RESUMO
In Figure 3, sensitivity and specificity were interchanged. The corrected Figure 3 is shown below. The author names listed in reference 14 have been corrected; the correct reference reads: Nakanishi R, Gransar H, Slomka P, Arsanjani R, Shalev A, Otaki Y, et al. Predictors of high-risk coronary artery disease in subjects with normal SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2016;23:530-41. The units of standard deviation (SD) and bandwidth (BW) in the abstract, results and in table 3 are expressed in degrees from 0 to 360°.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Left ventricular dyssynchrony (LVD) quantified by gated myocardial perfusion studies (MPS), through phase analysis (PA), has shown controversial results in myocardial stunning. OBJECTIVES: Assessment of LVD and regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) in normal and ischemic patients. METHODS: A cohort of 172 patients were studied. Summed Stress Score (SSS), Summed Resting Score (SRS), and Summed Difference Score (SDS) were evaluated. Group 1-patients with normal MPS (N = 133) and Group 2-patients with myocardial ischemia in the MPS (N = 39). LVD was evaluated through PA and RWM by visual analysis. RESULTS: SSS 0 vs 9.8 ± 3.9 P = .0001; SDS 0 vs 9.8 ± 3.9 P = .0001; SRS 0 vs 0 P = NS, in G1 and G2. Significant differences were found in LVD between G1 and G2, bandwidth 36 ± 14 vs 63 ± 46 P = .0001; standard deviation 16 ± 10 vs 26 ± 15 P = .0001. In G1, 16% had LVD vs RWMA in 0%, P = .0001 and in G2, 59% with LVD vs 33% with RWMA, P = .03. Sensitivity for LVD 59% and for RWMA 33%, P = .03 and specificity for LVD 83% and for RWMA 100%, P = .0001. CONCLUSION: Ischemic patients have LVD post-stress due to myocardial stunning. LVD measured by PA could be a useful tool to identify ischemia.
