Pilot implementation of a telemedicine care bundle: Antimicrobial stewardship, patient satisfaction, clinician satisfaction, and usability in patients with sinusitis.

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine-specific clinical pathways (CPWs), coupled with electronic health record (EHR) order panels, provide an opportunity to ensure evidence and guideline concordant care for conditions at risk for inconsistent diagnoses and management strategies. Standardized provider and patient-facing illness scripts may fill gaps in clinicians' communication skills secondary to a training deficit in virtual care delivery. We aimed to implement and assess the impact of a novel care bundle for sinusitis on antimicrobial use, patient satisfaction, clinician satisfaction, and usability in patients with sinusitis. METHODS: A sinusitis care bundle (SCB) for virtual urgent care patients included a sinusitis CPW with communication scripts, sinusitis order panels (SOP), and a patient education smart-phrase (SPESP) within visit instructions. Antimicrobial use was assessed during a 15-month period prior to the start of SCB element implementations and 14-months following, using statistical process control charts. Patient satisfaction was measured using Likert-style surveys. Clinician satisfaction was assessed using a novel survey addressing the SCB-targeted domains (decision support, communication, efficiency, usability, and overall satisfaction). RESULTS: There were 69,785 and 64,019 evaluable patients in the pre-care and post-care bundle periods, respectively. Despite a significant increase in patients receiving a sinusitis diagnosis in the post-care bundle period (3.2% pre- vs. 6.2% post-, p < 0.001), antimicrobial prescribing decreased by 3.9% (p < 0.001), with statistical process control evidence of special cause change. There was a 5.1% decrease (p < 0.001) in negative patient survey responses after implementation. Clinician survey revealed substantial agreement in the domains relating to improving communication with patients and/or families, with the highest satisfaction for the SPESP over the SOP. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a telemedicine care bundle for patients diagnosed with sinusitis can balance multiple elements of quality care. The combination of a clinical care pathway, standardized language, and order panels within the EHR has the potential to improve patient satisfaction and decrease antimicrobial prescribing.

Expanding Diabetes Screening to Identify Undiagnosed Cases Among Emergency Department Patients.

Introduction: Diabetes screening traditionally occurs in primary care settings, but many who are at high risk face barriers to accessing care and therefore delays in diagnosis and treatment. These same high-risk patients do frequently visit emergency departments (ED) and, therefore, might benefit from screening at that time. Our objective in this study was to analyze one year of results from a multisite, ED-based diabetes screening program. Methods: We assessed the demographics of patients screened, identified differences in rates of newly diagnosed diabetes by clinical site, and the geographic distribution of high and low hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) results. Results: We performed diabetes screening (HbA1c) among 4,211 ED patients 40-70 years old, with a body mass index ≥25, and no prior history of diabetes. Of these patients screened for diabetes, 9% had a HbA1c result consistent with undiagnosed diabetes, and nearly half of these patients had a HbA1c ≥9.0%. Rates of newly diagnosed diabetes were notably higher at EDs located in neighborhoods of lower socioeconomic status. Conclusion: Emergency department-based diabetes screening may be a practical and scalable solution to screen high-risk patients and reduce health disparities experienced in specific neighborhoods and demographic groups.

Assessing the Impact of a Rapidly Scaled Virtual Urgent Care in New York City During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 pandemic quickly challenged New York City health care systems. Telemedicine has been suggested to manage acute complaints and divert patients from in-person care. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to describe and assess the impact of a rapidly scaled virtual urgent care platform during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients who presented to a virtual urgent care platform over 1 month during the COVID-19 pandemic surge. We described scaling our telemedicine urgent care capacity, described patient clinical characteristics, assessed for emergency department (ED) referrals, and analyzed postvisit surveys. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 17,730 patients were seen via virtual urgent care; 454 (2.56%) were referred to an ED. The most frequent diagnoses were COVID-19 related or upper respiratory symptoms. Geospatial analysis indicated a wide catchment area. There were 251 providers onboarded to the platform; at peak, 62 providers supplied 364 h of coverage in 1 day. The average patient satisfaction score was 4.4/5. There were 2668 patients (15.05%) who responded to the postvisit survey; 1236 (49.35%) would have sought care in an ED (11.86%) or in-person urgent care (37.49%). CONCLUSIONS: A virtual urgent care platform was scaled to manage a volume of more than 800 patients a day across a large catchment area during the pandemic surge. About half of the patients would otherwise have presented to an ED or urgent care in person. Virtual urgent care is an option for appropriate patients while minimizing in-person visits during the COVID-19 pandemic.