Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pediatrics ; 121(3): e646-52, 2008 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18310184

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Local reactions are relatively common after the fifth diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccination, but factors associated with an increased risk of those reactions are not well defined. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between needle length and injection site on the risk of local reactions to the fifth diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccination administered in the context of usual clinical care. METHODS: In this prospective assessment, parents reported signs and symptoms of adverse events for 7 days after vaccination. The relative risk of adverse events in relation to needle length (16 or 25 mm) and injection site (arm or thigh) was estimated in multivariate analyses that adjusted for age, gender, and BMI. RESULTS; Of the 1315 study participants, 89% were vaccinated in the arm, and 67% were vaccinated with a 25-mm needle. Among children vaccinated in the arm, use of the shorter 16-mm needle was associated with a significantly higher risk of any redness, > or = 5 cm of redness, persistent redness on day 2, and pain compared with vaccination with a 25-mm needle. Similar trends among the smaller group of children vaccinated in the thigh were also suggested but were not statistically significant. In analyses that were restricted to children vaccinated with a 25-mm needle, vaccination in the thigh versus arm was associated with a substantially lower risk of > or = 5 cm of redness and a significantly lower risk of swelling and any itching but not with any difference in the risk of pain, irritability, or change in activity. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that a 25-mm needle should be used for the fifth diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccination regardless of injection site and that vaccination in the thigh is an option that may be considered by parents and providers who would like to decrease the risk of local reactions characterized by redness and swelling.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/efeitos adversos , Eritema/induzido quimicamente , Imunização Secundária/efeitos adversos , Agulhas , Fatores Etários , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/administração & dosagem , Desenho de Equipamento , Eritema/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Injeções Subcutâneas , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Probabilidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo , Vacinação/métodos
2.
Pediatrics ; 117(3): 620-5, 2006 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16510639

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The frequency of local vaccination reactions increases with successive doses of diphtheria-tetanus toxoids-acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine, and local reactions occur for the majority of children receiving the fifth DTaP vaccination. It is not known whether these reactions can be prevented with prophylactic use of acetaminophen or ibuprofen. METHODS: In this 3-group, randomized, blinded, controlled trial, 372 children were assigned randomly, in a 2:2:1 ratio, to receive 3 doses of acetaminophen, ibuprofen, or placebo. The first dose of study medication was administered within 2 hours before the fifth DTaP vaccination, and the remaining 2 doses were given at 6-hour intervals. The primary outcome measures included a local reaction with an area of redness or discoloration > or =5 cm in diameter on the evening of or during the 2 days after vaccination, an increase in mid-limb circumference of > or =2 cm on the evening of or during the 2 days after vaccination, and a persistent local reaction, defined as an area of redness or discoloration present on the third day after vaccination. RESULTS: Local reactions with a > or =5-cm area of redness or discoloration were reported for 35% of children in the placebo group, compared with 33% of children in the acetaminophen group and 37% of children in the ibuprofen group. There was also no significant difference between the placebo and treatment groups in the proportions of children with a > or =2-cm increase in mid-limb circumference or with a persistent local reaction. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find evidence that prophylaxis with acetaminophen or ibuprofen offers a clinically significant benefit in prevention of local reactions to the fifth DTaP vaccination.


Assuntos
Acetaminofen/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/efeitos adversos , Ibuprofeno/uso terapêutico , Imunização Secundária/efeitos adversos , Dor/prevenção & controle , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Método Duplo-Cego , Eritema/etiologia , Eritema/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Dor/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...