Cadaveric Simulation in Rib Plating is Beneficial for Helping Surgical Trainees to Assimilate New Technologies.

PURPOSE: Rib fixation procedures are being performed more frequently as they have shown multiple advantages over traditional non-operative management in well-selected patients. We have developed a rib-fixation simulation on cadavers for use by surgical residents in attempt to improve their comfort, knowledge and ability to use this new technology. METHODS: Residents in years 3 through 5 of training attended a rib-fixation simulation course with cadavers. Trauma faculty and representatives of manufacturers of rib-fixation hardware participated. The simulation consisted of groups of residents reviewing anatomy and creating adequate exposure for the entire procedure. Each group created rib fractures in the cadaver, determined which materials were needed, and then performed the rib-fixation procedure. Following the simulation, we surveyed the residents to determine the impact of the structured cadaveric rib fixation-based course on their comfort level. The survey was performed using a four- and five-level Likert questionnaire. The results were analyzed using paired t-tests. RESULTS: Of the participating residents, 72% of residents had performed five or fewer rib-fixation procedures in their training in the first cohort, while in the cohort for the following year, 65% had performed 5-10 procedures. The simulation had a statistically significant benefit to the residents' comfort level with rib plating (2.5 versus 3.6, p-value: 0.003). The greatest impact on the comfort level was seen in year 3 of training (2 versus 4, p-value 0.02). One hundred percent of residents found that having faculty and representatives present for the simulation was very helpful. The survey demonstrated that most residents gained new knowledge regarding the anatomy and technical dissection. In 20 of 25 encounters, residents strongly agreed that this simulation was beneficial for their surgical education, when used in addition to real operative experience. Every resident reported that they would recommend the simulation to younger resident classes. CONCLUSION: Rib-fixation simulations on cadavers were beneficial for surgical residents' self-assessed comfort level. The simulation increased residents' knowledge, comfort, and ability to perform rib-fixation procedures. We have seen a significant increase in resident participation in these cases after simulation training. Based on these findings, we will continue to incorporate these simulations into our program's curriculum.

Ketamine in Trauma: A Literature Review and Administration Guidelines.

Ketamine is a phencyclidine (PCP) derivative, which primarily acts as a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist. Ketamine serves as an analgesic and a dissociative sedative that produces potent analgesia, sedation, and amnesia while preserving spontaneous respiratory drive. It is rapidly gaining acceptance in the management of pain as multiple studies have demonstrated its reliable efficacy and a wide margin of safety. This article reviews some of these studies, the history of ketamine, and its pharmacological and pharmacokinetic properties. The article also discusses the use of ketamine in the trauma setting, including joint reductions, procedures, sedation, and pain control, as well as dosing recommendations.

Stapling Common Enterotomy Does Not Increase Leak Rates in Stapled Anastomoses.

BACKGROUND: Stapled vs handsewn methods of bowel anastomosis have been extensively studied, however, no study has compared the handsewn vs stapled technique of closing the common enterotomy. Anecdotal concerns of higher leak rates due to crossing staple lines has led some to prefer a handsewn technique for closing the common enterotomy. METHODS: Patients undergoing stapled side-to-side enteroenteric and enterocolonic anastomoses in both emergent and elective settings at 1 tertiary center from 2016 to 2020 were studied. 758 patients were included. They were divided into 2 cohorts: Stapled-Stapled (SS) and Stapled-Handsewn (SH) depending on the fashion in which their stapled common enterotomy was closed. Association of anastomotic leak rate overall, in the emergent vs elective setting, and within enteroenteric and enterocolonic anastomotic subgroups was evaluated with both univariate and multivariate analysis. Association with the closure technique, mortality and average operative time was also compared. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis overall leak rates (SS 5.9% vs SH 3.7%, P = .23) and enteroenteric leak rates (SS 2.9 vs SH 4.1, P = .52) were similar between cohorts. Operative times were significantly shorter in the SS cohort (SS 121.8 min vs SH 138.1 min, P = .049), with a difference of 16.3 min on average. No difference in mortality was seen. DISCUSSION: The SH and SS result in similar anastomotic leak rates overall, and the SS technique is significantly faster than the SH technique. We therefore consider the SS technique to be an acceptable, and in the emergent setting, potentially preferred method of anastomotic technique.