Underestimation of acute pancreatitis: patients with only a small increase in amylase/lipase levels can also have or develop severe acute pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: In most treatment studies on acute pancreatitis, pancreatologists base their diagnosis on amylase/lipase levels more than three times above the upper limit of normal (>3n) and thus exclude patients with smaller enzyme level increases. The recommendations derived from the results of treatment studies do not take into account such patients. Non-pancreatologists frequently believe that only patients with high enzyme levels have a serious prognosis. AIMS: To question the assumption that high enzyme levels indicate severe, and conversely low enzyme levels indicate mild, acute pancreatitis. PATIENTS/METHODS: This retrospective study includes 284 consecutive patients with a first attack of acute pancreatitis. The cause was biliary in 114 (40%) patients, alcoholism in 83 (29%), other in 21 (7%), and unknown in 66 (23%). Patients were divided into two groups according to their serum enzyme levels (amylase: 3n, n = 196; lipase: 3n, n = 233). Renal impairment, indication for dialysis and artificial ventilation, development of pseudocysts, necessity for surgery, and mortality were taken as parameters of severity. RESULTS: The incidence of severity was the same for both the 3n groups. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of acute pancreatitis is independent of the elevation in serum amylase/lipase level (3n) on admission. Patients with only a slight increase can also have or develop severe acute pancreatitis. Patients with

[Respiratory and circulatory parameters as indicators of the postoperative analgesic demand in newborns and infants]. / Atem- und Kreislaufparameter als Indikatoren des postoperativen Analgetikabedarfs bei Neugeborenen und Säuglingen.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Due to immature cognitive functions, infants are unable to communicate their pain perception verbally. To assess postoperative analgesic demand, the anaesthetist has to rely on observational techniques. Generally, pain expression is considered to be a multidimensional phenomenon consisting of physiological, motor-reflex and behavioural patterns. The majority of observational approaches to pain assessment in infants use the behavioural dimension only, regardless of the fact that pain perception might contribute substantially to the stress response. The aim of this study is to evaluate, whether sensitivity and specificity of a behavioural pain scale (CHIPPS [1]) can be improved by adding physiological measures, especially those representing the stress response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 30 infants aged 0-12 months and scheduled for unilateral herniorrhaphy were studied prospectively. In addition to 9 behavioural items (crying, facial expression, wrinkling of the forehead, motoric restlessness; posture of fingers, arms, legs, toes and torso) the ratio of actual physiological measurements (heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure) and their respective preoperative baseline values were recorded by a single observer in 5 minutes intervals during the first hour after recovery from anaesthesia. Maximal efforts were made to achieve valid measures. Factor analysis was performed to determine the dimensionality of the complete item pool. For additional validity testing, receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were calculated using the independent opinion of an experienced clinician as an external criterion. Discriminant analysis was performed to assess the accuracy of a combined behavioural and physiological scale. RESULTS: The factor analysis resulted in two independent dimensions: behaviour and cardiocirculatory measurements. The strong intercorrelations of all behavioural items and the fact, that the affective pain experience is expressed by a specific mimic behaviour, suggest the behavioural dimension to be regarded as pain expression. Because of the strictly orthogonal structure of the factor system, the circulatory and the respiratory dimension lack any relationship to pain experience. In addition to these statistical reasons, considerations on practicability disprove blood pressure and respiratory rate as useful pain indicators: Whereas the observer never failed to obtain a behavioural score, only 60% of the blood pressure measures and 80% of the respiratory rates were valid. In contrast, heart rate counts were obtained in over 99% and thus have to be considered as the only practicable physiological measurement in the early postoperative period. Corresponding to the results of the factor analysis, ROC curves suggest that the ability of the heart rate alone to assess pain is not substantially better than a random process, whereas the behavioural scale performs well. In addition the heart rate failed to improve the accuracy of the behavioural scale as shown by the results of a discriminant analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the multidimensional approach and the corresponding multivariate analyses, a unidimensional scale consisting of behavioural items was found to be a valid indicator of an postoperative analgesic demand. Due to the lack of diagnostic properties and difficulties to obtain sound values even under research conditions, physiological measurements like blood pressure, respiratory rate and heart rate are not suitable for the assessment of a postoperative analgesic demand in infants, neither for clinical nor for research purposes.

[Development of an observational scale for assessment of postoperative pain in infants]. / Entwicklung eines Fremdbeobach-tungsbogens zur Beurteilung des postoperativen Schmerzes bei Säuglingen.

In a prospective trial in 139 infants ASA classification I-II 13 observational items were scaled during the first postoperative hour (13 assessments). The items were drawn from the literature and chosen for economic purpose. Factor analyses (Principal component, Kaiser Criterion, Scree-test) were used for the elimination of useless items and for the identification of suitable ones. The discriminative properties of single items and different subsets of items to detect an analgetic demand were tested in discriminant analyses and variance analyses with repeated measurements. Due to insufficient variance four items had to be eliminated: "nasolabial folding", "colour of the face", "sweating of the head", and "muscle tone". The factor analysis if the remaining 9 items resulted in a one factorial solution. Neither the corrected item-scale-correlations nor the inter-item-correlations showed advantageous properties of single items compared with the others. For economic reasons two 5-item scales were chosen for further evaluation in regard to sensitivity, specify and validity. The items "crying", "facial expression", "positioning of the legs", "positioning of the trunc" and "motoric restlessness" built the Children's and Infants Postoperative Pain Scale (CHIPPS) whereas an Infants Postoperative Pain Scale (IPPS) contained the items "crying", "facial expression", "positioning of the arms", "positioning of the trunc" and "motoric restlessness". The latter five items had shown the highest factor loadings. The two systems had a high intern consistency with alpha > 0.90 (p < 0.01) with at least 73% explained variance. Inter-item-correlations and corrected item-scale-correlations showed no differences between the two scales. The discriminant analyses resulted in almost identic data for specify, sensitivity and predictive values of the IPPS compared with the CHIPPS. There was a significant interaction between repeated measurements and the supply of Piritramide and Ketamine, but not of Midazolam. Concurrent and constructive validation were positive for both systems, using administration of Piritramide as a criterion. For clinical purpose the CHIPPS should be preferred, because it has been proven to be valid in children up to 4 years of age and because controlled data on its sensitivity, specify, reliability and validity could already be presented.

Etiology and age have only a limited influence on the course of acute pancreatitis.

In a retrospective study of 602 patients with a first attack of acute pancreatitis, it was investigated whether the etiology of the disease and age of the patient are negative factors. There was no significant difference concerning hospital stay, respiratory and renal insufficiency, indication for surgery, or mortality rate among the different etiological groups. However, pancreatic pseudocysts developed significantly more frequently in alcoholics than in patients with other etiologies (p < 0.001 to p = 0.007). There was also no difference concerning hospital stay and respiratory insufficiency among the age groups. The increased incidence of renal insufficiency probably is related to physiological alteration with age, but the indication for dialysis did not increase. Pancreatic pseudocysts were more frequent in patients between 31 and 40 years of age, which was also the peak age group of alcoholics. Indication for surgery was the same for all age subgroups. The increase in mortality rate with age was weakly significant (p = 0.049). For the etiological subgroups, an increase in mortality with age was found only for biliary pancreatitis patients (p = 0.003). It is concluded that etiology and age of the patient have only limited influences on the course of acute pancreatitis.

Morbidity and mortality in 602 patients with acute pancreatitis seen between the years 1980-1994.

The course of a first attack of acute pancreatitis was evaluated in a retrospective study of 602 patients, who were admitted between 01.01.1980 and 30.09.1993 to the Centers of Internal Medicine and Surgery of the University of Göttingen (n = 417) and from 16.11.1986 to 30.06.1994 to the Municipal Hospital of Lüneburg (n = 185). Etiology was biliary tract disease in 227 (37.7%), alcohol abuse in 177 (29.4%), unknown in 133 (22.1%), and other causes in 65 (10.8%) patients. Mean hospital stay was 27.9 +/- 24 days (x +/- SD), median 23 days. Pancreatic pseudocysts developed in 14.3% of the patients, and surgical treatment was necessary in 11.1%. Within the first 48 hours, respiratory insufficiency was observed in 63.2% of the 204 patients undergoing arterial blood gas analysis while renal impairment occurred in 32.6% of 602 patients. Artificial ventilation was indicated in 12.5%, and dialysis in 7% of the patients. Mortality rate was 6.1%, correlating significantly with respiratory and renal impairment and procedures in connection with these complications and also with transfers from other hospitals.