Solute carrier family 16 member 1 as a potential prognostic factor for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and its influence on tumor immunity.

Background: Solute carrier family 16 member 1 (SLC16A1) serves as a biomarker in numerous types of cancer. Tumor immune infiltration has drawn increasing attention in cancer progression and treatment. The objective of our study was to explore the association between SLC16A1 and the tumor immune microenvironment in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods: Data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas. The xCell web tool was used to calculate the proportion of immune cells according to SLC16A1 expression. To further explore the mechanism of SLC16A1, immunity-related genes were screened from differentially expressed genes through weighted gene coexpression network analysis, examined via Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analyses, and filtrated using univariate Cox regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model combined correlation analysis (P<0.05). Next, CIBERSORT was used to analyze the correlation between immune cells and five important genes. SLC16A1 expression and its clinical role in pancreatic cancer was clarified via immunohistochemical staining experiments. Finally, the effects of SLC16A1 on the results of cancer immunity were evaluated by in vitro experiments. Results: SLC16A1 was overexpressed in PDAC tissues and could be an independent prognostic factor. SLC16A1 was significantly negatively correlated with overall survival and suppressed the tumor immunity of PDAC. In clinic, SLC16A1 expression was significantly positively correlated with tumor progression and poor prognosis. We also found that SLC16A1 could suppress the antitumor ability of CD8+ T cells. Conclusions: SLC16A1 is a biomarker for the prognosis of PDAC and can influence the immune environment of PDAC. These findings provide new insights into the treatment of PDAC.

Upregulated expression of PTTG1 is associated with progression of pancreatic cancer.

Background: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is an aggressive disease with a very poor prognosis. The insidious onset, rapid progression, and resistance to conventional therapies mark the imperious need for novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets. The pituitary tumor transforming gene 1 (PTTG1), implicated in tumorigenesis and cellular transformation, has been studied in various cancers, however, its role and mechanisms in PC remain to be elucidated for better understanding the disease pathology and in enhancing patient management strategies. Methods: The present study examined the PTTG1 messenger RNA (mRNA) expression levels and clinical significance through meta-analysis based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to measure PTTG1 protein levels in PC and adjacent non-cancerous tissues. A correlation was observed between PTTG1 expression and some clinical characteristics based on the TCGA and IHC data. Univariate and multivariate Cox regressions were used to identify independent prognostic factors. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis was performed. The co-expressed genes of PTTG1 were determined by integrating online tools, and the enrichment analyses were performed to determine PTTG1-related pathways and hub co-expressed genes. Results: PTTG1 was highly expressed in PC tissues based on the TCGA, GEO, and IHC data. The combined standard mean difference (SMD) values of PTTG1 expression based on TCGA and GEO databases was 1.02 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-1.30]. The area under the curve (AUC) based on the summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90-0.95). PTTG1 overexpression was remarkably correlated with an inferior overall survival (OS). A total of 367 genes were identified as co-expressed genes of PTTG1 in PC and were mainly involved in the cell cycle pathway. The four identified core genes were CDK1, CCNA2, CDC20, and MAD2L1. Conclusions: The upregulated expression of PTTG1 plays an essential role in PC's progression as a biomarker.

Surgical and local control outcomes after sequential short-course radiation therapy and chemotherapy for rectal cancer.

Background: Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is an accepted approach for the management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and is associated with a decreased risk of development of metastatic disease compared to standard neoadjuvant therapy. However, questions remain regarding surgical outcomes and local control in patients who proceed to surgery, particularly when radiation is given first in the neoadjuvant sequence. We report on our institution's experience with patients who underwent short-course radiation therapy, consolidation chemotherapy, and surgery. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed surgical specimen outcomes, postoperative complications, and local/pelvic control in a large cohort of patients with LARC who underwent neoadjuvant therapy incorporating upfront short-course radiation therapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy. Results: In our cohort of 83 patients who proceeded to surgery, a complete/near-complete mesorectal specimen was achieved in 90 % of patients. This outcome was not associated with the time interval from completion of radiation to surgery. Postoperative complications were acceptably low. Local control at two years was 93.4 % for all patients- 97.6 % for those with low-risk disease and 90.4 % for high-risk disease. Conclusion: Upfront short-course radiation therapy and consolidation chemotherapy is an effective treatment course. Extended interval from completion of short-course radiation therapy did not impact surgical specimen quality.

Effectiveness of the nutrition referral system in a multidisciplinary pancreatic cancer clinic.

PURPOSE: Proactive nutrition screening and intervention is associated with improved outcomes for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). To better optimize nutrition amongst our PDAC population, we implemented systematic malnutrition screening in the Johns Hopkins pancreas multidisciplinary clinic (PMDC) and assessed the effectiveness of our nutrition referral system. METHODS: This was a single institution prospective study of patients seen in the PMDC, screened for malnutrition using the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) (score range=0 to 5, score > 2 indicates risk of malnutrition), and offered referrals to the oncology dietitian. Patients that requested a referral but did not attend a nutrition appointment were contacted by phone to assess barriers to seeing the dietitian. Univariate (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) analyses were carried out to identify predictors of referral status and appointment completion status. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients were included in the study, of which 72 (74.2%) requested a referral and 25 (25.8%) declined. Of the 72 patients who requested a referral, 31 (43.1%) attended an appointment with the oncology dietitian. Data on information session attendance was available for 35 patients, of which 8 (22.9%) attended a pre-clinic information session in which the importance of optimal nutrition was highlighted. On MVA, information session attendance was significantly associated with requesting a referral (OR: 11.1, 95% CI 1.12-1.0E3, p=0.037) and successfully meeting with the oncology dietitian (OR: 5.88, 95% CI 1.00-33.3, p=0.049). CONCLUSION: PMDC teams should institute educational initiatives on the importance of optimal nutrition in order to increase patient engagement with nutrition services.

A safety study of intraoperative radiation therapy following stereotactic body radiation therapy and multi-agent chemotherapy in the treatment of localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma: study protocol of a phase I trial.

BACKGROUND: Localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma carries a poor prognosis even after aggressive therapy. Up to 40% of patients may develop locoregional disease as the first site of failure. As such, there may be a role for intensification of local therapy such as radiation therapy. Radiation dose escalation for pancreatic cancer is limited by proximity of the tumor to the duodenum. However, the duodenum is removed during Whipple procedure, allowing the opportunity to dose escalate with intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT). Although prior studies have shown potential benefit of IORT in pancreatic cancer, these studies did not utilize ablative doses (biologically effective dose [BED10] > 100 Gy). Furthermore, the optimal radiation target volume in this setting is unclear. There has been increased interest in a "Triangle Volume" (TV), bordered by the celiac axis, superior mesenteric artery, common hepatic artery, portal vein, and superior mesenteric vein. Dissection of this area, has been advocated for by surgeons from Heidelberg as it contains extra-pancreatic perineural and lymphatic tracts, which may harbor microscopic disease at risk of mediating local failure. Interestingly, a recent analysis from our institution indicated that nearly all local failures occur in the TV. Therefore, the purpose of this protocol is to evaluate the safety of delivering an ablative radiation dose to the TV with IORT following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). METHODS: Patients with non-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma centered in the head or neck of the pancreas will be enrolled. Following treatment with multi-agent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, patients will undergo SBRT (40 Gy/5 fractions) followed by IORT (15 Gy/1 fraction) to the TV during the Whipple procedure. The primary objective is acute (< 90 days) toxicity after IORT measured by Clavien-Dindo classification. Secondary objectives include late (> 90 days) toxicity after IORT measured by Clavien-Dindo classification, overall survival, local progression-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and progression-free survival. DISCUSSION: If the results show that delivering an ablative radiation dose to the TV with IORT after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and SBRT is safe and feasible, it warrants further investigation in a phase II trial to evaluate efficacy of this approach. Trial Registration This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 12/2/2021 (NCT05141513). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05141513.

Exploration of hub genes, lipid metabolism, and the immune microenvironment in stomach carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma.

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is the 5th most common cause of cancer in the world and the 3rd largest cause of cancer-related death. It is usually associated with a variety of cancers, of which cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) combined with GC accounts for about 1.6%. This study sought to examine the hub genes and role of lipid metabolism in the development and diagnosis of GC and CCA. Methods: To screen potential hub genes, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data sets, including the GC (STAD, dataset of GC) and CCA (CHOL, dataset of CCA) data sets, were used to conduct a differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis and an enrichment analysis of the DEGs. A weighted-gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was conducted to identify the significant gene module and then find the hub genes in the module. To verify the 4 hub genes, we conducted a differentiation analysis of the 4 genes in GC and CCA and found that there were differences. A survival analysis of the hub genes was performed and mutations were mapped. Additionally, tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and immune analyses were performed to evaluate how lipid metabolism affects the development of GC with CCA. Results: The principal component analysis showed that both GC and CCA had distinct up-regulated and down-regulated genes, which are involved in a variety of metabolic processes. Upon WGCNA, the turquoise and blue modules were meaningful, and the hub genes were identified from these 2 modules. Four hub genes were identified: amyloid beta precursor protein binding family B member 1 (APBB1), Homo sapiens armadillo repeat containing X-linked 1 (ARMCX1), DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 1 (DZIP1), and methionine sulfoxide reductase B3 (MSRB3). In survival analysis, increased expression of the 4 hub genes was associated with inferior survival outcomes, with variations in all 4 genes. Additionally, we demonstrated that genes related to lipid metabolism had an effect on immune function. Conclusions: APBB1, ARMCX1, DZIP1, and MSRB3 affect the development of GC and CCA and can be used as biomarkers. The expression of lipid metabolism genes is related to the TIME of patients with GC and CCA.

Post-radiation neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a prognostic marker in patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with anti-PD-1 antibody and stereotactic body radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the role of pre- and post-stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with localized pancreatic cancer treated with anti-PD-1 (programmed cell death protein-1) antibody and SBRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 68 patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with anti-PD-1 antibody and SBRT after multi-agent chemotherapy. Immunotherapy was administered with 5-fraction SBRT in the neoadjuvant, concurrent, or adjuvant/maintenance setting. Clinical outcomes included overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and progression-free survival. Median pre- and post-SBRT peripheral blood markers were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. Univariate and multivariable analyses (UVA and MVA) were performed to identify variables associated with clinical outcomes. Linear regression was performed to determine correlations between variables and peripheral blood markers. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients were included in the study. The percent change between median pre- and post-SBRT absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), absolute neutrophil count, and NLR were -36.0% (p < 0.001), -5.6% (p = 0.190), and +35.7% (p = 0.003), respectively. Median OS after SBRT was 22.4 months. On UVA, pre-SBRT CA19-9 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.000-1.001; p = 0.031), post-SBRT ALC (HR = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.11-0.91; p = 0.031), and post-SBRT NLR (HR = 1.13; 95% CI, 1.04-1.22; p = 0.009) were associated with OS. On MVA, induction chemotherapy duration (HR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57-0.99; p = 0.048) and post-SBRT NLR (HR = 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04-1.23; p = 0.002) predicted for OS. Patients with post-SBRT NLR ≥3.2 had a median OS of 15.6 months versus 27.6 months in patients with post-SBRT NLR <3.2 (p = 0.009). On MVA linear regression, log10CTV had a negative correlation with post-SBRT ALC (regression coefficient = -0.314; 95% CI, -0.626 to -0.003; p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: Elevated NLR after SBRT is primarily due to depletion of lymphocytes and associated with worse survival outcomes in localized pancreatic cancer treated with anti-PD-1 antibody. Larger CTVs were associated with decreased post-SBRT ALC.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for the treatment of locally recurrent pancreatic cancer after surgical resection.

Background: To report on a cohort of radiation-naïve patients with pancreatic cancer who developed isolated local recurrence following surgical resection and were subsequently treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods: Patients with pancreatic cancer who were treated with SBRT for isolated local recurrence after surgical resection were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical outcomes were calculated from completion of SBRT and included overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (LPFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Univariate (UVA) analysis was performed to identify variables associated with clinical outcomes. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival outcomes. Toxicity was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Results: From September 2012 to November 2018, a total of 19 patients with localized pancreatic cancer were treated with SBRT for isolated local recurrence after initial surgical resection. No patients had prior radiation. The median biologically effective dose (BED10) was 54.8 Gy (range, 37.5-54.8 Gy). Median OS was 17.1 months, with 6-month and 1-year OS rates of 94.4% and 69.6%, respectively. Nine patients (47.4%) developed local failure after SBRT. Pattern of first failure after SBRT was distant in 7 patients (46.7%), local in 5 patients (33.3%), and synchronous distant and local in 3 patients (20.0%). One patient developed local failure after developing distant disease first. Of the 9 local failures, 3 (33.3%) were out-of-field. Median LPFS was 22.2 months, with 6-month and 1-year LPFS rates of 86.9% and 63.2%, respectively. A BED10 <54.8 Gy was associated with inferior LPFS (1-year, 25.0% vs. 80.2%, P<0.009). Median DMFS and PFS were 15.6 months. There was 1 case (5.3 %) of grade 3 gastric perforation. There were no cases of grade 4-5 toxicity events. Conclusions: SBRT for locally recurrent pancreatic cancer after initial curative resection is safe and feasible. A BED10 <54.8 Gy was significantly associated with inferior local control. Further studies investigating dose escalation and optimal treatment volumes in the locally recurrent setting are warranted.

Nonoperative Management Following Complete Response in Rectal Cancer After Short-course Radiation Therapy and Consolidation Chemotherapy: Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Life Measures.

PURPOSE: The purpose of his study was to report on a cohort of patients managed with nonoperative management (NOM) with a watch-and-wait strategy after achieving complete response (CR) to sequential short-course radiation therapy (SCRT) and consolidation chemotherapy. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients treated SCRT and chemotherapy who achieved a CR and were managed with NOM. Bowel function was assessed with European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30, EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Colorectal Cancer 29, and the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) questionnaires. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), freedom from local failure (FFLF), freedom from distant metastasis, and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients met inclusion criteria. Seven (26.9%) patients developed local failure at a median of 6.8 months following CR, of which 5 were successfully salvaged. Median FFLF was not reached, with 6-month, 1-, and 2-year FFLF rates of 100.0%, 82.3%, and 71.3%. Median OS was not reached, with 6-month, 1-, and 2-year OS rates of 100%. Median DFS was not reached, with 6-month, 1-, and 2-year DFS rates of 100%, 95.0%, and 89.4%. Questionnaire response rate was 83.3%. Median LARS score was 27. Major, minor, and no LARS occurred in 3 (20%), 6 (40%), and 6 (40%) patients, respectively. There were no differences in questionnaire scores between patients who had the majority of their anal sphincter complex irradiated and those who did not. CONCLUSION: NOM with a watch-and-wait strategy is safe and feasible in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who achieve CR after sequential SCRT and chemotherapy, with evidence for good anorectal function.

High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio following stereotactic body radiation therapy is associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Background: The purpose of this study is to report on the prognostic role of pre- and post-stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in a cohort of patients with borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) who was treated with multi-agent induction chemotherapy followed by five-fraction SBRT. Methods: Patients treated with multi-agent induction chemotherapy followed by SBRT from August 2016 to January 2019 and who had laboratory values available for review were included in the study. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate analyses (MVA) were performed to determine associations between pre-/post-SBRT NLR and overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (LPFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 156 patients were treated with multi-agent induction chemotherapy followed by SBRT and had laboratory values available for review. On UVA, chemotherapy duration ≥4 months, poorly differentiated disease, inability to undergo resection, pre-SBRT ANC ≥3.7 No./µL, pre-SBRT NLR ≥2.3, and post-SBRT NLR ≥2.6 were associated with worse OS. Patients with post-SBRT NLR ≥2.6 had a median OS of 16.7 months versus median OS not yet reached in patients with post-SBRT <2.6 (P=0.009). On MVA, poorly differentiated disease [hazard ratio (HR) =1.82, 95% CI: 1.04-3.18, P=0.035], inability to undergo resection (HR =2.17, 95% CI: 1.25-3.70, P=0.006), and post-SBRT NLR ≥2.6 (HR =2.55, 95% CI: 1.20-5.45, P=0.015) were associated with inferior OS. On UVA, baseline CA 19-9 ≥219 U/mL, pre-SBRT platelet count ≥157×1,000/µL, and post-SBRT NLR ≥2.6 were associated with inferior LPFS. Patients with post-SBRT NLR ≥2.6 had a median LPFS of 18.3 months versus median LPFS not yet reached in patients with post-SBRT <2.6 (P=0.028). On MVA, only post-SBRT NLR ≥2.6 was associated with worse LPFS (HR =3.22, 95% CI: 1.04-9.98, P=0.043). Conclusions: Post-SBRT NLR ≥2.6 predicted for inferior OS and LPFS in BRPC/LAPC patients treated with multi-agent chemotherapy and SBRT. These findings highlight the importance of further elucidating the immunologic effects of radiation therapy in this setting, which may have significant implications on both radiation design as well as combination strategies.

Location, Location, Location: What Should be Targeted Beyond Gross Disease for Localized Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma? Proposal of a Standardized Clinical Tumor Volume for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Head: The "Triangle Volume".

PURPOSE: In patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (BRPC/LAPC), local failure rates after resection remain significant, even in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation. Suboptimal local control may relate to variable radiation target delineation, as no consensus exists around clinical tumor volume (CTV) design in this context. In the surgical literature, recent attention has been given to the "triangle" volume (TV) as a source of subclinical, residual disease. To understand whether the TV can inform optimal CTV design, we mapped locoregional failures after resection in a large cohort of patients with BRPC/LAPC and compared locations of failure to the TV. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with BRPC/LAPC of the head or neck diagnosed between 2016 AND 2019 who developed locoregional failure after surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and radiation were identified. Descriptive statistics were generated to report the frequency of locoregional failures located within the TV and the frequency of new vascular involvement at time of failure, compared with vascular involvement at diagnosis. Additionally, dosimetric coverage of the TV with the preoperative radiation plan that had been used was assessed. RESULTS: In 31 patients who experienced locoregional failure, the centroid of failure was located within the TV in 28 cases (90%). Extent of vascular involvement at time of locoregional failure included vasculature that had not been involved at diagnosis in 13 cases (42%). The preoperative radiation plan that had been used provided a median V33 Gy and V25 Gy of the TV of only 53% (interquartile range, 34%-72%) and 70% (IQR, 48%-85%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The TV encompassed the vast majority of locoregional failures, but dosimetric coverage of the TV was poor when only targeting gross disease and the full circumference of involved vasculature. As such, the TV may better serve as a basis for CTV design in patients with BRPC/LAPC undergoing neoadjuvant radiation.

Upfront Chemotherapy Followed by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy with or without Surgery in Older Patients with Localized Pancreatic Cancer: A Single Institution Experience and Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVE: To report on clinical outcomes and toxicity in older (age ≥ 70 years) patients with localized pancreatic cancer treated with upfront chemotherapy followed by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with or without surgery. METHODS: Endpoints included overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (LPFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 57 older patients were included in the study. Median OS was 19.6 months, with six-month, one-year, and two-year OS rates of 83.4, 66.5, and 42.4%. On MVA, resection status (HR: 0.30, 95% CI 0.12-0.91, p = 0.031) was associated with OS. Patients with surgically resected tumors had improved median OS (29.1 vs. 7.0 months, p < 0.001). On MVA, resection status (HR: 0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.93, p = 0.034) was also associated with PFS. Patients with surgically resected tumors had improved median PFS (12.9 vs. 1.6 months, p < 0.001). There were 3/57 cases (5.3%) of late grade 3 radiation toxicity and 2/38 cases (5.3%) of Clavien-Dindo grade 3b toxicity in those who underwent resection. CONCLUSION: Multimodality therapy involving SBRT is safe and feasible in older patients with localized pancreatic cancer. Surgical resection was associated with improved clinical outcomes. As such, older patients who complete chemotherapy should not be excluded from aggressive local therapy when possible.

Vertebral body and splenic irradiation are associated with lymphopenia in localized pancreatic cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine if vertebral body and splenic dosimetry was associated with the development of lymphopenia in patients with borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). METHODS: Patients with BRPC/LAPC who were treated with SBRT and who had lymphocyte counts and radiation treatment plans available for review were included in the study. Vertebral body levels T11-L3 and the spleen were retrospectively contoured for each patient. Univariate (UVA) and multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed to identify associations between vertebral body and splenic dosimetric parameters with absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and grade ≥ 2 lymphopenia. Receiver operator characteristic curves were generated to identify dose-volume thresholds in predicting grade ≥ 2 lymphopenia. RESULTS: A total of 132 patients were included in the study. On UVA and MVA, vertebral V15 (regression coefficient [ß]: - 0.026, 95% CI - 0.044 to - 0.009, p = 0.003), vertebral V2.5 (ß: - 0.011, 95% CI - 0.020 to - 0.002, p = 0.015), and log10PTV (ß: - 0.15, 95% CI - 0.30 to - 0.005, p = 0.042) were associated with post-SBRT ALC. On UVA and MVA, vertebral V15 (odds ratio [OR]: 3.98, 95% CI 1.09-14.51, p = 0.027), vertebral V2.5 (OR: 1.04, 95% CI 1.00-1.09, p = 0.032), and spleen V10 (OR: 1.05, 95% CI 1.09-1.95, p = 0.004) were associated with development of grade ≥ 2 lymphopenia. Development of grade ≥ 2 lymphopenia was more likely in patients with vertebral V15 ≥ 5.84% (65.5% vs 34.0%, p = 0.002), vertebral V2.5 ≥ 48.36% (48.9% vs 23.8%, p = 0.005), and spleen V10 ≥ 4.17% (56.2% vs 26.9%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing radiation dose to vertebral bodies and spleen were associated with the development of lymphopenia in BRPC/LAPC treated with SBRT. Optimization of vertebral body and splenic dosimetry may reduce the risk of developing lymphopenia and improve clinical outcomes in this population.

Comfort Level of US Radiation Oncology Graduates: Assessment of Transition to Independent Clinical Practice.

Radiation training programs are designed to prepare graduates for independent practice, with metrics in place to assess appropriateness of clinical decision-making. Here, we investigated the self-assessed preparedness of US graduates during the transition to independent practice.An anonymous, Internet-based survey was distributed to recent graduates of radiation oncology residencies (2016-2017). A Likert scale was used to assess comfort with various aspects of practice, as well as "time" to development of comfort in independent practice.Responses were obtained from 70/210 (33%), the majority reported training in programs with 5-8 residents (n = 35). Most (77%) reported designing between 500 and 900 treatment plans during training (n = 54). Only 41% of respondents reported the opportunity to review treatment plans and make decisions about safety/adequacy without attending input > 50% of the time (n = 29). Thirty percent of residents reported being responsible for seeing/managing on-treatment visits (OTVs) ≤ 75% of the time. Aspects with which practitioners reported the least comfort were understanding of billing/application to practice (2.43, IQR 2-3), orthovoltage (superficial radiation) setup and field design (2.57, IQR 1-4), and planning/delivery of prostate implants (2.82, IQR 2-4). Increased mean comfort levels were reported by those designing > 700 treatment plans in training as well as those reporting an opportunity to evaluate plans and make clinical decisions prior to attending input > 50% of the time during residency. Comfort with the delivery of stereotactic body radiation (SBRT) correlated with caseload for liver, spine, prostate, and CNS disease sites but not lung.Variations in training experiences exist across institutions. Here, a lower than expected number of residents reported seeing/managing OTVs as well as reviewing treatment plans prior to attending input during training. Overall comfort was correlated with case volume and opportunities to independently review treatment plans prior to attending input. These data highlight areas of opportunity for improving resident education with implications for ease of transition to independent clinical practice.

Impact of somatic mutations on clinical and pathologic outcomes in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy followed by surgical resection.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if somatic mutations are associated with clinical and pathologic outcomes in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and SBRT followed by surgical resection from August 2016 to January 2019 and who underwent next generation sequencing of their primary tumor were included in the study. Next-generation sequencing was performed either in-house with a Solid Tumor Panel or with FoundationOne CDx. Univariate (UVA) and multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed to determine associations between somatic mutations and pathologic and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were included in the study. Chemotherapy consisted of modified FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel, or gemcitabine and capecitabine. Patients were treated with SBRT in 33 Gy in 5 fractions. On UVA and MVA, tumors with KRAS G12V mutation demonstrated better pathologic tumor regression grade (TRG) to neoadjuvant therapy when compared to tumors with other KRAS mutations (odds ratio = 0.087; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.009-0.860; p = 0.036). On UVA and MVA, mutations in NOTCH1/2 were associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.15; 95% CI, 1.57-10.95; p = 0.004) and progression-free survival (HR = 3.61; 95% CI, 1.41-9.28; p = 0.008). On UVA, only mutations in NOTCH1/2 were associated with inferior distant metastasis-free survival (HR = 3.38; 95% CI, 1.25-9.16; p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: In BRPC and LAPC, the KRAS G12V mutation was associated with better TRG following chemotherapy and SBRT. Additionally, NOTCH1/2 mutations were associated with worse overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and progression-free survival.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Oligometastatic Uterine Cancer: Clinical Outcomes and Toxicity.

We report on clinical outcomes in patients with oligometastatic uterine cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Twenty-seven patients with 61 lesions were treated with SBRT. Median follow-up was 16.9 months. Local control was achieved in 49/61 (80.3%) lesions. One-year local-progression-free survival and overall survival were 75.9% and 65.4%. Lesions with favorable response were smaller than lesions with unfavorable response (p = .007). Liver lesions were less likely to achieve favorable response (p = .0128). There were no grade 3 or 4 events. Treatment with SBRT can provide excellent local control in oligometastatic uterine cancer with minimal toxicity.

The Prognostic Role of Pretreatment Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) in Malignant Adrenal Lesions Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT).

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate a single institution's experience with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in treating malignant adrenal lesions, as well as the prognostic value of systemic inflammation biomarkers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From November 2007 to February 2018, 27 patients with malignant adrenal lesions received 31 SBRT treatments. Outcomes, measured from the date of SBRT, included overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and freedom from progression. Cox proportional hazard model was utilized to identify potential prognostic factors. Tumor response was assessed with PET Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (PERCIST)/Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Acute toxicity was evaluated with the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03 criteria. RESULTS: Median follow-up for all patients was 8 months. The complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease rates were 59%, 9%, 32%, and 0%, respectively. One-year LC, OS, and freedom from progression were 77.7%, 38.0%, and 10.0%, respectively. There was a trend toward significance upon multivariate analysis for pretreatment neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio >4.1 to predict inferior OS (adjusted hazard ratio=3.29, P=0.09, 1-year OS: 11% vs. 80%). There were 3 cases (10%) complicated by grade 2 acute toxicity, including nausea and fatigue. There was 1 grade 5 toxicity, as 1 case was complicated by a fatal gastric ulcer occurring 3 months after SBRT to the left adrenal gland (112.5 BED10). CONCLUSIONS: These results support the limited existing literature, demonstrating that SBRT provides adequate LC for adrenal lesions with minimal toxicity. Pretreatment neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio may serve as a prognostic factor in these patients.

Regional Influence of Radiation Oncology Residency Training on Job Securement over Two Time Periods.

Purpose Recent reports have noted conflicting predictions regarding the future of the radiation oncology job market. Residents and practicing radiation oncologists (ROs) report perceptions of an increasingly saturated market. An important factor contributing to the job landscape is the potential geographic maldistribution of ROs in the United States. Given the importance of the evolving job market and appropriate supply and demand for future ROs, this study investigated whether residency training region influences employment region and whether "portability" of residency training has changed over time from 2003-2015. Methods Radiation oncology residency graduates were identified from Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology (ARRO) directories from 2003-2012. This information was cross-referenced with the American Society of Radiation Oncology directory to determine current employment location. The region of residency training and employment were categorized into four regions per the US Census Bureau: Northeast (NE), South (S), Midwest (MW), and West (W). The change in "portability" of residency training over time was determined from the results of an anonymous internet-based survey which provided information on year of graduation and location of first job. "Portability" was defined as the rate at which a trainee in one region could find employment in another region. From the survey, two cohorts were identified: early (graduated from 2003-2006) and late (graduated from 2012-2015). Results Current employment location was available for 817/1168 (70%) residents identified in the ARRO directories from 2003-2012. The percentages of residents who trained in the NE, S, MW, and W were 29%, 28%, 27%, and 15%, respectively. The percentages of residents with current employment in the NE, S, MW, and W were 20%, 34%, 22%, and 24%, respectively. Residents were more likely to remain employed in the region in which they trained (p < 0.05), with 58% having current employment in the region of their training. Residency graduation year and location of first job (in the United States) were available for 139/198 (70%) survey respondents. Portability of residency training did not significantly change from 2003-2012 with 49% of the early cohort securing their first job in the region in which they trained compared to 57% of the late cohort (p = 0.39). Conclusions This study suggests that recent residents are not moving to different geographic regions at an increased rate than previous and that residents are more likely to find employment in the region in which they trained.

Long term control and preservation of renal function after multiple courses of stereotactic body radiation therapy for renal cell carcinoma.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is usually treated with surgery, with or without systemic therapy. For select patients, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) may be a suitable alternative. Although many reports exist on the successful use of SBRT, very few have described long term outcomes with regard to disease progression and renal function. We report a rare case of a single patient with primary, metastatic, and locally recurrent renal cell carcinoma who was successfully treated with SBRT. The patient has been disease-free for 8 years since treatment, with stable renal function even after two courses of SBRT to her solitary functioning kidney.