acute decompensated heart failure based on the blinded adjudication of an independent clinical endpoint committee. Primary efficacy endpoint analyses and safety analyses were done by modified intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01670981. FINDINGS: Between April 2, 2013, and Jan 28, 2015, 126 participants were randomly assigned to receive either ixmyelocel-T (n=66) or placebo (n=60). 114 (90%) patients comprised the modified intention-to-treat population and 109 (87%) patients were included in the per-protocol primary efficacy analysis (58 in the ixmyelocel-T group and 51 in the placebo group). The primary efficacy endpoint was observed in 47 patients: 50 events in 25 (49%) of 51 patients in the placebo group and 38 events in 22 (38%) of 58 patients in the ixmyelocel-T group, which represents a 37% reduction in cardiac events compared with placebo (risk ratio 0·63 [95% CI 0·42-0·97]; p=0·0344). 41 (75%) of 51 participants in the placebo group had serious adverse events versus 31 (53%) of 58 in the ixmyelocel-T group (p=0·0197). INTERPRETATION: To the best of our knowledge, ixCELL-DCM is the largest cell therapy study done in patients with heart failure so far. The transendocardial delivery of ixmyelocel-T in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction due to ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy resulted in a significant reduction in adjudicated clinical cardiac events compared with placebo leading to improved patient outcomes. FUNDING: Vericel Corporation.

The ixCELL-DCM Trial: Rationale and Design.

Ixmyelocel-T is an investigational patient-specific, expanded, multicellular therapy produced from a patient's own bone marrow. It is produced by selectively expanding two key types of bone marrow mononuclear cells (BM-MNCs), CD90+ mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and CD45+CD14+ autofluorescent, alternatively activated macrophages. Earlier clinical trials suggested that intramyocardial ixmyelocel-T might improve clinical, functional, symptomatic, and quality of life outcomes in patients with ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM). This ongoing randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial (ixCELL-DCM) was designed to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of catheter-based transendocardial injection of ixmyelocel-T in patients with heart failure due to IDCM. Patients (N = 114) with New York Heart Association class III or IV symptomatic heart failure due to IDCM, who have left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% and an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator, but are ineligible for revascularization procedures, were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to ixmyelocel-T or placebo (vehicle control). The primary efficacy endpoint is a composite of the total number of deaths, cardiovascular hospitalizations, or unplanned clinic visits to treat acutely decompensated heart failure during the 12 months following treatment administration. Secondary endpoints include the win ratio analysis for hierarchical occurrences of clinical events in the primary endpoint, total numbers of clinical events, left ventricular structure and function, and quality-of-life assessments. ixCELL-DCM is one of the largest cell therapy trials in heart failure patients to date and the first double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of ixmyelocel-T administered via transendocardial catheter-based injections in patients with heart failure secondary to IDCM.

Safety and efficacy of ixmyelocel-T: an expanded, autologous multi-cellular therapy, in dilated cardiomyopathy.

RATIONALE: Ixmyelocel-T is associated with a wide range of biological activities relevant to tissue repair and regeneration. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ixmyelocel-T in 2 prospective randomized phase 2A Trials administered via minithoracotomy or intramyocardial catheter injections in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) stratified by ischemic or nonischemic status. METHODS AND RESULTS: In IMPACT-DCM, patients were randomized to either ixmyelocel-T or standard-of-care control in a 3:1 ratio (n=39); ixmyelocel-T was administered intramyocardially via minithoracotomy. In Catheter-DCM, patients were randomized to either ixmyelocel-T or standard of care control in a 2:1 ratio (n=22); ixmyelocel-T was administered intramyocardially using the NOGA Myostar catheter. Only patients randomized to ixmyelocel-T underwent bone marrow aspiration and injections. In the 2 studies, a total of 61 patients were randomized, and 59 were treated or received standard of care. Fewer ischemic patients treated with ixmyelocel-T experienced a major adverse cardiovascular event during follow-up when compared with control patients. A similar benefit was not seen in the nonischemic patients. Heart failure exacerbation was the most common major adverse cardiovascular event. Ixmyelocel-T treatment was associated with improved New York Heart Association class, 6-minute walk distance, and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire scores in the ischemic population relative to control; a similar trend was not observed in the nonischemic population. CONCLUSIONS: Intramyocardial injection with ixmyelocel-T reduces major adverse cardiovascular event and improves symptoms in patients with ischemic DCM but not in patients with nonischemic DCM.

Lack of an effect of a novel beta3-adrenoceptor agonist, TAK-677, on energy metabolism in obese individuals: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to test the safety and metabolic effects of a novel beta(3)-adrenoreceptor agonist (TAK-677) in humans. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-five obese (body mass index = 33.9 +/- 2.1 kg/m2, mean +/- se) men and women (31.4 +/- 0.9 yr) participated in a double-blind placebo-controlled study at an institutional research center. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomized to 0.1 mg TAK-677 twice daily (BID) (n = 21), 0.5 mg TAK-677 BID (n = 22), or placebo BID (n = 22) for 29 d. OUTCOMES: Drug safety, 24-h respiratory quotient (RQ), 24-h energy expenditure (EE), body composition, fat distribution, and fasting plasma concentration of substrates and hormones were assessed. An acute-response study was also conducted. RESULTS: The drug was well tolerated by all participants; however, heart rate was elevated (9 +/- 2 beats per minute) with the 0.5-mg BID dose. After 28 d of treatment and when compared with placebo, there was no change in 24-h RQ with either 0.1-mg BID (P = 0.1) or 0.5-mg BID (P = 1.0) doses of TAK-677. However, TAK, 0.5 mg BID, resulted in a small increase in 24-h EE that was significantly different from placebo [change from baseline, 13 +/- 17 (0.5 mg BID) vs.-39 +/- 18 (placebo) kcal/d, P < 0.05]. Changes in weight, fat-free mass, and abdominal fat depots (visceral or sc) were not different between the three groups, nor were changes in fasting insulin, free fatty acid, or glucose concentrations. CONCLUSION: TAK-677 has no effect on 24-h RQ or fat oxidation but does slightly increase 24-h EE at the highest dose (0.5 mg BID). The acute studies showed large interindividual variability in plasma concentrations of TAK-677 indicating some possible problems with bioavailability and therefore efficacy.

The COX-2 selective inhibitor, valdecoxib, does not impair platelet function in the elderly: results of a randomized controlled trial.

The effects of the new cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 selective inhibitor, valdecoxib (40 mg bid; n = 17), on platelet function were evaluated, along with ibuprofen (800 mg tid; n = 15) and placebo (n = 15), in healthy elderly subjects (65-85 years) in this 7.5-day, randomized, single-center, double-blind study. Platelet aggregation (to sodium arachidonate, collagen, and adenosine diphosphate), bleeding time, and serum thromboxane B2 (TxB2) concentrations were measured up to 8 hours postdose on Days 1 and 8. Valdecoxib had no platelet effects, while ibuprofen significantly decreased platelet aggregation, significantly increased bleeding time (2-4 h postdose on each day), and significantly decreased TxB2 levels at all time points. In conclusion, unlike ibuprofen, valdecoxib 40 mg bid spares platelet COX-1 function in healthy elderly subjects. Valdecoxib's lack of effect on platelet aggregation and bleeding time suggests that it will have an improved clinical profile over nonselective NSAIDs, particularly in patients for whom bleeding complications are a concern.

A selective inhibitor of inducible nitric oxide synthase inhibits exhaled breath nitric oxide in healthy volunteers and asthmatics.

The inducible isoenzyme of nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) generates nitric oxide (NO) in inflammatory diseases such as asthma. The prodrug L-N6-(1-iminoethyl)lysine 5-tetrazole amide (SC-51) is rapidly converted in vivo to the active metabolite L-N6-(1-iminoethyl)lysine (L-NIL). Initially, we performed in vitro experiments in human primary airway epithelial cells to demonstrate that L-NIL causes inhibition of iNOS. In a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial, SC-51 was administered as a single oral dose (20 or 200 mg) in separate cohorts of healthy volunteers (two groups of n=12) and mild asthmatic patients (two groups of n=12). SC-51 (200 mg) reduced exhaled breath NO levels to <2 ppb in both healthy volunteers (P<0.001) and mild asthmatics (P<0.001) within 15 min, representing >90% inhibition of baseline levels of NO in asthmatic patients, with the effects lasting at least 72 h. There were no significant effects on blood pressure, pulse rate, or respiratory function (FEV1). This study demonstrates that an inhibitor of iNOS produces marked inhibition of exhaled breath NO in normal and asthmatic subjects without producing the side effects observed following the systemic administration of non-selective NOS inhibitors, and thus provides support for the potential use of iNOS inhibitors to treat a range of inflammatory clinical disorders.

The COX-2 specific inhibitor, valdecoxib, is an effective, opioid-sparing analgesic in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the analgesic efficacy and opioid-sparing effects of valdecoxib, a potent COX-2 specific inhibitor, in patients undergoing knee replacement. Patients received morphine by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and valdecoxib 40 mg or 80 mg daily, or placebo, for up to two days. Efficacy was assessed by the cumulative amount of morphine administered over 48 hours, pain intensity and patient's evaluation of medication. Morphine consumption over 48 hours by patients receiving valdecoxib 40 mg or 80 mg daily plus morphine was 83.7% and 75.8% (P < 0.05) of the total amount consumed by patients receiving morphine alone. Patients receiving valdecoxib 40 mg and 80 mg daily experienced significantly lower maximum pain intensity on Day 2 (P < 0.05), and rated their study medication significantly higher than patients receiving morphine alone. Valdecoxib plus morphine was well tolerated. Thus, valdecoxib in combination with morphine provides multi-modal analgesia that reduces pain and opioid use and increases patient satisfaction following knee replacement surgery.

Incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers associated with valdecoxib compared with that of ibuprofen and diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether valdecoxib, at chronic arthritis doses, has the characteristics of a cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX-2) specific inhibitor, as measured by a reduced incidence of upper-gastrointestinal ulceration compared with conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). METHODS: This double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study compared the incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers associated with valdecoxib 10 mg daily (q.d.) and 20 mg q.d. with that of ibuprofen 800 mg three times daily (t.i.d.) or diclofenac 75 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) when administered over a 12-week period. The incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers was assessed by upper-gastrointestinal endoscopy, performed at baseline and again at the end of week 12 (or at early study termination). Efficacy assessments were performed at baseline and at weeks 2, 6 and 12 using Patient's and Physician's Global Assessments of Arthritis. RESULTS: A total of 1052 osteoarthritis patients were enrolled into the trial. The incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers over 12 weeks was 5% in patients receiving valdecoxib 10 mg q.d., 4% in patients receiving valdecoxib 20 mg q.d., 7% in patients receiving placebo, 16% in patients receiving ibuprofen 800 mg t.i.d. (P <0.05 v. placebo), and 17% in patients receiving diclofenac 75 mg b.i.d. (P <0.05 v. placebo). The incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers at week 12 seen in the ibuprofen 800 mg t.i.d. and diclofenac 75 mg b.i.d. groups was significantly higher than that in the valdecoxib 10 mg q.d. and valdecoxib 20 mg q.d. groups (P <0.05). The incidence rates of gastroduodenal ulcers were not significantly different between the valdecoxib treatment groups or between valdecoxib- and placebo-treated patients. Efficacy responses to valdecoxib 10 mg and 20 mg q.d. were significantly greater than placebo and comparable with both ibuprofen 800 mg t.i.d. and diclofenac 75 mg b.i.d. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study demonstrate that valdecoxib has an upper-gastrointestinal safety profile typical of a COX-2 specific inhibitor. Overall, the data indicate that administration of valdecoxib offers similar efficacy for the treatment of osteoarthritis but improved upper-gastrointestinal safety compared with the conventional NSAIDs, ibuprofen and diclofenac, based on the significantly lower incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers detected by endoscopy.

A single preoperative oral dose of valdecoxib, a new cyclooxygenase-2 specific inhibitor, relieves post-oral surgery or bunionectomy pain.

BACKGROUND: The trend toward day-case surgery, with discharge on oral medication, has highlighted the need for effective and safe analgesics that facilitate a rapid recovery and discharge time. This study evaluated the analgesic efficacy, dose dependency, duration of action, and safety of the cyclooxygenase-2 specific inhibitor, valdecoxib, administered before oral or orthopedic surgery. METHODS: Eligible healthy adult patients were scheduled to undergo either extraction of two impacted third molar teeth (n = 284) or bunionectomy surgery (n = 223) with local anesthesia in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies conducted at three centers in the United States. Patients received a single, preoperatively administered oral dose of placebo or 10 (oral surgery only), 20, 40, or 80 mg valdecoxib. Analgesic efficacy was assessed postoperatively, over a 24-h treatment period, or until the patient required rescue medication. Efficacy measures included time to rescue medication, proportion of patients requiring such rescue, pain intensity, and the Patient's Global Evaluation of Study Medication. RESULTS: In both studies, all doses of valdecoxib produced analgesia with a duration (time to rescue analgesia) and magnitude (Pain Intensity, Patient's Global Evaluation) significantly greater than placebo. A dose-dependent effect was observed up to 40 mg valdecoxib, with an 80-mg dose providing no additional analgesic benefit. In both models, all doses of valdecoxib were well tolerated, with no clinically significant treatment-related gastrointestinal, renal, or platelet-derived adverse events, and no evidence of a dose-related increase in adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative orally administered valdecoxib provides well-tolerated and effective analgesia for mild to moderate postoperative pain.

Valdecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2-specific inhibitor, is effective in treating primary dysmenorrhea.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of the cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-specific inhibitor valdecoxib with naproxen sodium in treating menstrual pain associated with primary dysmenorrhea. METHOD: This single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover study compared the efficacy and safety of single oral doses of valdecoxib 20 mg and 40 mg with naproxen sodium 550 mg, or placebo, with an option of treatment for up to 3 days, twice daily. Efficacy was assessed by time-weighted sum of total pain relief, sum of pain intensity difference, time-specific pain relief, and pain intensity difference over 12 hours, time to rescue medication or first re-medication, the percentage of patients taking rescue medication, and patient's global evaluation of study medication. RESULTS: Mean time-weighted sum of total pain relief and sum of pain intensity difference were significantly superior to placebo for the first 8 and 12 hours after the initial dose of valdecoxib 20 mg (P <.01) and 40 mg (P <.001). Valdecoxib 20 mg and 40 mg were comparable to naproxen sodium 550 mg for all efficacy measures. Other differences in efficacy measures favoring the higher dose of valdecoxib did not achieve statistical significance, with the exception of sum of pain intensity difference-12. Both doses of valdecoxib were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Both valdecoxib 20- and 40-mg doses were effective and well tolerated for the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea. Valdecoxib 20 mg and 40 mg demonstrate analgesic efficacy, based on onset, magnitude, and duration of analgesia that is similar to naproxen sodium, making it a potential choice for treating women with primary dysmenorrhea.

Valdecoxib does not impair platelet function.

The platelet effects of a supratherapeutic dose of the new cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 specific inhibitor, valdecoxib (40 mg twice a day), naproxen 500 mg twice a day, diclofenac 75 mg twice a day, and placebo were compared in 62 healthy adult subjects in this 7(1/2) day single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Platelet aggregation responses (to arachidonate [AA], collagen, and adenosine diphosphate [ADP]), bleeding time, and serum thromboxane B(2) (TxB(2)) concentrations were measured at baseline and at regular intervals on days 1 and 8. Valdecoxib had no effect on platelet function. Naproxen and diclofenac significantly reduced the platelet aggregation response to AA and to a lesser extent collagen and ADP at most assessments compared with placebo. Naproxen significantly lowered serum TxB(2) levels. In contrast to standard doses of 2 nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), a supratherapeutic valdecoxib dosage does not impair platelet function (COX-1). Valdecoxib may be a safer analgesic option than conventional NSAIDs in patients for whom bleeding complications are a concern. (Am J Emerg Med 2002;20:275-281.

Randomized placebo-controlled trial comparing efficacy and safety of valdecoxib with naproxen in patients with osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: We compared the efficacy and upper gastrointestinal safety of the cyclooxygenase-2-specific inhibitor valdecoxib with naproxen and placebo in treating moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the knee. STUDY DESIGN: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared the efficacy and upper gastrointestinal tract safety of valdecoxib at dosages of 5, 10, and 20 mg once daily with placebo and naproxen at the dosage of 500 mg twice daily. POPULATION: We included patients who had been diagnosed with moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the knee according to the modified criteria of the American College of Rheumatology. OUTCOMES MEASURED: The Patient's and Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis (PaGAA, PhGAA), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), and Western Ontario and McMaster's Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis indices were assessed at baseline and at weeks 2, 6, and 12. Upper gastrointestinal ulceration was assessed by pre- and posttreatment endoscopies. RESULTS: Valdecoxib 10 and 20 mg once daily (but not 5 mg once daily) demonstrated similar efficacy to naproxen at 500 mg twice daily, and all 3 dosages were superior to placebo for the PaGAA, PhGAA, PAAP-VAS, and WOMAC Osteoarthritis indices at most assessments throughout the 12-week study (P <.05). The incidence of endoscopically proven ulcers was significantly higher in the naproxen group than in the 5- and 10-mg valdecoxib groups, but not in the 20-mg valdecoxib group. All 3 valdecoxib doses were comparable to placebo in ulcer incidence. CONCLUSIONS: Valdecoxib (10 and 20 mg once daily) is significantly superior to placebo and as effective as naproxen (500 mg twice daily) in improving moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the knee. Upper gastrointestinal tract safety of valdecoxib (5 and 10 mg) was comparable to that of placebo and significantly better than that of naproxen.

The analgesic efficacy of valdecoxib vs. oxycodone/acetaminophen after oral surgery.

BACKGROUND: The authors conducted two studies to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of the cyclooxygenase, or COX, -2-specific inhibitor, valdecoxib, with oxycodone/ acetaminophen in patients who have undergone oral surgery. METHODS: In total, 205 eligible subjects in Study A and 201 in Study B were randomized to receive a single oral dose of valdecoxib (20 or 40 milligrams), a combination of oxycodone 10 mg/acetaminophen 1,000 mg or placebo. Eligible subjects experienced moderate-to-severe pain within six hours of surgery during which two or more impacted third molars were extracted. Analgesic efficacy was assessed over 24 hours or until the patient required rescue analgesia. RESULTS: In both studies, subjects receiving either dose of valdecoxib experienced a rapid onset of analgesia and (among those who received valdecoxib 40 mg) a level of pain relief comparable with that of those who received oxycodone/ acetaminophen. Both valdecoxib doses had a significantly longer duration of analgesic effect than did oxycodone/acetaminophen. Pooled safety data demonstrated that each valdecoxib dose had a tolerability profile superior to that of oxycodone/ acetaminophen and similar to that of placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Orally administered valdecoxib is as rapidly acting and effective as oxycodone/acetaminophen, and it has a superior duration of analgesic effect in patients after oral surgery. Valdecoxib has a tolerability profile superior to that of oxycodone/acetaminophen. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The current standard of care for alleviating acute pain after oral surgery has rested largely on conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or opioid/analgesic combination products. The studies reported here suggest that the COX-2-specific inhibitor valdecoxib offers an efficacious and safe alternative to other analgesics used to treat pain after oral surgery.

Efficacy and safety of the COX-2 specific inhibitor valdecoxib in the management of osteoarthritis of the hip: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison with naproxen.

OBJECTIVE: Non-steroidal antiinflammatory agents are commonly used to treat pain and inflammation associated with osteoarthritis (OA), but have poor gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability. This study compared the efficacy of the COX-2 specific inhibitor valdecoxib with naproxen and placebo, in treating symptomatic OA of the hip. DESIGN: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind 12-week study compared the efficacy and tolerability of single daily doses of valdecoxib 5 mg and 10 mg with placebo or naproxen 500 mg BID. Efficacy was assessed by Patient's and Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis, and the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMasters) OA Individual and Composite Indices. The incidence of adverse events was monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: Valdecoxib was clinically and statistically superior to placebo for Patient's and Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis and for all WOMAC OA Indices over the 12 week study period (P

Valdecoxib is more efficacious than rofecoxib in relieving pain associated with oral surgery.

Inhibition of the cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 enzyme has been shown previously to reduce pain and inflammation. Valdecoxib is a new highly selective COX-2 inhibitor with a rapid onset of action and significant analgesic properties. This study compared the analgesic efficacy of valdecoxib and rofecoxib in treating postoperative pain in patients undergoing oral surgery. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared the efficacy of 40 mg valdecoxib with that of 50 mg rofecoxib and placebo. Efficacy was assessed by the onset of analgesia, pain intensity levels, and pain relief over 24 hours, time-weighted sum of total pain, sum of pain intensity difference, the percentage of patients requiring rescue medication and experiencing regimen failure, and patients' global evaluation. Patients receiving valdecoxib experienced a significantly quicker onset of analgesia, significantly improved pain relief, and lower pain intensity compared with patients receiving rofecoxib and greater satisfaction with their study medication after a single dose. Valdecoxib also demonstrated efficacy that was superior to that of rofecoxib with respect to the percentage of patients requiring rescue medication or experiencing regimen failure (p < or =.05). Valdecoxib, rofecoxib, and placebo were equally well tolerated. This study demonstrates that valdecoxib provides significantly greater analgesic efficacy than rofecoxib in the management of pain after oral surgery.

Valdecoxib, a COX-2-specific inhibitor, is an efficacious, opioid-sparing analgesic in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty.

Opioid agents are highly effective analgesics after orthopedic surgery but are associated with several adverse effects. Valdecoxib is a new, highly selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-specific inhibitor with a rapid onset of action and significant analgesic properties that is being developed for the management of acute pain. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the opioid-sparing efficacy of valdecoxib as part of a multimodal treatment of pain associated with hip arthroplasty. This multicenter, multiple-dose, double-blind, parallel-group study compared the opioid-sparing effects, analgesic efficacy, and safety of 20- and 40-mg doses of valdecoxib twice daily with placebo in patients receiving morphine by patient-controlled analgesia after hip arthroplasty. Study medication was first administered 1 to 3 hours preoperatively. The total amount of morphine administered, pain intensity, and patient's global evaluation of study medication were assessed over a period of 48 hours. Patients receiving 20 or 40 mg valdecoxib twice daily required on average 40% less morphine than those receiving placebo after hip arthroplasty. Pain intensity levels and patient satisfaction were significantly improved in both valdecoxib groups compared with placebo. Valdecoxib and placebo were equally well tolerated. Pre- and postoperative administration of valdecoxib reduces the amount of morphine required for postoperative pain relief and provides greater analgesic efficacy compared with morphine alone. Thus, valdecoxib has significant clinical utility for acute pain management in orthopedic surgery patients.